tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-91085773950567367112024-03-12T18:24:22.709-07:00ORIGINAL GENESIS ORIGINAL INTENTThe <b>ORIGINAL GENESIS ORIGINAL INTENT</b> of the <b>ORIGINAL WORDS</b> of the <b>ORIGINAL BIRTH</b> document of America,<br> the U.S. Constitution <i>(specifically Article II Section 1 Clause 5)</i> and the meaning to the <b><i>ORIGINAL BIRTHERS</i></b>, the original <br> Founders, Framers and Ratifiers of the perpetual words <b>"natural born Citizen"</b> and the temporary words <b>"... <u>or</u> a Citizen of..."</b> <br> since the last "...or a Citizen of..." died sometime in the 1800s.ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.comBlogger86125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-89867228362497517272019-09-30T19:56:00.004-07:002019-10-01T17:48:09.682-07:00Natural Born Citizen Archive Listed by Title and Date<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">For
people interested in reading about the original </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">genesis
original intent </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">meaning
of “natural born citizen” </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">in</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
Article II Section 1 clause 5, </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">below
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">is
a list of</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Attorney
Mario Apuzzo’</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">s
357 </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">articles</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">on
his </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><i><b>Natural
Born Citizen</b></i></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
blog </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">(<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/">puzo1.blogspot.com</a>)
from</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">December
20, 2008 to June 2, 2019.</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Copy
and paste the list of the articles to your </span></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">Microsoft
Word</span></i></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
or </span></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">LibreOffice.org</span></i></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
doc for </span></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">key
word searches</span></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Following
the </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">list
of </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">articles
are his</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">links
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">to
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">his
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">other</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">re</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">sources:
(1) </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">SCRIBD
Links to Obtain Court Docs Filed, (2) Useful Info, Docs, &
Videos, (3) Radio Interviews – Sampling, (4) </span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Print
Media Announcements and Advertorials.</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Here
is the comment I put on Attorney Apuzzo’s </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><b><i>Natural
Born Citizen</i></b> </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">blog.</span></span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Hi
Mario,</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">For
people interested in reading about the original </span><span lang="en-US">genesis
original intent </span><span lang="en-US">meaning of “natural born
citizen” </span><span lang="en-US">in</span><span lang="en-US">
Article II Section 1 clause 5 </span><span lang="en-US">your </span><span lang="en-US"><i><b>Natural
Born Citizen</b></i></span><span lang="en-US"><i><b>
</b></i></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">blog
with 357 articles </span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">is
the </span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">erudite
</span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">go-to
</span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">resource,
well, at least until you write a book (are you?)</span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
Below are </span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">2</span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
examples of titles with dates </span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">and
hot links</span></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of your articles. </span></span></span><span lang="en-US">For those
who want to copy and paste </span><span lang="en-US">the list to
their </span><span lang="en-US">computer</span><span lang="en-US">
Microsoft WORD or LibreOffice.org docs </span><span lang="en-US">or
on their website blogs</span><span lang="en-US">, a</span><span lang="en-US">ll
of the </span><span lang="en-US">titles with dates </span><span lang="en-US">and
hot links</span><span lang="en-US"> are </span><span lang="en-US">on
my Original Genesis blog</span><span lang="en-US"> –</span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2019/09/natural-born-citizen-archive-listed-by.html">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2019/09/natural-born-citizen-archive-listed-by.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Saturday,
December 20, 2008</span></span></span><br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="35223914729481804221113"></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
Two Constitutional Obstacles Obama Has To Overcome To Be President<span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/two-constitutional-obstacles-obama-has.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/two-constitutional-obstacles-obama-has.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Thursday,
May 17, 2018</span></span></span><br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="1847364673434971734113"></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">A
Response to the Idea of Removing the Natural Born Citizen Clause From
Our Constitution </span></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-response-to-theidea-of-removing.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-response-to-theidea-of-removing.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
I'm not a prophet or the son of a prophet, but I think that your
<span lang="en-US"><i><b>Natural Born Citizen</b></i></span> blog
content and SCRIBD posts, and your client CDR Kerchner's <i><b>ProtectOurLiberty.</b></i><i><b>org*</b></i> articles and graphics will be
referenced for decades (as Emer de Vattel is) as authoritative because the content of both
of you is consistently intuitive and coherent in defense of the
original intent of the 1787 founders, framers and ratifiers of the
U.S Constitution and Article II Section 1 clause 5 that to be
<i><b>"...eligible to </b></i><i><b>the Office of P</b></i><i><b>resident..."</b></i>
of the United States a person must have ONLY singular U.S.
citizenship, ONLY by birth alone, ONLY birth on U.S.
soil/jurisdiction, ONLY birth to two U.S. citizen parents. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">*<a href="http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm">http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/protectourliberty.htm</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">And,
of course, it must be added that In 1787 America where the "we
the people" "common law" was relevant and was adduced
to inform "positive law", "birth to two U.S. citizen
parents" meant ONLY heterosexual married males and females and
ONLY to each other, not birth to someone married with multiple wives
at the same time as Muslims have done for centuries and some Mormon
sects still do, and not birth to two U.S. citizens who were not
married to each other. If not only heterosexual marriage, what was
the community standard of that era which supported the "common
law" of that era that informed the "positive law" of
that era (“positive law” which was intended to extend to today in
the 2000s) which was supposed to articulate the "legal"
foundation that defined "eligibility" which was intended to
last into posterity? If not heterosexual "legal" marriage,
what was the legal basis in 1787 America for using the word
"eligible"? If not heterosexual "legal" marriage,
why did the 1787 founders of America say that to be <i><b>“...eligible
to the Office of President...”</b></i> a person must be ONLY a
<i><b>“natural born Citizen”</b></i> with the ONLY implication
possible in a long-lasting coherent society (from the 1700s – 2000s
and into posterity)<b>:- </b>ONLY singular U.S. citizenship that is
possible ONLY by birth alone ONLY on U.S. soil ONLY to two U.S.
citizen parents?</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
►
2008 (6)<br />
► 2009 (129)<br />
► 2010 (102)<br />
► 2011 (77)<br />
►
2012 (22)<br />
► 2013 (4)<br />
► 2015 (8)<br />
► 2016 (7)<br />
►
2018 (1)<br />
► 2019 (1)<br />
<br />
Saturday, December 20, 2008<br />
The
Two Constitutional Obstacles Obama Has To Overcome To Be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/two-constitutional-obstacles-obama-has.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/two-constitutional-obstacles-obama-has.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, December 26, 2008<br />
Obama's Personal Right To
Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their
President Is
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, December 28, 2008<br />
Was Obama Properly Vetted
for the Office of President?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/was-obama-properly-vetted-for-office-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/was-obama-properly-vetted-for-office-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, December 29, 2008<br />
How the Public Can Gain
Access to Obama's Original Birth Records
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-public-can-gain-access-to-obamas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/how-public-can-gain-access-to-obamas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, December 29, 2008<br />
Regarding Senate
Resolution 511 Declaring McCain A "Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/regarding-senate-resolution-511.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/regarding-senate-resolution-511.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, December 31, 2008<br />
Obama Has Not Met His
Burden Of Proving He Was Born In Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-has-not-met-his-burden-of-proving.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-has-not-met-his-burden-of-proving.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, January 1, 2009<br />
The Arrogance Of Obama
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/arrogance-of-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/arrogance-of-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, January 3, 2009<br />
The Two Reasons Why Obama
Will Neither Publicly Speak About Where He Was Born Nor Produce His
Original Birth Certificate
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/two-reasons-why-obama-will-neither.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/two-reasons-why-obama-will-neither.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, January 4, 2009<br />
What Is Obama's True
Religion?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-is-obamas-true-religion.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-is-obamas-true-religion.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, January 7, 2009<br />
Defining What An Article
Ii “Natural Born Citizen” Is
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/defining-what-article-ii-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/defining-what-article-ii-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, January 8, 2009<br />
National Security Should
Drive The Meaning Of An Article Ii “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/national-security-should-drive-meaning.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/national-security-should-drive-meaning.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, January 10, 2009<br />
The Difference Between
“Natural” And “Native” As Applied To An Article Ii “Natural
Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/difference-between-natural-and-native.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/difference-between-natural-and-native.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, January 22, 2009<br />
NEW CASE FILED: Kerchner
et al v. Obama et al - Announcement
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-case-filed-kerchner-et-al-v-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-case-filed-kerchner-et-al-v-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, January 24, 2009<br />
COURT DOCUMENT: Kerchner
et al v Obama et al Filed 20JAN09 about 3 a.m. As Amended 21JAN09.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-filed.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-filed.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, January 30, 2009<br />
DISCUSSION 1: Kerchner et
al v. Obama et al - Discussion Thread #1
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-discussion.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-discussion.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, February 4, 2009<br />
DISCUSSION 2: Kerchner
et al v. Obama et al - Discussion Thread #2
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion2-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion2-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 9, 2009<br />
Second Amended Verified
Complaint for Kerchner v. Obama Filed Feb. 9, 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/second-amended-verified-complaint-for.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/second-amended-verified-complaint-for.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 13, 2009<br />
Momma E Radio Rebels
BlogTalkRadio 13 Feb 09 - Kerchner v Obama Case Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-mommae-radio-rebels-show.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-mommae-radio-rebels-show.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, February 14, 2009<br />
DISCUSSION 3: Kerchner
et al v. Obama et al - Discussion Thread #3
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion3-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion3-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, February 17, 2009<br />
Kerchner v Obama -
Summons & 2nd Amended Verified Complaint Delivered to Process
Servers Yesterday - President's Day, February 16th, 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/kerchner-v-obama-summons-complaint.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/kerchner-v-obama-summons-complaint.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, February 18, 2009<br />
Let Freedom Ring
BlogTalkRadio Show with John and Michelle - Thursday 19 Feb 09 -
Kerchner v Obama Case Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-let-freedom-ring-radio.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-let-freedom-ring-radio.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, February 19, 2009<br />
DISCUSSION 4: Kerchner
et al v Obama et al - Questions About Case & Discussion Thread #4
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion4-kerchner-v-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion4-kerchner-v-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, February 25, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels
BlogTalkRadio - Friday 27 Feb 09 - Kerchner v Obama Case Update &
Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-mommae-radio-rebels-show_25.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogtalkradio-mommae-radio-rebels-show_25.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 27, 2009<br />
DISCUSSION 5: Kerchner et
al v Obama et al - Questions About Case & Discussion Thread #5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion5-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/02/discussion5-kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 2, 2009<br />
1330 AM WEBY Radio N.W.
Florida's Talk Radio Station - 6 PM EST Tuesday 3 Mar 2009 - Kerchner
v Obama - Case Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/1330-weby-radio-tuesday-3-mar-2009.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/1330-weby-radio-tuesday-3-mar-2009.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, March 7, 2009<br />
Let Freedom Ring
BlogTalkRadio Show with John & Michelle - 8 PM EDT Thursday 12
Mar 2009 - Kerchner v Obama Case Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 9, 2009<br />
Justice and the American
People Not Served by the Hollister v. Soetoro Decision
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/justice-and-american-people-not-served.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/justice-and-american-people-not-served.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 9, 2009<br />
Natural Born Citizen - a 'Term
of Art' put in our Constitution in 1787 by Jay - Written &
Defined by Vattel in 1758 - The Law of Nations Tome 1 pg 197
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/natural-born-citizen-discussion-thread.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/natural-born-citizen-discussion-thread.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 11, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio Network - 8:30 EDT Friday 13 Mar 2009 - Kerchner et al
v. Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_11.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_11.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, March 14, 2009<br />
On the People’s
Unalienable Right to Safety and the Pursuit of Happiness
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/on-peoples-unalienable-right-to-safety.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/on-peoples-unalienable-right-to-safety.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 15, 2009<br />
Andrea Shea King Radio Show -
BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 EDT Monday 16 Mar 2009 - Kerchner et al
v. Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_15.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_15.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 17, 2009<br />
America's True Form of
Government
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/americas-true-form-of-government.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/americas-true-form-of-government.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 18, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio Network - 8:30 EDT Friday 20 Mar 2009 - Kerchner et al
v. Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_18.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/radio-show-announcement_18.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 22, 2009<br />
Obama Continues to Deny
America the Protection of the Constitution’s “Natural born
Citizen” and Residency Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-continues-to-deny-america.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-continues-to-deny-america.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 3, 2009<br />
More On What Is an Article II
"Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-on-what-is-article-ii-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-on-what-is-article-ii-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 7, 2009<br />
Obama, the President of the
U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html</a>
<br />
See 29 July 2009 major update to this essay at this
link:<br />
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 11, 2009<br />
Constitutional Radio Talk
Show - BlogTalkRadio Network
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/i-am-pleased-to-announce-that-lead.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/i-am-pleased-to-announce-that-lead.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 13, 2009<br />
Obama & USA Request and
Get Extension of Time to Respond
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/usa-obama-request-extension-of-time-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/usa-obama-request-extension-of-time-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, April 16, 2009<br />
Where Is the Conspiracy?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/where-is-conspiracy.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/where-is-conspiracy.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 17, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio Network - 8:30 EDT Friday 17 Apr 2009 - Kerchner et al
v. Obama & Congress et al Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/radio-show-announcement.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/radio-show-announcement.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 18, 2009<br />
The Similarity Between the
Tea Party and the Obama Eligibility Movements
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/similarity-between-tea-party-and-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/similarity-between-tea-party-and-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 21, 2009<br />
The True Target of the DHS
Rightwing Extremism Policy Report
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/true-target-of-dhs-rightwing-extremism.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/true-target-of-dhs-rightwing-extremism.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, April 23, 2009<br />
Article II "Natural
Born Citizen" Means Unity of Citizenship and Sole Allegiance At
Birth<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, April 26, 2009<br />
The Chalice Show - Patriot's
Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 P.M. EDT Sunday 26
Apr 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/patriots-heart-radio-show.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/patriots-heart-radio-show.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 28, 2009<br />
Activity in Kerchner v Obama
Case - Motion to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond &
Declaration of Counsel Filed by Defendants
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-case.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-case.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 28, 2009<br />
More Delays. USA/Obama Say
They Need 124-Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-delays-usaobama-say-they-need-124.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-delays-usaobama-say-they-need-124.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 3, 2009<br />
The Wisdom King
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/wisdom-king.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/wisdom-king.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 5, 2009<br />
The President’s Sole
Allegiance at Birth Serves the Best Interest of the United States
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/presidents-sole-allegiance-at-birth.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/presidents-sole-allegiance-at-birth.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, May 13, 2009<br />
Andrea Shea King Radio Show
- BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 EDT Wed 13 May 2009 - Kerchner et al
v. Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 18, 2009<br />
Article II "Natural Born
Citizen" Means Unity of Citizenship and Allegiance at Birth
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 19, 2009<br />
Declaration Opposing
Defendants' Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to
the Amended Complaint Returnable June 1, 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/declaration-of-opposing-defendants.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/declaration-of-opposing-defendants.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, May 20, 2009<br />
The Mark S McGrew Show -
Sentinel Radio on BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 EDT Thurs 21 May 2009
- Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/mark-s-mcgrew-show-sentinel-radio-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/mark-s-mcgrew-show-sentinel-radio-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, May 28, 2009<br />
Natural Born Citizen Through
the Eyes of Early Congresses
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/natural-born-citizen-through-eyes-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/natural-born-citizen-through-eyes-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, May 29, 2009<br />
Why Can't Obama Give a Simple
and Truthful Answer to the Birth Certificate Question?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/why-cant-obama-give-simple-and-truthful.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/why-cant-obama-give-simple-and-truthful.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 31, 2009<br />
Wishful Reality
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/wishful-reality.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/05/wishful-reality.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 3, 2009<br />
Sean & Frank Radio Show
of Baltimore MD Interview of Atty Mario Apuzzo
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sean-frank-show-of-baltimore-md.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sean-frank-show-of-baltimore-md.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, June 4, 2009<br />
G. Gordon Liddy Radio Show
Interview with Atty Mario Apuzzo and Mr. Kerchner
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/g-gordon-liddy-radio-show-interview.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/g-gordon-liddy-radio-show-interview.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, June 4, 2009<br />
The Birthright Citizenship
Act of 2009 (HR1868) Does Not Nor Can It Make Anyone a "Natural
Born Citizen." It Adds Conditions for Citizenship by
Birth<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/birthright-citizenship-act-of-2009-hr.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/birthright-citizenship-act-of-2009-hr.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 7, 2009<br />
Update on Kerchner et al v
Obama & Congress et al
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/update-on-kerchner-et-als-v-obama-et.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/update-on-kerchner-et-als-v-obama-et.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, June 9, 2009<br />
Activity in Kerchner v Obama &
Congress Case - 2nd Extension of time granted to Defendants
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 10, 2009<br />
Devvy Kidd's Radio Show
Wednesday 10 Jun 09 at 9 p.m. EDT
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/we-will-be-on-devvy-kidd-radio-show.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/we-will-be-on-devvy-kidd-radio-show.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 10, 2009<br />
The Chalice Show -
Patriot's Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network -8:00 p.m. EDT
Wednesday 10 Jun 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/chalice-show-tonight.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/chalice-show-tonight.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, June 11, 2009<br />
Andrea Shea King Radio Show
- BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 p.m. EDT Thursday 11 June 2009 -
Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress et al - Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 14, 2009<br />
Why Should We Care That Our
President Is At Least A Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-should-we-care-that-our-president.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-should-we-care-that-our-president.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 17, 2009<br />
Sean & Frank Radio Show
of Baltimore MD at 8:35 a.m. EDT Thursday 18 June 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sean-frank-radio-show-of-baltimore-md.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sean-frank-radio-show-of-baltimore-md.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, June 19, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio Network - 8:30 p.m. EDT Friday 19 Jun 2009 - Kerchner
et al v. Obama & Congress et al Update & Q&A
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio_19.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio_19.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, June 22, 2009<br />
Sixth U.S. House
Representative Signs on to Sponsor HR 1503
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sixth-congressman-signs-on-to-sponsor.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/sixth-congressman-signs-on-to-sponsor.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 24, 2009<br />
An Open Letter to President
Obama by Lou Pritchett former VP Procter & Gamble
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/open-letter-to-president-obama-by-lou.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/open-letter-to-president-obama-by-lou.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, June 26, 2009<br />
Activity in Kerchner v Obama &
Congress Case - Defendants' Motion to Dismiss & Supporting Brief
Received (this motion was expected)
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress_26.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/activity-in-kerchner-v-obama-congress_26.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 28, 2009<br />
The Chalice Show - Patriot's
Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network -10:15 p.m. EDT Sunday 28
Jun 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i>[Law
of Nations published 1758] </i></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
Vattel:
Law of Nations Vol. 1 Chapter III § 30. Of the support of the
constitution and obedience to the laws.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/vattel-law-of-nations-vol-1-chapter-iii.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/vattel-law-of-nations-vol-1-chapter-iii.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 2, 2009<br />
Kerchner: On the Sovereign
and Sovereign Immunity
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/on-sovereign-immunity.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/on-sovereign-immunity.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 2, 2009<br />
Vattel: On Those Claiming
Sovereignty of a Nation also Having to Respect the Fundamental Laws
and the Constitution or Contract with the People
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/vattel-on-respecting-fundamental-laws.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/vattel-on-respecting-fundamental-laws.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, July 5, 2009<br />
The Chalice Show - Patriot's
Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network -10:30 p.m. EDT Sunday 5
Jul 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress Update
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, July 6, 2009<br />
Plaintiffs Obtain Extension of
Time to Answer Obama/Congress Motion to Dismiss
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/plaintiffs-obtain-extension-of-time-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/plaintiffs-obtain-extension-of-time-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 9, 2009<br />
The Blog Rules
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/rules-for-newbies.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/rules-for-newbies.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 9, 2009<br />
Plaintiffs Obtain Extension
of Time to Answer Obama/Congress Motion to Dismiss.<br />
Motion
Decision Date Now Set for Monday, August 3, 2009.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/plaintiffs-obtain-extension-of-time-to_08.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/plaintiffs-obtain-extension-of-time-to_08.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, July 15, 2009<br />
Neither the 14th Amendment
nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/neither-14th-amendment-nor-wong-kim-ark.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/neither-14th-amendment-nor-wong-kim-ark.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 17, 2009<br />
Citizen at Birth (CAB) does
NOT equal Natural Born Citizen (NBC). Obama is NOT a Natural Born
Citizen of the USA.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/citizen-at-birth-cab-does-not-equal.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/citizen-at-birth-cab-does-not-equal.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, July 19, 2009<br />
Washington Times National
Weekly, 20 July 2009 issue - Advertorial on Page 9
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/washington-times-national-weekly-20.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/washington-times-national-weekly-20.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, July 21, 2009<br />
Filing Announcement:
Plaintiffs' Brief Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Filed
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-plaintiffs-brief.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-plaintiffs-brief.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, July 21, 2009<br />
Our Constitution Show -
Patriot's Heart Network - BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:00 p.m. EDT Tues
21 Jul 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama & Congress Update
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/our-constitution-show-patriots-heart.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/our-constitution-show-patriots-heart.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, July 25, 2009<br />
Race Has No Part in the
Obama Eligibility Issue
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/race-has-no-part-in-obama-eligibility.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/race-has-no-part-in-obama-eligibility.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, July 27, 2009<br />
Censorship by Google and
BlogSpot Robots, Altered Search Engine Algorithms, Biased Google
Staff. Internet Cyber-Attacks on Conservative Blogs/Websites
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/censorship-by-google-and-blogspot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/censorship-by-google-and-blogspot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, July 27, 2009<br />
Filing Announcement: DOC 37 -
Kerchner v Obama & Congress - Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs'
Opposition Brief to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (MTD)
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-kerchner-v-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-kerchner-v-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, July 28, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels - Monks
Media - 8:00 p.m. EDT Tues 28 Jul 2009 - Kerchner et al v. Obama &
Congress Update
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/mommae-radio-rebels-monks-media-800-pm.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/mommae-radio-rebels-monks-media-800-pm.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, July 29, 2009<br />
Obama, the Putative
President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 31, 2009<br />
Filing Announcement:
Plaintiffs' Reply Brief Supporting Cross-Motion for Leave Nunc Pro
Tunc to File the Second Amended Complaint/Petition
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-plaintiffs-reply.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/filing-announcement-plaintiffs-reply.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 31, 2009<br />
What to Tell The Birthers
Bashers
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/what-to-tell-birthers-bashers.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/what-to-tell-birthers-bashers.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 31, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio - 8:00 p.m. EDT Friday 31 Jul 2009 - Kerchner et al v.
Obama & Congress - Update by Atty Apuzzo and Mr. Kerchner:
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-800.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-800.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, August 2, 2009<br />
Breaking News - Picture of
Obama's Alleged Kenyan Birth Certificate Placed on the Internet
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/breaking-news-picture-of-obamas-birth.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/breaking-news-picture-of-obamas-birth.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, August 4, 2009<br />
Charles Kerchner, Lead
Plaintiff in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress Lawsuit, converts
Bill Cunningham into a Birther
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/charles-kerchner-lead-plaintiff.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/charles-kerchner-lead-plaintiff.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, August 4, 2009<br />
Constitutional Radio -
BlogTalkRadio - 9:00 p.m. EDT Tues 4 Aug 2009 - Kerchner et al v.
Obama & Congress - Update by Atty Apuzzo and Mr. Kerchner
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/constitutional-radio-blogtalkradio-900.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/constitutional-radio-blogtalkradio-900.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, August 7, 2009<br />
Why the “Natural Born
Citizen” Clause of Our Constitution Is Important and Worth
Preserving
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-natural-born-citizen-clause-is.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-natural-born-citizen-clause-is.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, August 11, 2009<br />
The Logical Analysis of a
Natural Born
Citizen<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/logical-analysis-of-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/logical-analysis-of-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, August 12, 2009<br />
Two-Page Spread in
Monday, 10 Aug 2009, Washington Times National Weekly Edition - Obama
Born a British Subject and is Still a British Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/two-page-spread-in-monday-10-aug-2009.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/two-page-spread-in-monday-10-aug-2009.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, August 21, 2009<br />
'The Law of Nations or
Principles of Natural Law' as U.S. Federal Common Law Not English
Common Law Define What an Article II Natural Born Citizen Is
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, August 30, 2009<br />
A FAQ Recently - Have We
Heard Anything About the Case?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/faq-of-late-have-we-heard-anything.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/faq-of-late-have-we-heard-anything.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, August 30, 2009<br />
The Chalice Show - Patriot's
Heart Broadcasting - BlogTalkRadio Network - 9:45 PM EDT Sunday 30
Aug 2009 - Update on Kerchner v Obama & Congress
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/chalice-show-patriots-heart.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, August 31, 2009<br />
Being Born Subject to a
Foreign Power, Obama Cannot be President and Military
Commander-in-Chief
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/being-born-subject-to-foreign-power.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/being-born-subject-to-foreign-power.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, September 8, 2009<br />
The Natural Born Citizen
Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s
Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, September 10, 2009<br />
Mombasa Kenya History
and Geography
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/mombasa-kenya-history-and-geography.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/mombasa-kenya-history-and-geography.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, September 12, 2009<br />
Why For McCain But Not
For Obama?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/why-for-mccain-but-not-for-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/why-for-mccain-but-not-for-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, September 18, 2009<br />
“Simply Saying
Something Is So Does Not Make It So” — Judge Land, Rhodes v.
Obama
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/simply-saying-something-is-so-does-not.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/simply-saying-something-is-so-does-not.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, September 20, 2009<br />
How to Try An Eligibility
Case Against the Putative President Barack Obama
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-to-try-eligibility-case-against.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-to-try-eligibility-case-against.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, October 1, 2009<br />
Letter of Inquiry by Atty
Apuzzo Sent to Judge Simandle 1 Oct 09 re Delay<br />
in Deciding 2
Motion Decisions Since Jul 09 and Judge's Response 2 Oct 09
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/letter-of-inquiry-by-atty-apuzzo.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/letter-of-inquiry-by-atty-apuzzo.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 7, 2009<br />
The Andrea Shea King Show
- BlogTalkRadio - 9-11 pm, EDT, Thursday, 8 Oct 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/blogtalkradio-andrea-shea-king-show-9.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/blogtalkradio-andrea-shea-king-show-9.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, October 11, 2009<br />
The Federal Courts Are
Committing Treason to the Constitution per Chief Justice John
Marshall
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/federal-courts-are-committing-treason.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/federal-courts-are-committing-treason.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 14, 2009<br />
Why Should a Reputable
Attorney Pursue the Obama Eligibility Issue?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-should-reputable-attorney-pursue.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-should-reputable-attorney-pursue.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, October 16, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio - 8:30 PM EDT, Friday, 16 Oct 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-830.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-830.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, October 18, 2009<br />
Congress and the Media Have
Placed America at Risk of Being Attacked from Within
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/congress-and-media-have-placed-america.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/congress-and-media-have-placed-america.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, October 19, 2009<br />
Current Issues with MommaE
- Patriot Heart Network - BlogTalkRadio - 9-11 PM EDT, Monday, 19 Oct
2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/current-issues-with-mommae-patriot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/current-issues-with-mommae-patriot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, October 20, 2009<br />
When It Comes to Obama the
Media Continues to Fail the American People
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-it-comes-to-obama-media-continues.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/when-it-comes-to-obama-media-continues.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 21, 2009<br />
Judge Simandle Has
Granted the DOJ's Motion to Dismiss
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/judge-simandle-has-granted-dojs-motion.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/judge-simandle-has-granted-dojs-motion.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 21, 2009<br />
Court Dismisses Kerchner
Complaint/Petition for Lack of Standing and Political Question. The
Decision Will Be Appealed.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/court-dismisses-kerchner.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/court-dismisses-kerchner.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 21, 2009<br />
MommaE Radio Rebels -
BlogTalkRadio - 8:30 PM EDT, Wednesday, 21 Oct 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-830_21.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/mommae-radio-rebels-blogtalkradio-830_21.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, October 23, 2009<br />
Kerchner: On the
Constitution, the Sovereign, and Sovereign Immunity
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/kerchner-on-sovereign-and-sovereign.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/kerchner-on-sovereign-and-sovereign.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, October 24, 2009<br />
The 'Real' Kerchner v.
Obama & Congress Case Is On Its Way to the Higher Courts of
Justice
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/real-kerchner-v-obama-congress-case-is.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/real-kerchner-v-obama-congress-case-is.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, October 27, 2009<br />
Kerchner Appeal Filed with
Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/kerchner-appeal-filed-with-third.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/kerchner-appeal-filed-with-third.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, October 31, 2009<br />
'Natural Born Citizen'
Graphics - A Picture Says A Thousand Words!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-born-citizen-graphic-picture.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-born-citizen-graphic-picture.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, October 31, 2009<br />
The DC District Court Is
Not the Only Court In Which to File a Quo Warranto Action
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/dc-district-court-in-not-only-court-in.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/dc-district-court-in-not-only-court-in.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, November 1, 2009<br />
Live and Let Live Talk
Radio Show - Rule of Law Radio Network - 10 PM EST Sunday 01 Nov 2009
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/live-and-let-live-rule-of-law-radio.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/live-and-let-live-rule-of-law-radio.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 2, 2009<br />
Vattel Asked for History to
Be His Judge
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/vattel-asked-for-history-to-be-his.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/vattel-asked-for-history-to-be-his.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 9, 2009<br />
Quo Warranto and the
Kerchner v. Obama and Congress Case
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/quo-warranto-and-kerchner-v-obama-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/quo-warranto-and-kerchner-v-obama-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, November 14, 2009<br />
Kerchner v Obama &
Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals - Philadelphia PA -
Docket Report - Docket# 09-4209
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/kerchner-v-obama-congress-docket-report.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/kerchner-v-obama-congress-docket-report.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, November 15, 2009<br />
New "Citizen vs.
Natural Born Citizen" Pictorial Advertisement in Washington
Times National Weekly - pg 5 - Monday 16 Nov 2009 Issue
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-citizen-vs-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-citizen-vs-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, November 20, 2009<br />
One Important
Congressional Effort to Amend the "Natural Born Citizen"
Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/one-important-congressional-effort-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/one-important-congressional-effort-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, November 21, 2009<br />
Video About Natural Born
Citizen - Three Little Words
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-video-about-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-video-about-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, November 25, 2009<br />
Kerchner v Obama &
Congress - 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals Briefing Notice Issued
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/kerchner-v-obama-congress-3rd-circuit.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/kerchner-v-obama-congress-3rd-circuit.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, November 28, 2009<br />
Obama's Lack of
Constitutional Eligibility - The Three Enablers - 30 Nov 2009 Issue
of Washington Times National Weekly - page 9
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, December 1, 2009<br />
United States v. Low Hong,
261 F.73 (5th Cir. 1919) Is No Precedent on the Question of What is
an Article II “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/united-states-v-low-hong-261-f73-5th.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/11/united-states-v-low-hong-261-f73-5th.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, December 3, 2009<br />
Obama, the Putative
President of the U.S., was Born a British Subject
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-putative-president-of-us-was-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/obama-putative-president-of-us-was-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, December 6, 2009<br />
Video - Obama's Dreams for
America - Merry Christmas OmeriKa!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-video-obamas-dreams-for-america_06.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-video-obamas-dreams-for-america_06.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, December 6, 2009<br />
What Is Putative President
Obama’s Current U.S. Citizenship Status?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, December 14, 2009<br />
Obama is an
Unconstitutional Illegal Putative President - 21 & 14 Dec 2009
Issues of Washington Times National Weekly Edition. Obama was Born
British
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-ad-obama-is-unconstitutional.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-ad-obama-is-unconstitutional.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, January 20, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama &
Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief -
Filed 19 Jan 2010
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-appellants.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-appellants.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, January 20, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 20 Jan
2010, 9:30 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, January 21, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson -
Thurs, 21 Jan 2010, 9:15 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-lets-talk_21.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-lets-talk_21.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, January 22, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Andrea Shea King Radio Show hosted by Andrea Shea King -
Friday, 22 Jan 2010, 9 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-andrea-shea.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-andrea-shea.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, January 24, 2010<br />
I Believe the Fix Was In by
Both Parties for the 2008 Election and the Cover Up is Still Going
Strong! The Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-believe-fix-was-in-for-2008-election.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-believe-fix-was-in-for-2008-election.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, January 28, 2010<br />
An Open Letter to Glenn
Beck
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-glenn-beck.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-glenn-beck.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 1, 2010<br />
Glenn ... Are You
Listening? Another Open Letter to Glenn Beck from Commander Kerchner
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/glenn-are-you-listening-another-open.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/glenn-are-you-listening-another-open.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 8, 2010<br />
AD - "Citizen vs
Natural Born Citizen"- it's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
with Obama's Exact Citizenship Status-Wash Times Natl Wkly-Mon 08 Feb
2010-pg 15
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-ad-citizen-vs-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-ad-citizen-vs-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 12, 2010<br />
Obama and Congress Request
and Obtain Extension of Time to File Opposition Brief to Kerchner
Appeal
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-and-congress-request-and-obtain.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-and-congress-request-and-obtain.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, February 14, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Kerchner on Les Naiman Show radio show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY,
hosted by Les Naiman, Sunday 14 Feb 2010 10:30 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 15, 2010<br />
Ad: "Obama's
Constitutional Eligibility Question" - Obama's New Policy -
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" - Wash Times National Weekly - Mon
15 Feb 2010 & 01 Mar 2010 - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/obamas-constitutional-eligibility.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/obamas-constitutional-eligibility.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 22, 2010<br />
Court Grants Motion for
Leave to File Overlength Brief in Kerchner Appeal
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/court-grants-motion-for-leave-to-file.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/02/court-grants-motion-for-leave-to-file.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 3, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo will be
on the Sean & Frank Radio Show, 680 WCBM, of Baltimore MD -
Monday, 8 Mar 2010, 8:35 a.m. Segment
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-sean-frank.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-sean-frank.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, March 4, 2010<br />
Obama - Maybe a Citizen of
the United States but Not a "natural born Citizen" of the
United States
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 8, 2010<br />
Obama and Congress File Their
Opposition Brief to the Kerchner Appeal
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-and-congress-file-their.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-and-congress-file-their.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, March 12, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by Les
Naiman, Sunday 14 Mar 2010 10:30 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 15, 2010<br />
Ad - Obama Flouts the
Constitution - 22 & 15 Mar 2010 Issue of Wash Times Natl Wkly -
pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-ad-obama-flaunts-constitution-15.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-ad-obama-flaunts-constitution-15.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, March 18, 2010<br />
Is the State of Hawaii
Covering Up Birth Registration Fraud in the Case of Obama? Hawaii Law
Makers Contemplating Stopping Concerned Americans from Investigating
Whether Obama Was Born There. A Catalog of Evidence for and Against
Obama's Physically Being Born in Hawaii and Not Just Falsely
Registered There After the Fact.
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/hawaii-law-makers-contemplating.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/hawaii-law-makers-contemplating.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 23, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama &
Congress Appeal Reply Brief and Oral Argument Request Filed
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/kerchner-reply-brief-and-oral-argument.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/kerchner-reply-brief-and-oral-argument.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, March 25, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson -
Thurs, 25 Mar 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-lets-talk.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-lets-talk.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, March 26, 2010<br />
Obamacare and the Natural
Born Citizen Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obamacare-and-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obamacare-and-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 28, 2010<br />
What Does Obama Truly Want to
Accomplish With His Health Care Plan?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-does-obama-truly-want-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-does-obama-truly-want-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 2, 2010<br />
Founder and Historian David
Ramsay Defines a Natural Born Citizen in 1789
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/founder-and-historian-david-ramsay.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/founder-and-historian-david-ramsay.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 6, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama &
Congress Appeal - Activity in the Case
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-congress-activity-in.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-congress-activity-in.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, April 7, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 07 Apr
2010, 9:10 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 9, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama Appeal - Atty
Apuzzo Files 'Argument Acknowledgment' to 3rd Circuit Court of
Appeals in Preparation for Argument on 29 Jun 2010
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-atty-apuzzo.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-atty-apuzzo.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 10, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama Appeal -
Atty Apuzzo Files Appellants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental
Appendix. Copy of the Appendix Also
Filed<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-atty-apuzzo_10.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-atty-apuzzo_10.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, April 11, 2010<br />
New Ad - Obama & Pelosi
Flout the Constitution - Obama Not "natural born Citizen" -
12 Apr 2010 Issue of Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/new-ad-obama-pelosi-flout-constitution_11.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/new-ad-obama-pelosi-flout-constitution_11.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, April 11, 2010<br />
Current Minister of Kenyan
Government Declares Obama "was born here in Kenya" and Is
Not a “native American”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/current-minister-of-kenyan-government.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/current-minister-of-kenyan-government.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 17, 2010<br />
Newspaper Birth
Announcement Ads in 1961 in two Hawaiian Newspapers do NOT prove
Obama was physically born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/newspaper-birth-announcement-ads-in.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/newspaper-birth-announcement-ads-in.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 17, 2010<br />
The Court and Congress
Expected the Other to Resolve the Obama Eligibility Question
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/court-and-congress-expected-other-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/court-and-congress-expected-other-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 23, 2010<br />
George Washington Consulted
the Legal Treatise "Law of Nations" as America's New
President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/george-washington-consulted-legal.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/george-washington-consulted-legal.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, April 25, 2010<br />
Concerned Americans Have Good
Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/concerned-americans-have-good-reason-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/concerned-americans-have-good-reason-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 26, 2010<br />
Benjamin Franklin in 1775
thanks Charles Dumas of the Netherlands for sending him 3 more copies
of the newest 1775 edition of Vattel's Law of Nations
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/benjamin-franklin-in-1775-thanks.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/benjamin-franklin-in-1775-thanks.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 30, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner
on Jeff Kuhner Show in Wash DC - Friday, 30 Apr 2010 @ 1 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/atty-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-on-jeff.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/04/atty-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-on-jeff.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 2, 2010<br />
Thomas Jefferson a Founder of
our Nation & Influential in Framing our Constitution used his
personal copy of 1775 French edition of 'The Law of Nations or
Principles of Natural Law' by Vattel
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/thomas-jefferson-founder-of-our-nation.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/thomas-jefferson-founder-of-our-nation.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 2, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by Les
Naiman, Sunday 2 May 2010 7 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 3, 2010<br />
For Love of Party Obama
Supporter Declares President George Washington a “Natural Born
Citizen” Instead of an "Original Citizen" Covered by the
Constitution's 'Founding Fathers Grandfather Clause'
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/for-love-of-party-obama-supporter.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/for-love-of-party-obama-supporter.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 3, 2010<br />
Washington Times Natl Wkly - 3
May 2010 Issue on Pg 5 - The Minister of Lands in Kenya Declares
Obama "was born here in Kenya"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-ad-washington-times-natl-wkly-3-may.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-ad-washington-times-natl-wkly-3-may.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 4, 2010<br />
Responses to an Obama
Supporter’s Comments on Obama’s Eligibility to be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/responses-to-obama-supporters-comments.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/responses-to-obama-supporters-comments.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, May 5, 2010<br />
Obama - Maybe a Citizen of
the United States but Not a "natural born Citizen" of the
United States
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, May 6, 2010<br />
A Catalog of Evidence -
Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President
Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, May 7, 2010<br />
A Failed Lesson in Honor and
Courage
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/failed-lesson-in-honor-and-courage.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/failed-lesson-in-honor-and-courage.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 10, 2010<br />
Wash Times Natl Wkly-10 May
2010 Pg 5-Minister of Lands in Kenya Declares Obama "was born
here in Kenya". Minister Khalwale..Obama should Repatriate
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/wash-times-natl-wkly-3-may-2010-pg-5.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/wash-times-natl-wkly-3-may-2010-pg-5.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, May 12, 2010<br />
A TRUE ENIGMA by Pixel
Patriot
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/true-enigma-by-pixel-patriot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/true-enigma-by-pixel-patriot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, May 13, 2010<br />
The Nonsense Published by Our
Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/nonsense-published-by-our-nations.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/nonsense-published-by-our-nations.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, May 19, 2010<br />
A U.S. Constitution Article
II “natural born Citizen” Is Not the Same As an English Common
Law “natural born subject”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-is-not.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-is-not.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, May 22, 2010<br />
Rev. James David Manning
Trial Results in Guilty Verdict for Obama and Former Columbia Univ.
President on Various High Crimes Including Fraud
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/rev-james-david-manning-trial-results.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/rev-james-david-manning-trial-results.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 24, 2010<br />
New Ad - Obama's Lack of
Eligibility - The Three Enablers of the Cone of Silence in Washington
DC - 24 & 31 May 2010 issue Washington Times National Weekly -
Page 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-ad-obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-ad-obamas-lack-of-eligibility-three.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, May 28, 2010<br />
Obama’s “Natural Born
Citizen” Status: Is It Place of Birth or Parentage that Controls?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/obamas-natural-born-citizen-status-is.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/obamas-natural-born-citizen-status-is.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, June 1, 2010<br />
On Obama’s Eligibility to be
President, Who Is Protecting the Constitution and the Nation, the
“Birthers” or Obama and His Enablers?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/on-obamas-eligibility-to-be-president.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/on-obamas-eligibility-to-be-president.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 2, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 02 Jun
2010, 9:10 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, June 14, 2010<br />
The Post & Email’s
Exclusive Interview with Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/post-emails-exclusive-interview-with.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/post-emails-exclusive-interview-with.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, June 15, 2010<br />
The Kerchner et al v.
Obama/Congress et al Appeal to the Third Circuit to Be Decided on the
Briefs with No Oral Argument
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, June 19, 2010<br />
The Kerchner v.
Obama/Congress Case Is Not the Same as the Berg v. Obama Case<br />
Despite
the OBOT Minions' Talking Points Blogging/Claiming That It Is
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-v-obamacongress-case-is-not.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-v-obamacongress-case-is-not.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, June 21, 2010<br />
New Ad - Hawaii 2008 Senior
Elections Clerk, Tim Adams, Supervisors' Investigations in 2008 -
Obama Not Born in any Hawaii Hospital
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/new-ad-hawaii-2008-senior-elections.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/new-ad-hawaii-2008-senior-elections.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, June 21, 2010<br />
A One-on-One Personal
Interview with Commander Kerchner Regarding his Eligibility Challenge
and Lawsuit against Obama & Congress | @ The Post & Email
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/one-on-one-personal-interview-with.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/one-on-one-personal-interview-with.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, June 25, 2010<br />
Obama’s Long-Form Birth
Certificate: A Quick $10,000.00 for Dr. Conspiracy
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/obamas-long-form-birth-certificate.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/obamas-long-form-birth-certificate.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 27, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by Les
Naiman, Sunday 27 June 2010 7 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 27, 2010<br />
Two Questions to Ask Putative
President Obama’s Enablers, aka Obots, Regarding Where Obama Was
Born
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/two-questions-to-ask-putative-president.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/two-questions-to-ask-putative-president.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 30, 2010<br />
The Kerchner et al v.
Obama/Congress et al Appeal to Third Circuit 'Submitted for Decision'
29 June 2010 on the Written Briefs with No Oral Argument
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al_30.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al_30.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 30, 2010<br />
The U.S. Third Circuit
Court of Appeals Receives Kerchner v. Obama/Congress for Decision
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-receives.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/06/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-receives.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, July 4, 2010<br />
The Third Circuit Court of
Appeals Affirms the Dismissal of the Kerchner v. Obama/Congress Case
for Lack of Standing and Orders Attorney Apuzzo to Show Cause Why He
Should Not Be Assessed Damages and Costs
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-affirms.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-affirms.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, July 12, 2010<br />
Ad-Kenya My Country, Tussker
My Beer-The Elephant in Oval Office Congress & Major Media Won't
Talk About-Wash Times Natl Wkly 26 19 12 Jul 2010-pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/new-ad-kenya-my-country-tussker-my-beer.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/new-ad-kenya-my-country-tussker-my-beer.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, July 19, 2010<br />
The Kerchner et al v.
Obama/Congress et al Appeal to 3rd Circuit - Attorney Apuzzo Files
his Response to the Show Cause Order
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/kerchner-et-al-v-obamacongress-et-al.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 22, 2010<br />
The Third Circuit Court of
Appeals Finds Attorney Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama's/Congress’
Damages and Costs Incurred by Them in Defending the Kerchner Appeal
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-finds.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/third-circuit-court-of-appeals-finds.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 30, 2010<br />
Dr Polland charges in his
videos that Identity, Election, Wire, Internet, Interstate Commerce,
& Birth Certificate Fraud were committed by Obama et al
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/dr-polland-charges-in-his-videos-that.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/dr-polland-charges-in-his-videos-that.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, July 31, 2010<br />
Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham)
Obama Soetoro's Passport Application Records Are Released due to
Strunk FOIA Filing
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/some-of-stanley-ann-dunham-obama.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/some-of-stanley-ann-dunham-obama.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, August 2, 2010<br />
Ad - Obama Is A Usurper &
Illegal President - Washington Times National Weekly edition - 02 Aug
2010 - page 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/newest-ad-obama-is-usurper-illegal.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/newest-ad-obama-is-usurper-illegal.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, August 4, 2010<br />
Some [RINO] Republicans
Want Birthright Citizenship Review-But is it Simply Cover for Another
Cloaked more Sinister Objective? | by CDR Kerchner (Ret)
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/republicans-want-review-of-birthright.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/republicans-want-review-of-birthright.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, August 9, 2010<br />
Ad - Citizen vs "natural
born Citizen" - with Obama It's Don't Ask, Don't Tell - 09 Aug
2010 issue Wash Times Natl Wkly - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/latest-ad-citizen-vs-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/latest-ad-citizen-vs-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, August 12, 2010<br />
An Open Letter to John
McCain-Will you do the right thing at this crucial time? We will see.
We the People, history and God will be your final Judge
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/open-letter-to-john-mccain-will-you-do.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/open-letter-to-john-mccain-will-you-do.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, August 16, 2010<br />
Latest Ad - Kenyan Ministers
Orengo & Khalwale say Obama "born in Kenya" - "not
native American"-"should repatriate" to Kenya-30, 23,
& 16 Aug 10 WTNW
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/latest-ad-kenyan-ministers-orengo.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/latest-ad-kenyan-ministers-orengo.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, August 18, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on Dr. Kate's Revolution Radio Show - Wed, 18 Aug 2010, 9:00
p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, August 25, 2010<br />
The U.S. State Department
Fails to Address the Meaning of a Natural Born Citizen and to
Conclusively Show that Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/us-state-department-fails-to-address.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/us-state-department-fails-to-address.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, August 31, 2010<br />
Is Obama Telling Us the
Truth About His Place of Birth and Religion?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-obama-telling-us-truth-about-his.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-obama-telling-us-truth-about-his.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, September 13, 2010<br />
Ad - Obama Ineligible! I
Tried and Lied But It Won't Go Away! Washington Times National Weekly
- 04 Oct, 27, 20, 13 Sep 2010 Issues
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-ad-ineligible-i-tried-and-lied-but.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/new-ad-ineligible-i-tried-and-lied-but.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, September 15, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo &
CDR Charles Kerchner on Conservative Monster Radio Show, hosted by
Steve Cooper, Blog Talk Radio, Wed 15 Sep 2010 9 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, September 18, 2010<br />
Is Being a Born Citizen
of the United States Sufficient Citizenship Status to be President?
The Founders and Framers Emphatically Decided It Was Not!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/is-being-born-citizen-of-united-states.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/is-being-born-citizen-of-united-states.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, September 30, 2010<br />
Petition for Writ of
Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs.
Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-filed.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/09/petition-for-writ-of-certiorari-filed.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, October 6, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 06
Oct 2010, 9:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-revolution.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, October 8, 2010<br />
Absolute proof the Founders
knew and accepted Vattel`s French "naturels" to mean
"natural born"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/absoloute-proof-founding-fathers-knew.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/absoloute-proof-founding-fathers-knew.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, October 10, 2010<br />
A Sampling of Some Quotes
about the U.S. Constitution from History
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/constitutional-quotes.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/constitutional-quotes.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, October 11, 2010<br />
Kerchner v Obama Petition
for Writ of Certiorari filed & docketed with U.S. Supreme Court -
Washington Times National Weekly edition - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-ad-kerchner-v-obama-petition-for.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-ad-kerchner-v-obama-petition-for.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, November 2, 2010<br />
The Framers Used Emer de
Vattel, Not William Blackstone to Define a “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/framers-used-emer-de-vattel-not-william.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/framers-used-emer-de-vattel-not-william.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, November 5, 2010<br />
Members of Congress
Internal Memo--What to Tell Your Constituents in Answer to Obama
Eligibility Questions - Their Talking Points Internal Memo Revealed
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/members-of-congress-memo-what-to-tell.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/members-of-congress-memo-what-to-tell.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, November 5, 2010<br />
Trees are plants but not
all plants are trees. "natural born Citizens (NBC)" are
"Citizens at birth (CAB)" but not all "CAB" are
"NBC"!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/of-trees-and-plants-and-basic-logic_05.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/of-trees-and-plants-and-basic-logic_05.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, November 6, 2010<br />
Respondents Waive the
Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S.
Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/respondents-waive-right-to-respond-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/respondents-waive-right-to-respond-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 8, 2010<br />
Kerchner et al v Obama et
al Petition for Writ of Certiorari Distributed to the U.S. Supreme
Court Justices for Conference Scheduled for 23 Nov 2010
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-petition.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/kerchner-et-al-v-obama-et-al-petition.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, November 9, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show hosted by Jim
'Howie' Mandel - Tues 09 Nov 2010, 4:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-howie.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-howie.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, November 10, 2010<br />
Daniel Webster Reveals
that the Kerchner Petitioners Have Standing to Demand that Obama Show
He Is A “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/daniel-webster-reveals-that-kerchner.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/daniel-webster-reveals-that-kerchner.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, November 14, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo &
CDR Kerchner on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by
Les Naiman, Sunday 14 Nov 2010 6 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-on-les.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 15, 2010<br />
Ad: Kerchner v Obama
Petition is Scheduled for Conference in U.S. Supreme Court on Nov
23rd - Wash Times National Weekly ed - 15 Nov 2010 - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/new-ad-kerchner-v-obama-petition-is.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/new-ad-kerchner-v-obama-petition-is.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 15, 2010<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & Mr
Don Nelsen were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show hosted by Jim
'Howie' Mandel - Tues 16 Nov 2010, 4:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-mario-apuzzo-mr-don-nelsen-will-be.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-mario-apuzzo-mr-don-nelsen-will-be.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, November 16, 2010<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner will be on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate -
Wed, 17 Nov 2010, 9:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/atty-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, November 19, 2010<br />
Article II "Natural
Born Citizen" Means Unity of Citizenship and Sole Allegiance At
Birth
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, November 19, 2010<br />
Unconstitutionally Elected
& Seated State & Federal Officials Can and Have Been Removed.
A Popular Election Does Not Trump or Amend the Constitution
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/unconstitutionally-elected-seated-state.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, November 21, 2010<br />
Washington Times -
Kerchner v Obama & Congress et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari
at U.S. Supreme Court Conference on Tuesday 23 Nov 2010
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/washington-times-kerchner-et-al-v-obama_21.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/washington-times-kerchner-et-al-v-obama_21.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 29, 2010<br />
Obama Ineligible! Obama: I
Tried and Lied but It Won't Go Away! Washington Times National Weekly
- 29 Nov 2010 Issue - Pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-ineligible-obama-i-tried-and-lied.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-ineligible-obama-i-tried-and-lied.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, November 29, 2010<br />
A Statement from CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision on
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/statement-from-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/statement-from-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, December 1, 2010<br />
Obama May Be a
Naturalized Born Citizen but Not a Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-may-be-born-naturalized-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/obama-may-be-born-naturalized-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, December 16, 2010<br />
Would the Founders and
Framers Have Allowed the Son of a British “Natural Born Subject”
Father and U.S. Citizen Mother To Be President and Commander in Chief
of the United States in 2009?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/12/would-founders-and-framers-have-allowed.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/12/would-founders-and-framers-have-allowed.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, January 9, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner were Guests on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY,
hosted by Les Naiman, Sunday 09 Jan 2011 7:05 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-kerchner-will-be.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, January 18, 2011<br />
Ad: Obama is NOT a Natural
Born Citizen of the United States - 24 & 17 Jan 2011 Wash Times
Natl Wkly pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-ad-obama-is-not-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/new-ad-obama-is-not-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, January 21, 2011<br />
In Search of the Holy Grail
of Documents -- The Obama Birth Certificate
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/in-search-of-holy-grail-of-documents.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/in-search-of-holy-grail-of-documents.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, January 22, 2011<br />
Questions to Ask Hawaii
Governor Abercrombie About Obama’s Alleged Long-Form Birth
Certificate
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/questions-to-ask-hawaii-governor.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/questions-to-ask-hawaii-governor.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, January 25, 2011<br />
Gov. Abercrombie Tells
Hollywood Journalist/Radio Host Mike Evans There Is No Obama Hawaii
Birth Certificate
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/gov-abercrombie-tells-hollywood.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/gov-abercrombie-tells-hollywood.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, January 28, 2011<br />
The Two Issues Regarding
Obama's Eligibility to be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/two-issues-regarding-obamas-eligibility.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/01/two-issues-regarding-obamas-eligibility.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, February 9, 2011<br />
Biased Media Reporting
on the Meaning of an Article II "Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/biased-media-reporting-on-meaning-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/biased-media-reporting-on-meaning-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 14, 2011<br />
Ad: Obama is NOT a Natural
Born Citizen of the United States - 14 Feb 2011 Wash Times Natl Wkly
pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/ad-obama-is-not-natural-born-citizen-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/ad-obama-is-not-natural-born-citizen-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, February 15, 2011<br />
List of U.S. Presidents -
Eligibility under Article II Grandfather Clause (GFC) or Natural Born
Citizen (NBC) Clause or Seated due to Election Fraud
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/list-of-us-presidents-eligibility-under.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/list-of-us-presidents-eligibility-under.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, February 15, 2011<br />
The Citizenship Status of
Our 44 Presidents
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/citizenship-status-of-our-44-presidents.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/citizenship-status-of-our-44-presidents.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 21, 2011<br />
Ad - Obama Ineligible! 21
Feb 2011 Issue Washington Times National Weekly Edition - page 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/ad-obama-ineligible-washington-times_21.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/ad-obama-ineligible-washington-times_21.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, February 24, 2011<br />
Arizona’s Proposed
Interstate Birth Certificate Compact Law As Now Written Is Both
Unconstitutional and Contrary to the Best Interests of the United
States
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/arizonas-proposed-interstate-birth.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/02/arizonas-proposed-interstate-birth.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 2, 2011<br />
The States Have a Right and
Duty to Assure Their Citizens That a Presidential Candidate Is an
Article II “Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/states-have-right-and-duty-to-assure.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/states-have-right-and-duty-to-assure.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, March 4, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on The Roth Radio Show tonight - Friday 4
Mar 2011 @ 7 P.M. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, March 5, 2011<br />
Obama Uses Race to Avoid
Answering Whether He Is a “Natural Born Citizen” and to Divide
and Conquer Our Nation to Hold Political Power
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/obama-uses-race-to-avoid-answering.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/obama-uses-race-to-avoid-answering.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 6, 2011<br />
CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
will be on the Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Show - Monday 7 Mar 2011
3 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/cdr-charles-kerchner-ret-will-be-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/cdr-charles-kerchner-ret-will-be-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 6, 2011<br />
Mike Huckabee Has Failed
Concerned Americans On the Obama Eligibility Issue
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/mike-huckabee-has-failed-concerned.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/mike-huckabee-has-failed-concerned.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 8, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo was on the
Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630 in Denver CO - Wednesday 9 Mar
2011 @ 10 a.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-peter.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-peter.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 8, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) will be on the Andrea Shea King Radio Show
tonight - Tuesday 8 Mar 2011 @ 9 P.M. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_08.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_08.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 9, 2011<br />
A Catalog of Evidence -
Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President
Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 9, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) will be on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by
Dr. Kate - Wed, 9 Mar 2011, 9:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, March 11, 2011<br />
The States Have the
Constitutional Power to Pass Legislation Prescribing Presidential
Ballot Access Requirements Including Determining Whether a Candidate
Meets the Eligibility Requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/states-have-constitutional-power-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/states-have-constitutional-power-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, March 12, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Hagmann-McLeod Report on CFP Radio
tonight - Saturday 12 Mar 2011 8:00 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner_12.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner_12.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 14, 2011<br />
Obama Ineligible! 14 Mar 2011
Issue Washington Times National Weekly Edition - page 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/ad-obama-ineligible-14-mar-2011-issue.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/ad-obama-ineligible-14-mar-2011-issue.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 14, 2011<br />
Action Alert-Contact GA House
Speaker Ralston/Majority Leader O'Neal & Urge them to 100%
Support the GA HB401 with 2012 Election Cycle Effective Date
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/contact-ga-speaker-of-house-david.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/contact-ga-speaker-of-house-david.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 15, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were guests on the Howie Mandel Radio Show
hosted by Jim 'Howie' Mandel - Tues 15 Mar 2011, 10:00 ET
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner_15.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-cdr-charles-kerchner_15.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 20, 2011<br />
The 'Independent.ie' Calls
the Birthers “An Ardent Group of Radicals”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/independentie-calls-birthers-ardent.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/independentie-calls-birthers-ardent.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 22, 2011<br />
BREAKING NEWS: Arizona House
Gov Committee Votes 5 to 1 to Approve Presidential Eligibility Bill
as Part of Renewed Effort in AZ
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/breaking-news-arizona-house-gov.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/breaking-news-arizona-house-gov.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 23, 2011<br />
May We See Your Real Birth
Certificate, Mr. President?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/may-we-see-your-real-birth-certificate.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/may-we-see-your-real-birth-certificate.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, March 26, 2011<br />
President Dwight Eisenhower
Had to File a Birth Certificate to Run for President - Unlike Obama,
Ike had nothing to hide!
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/president-dwight-eisenhower-had-to-file.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/president-dwight-eisenhower-had-to-file.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 27, 2011<br />
Atty Apuzzo & CDR
Kerchner were on Les Naiman Show, WGTK 970, Louisville KY, hosted by
Les Naiman, Sunday 27 Mar 2011 6 PM EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/les-naiman-show-atty-mario-apuzzo-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/les-naiman-show-atty-mario-apuzzo-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, March 27, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630
in Denver CO - Monday 28 Mar 2011 @ 8 a.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_27.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_27.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, March 30, 2011<br />
Standing Under Proposed
State Presidential Vetting and Eligibility Laws
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/standing-under-proposed-state.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/standing-under-proposed-state.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, March 31, 2011<br />
Donald Trump Is a “Natural
Born Citizen” But Putative President Barack Obama Is Not
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/donald-trump-is-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/03/donald-trump-is-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 2, 2011<br />
Governor Abercrombie’s
Bogus Quest to Prove Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/governor-abercrombies-bogus-quest-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/governor-abercrombies-bogus-quest-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 4, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo was on the
Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Show hosted by Marco Ciavolino - Monday
4 April 2011 at 3 p.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-terry_04.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/atty-mario-apuzzo-will-be-on-terry_04.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 4, 2011<br />
Ad: Obama Not Born in Hawaii
per Kenyan Assy Mbrs James Orengo and Bonny Khalwale and Hawaii 2008
Elections Office Official Tim Adams - 04Apr2011
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-obama-not-born-in-hawaii-per.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-obama-not-born-in-hawaii-per.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 11, 2011<br />
Wash Times Ad: Whose Social
Security Number is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using? Wash
Times Natl Wkly - 11 Apr 2011 pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-whose-social-security-number-is.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-whose-social-security-number-is.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 11, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Kerchner (Ret) were on the Peter Boyle Radio Show on KHOW 630 in
Denver CO - Tuesday 12 April 2011 @ 9 a.m. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-ret.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-kerchner-ret.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 12, 2011<br />
An Analysis of the Current
Revelations of Hawaii’s Dr. Chiyome Fukino to NBC News Regarding
Obama’s Place of Birth
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/analysis-of-current-revelations-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/analysis-of-current-revelations-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 15, 2011<br />
Both Houses in Arizona Pass
First Presidential Vetting and Eligibility Bill
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/both-houses-in-arizona-pass-first.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/both-houses-in-arizona-pass-first.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 16, 2011<br />
Obama Has Made the United
States and Its Leaders the Laughing Stock of the World
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-has-made-united.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-has-made-united.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 18, 2011<br />
Wash Times Ad: What U.S.
President in History Has So Many Sources in a Foreign Country Saying
He was Born in Their Country and NOT in the USA?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-what-us-president-in-history-has.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-ad-what-us-president-in-history-has.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 19, 2011<br />
What Governor Jan Brewer
Should Do With the Arizona Vetting and Eligibility Bill She Just
Vetoed
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/what-governor-jan-brewer-should-do-with.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/what-governor-jan-brewer-should-do-with.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 22, 2011<br />
Should Enforcing the
Constitution and Protecting the Nation Be An Embarrassment?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/should-enforcing-constitution-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/should-enforcing-constitution-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 25, 2011<br />
New Wash Times Ad: Whose CT
Social Security Number is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama
Using? Washington Times National Weekly in 25 Apr 2011 issue - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-wash-times-ad-whose-ct-social.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-wash-times-ad-whose-ct-social.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 29, 2011<br />
Obama Releases His Alleged
Long Form Certificate of Live Birth But He’s Still Not a Natural
Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-releases-his-alleged-long-form.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-releases-his-alleged-long-form.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 1, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Les Naiman radio show, WGTK 970 in
Louisville KY, hosted by Les Naiman, on Sunday, 1 May 2011 at 6:10
p.m EDT
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 2, 2011<br />
New Wash Times Ad: Obama
Committed Draft Registration Fraud! Whose CT Social Security Number
is President Barack Hussein Soetoro Obama Using? Washington Times
National Weekly in 02 May 2011 issue - pg 5
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-wash-times-ad-obama-committed-draft.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/new-wash-times-ad-obama-committed-draft.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 3, 2011<br />
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR
Charles Kerchner (Ret) were on the Andrea Shea King Radio Show
tonight - Tuesday 3 May 2011 @ 9:15 P.M. EST
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_03.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/atty-mario-apuzzo-and-cdr-charles_03.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 9, 2011<br />
Obama’s On-Line Image of His
Alleged 1961 Long-Form Certificate of Live Birth Contains Evidence of
Kerning Proving That the Actual Paper Certificate of Live Birth Is a
Forgery
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-on-line-image-of-his-alleged.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-on-line-image-of-his-alleged.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, May 13, 2011<br />
When Will Congress and the FBI
Investigate the Suspicious Circumstances Involved With Obama’s
Alleged Long-Form Certificate of Live Birth?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/when-will-congress-and-fbi-investigate.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/when-will-congress-and-fbi-investigate.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 15, 2011<br />
Has Obama Won the Birth
Certificate Game?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/has-obama-won-birth-certificate-game.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/has-obama-won-birth-certificate-game.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, May 21, 2011<br />
Why Doesn’t Obama and the
State of Hawaii Release Real Evidence of Obama’s Alleged Birth in
Hawaii?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/why-doesnt-obama-and-state-of-hawaii.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/why-doesnt-obama-and-state-of-hawaii.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 29, 2011<br />
Obama’s Enablers Put Forth
Another Straw Man Argument: One’s Parents Do Not Have to Be Born in
the U.S. to Be a “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-enablers-put-forth-another-straw.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-enablers-put-forth-another-straw.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 8, 2011<br />
Congress Investigates the
Sexual Flings of Rep. Anthony Weiner but Not Obama, the Impostor
President Sitting in the Most Powerful Office in the World
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/congress-investigates-sexual-flings-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/congress-investigates-sexual-flings-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, June 18, 2011<br />
Why Doesn’t Hawaii Senator
Sam Slom Investigate the Authenticity of Obama’s Long-Form
Certificate of Live Birth?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/why-doesnt-hawaii-senator-sam-slom.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/why-doesnt-hawaii-senator-sam-slom.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, June 23, 2011<br />
Snopes.com Provides
Misleading and Incomplete Information About Obama’s Social Security
Number and Incorrect Information About Whether He Is a “Natural
Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/snopescom-provides-misleading-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/snopescom-provides-misleading-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, June 29, 2011<br />
Bond v. United States and
Standing to Challenge Putative President Obama on His Eligibility to
be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/bond-v-united-states-and-standing-to.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/bond-v-united-states-and-standing-to.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, July 7, 2011<br />
The Boston Globe Kept Obama
Newsworthy Information Secret and the Immigration Service Released
Two Different Obama Sr. Immigration Files
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/boston-globe-kept-newsworthy.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/boston-globe-kept-newsworthy.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 8, 2011<br />
Democratic National Committee
Uses Obama’s Forged Birth Certificate for Fund Raising--A Huge
Mistake
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/democratic-national-committee-uses.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/democratic-national-committee-uses.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, July 10, 2011<br />
Obama Cannot Be A “Natural
Born Citizen" Under Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/obama-cannot-be-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/obama-cannot-be-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, July 30, 2011<br />
Obama’s Rape of the
Fourteenth Amendment—From Defining a Natural Born Citizen to
Authorizing His Threatened Dictatorial Raising of the Debt Ceiling
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/obamas-rape-of-fourteenth-amendmentfrom.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/07/obamas-rape-of-fourteenth-amendmentfrom.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, August 6, 2011<br />
Rachel Maddow of MSNBC
Should Be Ethically Sanctioned for Intentionally Misstating to the
American Public the Birthers’ Position On Whether Obama Is A
"Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/rachel-maddow-of-msnbc-should-be.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/rachel-maddow-of-msnbc-should-be.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, August 13, 2011<br />
The Most Stupid Story of
the Year
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/most-stupid-story-of-year.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/most-stupid-story-of-year.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, August 14, 2011<br />
Jedi Pauly: The False Flag
Obot
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/jedi-pauly-false-flag-obot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/jedi-pauly-false-flag-obot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, August 21, 2011<br />
The Rule of Law and the
“Natural Born Citizen” Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/rule-of-law-and-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/08/rule-of-law-and-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, September 1, 2011<br />
A Common Sense
Definition of a "Citizen" and a "Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/common-sense-definition-of-citizen-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/common-sense-definition-of-citizen-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, September 11, 2011<br />
Attorney Mario Apuzzo on
the Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Hour
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/attorney-mario-apuzzo-on-terry-lakin.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/attorney-mario-apuzzo-on-terry-lakin.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, September 20, 2011<br />
Having the Status of
Birthright Citizenship Is Not Sufficient to Make One an Article II
“Natural Born” Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/having-status-of-birthright-citizenship.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/having-status-of-birthright-citizenship.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, September 29, 2011<br />
New Evidence Regarding
Obama's Alleged Father: Is it Malcolm X?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-evidence-regarding-obamas-alleged.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-evidence-regarding-obamas-alleged.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, October 11, 2011<br />
How Obama’s Enablers
Mislead the Public on the Meaning of an Article II “Natural Born”
Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-obamas-enablers-mislead-public-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-obamas-enablers-mislead-public-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, November 2, 2011<br />
Is Barack Hussein Obama
II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York
City?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-barack-hussein-obama-ii-really-bari.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-barack-hussein-obama-ii-really-bari.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, November 8, 2011<br />
Is Putative President
Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice
For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on
March 12, 1982?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, November 15, 2011<br />
Is Putative President
Barack Obama’s Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Really Jo Ann Newman?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-obamas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-obamas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, December 11, 2011<br />
Emer de Vattel, Adolf
Hitler, America’s Youth, and the Natural Born Citizen Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/12/emer-de-vattel-adolf-hitler-americas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/12/emer-de-vattel-adolf-hitler-americas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, December 18, 2011<br />
Did Putative President,
Barack Obama, At the Behest of Malcolm X, His Alleged Biological
Father, Live with Then-Indonesian President Sukarno When He Was a
Young Boy?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/12/did-putative-president-barack-obama-at.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/12/did-putative-president-barack-obama-at.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, January 9, 2012<br />
How Obama’s Enablers
Mislead the Public on the Meaning of an Article II “Natural Born”
Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-obamas-enablers-mislead-public-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-obamas-enablers-mislead-public-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, January 21, 2012<br />
The McClellan/Obama
Citizenship Debate and the Natural Born Citizen Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/mcclellanobama-citizenship-debate-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/mcclellanobama-citizenship-debate-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, January 30, 2012<br />
Eligibility Attorney Mario
Apuzzo on the Jeff Rense Radio Show Tonight, Monday, January 30,
2012, at 8:00 p.m. Pacific/11:00 p.m. Eastern
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo-on.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/01/eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo-on.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 3, 2012<br />
All That Is Wrong with
Georgia State Judge Michael M. Malihi’s Decision that Putative
President Obama Is a “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/all-that-is-wrong-with-georgia-state.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/all-that-is-wrong-with-georgia-state.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, February 16, 2012<br />
Tisdale v. Obama and the
“Natural Born Citizen” Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/tisdale-v-obama-and-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/02/tisdale-v-obama-and-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 5, 2012<br />
A Catalog of Evidence -
Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President
Barack Obama Was Born in Hawaii
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/03/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/03/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, March 6, 2012<br />
Putative President Barack
Obama’s Unconstitutional Amending of Article II’s “Natural Born
Citizen” Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/03/putative-president-barack-obamas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/03/putative-president-barack-obamas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, April 2, 2012<br />
The Faux Claims of John
Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/faux-claims-of-john-woodman-regarding.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/faux-claims-of-john-woodman-regarding.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, April 6, 2012<br />
Objection to Candidate Barack
Obama’s Petition of Nomination for the Primary Presidential
Election Filed in New Jersey
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/objection-to-candidate-barack-obamas.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/objection-to-candidate-barack-obamas.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, April 10, 2012<br />
Update on the Purpura and
Moran New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/update-on-purpura-and-moran-new-jersey.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/update-on-purpura-and-moran-new-jersey.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, April 28, 2012<br />
President James Monroe and
the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/president-james-monroe-and-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/president-james-monroe-and-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 1, 2012<br />
Fox News Is Spreading False
Information on the Meaning of a “Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/fox-news-is-spreading-false-information.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/fox-news-is-spreading-false-information.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, May 6, 2012<br />
The New York State Court Should
Not Sanction Pro Se Plaintiff, Christopher Earl Strunk, for His
"Natural Born Citizen" Litigation
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/new-york-state-court-should-not.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/new-york-state-court-should-not.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, May 14, 2012<br />
Purpura-Moran New Jersey Obama
Ballot Challenge Appealed to Appellate Division-Briefing and Oral
Argument Scheduled
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpura-moran-new-jersey-obama-ballot.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpura-moran-new-jersey-obama-ballot.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, May 22, 2012<br />
Purpura and Moran File Their
Brief and Appendix in Barack Obama N.J. Ballot Access Challenge
Appeal
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpura-and-moran-file-their-brief-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/purpura-and-moran-file-their-brief-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate June 2012</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">pos</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>t</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Monday,
July 2, 2012<br />
Purpura and Moran File Petition for Certification
With the NJ Supreme Court in Obama NJ Ballot Challenge
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/07/purpura-and-moran-file-petition-for.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/07/purpura-and-moran-file-petition-for.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, August 8, 2012<br />
Barack Obama Ballot
Challenge Proceeding Forward in the NJ Supreme Court
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/08/barack-obama-ballot-challenge.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/08/barack-obama-ballot-challenge.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate September 2012</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Sunday,
October 28, 2012<br />
Barack Obama Is Ineligible to be President, For
He Is Neither a “Natural Born Citizen” Nor a “Citizen of the
United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/10/barack-obama-is-ineligible-to-be.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/10/barack-obama-is-ineligible-to-be.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, November 17, 2012<br />
The Vermont Court Errs
in Dismissing Presidential Ballot Challenge H. Brooke Paige v. Barack
Obama
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-vermont-court-errs-in-dismissing.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-vermont-court-errs-in-dismissing.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, November 28, 2012<br />
Logic and Defining the
"Natural Born Citizen" Clause
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Saturday, December 22, 2012<br />
The Florida Courts Say
that If Anyone Can Be Santa Claus, Barack Obama Can Be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-florida-courts-say-that-if-anyone.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-florida-courts-say-that-if-anyone.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, December 31, 2012<br />
Congress Should Not
Confirm Barack Obama As President, For He Is Not an Article II
"Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/12/congress-should-not-confirm-barack.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/12/congress-should-not-confirm-barack.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Tuesday, January 22, 2013<br />
Barack Obama: The De Facto
President of the United States-Maybe a Born Citizen But Not A
"Natural Born Citizen"
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/01/barack-obama-de-facto-president-of.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/01/barack-obama-de-facto-president-of.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate February 2013 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Monday,
March 25, 2013<br />
Senator Ted Cruz Is Not a “Natural Born
Citizen” and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/03/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/03/senator-ted-cruz-is-not-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate April 2013 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
>>
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate May</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">2013
post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Sunday,
June 2, 2013<br />
The Fallacies of Congressional Legislative Attorney
Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-fallacies-of-congressional.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-fallacies-of-congressional.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, July 19, 2013 </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">[3,182
comments]</span></i></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
The
Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the “Natural Born Citizen”
Clause: A Response to Artsy Fartsy Squeeky Fromm Girl Reporter
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-constitution-rule-of-law-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-constitution-rule-of-law-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate January to December</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">2014
post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Sunday,
January 25, 2015<br />
Attorney Mario Apuzzo on Moretti Underground
Radio—Is Senator Ted Cruz a Natural Born Citizen?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/01/attorney-mario-apuzzo-on-moretti.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/01/attorney-mario-apuzzo-on-moretti.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Wednesday, January 28, 2015<br />
Rick Santorum Is An
Article II Natural Born Citizen and Eligible to Be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/01/rick-santorum-is-article-ii-natural.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/01/rick-santorum-is-article-ii-natural.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 20, 2015<br />
What Do President Obama
and Senator Cruz Have In Common? They Are Both Not Natural Born
Citizens
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-do-president-obama-and-senator.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/02/what-do-president-obama-and-senator.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, March 13, 2015<br />
A Response to Neal Katyal and
Paul Clement on the Meaning of a Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate April 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Monday,
May 25, 2015<br />
Senator Cruz, Senator Rubio, and Governor Jindal
Should Not Be Allowed to Participate in the Presidential Debates
Because They, Like De Facto President Obama, Are All Not Natural Born
Citizens and Therefore Not Eligible to Be President
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate June 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Saturday,
July 4, 2015<br />
July 4, 1776, the Birth Day of the Nation and the
Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate August 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
>>
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate September 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
>>
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate October 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Wednesday,
November 25, 2015<br />
New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against
Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Fail for Want of Jurisdiction
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-hampshire-ballot-access-challenges.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-hampshire-ballot-access-challenges.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, November 29, 2015<br />
A Citizen is One Thing,
But a Natural Born Citizen is Another
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/a-citizen-is-one-thing-but-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/a-citizen-is-one-thing-but-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate December 2015 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Monday,
January 25, 2016<br />
If Winston Churchill Was Not Even a Citizen of
the United States, How Can Ted Cruz Be Its Natural Born Citizen?
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/01/if-winston-churchill-was-not-even.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/01/if-winston-churchill-was-not-even.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Friday, February 5, 2016<br />
The Illinois Board of
Elections Got It Wrong: Ted Cruz Is Not a Natural Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-illinois-board-of-elections-got-it.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-illinois-board-of-elections-got-it.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Thursday, February 18, 2016<br />
Ted Cruz Misrepresents
the Law and His Being a Natural Born Citizen at Town Hall Meeting
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/ted-cruz-misrepresents-law-and-his.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/ted-cruz-misrepresents-law-and-his.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 22, 2016<br />
Donald Trump Is Right to
Retweet that Marco Rubio Is Not a Natural Born
Citizen<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/donald-trump-is-right-to-retweet-that.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/donald-trump-is-right-to-retweet-that.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, February 29, 2016<br />
The Framers’ Definition
of a Natural Born Citizen Is Not Based on Race, Color, or Religion
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-framers-definition-of-natural-born.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-framers-definition-of-natural-born.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Monday, March 7, 2016<br />
Ted Cruz: Neither a Natural
Born Citizen Nor “TrusTed”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate April 2016 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
>>
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate May 2016 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
>>
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate June 2016 post</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Saturday,
July 9, 2016<br />
Carmon Elliott Files a Petition for a Writ of
Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on Ted Cruz Not Being a Natural
Born Citizen
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</a>
<br />
<br />
>> </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NO
separate January to December 2017 posts</span></b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
<br />
Thursday,
May 17, 2018<br />
A Response to the Idea of Removing the Natural Born
Citizen Clause From Our Constitution
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-response-to-theidea-of-removing.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-response-to-theidea-of-removing.html</a>
<br />
<br />
Sunday, June 2, 2019<br />
The Fallacies of Congressional
Legislative Attorney Jack Maskell’s Definition of a “Natural Born
Citizen”
<br />
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-fallacies-of-congressional.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-fallacies-of-congressional.html</a>
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>SCRIBD
Links to Obtain Court Docs Filed</b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Kerchner
v Obama & Congress - All Court Documents - At Apuzzo's SCRIBD
Account </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/collections/2344225">http://www.scribd.com/collections/2344225</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DOCKET
REPORT - Supreme Court of U.S. - Kerchner v Obama & Congress -
Washington DC </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm">http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DOCKET
REPORT - Appeals Court - Kerchner v Obama & Congress -
Philadelphia PA </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/22556305/Kerchner-v-Obama-U-S-3rd-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-Philadelphia-PA-Docket-09-4209">http://www.scribd.com/doc/22556305/Kerchner-v-Obama-U-S-3rd-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-Philadelphia-PA-Docket-09-4209</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DOCKET
REPORT - District Court - Kerchner v Obama & Congress - Camden
NJ </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/17748032">http://www.scribd.com/doc/17748032</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Table
of Contents for Kerchner v Obama & Congress 2nd Amended
Complaint Served on the Defendants </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/19914488/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-Table-of-Contents-2nd-Amended-Complaint">http://www.scribd.com/doc/19914488/Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress-Table-of-Contents-2nd-Amended-Complaint</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
Lawsuit - Kerchner et al v Obama et al: Initial filing 2:50 a.m. 20
Jan 2009. Second Amended Verified Complaint Filed 9 Feb 2009. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/11317148">http://www.scribd.com/doc/11317148</a>
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Useful
Info, Docs, & Videos</b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Article
II Legal Defense Fund for New Jersey </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://sites.google.com/site/articleiilegaldefensefund/home/new-jersey-ballot-challenge">http://sites.google.com/site/articleiilegaldefensefund/home/new-jersey-ballot-challenge</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Make
Mine Freedom (1948) </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://nationaljuggernaut.blogspot.com/2009/09/this-cartoon-seemed-far-fetched-in-1948.html">http://nationaljuggernaut.blogspot.com/2009/09/this-cartoon-seemed-far-fetched-in-1948.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Birther
Summit March 2012 Registration </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.birthersummit.org/register.html">http://www.birthersummit.org/register.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Natural
Born Citizen for Dummies </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGJdN2KPf0g">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGJdN2KPf0g</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Learn
What is America's True Form of Government</span></span></span><br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7M-7LkvcVw</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Five
Citizenship Terms Used in Constitution </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same">http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Euler
Logic Diagram Analysis of Natural Born Citizenship Term In Article
II of U.S. Constitution </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://thebirthers.org/misc/logic_files/image035.jpg">http://thebirthers.org/misc/logic_files/image035.</a><a href="http://thebirthers.org/misc/logic_files/image035.jpg">jpg</a></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Natural
Born Citizen Graphics - A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-born-citizen-graphic-picture.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/10/natural-born-citizen-graphic-picture.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">What
is a Natural Born Citizen?</span></span></span><br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp2kKNTjH70">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp2kKNTjH70</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Exactly
What is a Natural Born Citizen? - Very Good Video. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEnaAZrYqQI</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Clearing
the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s
June 10 2009 Report </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/clearing-the-smoke-june10">http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/clearing-the-smoke-june10</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">See
How Easy it is to Produce a Phony Certification of Live Birth (COLB)
and a Digital Image & Picture of Same and Put it Online. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Here
is one for Mickey Hussein Mouse II. Such a digital image is all that
Obama has given to the electorate and public to support his claim of
birth in the USA. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.</span></span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;"><a href="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg">jpg</a>
</span></span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Analysis
of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and Examples of Other
Type Birth Records by syc1959. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QdyLOUHz-A&feature=related">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QdyLOUHz-A&feature=related</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Analysis
of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) by Ron Polarik, PhD. </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2009/05/04/why_obama_will_never_show_his_birth_certificate.thtml">http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2009/05/04/why_obama_will_never_show_his_birth_certificate.thtml</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
Greatest Birth Certificate Fraud in History - Obama's Forged Online
Certification of Live Birth - How It Was Done </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2010/05/14/fraud_in_the_usa_the_greatest_birth_certificate_fraud_in_history.thtml">http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2010/05/14/fraud_in_the_usa_the_greatest_birth_certificate_fraud_in_history.thtml</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Video
- Three Little Words </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Video
- Merry Christmas Omerika!! </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY&feature=related">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY&feature=related</a>
<br />
<br />
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><br />
Radio
Interviews – Sampling</b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jeff
Rense Radio Show </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://dprogram.net/2012/02/04/jeff-rense-with-mario-apuzzo-is-obama-coming-unraveled">http://dprogram.net/2012/02/04/jeff-rense-with-mario-apuzzo-is-obama-coming-unraveled</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Les
Naiman Show-970 WGTK Louisville KY-Nov10 </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://lesnaimanshow.podbean.com/2010/11/14/the-les-naiman-show-111410">http://lesnaimanshow.podbean.com/2010/11/14/the-les-naiman-show-111410</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Les
Naiman Show-970 WGTK Louisville KY-May10 </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://lesnaimanshow.podbean.com/2010/05/02/the-les-naiman-show-50210">http://lesnaimanshow.podbean.com/2010/05/02/the-les-naiman-show-50210</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jeff
Kuhner Show-570 WTNT Wash DC-Apr10 </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/jeffkuhnershow20100430.wav"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/jeffkuhnershow20100430.</span></span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;"><a href="http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/jeffkuhnershow20100430.wav">wav</a>
</span></span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bill
Cunningham Show-700 WLW Cincinnati OH-Aug09 </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Sean
& Frank Show-680 WCBM Baltimore MD-Jun09 </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://thebirthers.org/apuzzo/apuzzoseanandfrankshow20090618.mp3"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">http://thebirthers.org/apuzzo/apuzzoseanandfrankshow20090618.</span></span></span></a><a href="http://thebirthers.org/apuzzo/apuzzoseanandfrankshow20090618.mp3"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">mp3</span></span></span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jan10
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2010/01/23/the-andrea-shea-king-show">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2010/01/23/the-andrea-shea-king-show</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Oct09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ASKShow/2009/10/09/The-Andrea-Shea-King-Show">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ASKShow/2009/10/09/The-Andrea-Shea-King-Show</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jun09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/06/andrea-shea-king-radio-show.html</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ChaliceShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jul09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/07/06/The-Chalice-Show">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/PatriotsHeartNetwork/2009/07/06/The-Chalice-Show</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DrKateConstitutionalRadio-BlogTalkRadio-Aug09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Constitutional-Radio/2009/08/05/Constitutional-Radio">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Constitutional-Radio/2009/08/05/Constitutional-Radio</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">DrKateRevolutionRadio-BlogTalkRadio-Jan10
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/01/21/revolution-radio-the-unconstitutional-obama">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/01/21/revolution-radio-the-unconstitutional-obama</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">MommaeRadioRebels-BlogTalkRadio-Oct09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mommaEradioRebels/2009/10/17/Momma-E-and-the-Radio-Rebels">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mommaEradioRebels/2009/10/17/Momma-E-and-the-Radio-Rebels</a>
</span></span></span>
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">MommaeRadioRebels-BlogTalkRadio-Jul09
</span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mommaEradioRebels/2009/08/01/Momma-E-and-the-Radio-Rebels-Politics-And-News-At-Its-Best-Host-MommaE-">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/mommaEradioRebels/2009/08/01/Momma-E-and-the-Radio-Rebels-Politics-And-News-At-Its-Best-Host-MommaE-</a>
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Print
Media Announcements and Advertorials</b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">How
to Help Place More Print Media Insertions </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<a href="http://www.protectourliberty.org/"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">http://www.protectourliberty.org</span></span></span></a><br />
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Advertising
Archives - See prior ads </span></span></span>
<br />
</li>
</ul>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/archives.htm">http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/archives.htm</a>
<br />
</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-54022202933151928372017-08-01T13:06:00.000-07:002017-08-01T13:06:09.543-07:00Natural Born Citizen "Gender Essentialism" vs. Transgender Citizen
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Natural
Born Citizen "Gender Essentialism" vs. Transgender Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">This
was also posted on Mario Apuzzo’s</span></span></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">
</span></span></span><a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html?commentPage=2"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><i><b>Natural
Born Citizen blog</b></i></span></span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">.
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Prof.
Lawrence Solum posted an interesting abstract by Melina Bell on his
Legal Theory Blog on July 3, 2017:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2017/07/melina-constantine-bell-washington-and-lee-university-has-postedgender-essentialism-and-american-law-why-and-how-to-sever.html</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">An
Article V amendment to the U.S. Constitution may be the only way to
stop the future of who determines who?/what? is a U.S. citizen. If
the "gender system" (the last two words of the last
sentence of the abstract) is altered, who will be a "natural
born Citizen" and who will be eligible to be president? Will
your "Natural Born Citizen" blog be necessary in a "gender
system" in which "gender essentialism" is history?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Bell
on Gender Essentialism</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Melina
Constantine Bell (Washington and Lee University) has posted Gender
Essentialism and American Law: Why and How to Sever the Connection
(Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 23, 2016) on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"American
law presumes that all persons are born either female or male, and
rests a surprising number of legal entitlements on this presumption.
Persons’ legal rights to express their identity at work, to use
public accommodations, and to retain legal parenthood status with
respect to their children may all depend on whether they are female
or male. Yet we, as individuals, generally have no choice regarding
whether we are legally designated female or male, just as people had
no choice as to whether they were designated “colored” or “white”
under past racial discrimination schemes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
American legal system plays a significant role in the construction,
maintenance, and coercive enforcement of the binary gender system
that requires people to conform their identities in distorting ways
to be included politically. By sustaining the gender system, legal
institutions unnecessarily undermine human well-being, and unjustly
and disrespectfully constrain individual liberty. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
United States and state governments should re-examine laws that use
sex or gender as a category by adapting the Law Commission of
Canada’s methodology in Beyond Conjugality. In this fashion,
American law can begin to move gradually away from the creation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the gender system."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This
is the url for the SSRN article by Melina Bell:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Gender
Essentialism and American Law: Why and How to Sever the Connection</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2994349</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Why
is "gender essentiallism" an important issue to discuss in
the context of who is a "natural born Citizen" and eligible
to be president? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Well,
consider this quote by a "trans veteran who served six tours in
the Middle East": <b>"My gender was female, but at birth,
my sex was male"</b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This
is the url for the July 30, 2017 article on Politico.com:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/30/transgender-veteran-on-trump-military-ban-215432</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">There
is so much that could be written, but, well, no wonder that John
Jay's original genesis original intent for underlining the word
"born" in "natural born Citizen" in his July 25,
1787 note to George Washington is ignored today in 2017 America.
Confusion about original genesis has become a mental illness that is
being legalized in front of God and everybody on earth, atheist,
theist, Jew, Christian, Muslim, statist, globalist, original genesis
original intent constitutionalist, etc.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">What
did John Jay imply by underlining the word "born" if NOT</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship/allegiance</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
<b>by birth alone</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
on U.S. soil (jurisdiction)</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to two U.S. citizen parents</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
married</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to each other</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
before the birth of the child</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
tick...tock... it's only a matter of time before Prof. Akhil Reed
Amar's "unwritten constitution" with it's "implicit"
serendipities discovers that "gender essentialism" was not
the ONLY essential that was implicit in the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment
"citizen" language in conjunction with the 1898 United
States v Wong Kim Ark "citizen" fiat "declaration"
by the Supreme Court. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-18083500155423880942017-07-10T11:09:00.002-07:002017-07-10T11:11:01.535-07:00John Jay vs. Anti-American Foreigners and Agitators<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>John
Jay vs. Anti-American Foreigner and Agitators</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="av-478630250358936443-07371651852897376905"></a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="c478630250358936443"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
also posted this on Mario Apuzzo’s<i><b> <a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html?commentPage=2" target="_blank">N</a></b></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><i><b><a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html?commentPage=2" target="_blank">aturalBorn Citizen blog</a></b></i>. The italic section below is from a July 10, 2017
at 9:30 AM comment at Mario’s blog.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"> </span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><i>Are
we REALLY supposed to believe THIS:<br />
<br />
If prior to the
necessity of The Obama Situation forcing us to accept a ridiculous
and perverse definition of NBC, we had openly and objectively
discussed the definition of NBC?<br />
<br />
<b><b></b><b>A
severely anti-American foreigner and agitator</b><b></b></b>
happens to visit USA and his wife plops out an anchor baby. The baby
is taken back to hostile foreign country and indoctrinated for many
years. Child/adult moves to USA and takes up residence. Upon living
here 14 years and achieving age of 35 he can become president.<br />
<br />
Now,
tell me with a straight face that Founding Fathers would have thought
this was just great.<br />
<br />
SIGH</i></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This
is my response of agreement:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Dittos
"a straight face"</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...where's
Bryan (not Linda)?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I'm
still waiting for Bryan (not Linda) to get in touch with the obvious
implication of John Jay's reason for underlining the word <b>"born"</b>
in "natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to
George Washington. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jay
would NOT have agreed with <b>"a severely anti-American
foreigner and agitator"</b>, or even a<b> "friendly"
foreigner</b>, being eligible to be president when it is obvious that
Jay's ONLY reason for underlining the word "born" is that
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship qualified a person in 1787 to be
president with the implication that ONLY singular U.S. citizenship
was to be a perpetual implication from generation to generation,
election to election, POTUS to POTUS. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">It
is NOT possible for Jay to have had ONLY singular U.S. citizenship as
the ONLY reason for underlining the word "born" and to have
ALSO U.S./foreign citizenship as an implication for underlining the
word "born". The myth, the neo-birther theory, the
“implicit constitution” suggestion that Jay implied and
Washington agreed that ALSO dual U.S./foreign citizenship qualifies a
person to have command of the U.S. military and to be president, is,
well, that theory is just nuts.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
the court of public opinion, this simple and obvious implication of
John Jay, the underliner of the word <b>"born"</b> and the
author of <b>"natural born Citizen"</b> in his note to
Washington as implying that ONLY singular U.S. citizenship qualifies
a person to have command of the U.S. military and to be president,
MUST be repeated and repeated and repeated. It MUST be repeated for
two reasons: first, ONLY singular U.S. citizenship qualifies a person
to be president is very simple to state and to understand and to
repeat to others, and second, Jay's original "implication"
is NOT debatable, it is NOT refutable, it is NOT rebutable, it is NOT
inclusive. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship is exclusive.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ALSO
dual U.S./foreign citizenship is inclusive. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">It
is obvious that Jay was promoting the idea that ONLY singular U.S.
citizenship qualifies a person to be president and so it is obvious
that Jay definitely was NOT promoting the idea that a person was
eligible to be president just because a person was born on U.S.
soil/jurisdiction to only 1 OR 0 U.S. citizen parents (see SCOTUS
Wong Kim Ark error about the Fourteenth Amendment “citizen”
language) OR born on foreign soil to either 1 OR 2 U.S. citizen
parents (see the 1795 Naturalization Act). </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Concerning
who is eligible to have command of the U.S. military and to be
president of the United States, ONLY singular U.S. citizenship is
exclusive for a security reason. The myth that ALSO dual U.S./foreign
citizenship qualifies a person to command the military and to be
president MUST be exposed as the “inclusive” fraud that it is and
it must NOT be allowed to gain traction in the discussion that Yale
Law Prof. Akhil Amar is promoting with his “implicit constitution”
theory.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
conclusion, and to repeat the obvious as I posted above:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">To
be eligible to be president John Jay's ONLY implication is obvious -
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship and definitely NOT ALSO dual
U.S./foreign citizenship:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
<b><b>"by birth alone"</b></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
on U.S. soil (jurisdiction)</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to two U.S. citizen parents</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
married</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to each other</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
before the child is born</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...still
waiting for Bryan (not Linda) and other myth makers and neo-birthers
to get in touch with the obvious reality about Jay’s security
concerns.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-84493305777529677402017-07-07T15:13:00.006-07:002017-07-07T17:24:29.200-07:00John Jay vs. Shallow Thinking About Natural Born Citizen<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>John
Jay </b><b>vs. Shallow Thinking About Natural Born Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
also posted this on Mario Apuzzo’s Natural Born Citizen blog. To
read it and other comments there <span style="color: #cc0000;"><i><b><a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html?commentPage=2" target="_blank">click here and scroll down to the July 7, 2017 at 5:54 PM</a></b></i></span> date and time stamp.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I,
being a "crank nonsense" spotter, noticed instantly that
Bryan came through again with "crank nonsense" on July 7,
2017 at 3:40 AM, and his comment indicates that he is not a very deep
thinker at 3:40 in the morning - with or without a drink or two or
three or...more.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">First,
I noticed that he asked a debate question and then finished the
paragraph with a shallow thinker insult and then says that to debate
me would "show undeserved respect" because my "position"
is "unworthy of serious consideration".</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Ha!</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan
wrote:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>"
Ajtelles, in your comments here you hold – and please challenge me
if you think I'm wrong on this – that to be eligible under Article
II, one's parents had to have been married. ...."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
are you serious?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe that the constitution delegates and states'
ratifiers were implicitly promoting the myth and theory that ALSO
U.S./foreign citizenship would quality a person to be president
without the parents being married only to each other before the child
is born? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
are you a Muslim or simply a Muslim supporter (supporting is not a
bad thing, but the intent could be detrimental to U.S. internal
security if it supports jihad and imposition of sharia jurisprudence
as superior to the U.S. Constitution) and, whether you a Muslim or a
Christian or a Jew or an animist or a Buddhist or an atheist, do you
believe that Muhammad’s multiple marriages, including his marriage
to 6 year old Aisha (which was consummated when she was 9 years old)
are an example of a good role model for persons in the United States
who may aspire to be president if they ALSO have multiple wives OR
ALSO marry a 9 year old child? Since you don’t really care for the
rule of law, forget for now that consummating marriage with a 9 year
old is not lawful in 2017 America just as it was unlawful in 1787
America when Jay underlined the word “born” in “natural born
Citizen”.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe that in 1787 America the Founders and Framers
of the Constitution were promoting the myth, the “crank nonsense”
theory, that ANY person could be president of the United States
simply because they were born on U.S. soil or U.S. jurisdiction to
only one or zero U.S. citizen parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe that in 1787 America the social custom of that
era would tolerate a child to be eligible to be president if the
child was born on U.S. soil to a foreign female who had a child out
of wedlock (emphasis is on "lock" by marriage) to a foreign
male?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe that when John Jay underlined the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in his note to George Washington
that Jay implied and Washington agreed that ANY child born on U.S.
soil could be eligible to be president even if born to a U.S. citizen
female prostitute who was not married to anybody?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe your "crank nonsense" drivel implicit
in your question to me: "...that to be eligible under Article
II, one's parents had to have been married"?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
are you serious?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
do you really believe the implicit "crank nonsense" that to
be eligible under Article II one's parents did NOT have to be
married?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
it is your own shallow thinker "position" that is truly
"unworthy of serious consideration" but it is definitely
worthy of derision because of it's shallowness and thoughtlessness
and the opportunity it presents to point out “crank nonsense” as
soon as it is posted here on Mario’s Natural Born Citizen blog.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
that's not mean, but it is responsive.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
you have revealed – again – that you are simply argumentative
without substance?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">And
Bryan, dittos back at you with your own words:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>>>"
My position is that your position is so obviously garbage, so clearly
unworthy of serious consideration, that to debate would show
undeserved respect. Your theory deserves naught but mockery and
derision."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
your position is definitely not worthy of serious consideration, but,
you come back, ok, cuz' you are fodder* for "crank nonsense"
spotters and your shallowness is just so easy to refute that it is
fun to respond and in that way educate others who may happen to read
what you write and how you are substantively rebutted and refuted as
you try spitting against the wind in your defense of the "crank
nonsense" myth and theory of ALSO U.S./foreign citizenship
qualified a person to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i>*
Check the dictionary: the second definition in my American Heritage
Dictionary for “fodder” is <b>“Raw material, as for artistic
creation.”</b> You’re the fodder Bryan, I’m the artistic
creator as is Mario.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">AND
Bryan, are you aware that you NEVER refer to John Jay to support your
"crank nonsense" position that ONLY U.S. citizenship
qualifies a person to be president was <b>NOT</b> Jay's <b>ONLY</b>
implicit reason for underlining the word "born" in "natural
born Citizen" but that <b>ALSO</b> U.S./foreign citizenship
qualifies a person to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">AND
Bryan, are you aware that you NEVER refer to John Jay as a person who
would agree with your "crank nonsense" that it does not
matter whether or not the couple who reproduced a child should be
married for their child to be eligible to be president?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?
ALSO dual and ALSO not married?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">So
Bryan, tick...tock...tick...tock...tick...tock…, still waiting for
you to adduce the historical record of the debate by the convention
delegates and states’ ratifiers. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">My
common sense position is that since they did NOT debate ALSO
U.S./foreign citizenship qualified a person to be president, the
delegates and ratifiers did NOT debate and simply accepted John Jay’s
implicit reason for underlining the word “born” in “natural
born Citizen” because the obvious does NOT need to be debated.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jay
implied the obvious:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
<b>by birth alone</b> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
on U.S. soil / jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to two U.S. citizen parents </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
married </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
to each other </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
before the child is born</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
see how easy it is to state the obvious?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Now,
you try to state the “obvious” as you see it, and keep your
intentional mean attitude to yourself – especially after 3 am,
unless that’s when you do your deepest thinkin’ and writin’.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-20836344149643328132017-07-06T13:53:00.001-07:002017-07-06T14:32:42.397-07:00John Jay - You're Wrong About Who Is Eligible To Be President<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>John
Jay – </b><b>You’re </b><b>W</b><b>rong </b><b>About Who Is
Eligible To Be President</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
also posted this on Mario Apuzzo’s Natural Born Citizen blog. To
read it and other comments there scroll down to the July 6, 2017 at
3:38 PM* date and time stamp.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">*
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</a>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
who has never really been mean to you or others here on your Natural
Born Citizen blog, has become nicer in his commentary and I’m
starting to like reading his comments more than before, so my
exposition about Bryan’s correction of your erudition is not
intended to be directed at Bryan the person in a mean spirited way
but directed at the content which could have been written by any
person who believes that <b>ALSO</b> dual U.S./foreign citizenship
qualifies a person to be eligible to be president instead of
believing that <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship qualifies a
person to be president. What I like, and which is just too easy to
rebut, is that Bryan hangs in there defendin<span style="font-weight: normal;">g
“crank nonsense” wit</span>h sources that <b>“no one”</b> can
rebut and refute. <b>“No one”</b> is a play on words since <b>“no
one”</b> is one of Bryan’s opposition authoritative sources as
will be clear below.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan’s
exposition is simple. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">You
are wrong and his conclusions about his quoted sources prove it.
Period.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">See,
Bryan’s “cheerleading”, as you put it on July 5, 2017 at 9:45
PM, is simple to do. It doesn’t take much thought, and expressing a
point without substance input is definitely not playing “the game”;
here is an example from Bryan’s own conclusions on July 5, 2017 at
8:45 PM.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Four
of Bryan’s quotes:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<span style="color: black;">“
‘<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
recurring doubts relate to those who have acquired United States
citizenship through birth abroad to American parents." [Gordon
1968]<br />
“ ‘But whether a person born abroad of American
parents, or of one American and one alien parent, qualifies as
natural born has never been resolved.’ [Pryor 1988]”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<span style="color: black;">“
‘<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">It
is clear enough that native-born citizens are eligible" [Gordon
1968]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<span style="color: black;">“
‘<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">It
is well settled that 'native-born' citizens, those born in the United
States, qualify as natural born.’ [Pryor 1988]”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
quoting Gordon and Pryor, Bryan says <i><b>“</b></i><i><b>No one
challenged Gordon or Pryor on those assertions.”</b></i> That, it
seems to me, is an excellent example of “cheerleading”. T<span style="font-weight: normal;">his
“crank nonsense” s</span>potter has a question about <span style="font-weight: normal;">the
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“assertions”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of “crank nonsense” </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">that
are supported by </span><b>“no one”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span>
Who are Bryan’s authoritative sources for his conclusion about
Gordon’s and P<span style="font-weight: normal;">ryor’s
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“assertions”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">?
S</span>imple, <b>“no one”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span>
How can <b>“no one”</b> be rebutted and refuted?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Simple
– by using the historical record.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Pryor’s
<i><b>“never been resolved”</b></i> conclusion is definitely not
an informed conclusion.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
1795 Naturalizatio<span style="font-weight: normal;">n Act “citizen”
languag</span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">e
“resolved” th</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">e
error of the 1790 Naturalization Act “natural born Citizen”
language of, as Gordon put it, </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“those
who have </span></i><i><b>acquired</b></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
United States citizenship through </span></i><i><b>birth abroad</b></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
to American parents”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
With her “resolved” comment, Pryor is simply tacitly promoting
the “crank nonsens</span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">e”
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">that</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>NOT</b></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
only singular U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be president but
that </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>ALSO</b></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
du</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">al U.S./foreign
citizenship qualifies a person to be president. As a “crank
nonsense” spotter I immediately spotted the “crank nonsense”
th</span>at the <i><b>implicit</b></i> dual U.S./foreign citizenship
qualifies a person to be president instead of John Jay’s common
sense <i><b>implicit</b></i> reason for underlining the w<span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ord
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>“born”</b></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in “natural born Citizen” </span></span>in his July 25, 1787 note
to his good friend George Washington (an <i><b>implicit original
genesis original intent</b></i> with which Washington agreed).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jay’s
common sense in 1787 was that “<i><b>by birth alone”</b></i> ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be president. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Why
and how?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">BECAUSE
“born” </span></span><i><b>implies</b></i><i><b><</b></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">O</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">NLY
singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ONLY
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">“by
birth alone” </span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ONLY
on U.S. soil, </span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ONLY
to two U.S. citizen parents, </span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ONLY
married before the</span></span> child is born, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
married to each other (NOT with multiple wives as practiced by some
Muslims). </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i>(Note
to Prof. Amar: In 1787 America, multiple wives was de<span style="font-weight: normal;">finitely</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
NOT part of the “implicit constitution” th</span>at you are<span style="font-weight: normal;">
promoting </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and also NOT part
of the “implicit constitution” was the idea that ALSO
U.S./foreign citizenship qualified a person to be president of the
United States. However, what was “implicit”</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in 1787 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the explicit constitution
language in </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Article II
Section 1 clause 5 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">was </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
common sense</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> idea that</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be president</span>).
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Jay’s
common sense in 1787 was th<span style="font-weight: normal;">at the
word </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">“born” did NOT
imply “birth abroad” as Gordon wrote or “born abroad” as
Pryor wrote. Do “constitutional scholars” in 2017 America really
believe that in 1787 America Jay underlined the word “born” in
“natu</span>ral born Citizen” in his note to Washington with the
intention to <i><b>imply</b></i>
birth on foreign soil to one <b>OR</b> two U.S. citizen parents, <b>OR</b>
birth on U.S. soil to one <b>OR</b> zero U.S. citizen parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Really?
One? Zero?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">That
is definit<span style="font-weight: normal;">ely “crank nonsense”
b</span>eing asserted by Gordon in 1968 and Pryor in 1988, and in
2017 by Prof. Akhil Amar, Mark Levin, Esq., Prof. Larry Solum, Prof.
Rob Natelson and et al who use the Fourteenth Amendment to tacitly
<b>“amend”</b> the original intent of “natural born Citizen”
in Article II Section 1 clause 5.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
references to Morse’s “definition of NBC” and Leo Donofrio,
Bryan references “no one’s” cousin “no one at all” as his
authoritative source to support his quoted source: <i><b>“I can
find no one at all saying that eligibility of U.S.-born children
depends upon the citizenship of their parents. Can you?”</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Well,
duh. It’s common sense that the obvious does not need to be stated.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
common sense assumption is that to be eligible to be president of the
United States ONLY U.S. citizen parents can pass on their U.S.
citizenship status <b>“by birth alone”</b> to their child. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Right?
Yes. Why? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Because
foreign citizen parents cannot pass on U.S. citizenship <b>“</b><b>by
birth alone”</b>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Right?
Yes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">That
is why the Fourteenth Amendment “citizen” language does not
“amend” the Article II Section 1 clause 5 “natural born
Citizen” language. That is why the 1898 Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court
decision did NOT explicitly refer to Article II Section 1 clause 5 as
being clarified by the Court’s use of the 1868 Fourteenth
Amendment, and the court did NOT imply a connection because a Supreme
Court decision or Supreme Court dicta cannot “amend” natural law
and <b>“by birth alone”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in
the context of who is eligible to be president</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
after quoting you about Wong Kim Ark Bryan wrote: <i>“Your theories
on Wong lost. … I'm pointing out that before Obama could have had
any influence the American legal community considered the eligibility
of the native-born </i><i><b>clear and settled</b></i><i>.“</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
conclusion Mario, Bryan finished his refutation of your erudition
about what is “clear” in the last sentence of the la<span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">st
paragraph </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">with
“</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
eligibility of the native-born” as being</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
“clear and settled”. </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">From
the perch of this “crank nonsense” spotter, here, use my
binoculars Bryan, do you see that “clear and settled” </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">contradicts
what Pryor said </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">because
the issue (pun intended) of “one American and one alien parent,
qualifies as natural born </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">has
never been </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">resolved”.
</span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">See,
when “no one” is the authoritative source to support the quoted
source then “no one” can conclude anything, even when it
contradicts “no one at all”… or, whatever, whoever.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock…
still waiting for the references to the debates about ALSO dual
U.S./foreign citizenship qualifies a person to be president and why
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship is NOT the ONLY reason for John Jay to
underline “born” in “natural born Citizen” in his note to
George Washington...Tick...Tock.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">P.S.
Mario, for people who may be wondering about the repetition of words
and phrases, the answer is that it works for reinforcement in the
subconscious, and because I’m not writing for a scholarly journal
or for a court. I’m writing for the court of public opinion and “it
seems to me” style of language fits the setting, similar to sitting
around the kitchen table and just talking.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">So
Bryan, tick...tock...tick...tock………….</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
<<>><br />
<br />
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"We
do not know vs. making stuff up"...</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Wow,
Bryan comes through again on July 6, 2017 at 3:52 PM.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan
said in his table talk style which I also like:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Would
the Framers have agreed, one way or the other, on whether a
foreign-born citizen from birth was a natural-born citizen in sense
of Article II? <b>We do not know</b> and anyone who pretends to, in
the absence of a clear historical citation not yet presented, is just
<b>making stuff up</b>."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Yep...
dittos... 100% agreement with Bryan... if "we" refers only
to the myth makers who promote the modern theory that ALSO dual
U.S./foreign citizenship qualifies a person to be president, and, by
implication, that ONLY singular U.S. citizenship is too exclusive for
modern, uh, "constitutional scholars" like "implicit
constitution" promoter Yale Law Prof. Akhil Amar.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Bryan,
to whom does "we do not know" refer?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Does
"we" refer to those who promote the modern myth and theory
that ALSO dual U.S./foreign citizenship qualifies a person to be
president and that alien idea was the understanding of <b>"some"(?)</b>
of the constitution delegates and states' ratifiers, but, and it's a
BIG, BIG, BIG, HUMONGUS BIG but, that ONLY singular U.S. citizenship
qualified a person to be president was NOT the <b>ONLY</b> patriotic
understanding of <b>ALL</b> of the delegates and ratifiers?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-61892867774312645572017-07-04T11:55:00.002-07:002017-07-04T12:48:11.537-07:00John Jay's Singular U.S. Citizenship vs. John Jay's Dual U.S./Foreign Citizenship<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Common
Sense vs. “Crank Nonsense”</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">or</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>John
Jay’s Singular U.S. Citizenship vs. John Jay’s Dual U.S./Foreign Citizenship</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In the past I have written on Mario Apuzzo’s Natural Born Citizen blog that his
expositions of the historical records concerning the1787 original
meaning of “natural born Citizen” in Article II Section 1 clause
5 are always informative, and absolutely nobody has ever challenged
his conclusions with facts that are definitive. They simply say that
he is wrong and then they cite a source and give a conclusion that
defends their use of their source.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">For
example, Bryan, a commentator, wrote a few days ago on June 29, 2017
at 4:15 PM* in the first sentence, <b>“… I'm a hobbyist. My
avocation is not, primarily, study of law. I study of crank
nonsense,”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Does
this mean that </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">he </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">i</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">s
a </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar and that</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
his </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">responses and assertions
to </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Mario Apuzzo, Esq.</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
are the conclusions of a hobbyist </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">are not to be taken as
serious expositions </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">intending
to advance knowledge?</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> Well,
duh, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">uh, I mean, of course
he is a serious </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar, as I am </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">when
I point out his </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in defense of dual
U.S./foreign citizenship <b>ALSO</b> qualifies a person to be president.</span></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">*<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html" target="_blank">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</a> </span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">J</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ust
as Bryan is </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">not</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">I also am not as
knowledgeable as </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Mario
Apuzzo</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">is</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
about the historical record</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">s,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">sources, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and
court cases,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> and </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">just
as Bryan is not,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> I </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">also
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">am not a constitutional
scholar, so this </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">comment</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ary</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">is not directed to Bryan,
the person, who wrote that he studies </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
but </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">is written </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in
layman’s language </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">to all
who express what I, also a student of </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
call the </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that dual U.S./foreign citizenship was John Jay’s </span><b>“</b><b>implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">original genesis original
intent </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">reason</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
for underlining the word </span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in </span><b>“natural born C</b><b>i</b><b>tizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George Washington.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Here
is how I, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">a </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">layman
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">student </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">like Bryan, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">explain
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in layman’s language, for
example, </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“it seems to
me”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;"> language, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">what
John Jay really meant by <i>implication</i> on July 25, 1787, an <i>implication</i>
what was incorporated into Article II Section 1 clause 5 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">when</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
the </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">spankin’</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
brand new U.S. Constitution </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">was
adopted </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">on September 17,
1787 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">by </span><b>ALL</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of the </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">constitutional
convention </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">delegates and
sent to the states for ratification by </span><b>ALL</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of the states without a</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ny
suggestion that a</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> word </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">or
words needed to be changed after ratification by amendment</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
In the case of the </span><b>“</b><b>implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">original meaning of </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
explicit words </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">“natural
born Citizen” – </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
</span><b>“</b><b>implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
meaning</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">of
“nbC” </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">was </span><b>NOT</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
challenged </span><b>OR</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> debated
by the convention delegates </span><b>OR</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
by the states’ ratifiers, which included New York state ratifier
John Jay </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">who definitely knew
what he meant on July 25, 1787 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">when
he underlined the word “</span><b>born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in </span><b>“natural born Citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in his note to Washington</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Hmm…
what does </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">adoption and
ratification of the new constitution </span><b>“as is”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> tell us</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
natural born citizen</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><b>“crank
nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholars
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">about the </span><b>“implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
meaning of the language of Article II Section 1 clause 5</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">?</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
</span><i><b>first thing</b></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that tells us is</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> that John
Jay could </span><b>NOT</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> have
implied </span><b>EITHER</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
singular U.S. citizenship </span><b>OR</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
dual U.S./foreign citizenship as qualifying a person to be president.
Why? Well, there is no record of a debate ab</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">o</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ut
the meaning</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">s</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of </span><b>“natural”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> or
</span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> or
</span><b>“citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> and
definitely, absolutely zero, zilch, nada, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">no</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
debate about the </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“explicit”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><b>OR</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implicit”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
meaning of “natural born Citizen” </span><b>BEFORE</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
it was inserted into Article II Section 1 clause 5 of the new
Constitution.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Since
Jay </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">underlined the word
</span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> common
sense dictates that Jay </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">implied
that </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> singular
U.S. citizenship would qualify a person to be president. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Also,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
and </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">since</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
our common sense is the same as the common sense of the convention
delegates </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">in 1787</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">our </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">common
sense </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">today in 2017</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">dictates</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">because </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
singular U.S. citizenship qualif</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">i</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">es
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">a person to be president,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the </span><b>“implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
meaning of </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
singular U.S. citizenship</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
would </span><b>NOT</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> need to be
debated.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Right?
Yes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
<i><b>second thing</b></i> that tells us is that <b>“IF”</b> Jay
had <b>“implied”</b> that dual U.S./foreign citizenship would
qualify a person to be president, that <b>DEFINITELY</b> would have
needed debate, and a record of that debate would be at the fingertips
of every Prof. Amar inspired <i>“implicit constitution”</i>
surrogate who would declare it from the roof tops, so to speak, of
their blogs.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Right?
Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">But,
where are </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">they and their
blogs? Where are </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the John
Jay and Prof. Amar inspired </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implicit
constitution”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
defenders who assert with “constitutional scholar” authority that
</span><b>“implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> in
Jay’s underlining of the word </span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in </span><b>“natural born Citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in his not</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">e</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
to Washington that Jay </span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implie</span></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">d</span></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that </span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">dual
U.S./foreign citizenship qualifies a person to be president?</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">T</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">he
convention delegates would have debated the point </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">before
adopting the constitution on September 17, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">1787
if they got </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">a smidgin’ of
an unsavory rotten egg, uh, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">wind
that Jay </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implied”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship instead of </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
singular U.S. citizenship would qualify a person to command the
military </span><b>AND</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> be
“...eligible to the Office of President” according to the
language of A2S1c5.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">T</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">he
convention delegates would have debated </span><b>“dual”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
and there would be a record of their debate before they sent the
constitution to the states for ratification. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">But,
and it’s a BIG</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> but, the
record of a convention debate and a states’ ratifying debate </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">about
</span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> is
not in the historical record ‘cuz there was no debate by the
convention delegates or by the states’ ratifiers about </span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
dual U.S./foreign citizenship qualifying a person to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
conclusion of this </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar is that John Jay
</span><b>“implied”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> in 1787
that </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> singular
U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be “...eligible to the
Office of President” and that Jay </span><b>NEVER</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implied”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that </span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship qualified a person to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">I</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">n
conclusion, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">I </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">have
noticed that </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar Bryan </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">(he’s
become nicer in his comments)</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
and other</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">s</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in the past </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">on Mario
Apuzzo’s</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> Natural Born
Citizen blog always seem to have a sometimes snarky, sometimes
friendly response to </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Mario’s</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
obvious erudition about </span><b>“natural born Citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in the historical record but </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">they
simply are not persuasive and therefore not convincing</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">but,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
for some reason, little ol’ me, a </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">like
Bryan but</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">who
defends John Jay’s </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">implication</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> singular
U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be president, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">little
ol’ me, I</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><b>NEVER</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
gets a response from </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholar Bryan or et al.
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">Tick… tock… tick…
tock… tick… tock… </span></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">going
on 4 years Bryan</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
All they need to do, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and
it’s really simple and not complicated,</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
is say that J</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ohn J</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ay,
the underliner of the word </span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
and the author of </span><b>“natural born Citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in his </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">July 25, 1787 </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">note
to Washington, meant...</span><b>NOT ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">...</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">singular
U.S. citizenship </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">but</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">...</span><b>AND</b><b>
ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">...</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">d</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ual
U.S./foreign citizenship would qualify a person to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Simple,
right? Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Of
course, they would <b>ALSO</b> need to present the record of the
debate by the delegates and ratifiers that they agreed that Jay
correctly <i>“implied”</i> <b>AND </b><b>ALSO</b> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship would qualify a person to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Simple,
right? Yes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">That’s
all, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">simply </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">adduce
the historical record to educate </span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">scholars </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">who
defend Jay’s </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">implication</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
that </span><b>ONLY</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> singular
U.S. citizenship qualifies a person to be president, and also educate
</span><b>“crank nonsense”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
and </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“implicit
constitution”</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
constitutional scholars like Yale law professor Ak</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">h</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">il
Reed Amar, and Mark Levin, Esq., a</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">n</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">d
Prof. Larry Solum, and Prof. Rob Natelson and, </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">well,
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">so many more </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">who
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">assert with solemnity that a
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">person with </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">dual
U.S./forei</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">g</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">n
citizenship is </span><b>ALSO</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">eligible to be president,
and</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">who
talk and write </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">for and
against </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">“originalism”
b</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ut </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">never
seem to apply their erudition </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and
scholarship </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">to explaining
John Jay’s </span><b>“</b><b>implicit”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">original genesis original
intent </span></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">reason</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">for underlining the word
</span><b>“born”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> in
</span><b>“natural born Citizen”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
in his </span><b>“inspired”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
note to George Washington on July 25, 1787.</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...Tick...Tock...</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-77465620784366987862017-06-24T17:52:00.001-07:002017-06-24T20:10:07.028-07:00Exclusive Original Intent vs. Prof. Akhil Reed Amar's "Implicit" Constitution<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>EXclusive
INTENT dittos </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>or</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>Exclusive
Original Intent vs. Prof. Akhil Reed Amar’s “Implicit”
Constitution</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Today
I also put this on Mario Apuzzo’s Natural Born Citizen blog</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: black;">>>
<a href="https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html">https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</a>
</span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
that is a good point by Carlyle. Did the "legislative or legal
system" clarify...ever?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">On
pages 240-245 of his book <b>The Constitution Today</b> Yale Prof. of
Law Amar seems to think that with the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment the
"system" clarified the issue of who is a citizen and their
birthrights. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">He
says on pages 240-41:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"We
begin with the Constitution itself. The Fourteenth Amendment opens
with a promise of birth equality: 'All persons born . . . in the
United States . . . are citizens; and thus <i>equal</i> [his
emphasis] citizens."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
the last sentence at the bottom of page 240 Amar implies that even
"plop-and-drop" anchor babies are citizens, with the tacit
implication that they are eligible to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">He
says:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"A
child born in America to a family of noncitizen parents is a full
birthright citizen with all the same entitlements and privileges as
any other American child."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Amar
concludes the "birthright citizen" point with a comment
about homosexuality and heterosexuality, and then concludes on page
245 with comments about transgenders, implying that the Fourteenth
Amendment from 1868 on also applies to future changes in America.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">He
says on page 241:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"And
today we make clear that those born gay or lesbian are no less in
civil rights than those born straight."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Amar
extrapolates further about being “born’” on pages 241-245 and
mentions racial equality, civil rights, sex discrimination, women's
civil rights, being born blind, diseases, marriage laws, religious
equality, racial separation, etc., and concludes with this comment
about <b>“equality and freedom”</b>:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">He
says:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">To
put this point about the deep connection between equality and freedom
a different way – and to explain from yet another angle why we now
must vindicate the enacted letter and spirit of the Fourteenth
Amendment without being hamstrung by every specific nontextual and
unratified factual or normative assumption that its framers may have
held – we today take judicial notice of the following basic and
widespread facts of our modern world. Sexual intimacy and human
procreation have been profoundly decoupled in the last half-century.
Persons can have babies without having sex (in vitro fertilization)
and ….”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
a few more comments about marriage laws, genders, transgenders
staying married to their spouses and creating a same-sex marriage,
transgender birth certificates and transgender driver’s licenses
and transgender passports, Amar concludes his comments with a
sentence which implies that what law professors say the law means
today is what the law meant to the law writers of the past – last
week or last century or 1868:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">He
says:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Our
fundamental nature is not male or female, black or white, but human,
pure and simple. Our most basic law must recognize these basic facts
of modern life, modern law, and modern science.”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
I would like to add to a previous comment that I put here on June 20,
2017 at 10:45 PM in which I finished with <i>"This is not a
previous essay, but it is definitely an excellent point about the
Fourteenth Amendment and 'citizenship rights'”.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Yes,
it’s an excellent point – <b>except for Prof. Amar's implication</b>
that the Fourteenth Amendment is the constitutional authority that
allows plop-and-drop anchor babies, who are born on U.S. soil to
parents who are not U.S. citizens, to be eligible to be president.
The implication is shallow, thoughtless, irrational, and <i><b>contrary
to self-preservation</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
as a lawyer, and since this Article II Section clause 5 “natural
born Citizen” debate will never die as long as “natural born
Citizen” remains in the constitution, you should challenge Prof.
Amar here on your Natural Born Citizen blog about his <b>“equality
and freedom”</b> proposition, something that he has been writing
about for years. You should publicly challenge the <b>“equality and
freedom”</b> of Prof. Amar in the context of a person being
eligible to be president as being <b>“contrary to
self-preservation”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">relative
to </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">his explicit statement on
page 241:</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">>>
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">"A child born in
America to a family </span><b>of </b><b>noncitizen parents is a full
birthright citizen</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> with all the
same entitlements and privileges as any other American child."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">It
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">is </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">shallow,
thoughtless and irrational </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">for
a tenured law professor to propose that a child born on U.S. soil to
</span><b>"noncitizen parents is a full birthright citizen"</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">because</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
his statement is </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">another way
of say</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ing</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
to the whole world </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">these two
things</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">:</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>(1)</b></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></i><i>All you parents, </i><i><b>citizens of the world</b></i><i>,
y</i><i>ou all come here, you hear, and have your babies in America
and your baby can be president </i><i>of America</i><i> someday just
like wanna be presidents </i><i>Gov. Bobby </i><i>Jindal, </i><i>Sen.
Marco </i><i>Rubio, </i><i>Gov./Amb. Nikki </i><i>Haley –</i><i>
cuz that's what Prof. Amar teaches his students –</i><i> </i><i>the
Fourteenth Amendment includes all peoples of the world who manage to
have their </i><i>anchor baby born, uh, I mean, who manage to have
their </i><i>child touch down on </i><i>U.S. </i><i>soil</i><span style="font-style: normal;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>(2)</b></i><i>
Sure, visit Saudi Arabia or ANY Muslim country, and if you are a
woman and have a child to a Muslim man </i><i>in a Muslim country</i><i>,
well, </i><i>for </i><i>sure, </i><i><b>your baby can also be
president of of America with only one U.S. citizen parent</b></i><i>
just like wanna be president Sen. Ted Cruz – cuz, well, we're
inclusive </i><i>in America, shucks, we're so inclusive that we're
for </i><i><b>"liberty and equality" </b></i><i>for all</i><i>
– so, you all come here, </i><i>now. Hear?</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b>Can
you </b></i><i><b>all </b></i><i><b>hear me now?</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
</span><b>“equality and freedom”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of Prof. Amar </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">being
</span><b>“contrary to self-preservation”</b> is a point that is
NEVER discussed by Amar because nobody ever challenges him, and of
course it is also never mentioned because it is never considered
relevant by Levin, Solum, Natelson and others when they defend using
the Fourteenth Amendment to justify eligibility to be president to
plop-and-drop anchor babies simply because they were born on U.S.
soil to parents who were not U.S. citizens at the time they (the
father who brought the mother) plopped themselves onto a hospital bed
and dropped their anchor baby.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
if anybody wants to read more, here is the url and three dates from
two years ago when I commented about Prof. Amar and his <b>"equality
and freedom"</b> emphasis, although previously he phrased it
<b>"liberty and equality"</b> consistently in his 2012 book
<i><b>America's Unwritten Constitution: </b></i><i><b>The Precedents
and Principles We Live B</b></i><i><b>y</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: black;">>>
</span><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html</a>
</span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html?showComment=1434942442157#c7127191249188949390">June
21, 2015 at 11:07 PM</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html?showComment=1435175543497#c3589021764546079949">June
24, 2015 at 3:52 PM</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html?showComment=1435341672315#c2277705275052225966">June
26, 2015 at 2:01 PM</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">June
24, 2015 at 3:52 PM – Prof. Amar's Three Rules for amendments
<b>"...that fits our tradition"</b>: </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Rule
# 1: Amendments must add to Liberty and Equality</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_Flag
Burning</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_Campaign
Finance Reform</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_Marriage
and Tradition</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Rule
#2: Both Political Parties Must Agree</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Rule
#3: States Test Ideas First</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_Direct
Election of the President</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_POTUS
Eligibility of Foreign Born</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">_Homosexual
Marriage "Implicitly" in the Constitution</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">1-
Flag Burning </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">2-
Campaign Finance Reform </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">3-
Marriage and Tradition </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">4-
Direct Election of the President </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">5-
POTUS Eligibility for Foreign Born </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">6-
Homosexual Marriage "Implicitly" in the Constitution </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Prof.
Amar's comments, as a recognized constitutional law scholar and
political scientist, are intended to be socially transformative and,
as he self-identified in the panel discussion, a registered Democrat,
so, as the current Democratic Party is constituted since the </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">n</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ew
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Democrat</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
activists, </span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">aka
Liberals, aka Progressives, aka Socialists, aka Marxists, aka
whatever new “ist” fits,</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
took it over, Prof. Amar's comments reveal, politically, progressive
new thought socialism with a new meaning to</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>“liberty and
equality”</b></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">and
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>“implicit.”</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Although
Professor Amar does not reference Article II and “natural born
Citizen” in this panel discussion, his <b>“liberty and equality”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">focus, along with his
</span><b>“...three rules, prescriptive and descriptive...for
constitutional amendments”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">,</span>
indicates that the Constitution's heterosexual preamble word
“posterity,” as related to the three heterosexual related POTUS
eligibility requirement words “natural born Citizen,” will
require the exclusivity of “natural born Citizen” as a reference
to ONLY birth on U.S. soil ONLY to two U.S. citizen married parents
to be excised from Article II by removing the written words “natural
born Citizen” from the Constitution. The excision of “natural
born Citizen” from Article II will be the necessary consequence if
Prof. Amar's <b>“liberty and equality”</b> proposal to amend the
written Constitution to include homosexuality is endorsed by all
political parties and then ratified by the states because the
<b>“implicit constitution”</b> of Prof. Amar condones the
implication of including natural law homosexuality to be on par with
natural law heterosexuality. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Professor
Amar's 2012 book, titled<i><b> </b></i><i><b>America's Unwritten
Constitution: </b></i><i><b>The Precedents and Principles We Live
B</b></i><i><b>y*</b></i>, and the first chapter, titled <i><b>Reading
Between the Lines: America's Implicit Constitution</b></i>, indicate
that as a socialist progressive, Yale Law Prof. Amar can allow
anything to be “implicit” in the written Constitution if it
promotes the agenda to “transform the United States of America”
by transforming the U.S. Constitution into a <b>“liberty and
equality”</b> “implicit constitution” in which can be found
anything, including promoting the homosexual agenda of less than 2%
of the American population. <span style="font-weight: normal;">S</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ee
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">below </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">a</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">n</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><b>“</b><b>implicitly”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">constitutional </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">new
meaning: </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">“...no
discrimination on the grounds of </span></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">[homosexual]</span></span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></i><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">sex. I think it would
be nice to have that in our federal constitution. It's</span></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
[homosexual “sex” is]</span></span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>already there
implicitly</b></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">”
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">followed
in the next sentence with </span></span><i><b>“States are giving us
gay marriage”</b></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
</span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">*America's
Unwritten Constitution (
<span style="background: #cfe7f5;">http://www.americasunwrittenconstitution.com/</span>
)</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Prof.
Amar's intent is to amend</span> the U.S. Constitution with three
amendments so that each <b>“...fits our tradition”</b> as he
defines “tradition,” specifically the tradition of marriage and
posterity since the 1787 “We the People” wrote the words <i><b>“...to
form a more perfect Union”</b></i><i> </i>for themselves and their
<b>“Posterity”</b> as the Union populated. If Prof. Amar's three
amendments listed below are ratified, at least one amendment will be
required for the <b>excision </b><span style="font-weight: normal;">of
the natural law related words “natural born Citizen” from Article
II to accommodate the </span><b>inclusion by amendment</b> of
positive law homosexual marriage and the <b>elevation by amendment</b>
of natural law homosexuality, a consistent 1% to 2% of the population
by recruiting through media ridicule and propaganda, to an equal
status with natural law heterosexuality.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Since
Prof. Amar spent so much space (pp. 241-245) on sexuality and
ramifications in society of the transgender phenomenon (e.g., staying
married to a spouse), I will conclude with a brief non-lawyers
response (hey, I’m just one guy in El Paso, Texas – if not me,
who?) to his erudite comments, he being a Yale tenured law professor
and a constitutional scholar and all that implies about his erudite
astuteness (whew, can I handle the stress? Yes – I write, you
decide).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Neither
“natural law homosexuality” (the activity) nor “natural law
heterosexuality” (the activity) require a “positive law” to be
actively practiced – activity is by choice alone, activity is not
mandated by positive law or natural law ( the “activity” of
celibacy is ONLY by choice, “mindset” – not by birth,
“bodyset”). Neither homosexuality nor heterosexuality are
activities determined by birth alone or by birth at all. Being male
or female is<b> </b><b>by </b><b>birth alone</b> – engaging in
sexual activity is <b>by choice alone</b> as bisexuality and the
transgender phenomenon prove daily. <b>Bisexuality and transgenderism
are mindsets, not bodysets</b>. A transgender person is exhibiting a
<b>“mindset”</b> about the <b>body</b>, not a <b>“bodyset”</b>
about the <b>mind</b>. Transgenderism is public proof that
homosexuality is a “mindset” activity and not a “bodyset”
activity. Being male or female is a “bodyset” that is not
determined by a “mindset” of choice. Being male or female is,
well, “being” – not choosing. Activity is “choosing” –
not being.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
in conclusion, if Prof. Amar is not challenged in writing and or
debate his <b>“liberty and equality”</b> amendments to the
constitution, if accepted in the classrooms of America and adopted
and ratified by the people of the states, they will “transform”
the original meaning of the Constitution's 1787 preamble words
<b>“posterity”</b> and <b>“Union.”</b> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">(http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2017/06/exclusive-original-intent-vs-prof-akhil.html)</span></span></span></div>
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-52240452335685963352017-06-20T19:31:00.003-07:002017-06-21T14:41:29.050-07:00Natural Born Citizen Debates - Redux<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Natural
Born Citizen Debates – Redux</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mario
Apuzzo, David Ramsay, Emer de Vattel</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mark
Levin, Larry Solum, Robert Natelson & Akhil Amar</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
also posted this on Mario Appuzo’s Natural Born Citizen blog</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">>>
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</a>
</span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
have another suggestion for a heavy hitter “natural born citizen”
debate opponent for you, Yale Law Professor Akhil Reed Amar, However,
if his page 38 footnote inserted into his 2008 Slate.com essay in his
last book is an indicator, you don’t stand a chance... cough,
cough, of staying awake.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
the quote from my previous comment here on June 2, 2017 at 8:18 PM
about Prof. Robert Natelson being added to the opposition’s natural
born citizen debate roster to “clarify what he, Natelson, meant
about Vattel’s clarification about “parents”, there are some
comments by Yale Law Prof. Akhil Reed Amar from his 2016 book
incorporating his essays, <i><b>The Constitution Today –</b></i><i><b>
Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era</b></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">My
</span></span>suggestion is that Prof. Amar should be included in the
debate roster of those who propose that dual U.S./foreign citizenship
is the original genesis original intent of Article II Section 1
clause 5and the Fourteenth Amendment, and that dual U.S./foreign
citizenship is sufficient for a person to be “...eligible to the
Office of President”. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">To
put it another way, Yale Law Prof. Amar should be included in the
list of debaters against you on the side of the opposition who
promote the shallow proposition that dual U.S./foreign citizenship
parents, married or unmarried to each other, can produce a singular
U.S. citizenship child, aka a natural born citizen, <b>“by birth
alone”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">. </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Also,</span>
to add to my debate suggestion against the proposition that dual
U.S./foreign citizenship is sufficient to be eligible to be
president, and contrary to Prof. Amar’s comments below (see
<b>“</b><span lang="en-US"><b>relevant congressional statute</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">conferred</span></i></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>birth-based American citizenship</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>”</b></span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">in footnote 38 below</span>), citizenship
by positive law is NOT citizenship by <b>“birth”</b> alone and
positive law should NOT be adduced in opposition to the proposition
that a “natural born Citizen” is by <b>“birth”</b> alone and
so is the ONLY U.S. citizen eligible to be president. If Levin,
Solum, Natelson, and Amar will stipulate that positive law
(<b>“conferring”</b>) is not the solution to clarifying natural
law (<b>“birth”</b>), then the concomitant proposition follows
that a “citizen” by positive law should NOT be adduced into the
debate to define the meaning of “natural born Citizen” if
eligibility to be president can be ONLY by <b>“birth”</b> alone.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">My
point is that all that Levin, Solum, Natelson, Amar and pinch
hitters/debaters et al. need to do is persuade us today, and, in
absentia of course, John Jay, George Washington, 100% of the
delegates who adopted the language of the Constitution on September
17, 1787 and eventually 100% of the ratifiers of the several states,
which includes ratifier John Jay from New York, that when John Jay
suggested on July 25, 1787 in his note to George Washington that
military “command” should not “devolve” on anyone but a
“natural born Citizen”, the dual U.S./foreign citizenship is
sufficient to be “...eligible to the Office of President”
proponents need to clarify why Jay did NOT mean that eligibility to
be president was derived exclusively by</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship; and</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
<b>“by birth alone”</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">; </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">and</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents; and</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
married to each (NOT multiple wives as with Muslims); and</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ONLY
before the birth of the child.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Also,
in addition to what Jay did NOT mean exclusively in 1787 America,
those who oppose ONLY singular U.S. citizenship need to persuade us
today in 2017 America that Jay ALSO meant (and George Washington
tacitly agreed when he passed Jay’s suggestion to the convention
delegates) that “natural born Citizen” also meant, or, at least,
<b>“could” have meant</b>, as the 1790 Naturalization Act
“natural born citizen” language implied until corrected by the
1795 Naturalization Act “citizen” language, that eligibility to
be president could be derived by those</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">1
– born on U.S. soil to only one U.S. citizen parent, married or not
to the reproductive partner, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">OR
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">2
– born on foreign soil to either two OR one U.S. citizen parent,
married or not to the reproductive partner,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">OR</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">3
– born on U.S. soil to ZERO U.S. citizen parents, married or not to
the reproductive partner.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Number
3 is the absurd conclusion</b> of the U.S. citizen parents are not
necessary fiat decision of the 1898 U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark court that
Levin, Solum, Natelson, and Amar, who, as proponents of dual
U.S./foreign citizenship, are really proposing a shallow legal
assumption about the legal meaning of “natural born Citizen” in
Article II Section 1 clause 5 that leads to the equally shallow
conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment is constitutional authority
for plop-and-drop “anchor babies” born on U.S. soil to alien
parents and U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Sen.
Marco Rubio, also born on U.S. soil to alien parents, are
“...eligible to the Office of President”.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
all Levin, Solum, Natelson, and Amar and et al. need to do is
persuade themselves first and then us that Jay was totally inclusive
and not exclusive when he underlined the word “born” in his
“natural born Citizen” note to Washington. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Simple,
huh? That’s all they need to do.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">For
context about Prof. Amar, here is my previous comment about including
Prof. Natelson into your debate roster.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
posting the previous comment today (June 2, 2017 at 12:38 PM) about
debates with Mark Levin and Professor Larry Solum I remembered
Professor Robert Natelson, author of <span lang="en-US"><i><b>The
Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant</b></i></span><span lang="en-US">,
</span><span lang="en-US">3</span><sup><span lang="en-US">rd</span></sup><span lang="en-US">
Edition, </span><span lang="en-US">published in 2014. He did not add
anything to the text of the 2nd Edition published in 2011, but he did
add footnote #25 about Emer de Vattel and how Vattel </span><span lang="en-US"><b>"clarified"</b></span><span lang="en-US">
what he meant </span><span lang="en-US">by</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US"><b>“</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>parents”</b></span><span lang="en-US">.
</span><span lang="en-US">After the quote from Natelson’s book
</span><span lang="en-US">about Emer de Vattel</span><span lang="en-US">
is your quote about </span><span lang="en-US">David Ramsay that
Natelson should be asked about to clarify what he, Natelson, meant
about Vattel’</span><span lang="en-US">s</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">clarification</span><span lang="en-US">.”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Now,
h</span><span lang="en-US">ere </span><span lang="en-US">are some of</span><span lang="en-US">
Prof. Amar’s comment</span><span lang="en-US">s related to</span><span lang="en-US">
wh</span><span lang="en-US">y </span><span lang="en-US">a “citizen”
</span><span lang="en-US">with only one U.S. citizen parent </span><span lang="en-US">(see
page 38 footnote </span><span lang="en-US">below</span><span lang="en-US">)</span><span lang="en-US">
is</span><span lang="en-US"> eligible to be president. </span><span lang="en-US">He
states on page</span><span lang="en-US">s</span><span lang="en-US"> 4
</span><span lang="en-US">and 5</span><span lang="en-US"> that </span><span lang="en-US">his
book is composed of his essays: </span><span lang="en-US"><i>“The
essays are organized by subject matter so that the reader may see the
larger patterns of argument that run through them. … To preserve
the integrity of the historical record, I’ve used this book’s
footnotes and endnotes to identify all important substantive
changes.”</i></span><span lang="en-US"> </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Mario,
to me t</span><span lang="en-US">his </span><span lang="en-US">statement
about </span><span lang="en-US"><b>“</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>substantive
changes”</b></span><span lang="en-US">, specifically</span><span lang="en-US">
his </span><span lang="en-US">long</span><span lang="en-US"> footnote
</span><span lang="en-US">on page 38 </span><span lang="en-US">about
a “citizen” who is “...eligible to the Office of President”
(my words)</span><span lang="en-US">,</span><span lang="en-US"> </span><span lang="en-US">means
that his footnote is all he thought was needed to deal with the
</span><span lang="en-US"><b>“hullabaloo”</b></span><span lang="en-US">
about the </span><span lang="en-US"><b>“presidential eligibility”</b></span><span lang="en-US">
of then Senator Obama </span><span lang="en-US">in 2008</span><span lang="en-US">
and Senator Cruz </span><span lang="en-US">in 2016</span><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Although
“natural born citizen” is on page 36 in the text, t</span><span lang="en-US">he
Index does not list “natural born citizen”, “natural”,
“born”, or “citizen”, but it does list </span><span lang="en-US"><b>“citizenship
rights</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
406; </span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>birthright citizenship</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
38(fn); </span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>detention of an “enemy
combatant</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,”
207-208; </span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>Obama and Cruz’s
presidential eligibility</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
38(fn); </span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>presidential
qualifications</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
36, 263”. </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">All
empheses are in the original.</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><b>Page
3</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>6</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>[</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>-37</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>]</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Slate
essay: </span></span><span lang="en-US"><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
Constitution and the Candidates</span></i></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
(2008)</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">presidential
eligibility”</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Consider
next the Constitution’s rule that the president </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">b</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">e
“a natural born citizen”—a </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">rule
that focuses not on </span></span><b><span lang="en-US"><i>where</i></span></b><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
a person becomes a citizen, but </span></span><b><span lang="en-US"><i>when</i></span></b><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.
To be </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">eligible,
one must be </span></span><b><span lang="en-US"><i>born</i></span></b><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
a citizen </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">rather
than naturalized at some later date. At the Founding, a special
constitutional clause provided tha</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">t</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
even those who had not been citizens at birth could nevertheless
become president, if they were citizens circa 1787. Thus, Alexander
Hamilton, born in the West Indies, was clearly eligible. All those
already in America in 1787 could be trusted; but the framers fretted
that an Old World earl or duke might someday sail across the Atlantic
with a boatload of gold and bribe his way into the presidency. (Rumor
had it that George III’s second son, the Bishop of Osnaburgh, would
soon head this way.) Thus, the “natural-born” clause’s main
target of concern was not immigrants generally, but wealthy European
aristocrats who might wreak havoc in an America lacking strong
campaign finance laws.</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
Constitution’s final requirement—fourteen years of U.S.
residence—also focused on transoceanic travel and made clear that
loyal Americans who had spent years or even decades abroad were
nonetheless welcome to pursue the American presidency. (The document
pointedly did not require decades of continuous and uninterrupted
residence in the U.S.) ….”</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">[...snip…
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">to
page 37</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">]</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Later
amendments have further opened the door of eligibility. Nothing at
the Founding required that state election laws give equal </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">t</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">reatment
to black or female voters or office seekers. </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">The
Constitution’s Fifteenth and Nineteenth Amendments corrected these
Founding lapses, promising blacks and women the rights to vote and to
be voted for as full political equals.”</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><b>P</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>age
38 footnote</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Slate
essay: </span><span lang="en-US"><i>The Constitution and the
Candidates</i></span><span lang="en-US"> (2008)</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">birthright
citizenship” </span><span lang="en-US">& “Obama and Cruz’s
presidential eligibility”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">[</span><span lang="en-US">After
a short comment in the text about Sen. John McCain, </span><span lang="en-US">the</span><span lang="en-US">
footnote </span><span lang="en-US">that references the </span><span lang="en-US"><b>“hullabaloo”</b></span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">about natural born citizen – </span><span lang="en-US"><b>“hullabaloo”</b></span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">??? – </span><span lang="en-US">starts
with </span><span lang="en-US"><i>“extra information </i></span><span lang="en-US"><i>for
readers interested</i></span><span lang="en-US"><i>...”</i></span><span lang="en-US"><i>.</i></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">A
question for Prof. Amar: </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">Is
this </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">long
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">footnote
the best that Prof. Amar, being a constitutional scholar and all that
implies, like constitutional scholars Levin, Solum, and Natelson, is
this footnote the best Prof. Amar can do… after eight years dealing
with the “nbC” </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;"><b>“hullabaloo”</b></span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">?</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-style: normal;">]</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><span lang="en-US">[...the
brackets [] below in the next paragraph are in the page 38 footnote]</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">[Extra
information for readers interested in the more recent hullabaloo
about Obama’s birth certificate and the questions raised about Ted
Cruz’s presidential eligibility: Cruz is eligible even though he
was undeniably born in Canada. At the time of his birth, the relevant
congressional statute conferred birth-based American citizenship on
any foreign-born baby who had at least one parent who was a U.S.
citizen, so long as that parent had met certain conditions of
extensive prior physical presence in the United States. On the day of
his birth, Cruz’s mother was a U.S. citizen, even though his father
was not; and his mother also met the relevant rules of extensive
prior physical presence. Why then, would Obama have been any
different even if he </span><b><span lang="en-US"><i>had</i></span></b><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">been born in Kenya, as has been
(preposterously but repeatedly) claimed by various critics, led by
Donald Trump? </span><span lang="en-US">Like Cruz, Obama’s mother
was a U.S. citizen on the day of his birth, even though, like Cruz,
his father was not. And nothing in the relevant congressional statute
treats a Kenyan birth as any different from a Canadian birth. The
</span><span lang="en-US">answer to this puzzle is that the
congressional law on the books when Obama was born required a
foreign-born child to have at least one citizen parent who had been
physically present in the United States at least five years after age
fourteen. Obama’s mother did not clear this bar because she was
only eighteen when she gave birth. So this birth had to happen in the
United States to make her son a citizen at birth. Of course this
birth did in actual fact happen in the United States—in the state
of Hawaii—and except for the children of foreign diplomats, </span><span lang="en-US"><i>anyone</i></span><span lang="en-US">
born these days in the United States is a birthright citizen under
the Constitution itself, whether or not the baby’s parents are
themselves citizens. (This birthright citizenship is the clear
command of the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment, see pp.
240-245.) For this law on the books on Obama’s birthday, see Act of
June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 235-36; Title III, ch. 1, section 301(a)(7).
For on the meaning of “natural born” see p. 42 n. 14.</span><span lang="en-US">]”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><b>Page
</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>2</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>0</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>7-208</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">New
Republic </span><span lang="en-US">essay:</span><span lang="en-US">
Go Directly To Jail</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">enemy
combatant”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Question
5: What difference does it make that Padilla<i>[*]</i> is an American?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i>[</i><i>*
Jose Padilla, aka Abdullah al-Muhajir is a U.S. citizen, and is
simply being “detained” as a “soldier”. </i><i>The Arabic
“abdullah” means “slave of Allah”</i><i>]</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“…<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">.
But the government is not (yet) charging Padilla with a crime. For
now, they are simply treating him as a soldier. Why should he get
more rights than a typical prisoner of war simply because he may also
be a criminal? Why should he get <b><i>more</i></b>
rights than all the detainees in Guantanamo simply because, unlike
the rest, if he is indeed a soldier then he has also betrayed his
country (whereas the others owed America no loyalty in the first
place)?”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><b>Page
</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>26</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>4</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Slate
essay: Two and a Quarter</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">presidential
qualifications”</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Consider
also the way that the states elect governors—directly by the
voters, one person, one vote. If the federal electoral college is so
good, why does no state closely follow it? Let’s scrap it. And if
naturalized Americans like California’s Arnold Schwarzenegger and
Michigan’s Jennifer Granholm can be trusted to serve as governors,
why not amend the federal Constitution to allow them to run for
president? In fact, in 2004, the Senate held hearings on just such a
proposed amendment, sponsored by Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and
strongly endorsed by several congressional Democrats.”</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">[Soft-socialist
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">S</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">chwarzenegger
lost California to </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">hard-</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">socialists
and Granholm did nothing to stop the socialists from “transforming”
Michigan, so they are definitely not </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">liberty
vs. tyranny </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">role
model</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">s</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
for amendment propositions </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">for
the same commonsense reason that the BREXIT </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">initiator of
26 years ago and 2016 BREXIT </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">hero
Nigel Farage is not a role model to “transform” America, with or without
absurd amendment propositions—they are not U.S. natural born
citizens </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">by
</span></span><span lang="en-US"><b>“birth”</b></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
alone</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">]</span></span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><b>Page
</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>406</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Conclusion
</span><span lang="en-US">(not an essay)</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">–
“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">citizenship
rights”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">Simply
put, the written Constitution is often wise—typically, wiser than
judges acting on their own steam—because the document distills the
democratic input of many minds over many generations. … Later
generations of ordinary Americans mobilized to enshrine in this terse
text an end to slavery, a sweeping guarantee of equal birthright
citizenship, an emphatic commitment to protecting civil rights
against all levels of government, and radical expansions of the
rights of political participation—to blacks, to women, to the poor,
to the young, and more. These were epic democratic achievements, and
they are all worthy of profound respect by today’s Americans. We,
the people of the twenty-first century, thus do well to ponder the
collected and collective wisdom of this old and intergenerational
text.”</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<i><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">[</span><span lang="en-US">This
is not a previous essay, but it is definitely</span><span lang="en-US">
an excellent point about the Fourteenth Amendment </span><span lang="en-US">and</span><span lang="en-US">
“citizenship rights” - except for Prof. Amar's implication that the Fourteenth Amendment is the constitutional authority that allows plop-and-drop anchor babies, who are born on U.S. soil to parents who are not U.S. citizens, to be eligible to be president. The implication is shallow, thoughtless, irrational, and contrary to self-preservation.</span><span lang="en-US">]</span></span></span></span></i></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "times new roman" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">2017-06-02</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Natural
Born Citizen Debates</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mario
Apuzzo, David Ramsay, Emer de Vattel</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mark
Levin, Larry Solum, Robert Natelson</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
posting the previous comment today (June 2, 2017 at 12:38 PM) about
debates with Mark Levin and Professor Larry Solum I remembered
Professor Robert Natelson, author of <span lang="en-US"><i><b>The
Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant</b></i></span><span lang="en-US">,
</span><span lang="en-US">3</span><sup><span lang="en-US">rd</span></sup><span lang="en-US">
Edition, </span><span lang="en-US">published in 2014. He did not add
anything to the text of the 2nd Edition published in 2011, but he did
add footnote #25 about Emer de Vattel and how Vattel </span><span lang="en-US"><b>"clarified"</b></span><span lang="en-US">
what he meant </span><span lang="en-US">by</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US"><b>“</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>parents”</b></span><span lang="en-US">.
</span><span lang="en-US">After the quote from Natelson’s book
</span><span lang="en-US">about Emer de Vattel</span><span lang="en-US">
is your quote about </span><span lang="en-US">David Ramsay that
Natelson should be asked about to clarify what he, Natelson, meant
about Vattel’</span><span lang="en-US">s</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">clarification</span><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span lang="en-US">P</span><span lang="en-US">rofessor
Rob Natelson</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">"...Vattel
wrote of citizenship following "parents," at several later
points he </span><b>clarified that, as in England, foreign-born
children followed the status of their fathers."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">On
pages 147-48 Natelson explains what the language of the U.S.
Constitution in Article II Section 1 clause 5 <b>"...actually
said and meant"</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">; </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
footnote is on page 148</span>:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
Constitution imposed certain qualifications on the President. The
Constitution implied, although it did not state explicitly until
adoption of the Twelfth Amendment, that the same qualifications
applied to the Vice President. Both had to be at least 35 years old,
which was a significant requirement in an age in which even people
who survived childhood often did not live beyond their 50s. The idea
was to better assure a certain amount of maturity and wisdom. Also,
both had to have resided within the country for the previous fourteen
years.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Most
importantly, the President and Vice President had to be natural-born
citizens or citizens at the time of ratification. We know exactly
what the founders meant by the phrase "natural-born citizen"
because they adapted it from the English legal term, "natural
born subject," which in Britain defined who could serve in
Parliament or the Privy Council(25). Essentially, a natural-born
citizen was one who met either one of two requirements. First, a
person qualified if born within the United States or within American
territory, even if the person's parents were aliens. Alternatively,
an individual qualified even if born outside the country if the
individual's father was an American citizen not then engaged in
traitorous or felonious activities.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"These
birth and residence requirements were designed better to assure that
these officers were truly sympathetic to those they were to govern,
and to guard against the risk that they might be sympathetic to a
foreign power(26).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"There
was no constitutional requirement that a President or Vice President
be male. The pronoun "he" used throughout the Constitution
was generic(27)."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"(25)Since
the publication of the first edition, several readers have contacted
me to argue that "natural born" should be defined as Emer
Vattel defined it in his international law treatise. Invariably their
argument is driven by hope that Vattel's definition, if applied,
would disqualify from the presidency some politician they dislike.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
Constitution's meaning does not, however, depend on one's political
hopes. The document generally employed domestic legal terms according
to English usage. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">As
Vattel acknowledged, the English standard for "natural born"
varied from the international standard with respect to children born
<i>within</i> the country; as to children born <i>outside</i> the
country, the rules were the same. (Although at one point in his book
Vattel wrote of citizenship following "parents," at several
later points he clarified that, as in England, foreign-born children
followed the status of their fathers.)”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>David
Ramsay</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">M</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ario,
here </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">is
</span></span><b><span lang="en-US">a short snippet</span></b><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">your
comment about David Ramsay, and the url on your blog </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">for
those who want to read it all</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">:</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Here
we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential
Founder defined a natural born citizen. Noah Webster, 1828, in
explaining how an American dictionary of the English language was
necessary because American words took on different meanings than the
same word in England, placed David Ramsay among great Founders such
as “Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jay, Madison, Marshall, Ramsay,
Dwight, Smith, Trumbull...”</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">Ramsay,
being of the Foun</span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">ding
generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time
would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><i><b>natural
born citizen</b></i></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"> and he
told us that such a person was one </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><i><b>born
in the country to citizen pare</b></i></span><i><b>nts</b></i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
giving us this definition, it is clear that <i><b>Ramsay did not
follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of
nations</b></i><i>,</i> and Emer de Vattel, who also defined the
“natives, or natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his
highly acclaimed and influential treatise, The Law of Nations, Or,
Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs
of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>We
can reasonably assume that the other Founders and Framers would have
defined a natural born citizen the same way that Ramsay did</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
....</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>It
is valuable because it is evidence of the public meaning of these
terms at the time they were framed and ratified."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
conclusion, Mario, for those who may wonder why the definition of
natural born Citizen is so important I have very simple questions.
Which words of the U.S. Constitution are NOT important? Were the
words of the First Amendment intended to be temporary or perpetual?
How about the Second Amendment? Was the <i><b>“...the security of a
free state”</b></i> intended to be temporary or perpetual? Was John
Jay’s statement in his note to George Washington that the <b>“command
in chief”</b> should <b>“devolve”</b> ONLY on a <i><b>“natural
born Citizen”</b></i> and <b>“...</b><b>eligibility </b><b>to the
Office of President”</b> intended to be temporary or perpetual,
generation to generation, election to election, POTUS to POTUS?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Well,
Mario, you have written <span style="background: transparent;">that
</span><span style="background: transparent;">you </span><span style="background: transparent;">are
</span>ready to debate, so, Mark Levin, Larry Solum, Robert Natelson
and et al., who will be the first to tap the plate? Batter up!</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">U.S.
Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="color: black;">O</span><span style="color: black;">riginal</span><span style="color: black;">B</span><span style="color: black;">irther</span><span style="color: black;">D</span><span style="color: black;">ocument.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-8149822543364671802017-05-29T19:39:00.002-07:002017-06-20T20:16:05.087-07:00Serendipity: 1790 & 1795 Naturalization Acts<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: transparent;">1790-1795
Naturalization Act Serendipity</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: transparent;">or</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: transparent;">From
Error in 1790 to Clarity in 1795 and 2017</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: transparent;">or</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span style="background: transparent;">A
Compass – A Perfect Circle – John Jay – nbC</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">I
also posted this on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog:</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">>>
https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/07/carmon-elliott-files-petition-for-writ.html</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Hi
Mario...again,</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">I
wanted to clarify a couple of things in my previous comment here on
your blog (April 14, 2017 at 12:46 AM) about Larry Solum and his </span><span style="background: transparent;">ten
</span><span style="background: transparent;">articles about
originalism</span><span style="background: transparent;">, </span><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">The
Case for Originalism</span></b></i><span style="background: transparent;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><span style="background: transparent;">>>
http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2017/04/the-case-for-originalism-links-to-all-the-posts.html</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">First
I will clarify my previous comment, followed by a long quote about
the value of a centered circle, a perfect circle drawn with a compass
instead of freehand. Then I will briefly relate the centered perfect
circle to John Jay and his original meaning of "natural born
Citizen" and how John Jay and HIS original meaning of "nbC"
is the "center" that brings understanding and "centers"
the discussion without discussion of ephemeral constructs, ethereal
constructs, airy constructs, vaporous constructs that like soap
bubbles go POP when not attached to a concrete issue like what did
John Jay mean when HE authored the phrase "natural born Citizen"
in the context of eligibility to be POTUS. That is the unsatisfying
aspect of reading all of Solum's originalism articles. If he had
discussed something as concrete as the original intent of "natural
born Citizen" instead of esoteric legal issues, which I find
interesting and worth analyzing and discussing, he would probably
have included the discussion in <i>Part One: Framing the Debate</i>,
<i>Part Four: The Fixation Thesis</i>, and <i>Part Five: The Argument
for Originalism from the Rule of Law</i>.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">I
noticed that what I wrote seems to imply that Mark Levin was
mentioned in Solum's originalism articles. What I intended to say,
concerning the constitutional "scholars" and their public
statements about the original meaning of "natural born Citizen"
is that they do not include any reference to John Jay's 1787 original
meaning, and that everybody that Solum <i>"adduces as
significant commentators about 'originalism' are insignificant,"</i>
for that reason, and the "insignificant" commentators
includes others like Mark Levin whom Solum did NOT reference in his
series of articles.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Now,
</span><span style="background: transparent;">they are not
insignificant, and </span><span style="background: transparent;">here
is the clarification:</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">A</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">bsolute</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">ly</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">
none</span></b></i><span style="background: transparent;"> of the
constitutional "scholars" that Solum mentions, including
Solum himself, and none of the constitutional "scholars"
that he does not mention, which includes Mark Levin </span><span style="background: transparent;">and
others</span><span style="background: transparent;">, </span><span style="background: transparent;">are</span><span style="background: transparent;">
</span><i><span style="background: transparent;">"insignificant"</span></i><span style="background: transparent;">
as constitutional "scholars." </span><span style="background: transparent;">They
are "insignificant" in that their conclusions are
"insignificant" when they try to define "natural born
Citizen" without adducing the source of the phrase, John Jay in
his July 25, 1787 note to his good friend George Washington.</span><span style="background: transparent;">
</span><span style="background: transparent;">In fact, Solums' </span><i><b><span style="background: transparent;">The
Case for Originalism *</span></b></i><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background: transparent;">,</span></span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background: transparent;">
</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background: transparent;">starting
with the </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="background: transparent;">intro</span></span><span style="background: transparent;">duction,
"</span><b><span style="background: transparent;">Part One:
Framing the Debate</span></b><span style="background: transparent;">,"</span><span style="background: transparent;">
is brilliant! After reading it people will probably </span><span style="background: transparent;">say</span><span style="background: transparent;">
that it is excellent, so, how can Solum, </span><span style="background: transparent;">whose
congressional testimony endorsing the nomination of Judge Gorsuch was
also excellent, </span><span style="background: transparent;">be so
wrong about Barack Obama being "eligible to the Office of
President" </span><span style="background: transparent;">when he
had ONLY one U.S. citizen parent?</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>*
The Case For Originalism:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
One: Framing the Debate</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Two: Methods of Justification</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Three: The Baseline Comparison of Originalism with Constitutional
Eclecticism</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Four: The Fixation Thesis</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Five: The Argument for Originalism from the Rule of Law</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Six: The Argument for Originalism from Legitimacy</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Seven: Underdeterminacy and the Construction Zone</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Eight: Some Objections to the Constraint Principle</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Nine: The Importance of Pairwise Comparisons</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Part
Ten: Implementing Originalism and a Conclusion</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">So,,
how could Solum be so excellent about Gorsuch's originalism and for
that reason be fit to be a SCOTUS justice and so wrong about Obama's
eligibility to be POTUS? Well, maybe because Solum was not "centered"
on John Jay and Jay's "original genesis original intent"
meaning about "natural born Citizen."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
point of being "centered" brings me to the quote below (p.
330-31) from Joseph Telushkin's 2016 HarperCollins softcover
biography: <i>REBBE – The Life and Teachings of Menachem M.
[</i><i>M</i><i>endel] Schneerson, the Most Influential Rabbi in
Modern History </i><span style="font-style: normal;">(1902-1994)</span>.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Instead
of paraphrasing this conversation between the Jewish seventh
Lubavitcher Rebbe and a young student, how the Rebbe "centers"
the student is relevant to how Solum, a true constitutional "scholar"
and other true constitutional "scholars" like Mark Levin
can become informed about John Jay's 1787 meaning of "natural
born Citizen" by becoming constitutionally "centered"
about "natural born Citizen" by analyzing Jay's original
"nbC" phrase and how the U.S. Congress corrected their 1790
Naturalization Act "natural born Citizen" language error
with their 1795 Naturalization Act "citizen" language,
which is how I will finish this extended comment about my natural
born Citizen "new best friend" John Jay.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">(The
quotes and emphases from "In the 1950s" to the end of the
quote are in the original.)</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">In
the 1950s, a nineteen-year-old student at the Lubavitch yeshiva came
for a <i>yechidus</i> to discuss his intention of going to college.
More than three decades later, the then middle-aged man related to
Rabbi Simon Jacobson the story of the encounter he had that day with
the Rebbe.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"I
told the Rebbe that the reason I wanted to go to college was because
I felt I had done my studies in Torah and I wanted to expand my
horizons." He explained that he intended to remain a Chasid but
hoped a secular education and a college degree would help prepare him
for a future livelihood.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">After
the student concluded his presentation, the Rebbe responded "Are
you asking for an <i>eitzah</i> [advice] or a <i>bracha</i>
[blessing]?"</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
young man, perhaps sensing the response that was coming, answered, "I
came in for a blessing."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"A
blessing with advice is always better than one without advice."
The Rebbe then proceeded to tell him, "In my opinion, you
shouldn't go. You should continue your studies in yeshiva. You will
be <i>matzliach</i> [successful] and you can be a leader in the
Jewish community with that."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">For
the young man, the stakes were sufficiently high that he found it
impossible simply to accept the Rebbe's veto of his plan. "How
can the Rebbe tell me that when the Rebbe himself went to college?"</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"Precisely
because I went to university <i>["I studied science on the
university level from 1928 to 1932 in Berlin, and from 1934 to 1938
in Paris" (p. 318)]</i>, I know what it's about. I know the
environment, and I think it will have a detrimental effect on you
instead of a positive one." Seeing that the young man was still
unconvinced, the Rebbe tried another tack. "Can you draw a
circle?" he asked.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"Yes,"
the young man answered, presumably perplexed by the question.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"Can
you draw a perfect circle?"</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"No,
I can't, not on my own."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"What
would you need to draw a perfect circle?" the Rebbe pressed.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"A
compass."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
Rebbe, whose interest in and aptitude for mathematics was well known,
continued, "Tell me the difference between the circle you would
draw on your own and the circle you would draw with a compass."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">"The
circle I draw on my own won't have a sturdy center around which to
draw the borders, but the compass's center creates a perfect circle."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
Rebbe then elaborated: "All knowledge you'll ever learn, every
experience you'll have in life, are the circles. They're not the
center. If you don't have a solid center, you'll have jagged circles,
incomplete circles, many different circles. I sense that you need
that center before you start building your circles."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">When
the man, then in his fifties, related this story, he added, "I
didn't listen. I went anyway." He then started to cry softly.
"And I still don't have a complete circle. I have many circles,
this one, that one, none complete."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Mario,
this brings me to the point about Solum, Mark Levin and et. al. not
being "centered" on John Jay's original intent for writing
"natural born Citizen" in his short note to George
Washington. They discuss everything but the central issue, or in
other words, the fulcrum, John Jay's original intent and by
implication, why George Washington accepted Jay's language and
forwarded it to the full Constitutional Convention delegates for
debate and adoption, and eventual ratification by the states. Also,
Jay's "centering" authority will clarify what I meant in
the fourth paragraph above, <i>"</i><i>After reading it people
will probably say that it is excellent, so, ... how can Solum be so
wrong about Barack Obama being "eligible to the Office of
President" </i><i>when he had ONLY one U.S. citizen parent</i><i>.'
"</i><span style="font-style: normal;"> </span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;"><span style="font-style: normal;">The
students response about how to draw a perfect circle pertains, "</span><span style="font-style: normal;">the
compass' center creates a perfect circle." </span><span style="font-style: normal;">John
Jay and HIS understanding of "natural born Citizen" is the
very center of the perfect circle, the discussion of Jay's original
intent, his "originalism" defines HIS original intent, not
the commentators who wrote about citizenship concerning the laws of
nations or who is a citizen. The commentators ideas are the circle,
but John Jay's original intent is the center where the spokes are
tethered. John Jay is the "compass" and his original intent
is the "center" that creates the "perfect circle"
and which gives meaning to being a "natural born Citizen"
and being eligible to be president as compared to being a "citizen"
and not being eligible to be president.</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
1790 Naturalization Act was erroneous and the 1795 Naturalization
corrected the error. The serendipity is that the error and the
correction reveal to us today in 2017 what "natural born
Citizen" meant to the 1795 "citizen" Congress that
corrected the 1790 "natural born citizen" error. Congress
corrected the language of the 1790 NA to mean the same thing that
John Jay meant in 1787: to be a "...natural born
Citizen...eligible to the Office of President" a person must be
born to two U.S. citizen married parents on U.S. soil. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">In
1787 America and until the 1920s, the U.S. citizenship of the husband
determined, <b>by marriage</b>, the citizenship status of the wife
and the children born to them. If the husband was a U.S. citizen, the
wife automatically acquired the U.S. citizen status of her new
husband, and the child born to them on U.S. soil automatically had
the same U.S. citizenship status as the father, and, by definition,
the citizenship status of BOTH U.S. citizenship parents. If the
husband was not a U.S. citizen and the wife was a U.S. citizen, the
foreign citizenship status of the husband determined the foreign
citizenship status of the new wife, and when a child was born, the
foreign citizenship status of the father determined the foreign
citizenship status of the child.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
language of the 1790 Naturalization Act stated that a child born to
two U.S. citizen married parents on foreign soil was a U.S. "natural
born citizen," implying that the child is "...eligible to
the Office of President." The 1795 Naturalization Act repealed
the 1790 NA language and said that a child born to two U.S. citizen
married parents on foreign soil was a "citizen" only,
implying that the child was NOT "...eligible to the Office of
President."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
1795 NA = 2 U.S. citizen married parents + born on foreign soil =
U.S. "citizen" = NOT eligible to be POTUS. So also, a child
born on foreign soil to ONLY 1 U.S. citizen parent = only a U.S.
"citizen" = not eligible to be POTUS. Now, if a child born
on foreign soil to two U.S. citizen married parents is not eligible
to be POTUS, then Senator Ted Cruz, who admits that he was born on
foreign soil to only one U.S. citizen parent, is certainly not
"eligible" to be POTUS.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
1790 NA error and the 1795 NA correction serendipity = 2 U.S. citizen
married parents + birth on U.S. soil = U.S. "natural born
Citizen" = eligible to be POTUS = Donald J. Trump is
constitutionally a "natural born Citizen" because his
mother naturalized as a U.S. citizen before her son was born on U.S.
soil to two U.S. citizen married parents. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Also,
just as a child is not eligible to be POTUS if born on foreign soil
to TWO U.S citizen married parents OR born on foreign soil to only
ONE U.S. citizen parent, so also, a child is not eligible to be POTUS
if born on U.S. soil to only ONE U.S. citizen parent.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">That
is the serendipity, the unexpected discovery, that the 1790 NA error
of the first congress and the 1795 NA correction by the third
congress reveal to us today in 2017. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
serendipity also reveals the judicial fiat error of the 1898 United
States v. Wong Kim Ark SCOTUS "declaration" that a child
born on U.S. soil to parents who are not U.S. citizens is a U.S.
"citizen" by birth alone – "by birth alone"!?
Well, since the congress did not correct the Supreme Court the
decision stands until it is overturned by the court or by amendment,
but it does not change the history of the 1790 NA error and the 1795
NA correction that ONLY <b>"by birth alone"</b> on U.S.
soil to TWO U.S. citizen married parents does a child become eligible
to be president. That means that U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki
Haley, Gov. Bobby Jindal and Florida Senator Marco Rubio, all three
are NOT eligible to be president. Since having ONLY one U.S. citizen
parent disqualifies eligibility to be president, certainly ZERO U.S.
citizen parents, married to each other or not, disqualifies a person
from eligibility.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">The
serendipity reveals to us today in 2017 America why John Jay is the
center of the "natural born Citizen" perfect circle for
understanding Jay's 1787 original genesis and original intent. The
original "genesis" is <b>"</b><b>by </b><b>birth
</b><b>alone"</b> on U.S. soil ONLY to TWO U.S. citizen married
parents, and the original "intent" is ONLY TWO U.S. citizen
married parents can pass on their singular U.S. citizenship to a
child, making that child <b>"</b><b>by </b><b>birth </b><b>alone"</b>
a U.S. "natural born Citizen" who alone of all U.S.
citizenship designations is "...eligible to the Office of
President."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
So,
Mario, and maybe I should add Larry Solum and Mark Levin, or anybody,
correct me if I am wrong in any phrase or wording or the history of
the 1790 NA and the 1795 NA. I could be wrong about something, but
not about the history of the two naturalization acts.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
I'm not a constitutional "scholar" and everything I know
about the purpose for limiting eligibility to the office of president
to a "natural born Citizen" I have learned from you,
mostly, and my personal study since 2012 (I got into the game late, I
know) when Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio gave his March news conference
about President Obama's bogus birth certificate. Even if Obama was
born in a hospital in Hawaii (no hospital has published a public
notice of his birth or posted a public plaque on a hospital wall
since Obama became president, which tells us what the hospital
administrators either know or do NOT know... which is a "tell"
that Obama does not control) he has admitted that he was NOT born on
U.S. soil to TWO U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Now,
a friendly challenge to Mark Levin, a true constitutional "scholar"
who challenged anybody in 2016 to a debate about the meaning of
"natural born Citizen" but then would not accept those who
responded because he thought they were not of high enough legal and
scholarship status. Well, why did he not debate them and correct
their erudition with his own erudition? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">See
my last comment here on your blog on July 25, 2016 at 9:43 PM where I
posted Levin's refusal to follow through on his debate challenge, and
where I also posted some info about all five of President Trump's
children not being eligible to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mario,
if you were to write an article about the Trump children not being
eligible to be president, I wonder if Mark Levin would finally agree
to debate you? <br />
<br />
“I wonder if Levin is really afraid to
debate you.<br />
<br />
“Levin implied that he has chosen to not
debate anybody because everybody who has accepted his challenge is
beneath his legal stature, or something like that. I heard him say it
only once on his radio program a few months ago, last April or May
<i>[2016]</i>.”</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">So,
my challenge to Mark Levin or Larry Solum or anybody is simple.
Respond to this extended comment, not to me personally, of course,
since I am definitely not a constitutional "scholar" like
Mark and Larry Solum and others are, but Mark, for example, can
respond to his audience on his radio program or on his online tv
program. It shouldn't take Mark very long to correct my articulation
of the "serendipity" revealed by the 1795 Naturalization
Act correction of the 1790 Naturalization Act error since he has
stated on his radio program more than once that Sen. Ted Cruz was
eligible to be president and the 1790 Naturalization Act was his
proof text, and, for some reason, he never referenced the 1795
Naturalization Act.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">In
conclusion, Mario, here again is the Lubavitcher Rebbe's advice to
the young student: "I sense that you need that center before you
start building your circles."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">I
also "sense" that Larry Solum, Mark Levin and other
constitutional "scholars" who are not informed like you are
Mario, about John Jay and his original intent for underlining the
word "born" in "natural born Citizen" in his July
25, 1787 note to George Washington "need that center" of
Jay and HIS "natural born Citizen" original intent, HIS
"public" meaning, before they start building their
arguments – their "circles" – about why a person is
eligible to be president with less than two U.S. citizen married
parents.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">See,
that's how simple it would be to correct non-scholars like me and
Article II Section 1 clause 5 constitutional "scholars."
However, Mario, what I have learned in the five years that I have
been reading your erudition on your Natural Born Citizen blog, is
that I won't be found to be wrong about the history of the 1790 NA
error and the 1795 NA correction and the perpetual significance of
John Jay's original genesis original intent meaning of "natural
born Citizen": ONLY <b>"by birth alone"</b> on U.S.
soil to TWO U.S. citizen married parents is a person "...eligible
to the Office of President."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Art</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">2017-05-31</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Dittos
Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">For
a long time I have been searching for a way to articulate the
“implicit” intent in John Jay’s underlining the word “born”
in “natural born Citizen” in his July 25, 1787 note to George
Washington, and then the “serendipity” revealed itself to me
recently, a couple of months ago. In my previous comment here two
days ago I said that I got into the game late, in 2008, but I meant
2012, the day after March 1, 2012 when Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio
held his news conference about Pres. Obama’s bogus birth
certificate. That means that it took me 5 years to make this
unexpected discovery of the implicit meaning of Jay’s underlining
“born” and the now obvious to me connection with the error of the
1790 Naturalization Act “natural born citizen” language and the
correction in the 1795 Naturalization Act “citizen” language.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">First,
the serendipity that is revealed by the language of the 1790 and 1795
acts is that both the first congress and the third congress, with the
use of the plural word “parents”, implicitly stipulated that
<b>“two” parents</b> are required for a child to be either a U.S.
“natural born Citizen” or a U.S. “citizen”.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Second,
the implicit serendipity, the unexpected discovery of what is
implicit in the language of the two naturalization acts, is that not
only “two” parents are required, but both congresses also
implicitly stipulated that “two” <b>married </b><b>parents</b>
were required for, as you have written for years, the
“naturalization” of the child born on foreign soil. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Third,
implicit in the <b>”</b><b>two” </b><b>married </b><b>parents</b>
stipulation is that, according to both congresses, both parents were
expected to be U.S. citizens AND married only to each other <b>before</b>
the child is born on U.S. soil/jurisdiction or born on foreign soil
that is not under U.S. jurisdiction.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Fourth,
the serendipity about the implicit intent of the language of the two
naturalization acts adds credibility to the substance of the
naturalization of children that you have articulated for years. The
error of the first congress that passed the 1790 NA that the third
congress corrected with the 1795 NA is that the U.S. Congress has
constitutional authority to naturalize a “citizen” but it does
<b>NOT</b> have authority to naturalize a “natural born citizen”,
whether the child is born on foreign soil <b>that is not</b> under
U.S. jurisdiction or born on foreign soil <b>that is</b> under U.S.
jurisdiction OR born on the U.S. soil of the 50 states.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">To
sum it up briefly, here are my recent serendipitous conclusions based
on what I have learned from you since 2012 and by reading what you
have written since 2008:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>1790
Naturalization Act</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Two
married parents – both U.S. citizens – <b>before</b> the child is
born on foreign soil that is <span style="text-decoration: none;">not</span>
under U.S. jurisdiction = the naturalization error – the child is a
U.S. “natural born citizen”.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>1795
Naturalization Act</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Two
married parents – both U.S. citizens – <b>before</b> the child is
born on foreign soil that is not under U.S. jurisdiction = the
naturalization correction – the child is a U,S. “citizen”.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
serendipity derived from the two naturalization acts and connected to
John Jay underlining the word “born” in “natural born Citizen”
in his note to Washington is that John Jay knew that the common law
of the 1700s meant that in 1787 America <b>”by marriage”</b> the
U.S. citizenship of the husband determined the U.S. citizenship of
the wife, whether she was foreign born or U.S. born, and the singular
U.S. citizenship of BOTH married parents determined the U.S.
citizenship of the child. By underling the word “born” Jay
implied that in 1700s America <b>two U.S. citizen married parents</b>,
married only to each other, are the common sense requirement for a
child to be, <b>“by birth alone”</b> a “natural born Citizen”
and “...eligible to the Office of President”, and that, as wJay
rote in his note, the “command in chief” authority should NOT
“devolve” on anybody except a “natural born Citizen” who is
also ONLY born on U.S. soil ONLY to two U.S. citizen married parents,
etc., and the implication continues generation to generation,
election to election, POTUS to POTUS.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
conclusion, Mario, do you remember the Englishman Mr. Vaughn who
asked Jay to administer "... an oath of allegiance to the United
States" and your response? I’ll put just my intro comment and
your intro comment response here:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">
</span><span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ajtelles</span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
said... </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Unity
of citizenship ...<br />
<br />
"Mario, here is a brief letter
from John Jay to a person called Del Campo about an Englishman named
Mr. Vaughn who wanted to become a U.S. naturalized citizen, and who
asked Jay, who was in Madrid, Spain in 1781, prior to the signing of
the 1783 Treaty of Paris by John Jay, Benjamin Franklin, and John
Adams, to administer the oath of <span style="text-decoration: none;">naturalization</span> <i>[correction: oath of allegiance]</i>.<br />
<br />
"This
indicates that in the late 1781, six years before the adoption of the
September 17, 1787 U.S. Constitution, the common law understanding of
John Jay about the <i><b>"unity of citizenship and allegiance"</b></i>
was that the citizenship of the husband determined the citizenship of
the wife, AND the citizenship of BOTH parents determined the
citizenship of the child."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"</span></span></span><a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/12200858207095622181"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario
Apuzzo, Esq.</span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
said... </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Art,
<br />
<br />
"I of II <br />
<br />
"Thank you for sharing
with us such a great find. I have the following comments on that
letter of John Jay, the father of the natural born citizen clause.
<br />
<br />
"Jay’s letter to De Campo, Confidential Secretary
to Florida Blanca at the Spanish Court, was written by Jay on
November 3, 1781, before Congress passed its first naturalization
act, the Naturalization Act of 1790. Jay’s letter goes to prove two
things. <br />
<br />
"First, the letter confirms that at common
law a child born out of the United States (John Vaughan was born in
England) to an alien father (British) who married a U.S. citizen
mother was neither a natural born citizen nor a citizen of the United
States. I assume that Mr. Vaughan’s parents were married from the
tone of Jay’s letter. The letter shows that central figures of the
Founding era were following the maxim partus sequitur patrem
(children follow the condition or citizenship of the “father,”
which under the doctrine that wives took on the citizenship of their
husbands meant “parents.”) Hence, under the common law, born out
of the United States to a citizen mother and an alien father was not
sufficient to be accepted as a citizen, let alone a natural born
citizen. "</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">For
those who want to read your entire response, here are the time stamps
of my two posts on June 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM and June 19, 2014 at
10:30 AM and your response on June 19, 2014 at 8:24 PM, and the url
link to your original 2013 post –<span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><i><b>The Constitution, the
Rule of Law, and the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause: A Response to
Artsy Fartsy Squeeky Fromm Girl Reporter</b></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Here
is the url to the original source for Jay’s letter:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="font-weight: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=2328&layout=html
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Here
is the url on your blog:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-constitution-rule-of-law-and.html?commentPage=13</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">PS.
Mario,</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">For
Mark Levin, or anybody, to rebut and refute your eleven years of
commentary about the constitutional meaning of natural born citizen,
all they need to do is center their opening argument on the center
point of the perfect circle – John Jay and his original genesis
original intent. So, is Sen. Ted Cruz a "citizen" or a
"natural born citizen" is a question with only one answer,
that it seems to me, was implicitly dealt with by John Jay and
implicitly by the third congresses 1790 Naturalization Act "citizen"
correction of the first congresses 1790 Naturalization Act "natural
born citizen" error.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Art</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US">2017-06-02</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Dittos
2 Debates...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">On
May 31, 2017 at 7:53 AM you wrote:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Too
bad that Mark Levin has not accepted my acceptance of his challenge
that he expressed on his radio show to millions across the globe that
he is willing to debate any attorney, authority, or scholar on the
meaning of a natural born citizen and whether Ted Cruz is a natural
born citizen under that definition. He says that Cruz is and I say he
is not. If not on his radio show, maybe he would accept doing the
debate on his television channel. We can do it at a college or
university. I think the College of William and Mary would be a great
place to do it, assuming the college would allow it. If not, we can
find another college or university."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
if Mark Levin never accepts your offer to debate him, Georgetown Law
Professor Larry Solum might be an alternative, although, being a
classroom educator, the professor might not be as combative as Levin
definitely could be, as Levin's phone responses to irritant callers
who challenge him indicate, <i>"get off my phone you big
dope"</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">I
would prefer Levin because, if he follows through on his challen to
all comers, he definitely needs to clarify his radio declarations
that Sen. Cruz is a "natural born citizen" because his
proof text, the 1790 Naturalization Act "natural born citizen"
language, says that a child born to "parents", implying TWO
U.S. citizen married parents, on foreign soil is a "natural born
citizen", and so that is why Sen. Cruz, born on foreign soil to
only ONE U.S. citizen parent is a "natural born citizen"
and "...eligible to the Office of President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Levin
also needs to explain why he ignores the 1795 Naturalization Act
"citizen" language which he knows, being a constitutional
scholar and all, he knows that what has been repealed by the
congress, i.e., by statute, does not pertain. Does Levin not know
that the U.S. Congress can "naturalize" a "citizen"
but it cannot "naturalize" with positive law language a
"natural born Citizen", which, as written in Article II
Section 1 clause 5 of the constitution, can only be changed by
amendment? Of course Levin knows that basic constitutional vs.
Legislative issue, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">So,
Mario, if (if "if" is the right word), if Levin never
responds to your challenge to a debate at William and Mary, Professor
Solum may be a viable alternative, he being a constitutional scholar,
and all, as his series on originalism, <b>"The Case For
Originalism"</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">, </span>shows.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2017/04/the-case-for-originalism-links-to-all-the-posts.html
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">>>
</span><span style="background: transparent;">His twitter url is</span><span style="background: transparent;">
https://twitter.com/</span>lsolum</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">All
Professor Solum needs to do is clarify why he wrote two opposing
conclusions in 2010: "Anyone born on American soil whose <i>parents</i> <i><b>[plural = two –
implying married to each other]</b></i> are citizens of the United
States is a 'natural born citizen'," and in an updated version
he wrote "[b]ased on my reading of the historical sources, there
is <b>no credible case</b> that a person born on American soil with
<i><b>one American parent</b></i> was clearly not a 'natural <span style="font-style: normal;">born
"citizen.' "</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="65597151716964292201"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
on Wednesday, May 19, 2010 you wrote about Professor Solum in an
article titled, <i>A U.S. Constitution Article II
“natural born Citizen” Is Not the Same As an English Common Law
“natural born subject”</i><span style="font-style: normal;">
.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">This
is your blog link to your article</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-is-not.html</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Paragraph
13:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Solum
continues in his essay: "Both Jay and Wilson’s opinions
suggest that usage in the founding era reflected a significant
conceptual distinction between the words “subject” and
“citizen”—a distinction that was strongly associated with the
ideas about the nature of sovereignty. The term “citizen”
reflects the notion that individual citizens are sovereign in a
republic, whereas the term “subject” reflects feudal and
monarchical conceptual of the monarch as sovereign and the individual
as the subject, owing a duty of allegiance and duty to the monarch.
This conceptual distinction may be relevant to the original
understanding of the phrase “natural born citizen” which was used
instead of “natural born subject,” the phrase that served as a
term of art in English legal usage. The notion of a natural born
subject may reflect a feudal understanding of political obligation:
those born in the kingdom owed a natural duty of allegiance to their
king and were his natural subjects. Given a republic theory of
popular sovereignty, citizens are sovereign and the notion of a
“natural born subject” would be anathema. This leaves a gap in
th<span style="background: transparent;">e theor</span>y of
citizenship—a gap that the Constitution fills with the concept of a
natural born citizen.” Id. at 10-11."<b> </b></span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Paragraph
14</b><span style="font-weight: normal;"> – </span><i><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
blog has the hot links to Solum's 2010 essays</span></i><span style="font-weight: normal;">:</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"</span></span></span><a href="http://www.michiganlawreview.org/assets/fi/107/solum.pdf"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="background: transparent;">In
his earlier version of this essay, Solum stated</span></span></span></a><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">:</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
“Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the
United States is a "natural born citizen." </span></span></span><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1263885"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
this updated version, Solum explains</span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
that some readers misread what he wrote. Now he concludes that
“[b]ased on my reading of the historical sources, there is no
credible case that a person born on American soil with one American
parent was clearly not a “natural born citizen.” I agree with
Solum’s previous statement but disagree with his current one. See
my essay entitled, </span></span></span><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-size: medium;">The
Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that
Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth</span></span></a><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">for
my reasons. Additionally, Solum does not cite what those “historical
sources” are. What is also strange is that while the debate over
Obama’s “natural born Citizen” status is currently raging,
Solum, while now taking a position which benefits Obama does not even
acknowledge that the issue exists. His essay is all about analyzing
the eligibility of John McCain who was born in Panama to two United
States citizen parents who were in military service which
circumstances present a more defensible case per </span></span></span><a href="http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/vattel/vatt-119.htm"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Vattel
Sec. 217</span></span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
than that of Obama </span></span></span><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-size: medium;">whose
place of birth has not been confirmed</span></span></a><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">and
who was born in 1961 to only one United States citizen parent (18
years old at the time of his birth)."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">So,
Mario, batter up! Put up or, uh, "get off my phone", or uh,
professor, but, you said...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="background: transparent;">2017-06-02</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Natural
Born Citizen Debates</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mario
Apuzzo, David Ramsay, Emer de Vattel</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Mark
Levin, Larry Solum, Robert Natelson</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Mario,
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">After
posting the previous comment today (June 2, 2017 at 12:38 PM) about
debates with Mark Levin and Professor Larry Solum I remembered
Professor Robert Natelson, author of <span lang="en-US"><i><b>The
Original Constitution: What It Actually Said and Meant</b></i></span><span lang="en-US">,
</span><span lang="en-US">3</span><sup><span lang="en-US">rd</span></sup><span lang="en-US">
Edition, </span><span lang="en-US">published in 2014. He did not add
anything to the text of the 2nd Edition published in 2011, but he did
add footnote #25 about Emer de Vattel and how Vattel </span><span lang="en-US"><b>"clarified"</b></span><span lang="en-US">
what he meant </span><span lang="en-US">by</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US"><b>“</b></span><span lang="en-US"><b>parents”</b></span><span lang="en-US">.
</span><span lang="en-US">After the quote from Natelson’s book
</span><span lang="en-US">about Emer de Vattel</span><span lang="en-US">
is your quote about </span><span lang="en-US">David Ramsay that
Natelson should be asked about to clarify what he, Natelson, meant
about Vattel’</span><span lang="en-US">s</span><span lang="en-US">
</span><span lang="en-US">clarification</span><span lang="en-US">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b><span lang="en-US">P</span><span lang="en-US">rofessor
Rob Natelson</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">"...Vattel
wrote of citizenship following "parents," at several later
points he </span><b>clarified that, as in England, foreign-born
children followed the status of their fathers."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">On
pages 147-48 Natelson explains what the language of the U.S.
Constitution in Article II Section 1 clause 5 <b>"...actually
said and meant"</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">; </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">the
footnote is on page 148</span>:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
Constitution imposed certain qualifications on the President. The
Constitution implied, although it did not state explicitly until
adoption of the Twelfth Amendment, that the same qualifications
applied to the Vice President. Both had to be at least 35 years old,
which was a significant requirement in an age in which even people
who survived childhood often did not live beyond their 50s. The idea
was to better assure a certain amount of maturity and wisdom. Also,
both had to have resided within the country for the previous fourteen
years.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"Most
importantly, the President and Vice President had to be natural-born
citizens or citizens at the time of ratification. We know exactly
what the founders meant by the phrase "natural-born citizen"
because they adapted it from the English legal term, "natural
born subject," which in Britain defined who could serve in
Parliament or the Privy Council(25). Essentially, a natural-born
citizen was one who met either one of two requirements. First, a
person qualified if born within the United States or within American
territory, even if the person's parents were aliens. Alternatively,
an individual qualified even if born outside the country if the
individual's father was an American citizen not then engaged in
traitorous or felonious activities.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"These
birth and residence requirements were designed better to assure that
these officers were truly sympathetic to those they were to govern,
and to guard against the risk that they might be sympathetic to a
foreign power(26).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"There
was no constitutional requirement that a President or Vice President
be male. The pronoun "he" used throughout the Constitution
was generic(27)."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"(25)Since
the publication of the first edition, several readers have contacted
me to argue that "natural born" should be defined as Emer
Vattel defined it in his international law treatise. Invariably their
argument is driven by hope that Vattel's definition, if applied,
would disqualify from the presidency some politician they dislike.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">"The
Constitution's meaning does not, however, depend on one's political
hopes. The document generally employed domestic legal terms according
to English usage. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">As
Vattel acknowledged, the English standard for "natural born"
varied from the international standard with respect to children born <i>within</i> the country; as to children born <i>outside</i> the country, the rules were the
same. (Although at one point in his book Vattel wrote of citizenship
following "parents," at several later points he clarified
that, as in England, foreign-born children followed the status of
their fathers.)”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>David
Ramsay</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">M</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">ario,
here </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">is
</span></span><b><span lang="en-US">a short snippet</span></b><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
of </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">your
comment about David Ramsay, and the url on your blog </span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">for
those who want to read it all</span></span><span lang="en-US"><span style="font-weight: normal;">:</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>Here
we have direct and convincing evidence of how a very influential
Founder defined a natural born citizen. Noah Webster, 1828, in
explaining how an American dictionary of the English language was
necessary because American words took on different meanings than the
same word in England, placed David Ramsay among great Founders such
as “Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jay, Madison, Marshall, Ramsay,
Dwight, Smith, Trumbull...”</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "century schoolbook" , serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">Ramsay,
being of the Foun</span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">ding
generation and being intimately involved in the events of the time
would have known how the Founders and Framers defined a </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><i><b>natural
born citizen</b></i></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"> and he
told us that such a person was one </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><i><b>born
in the country to citizen pare</b></i></span><i><b>nts</b></i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="font-style: normal; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
giving us this definition, it is clear that <i><b>Ramsay did not
follow the English common law but rather natural law, the law of
nations</b></i><i>,</i> and Emer de Vattel, who also defined the
“natives, or natural-born citizen” the same as did Ramsay in his
highly acclaimed and influential treatise, The Law of Nations, Or,
Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs
of Nations and Sovereigns, Section 212 (1758 French) (1759 English).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>We
can reasonably assume that the other Founders and Framers would have
defined a natural born citizen the same way that Ramsay did</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">,
....</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">”<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><b>It
is valuable because it is evidence of the public meaning of these
terms at the time they were framed and ratified."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">In
conclusion, Mario, for those who may wonder why the definition of
natural born Citizen is so important I have very simple questions.
Which words of the U.S. Constitution are NOT important? Were the
words of the First Amendment intended to be temporary or perpetual?
How about the Second Amendment? Was <i><b>“...the security of a
free state”</b></i> intended to be temporary or perpetual? Was John
Jay’s statement in his note to George Washington that the <b>“command
in chief”</b> should <b>“devolve”</b> ONLY on a <i><b>“natural
born Citizen”</b></i> and <b>“...</b><b>eligibility </b><b>to the
Office of President”</b> intended to be temporary or perpetual,
generation to generation, election to election, POTUS to POTUS?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Well,
Mario, you have written <span style="background: transparent;">that
</span><span style="background: transparent;">you </span><span style="background: transparent;">are
</span>ready to debate, so, Mark Levin, Larry Solum, Robert Natelson
and et al., who will be the first to tap the plate? Batter up!</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Art
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">U.S.
Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: medium;">OriginalBirtherDocument.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-5204858209178839332016-09-11T10:12:00.002-07:002016-10-09T10:08:44.882-07:00Donald Trump: One People - One God - One Flag<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>Donald
Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b>One
People – One God – One Flag</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
these five speeches by Donald Trump on September 6, 7, 9, 12, 13,
2016, Trump, without mentioning Muslims, Islam, terrorism, "radical
Islam" or "fundamental Islam," uses language that is
an attention getting shot across the bow of world terrorism that is
being promoted by fundamentalist Muslims who are said to be religious
and political "scholars" who presume to be wiser than all
people on earth. Being fundamentalist Muslims the "scholars"
promote transforming all people on earth into submitters <i>("Muslim"
means submitter)</i> who will be <b>"</b><b>one</b><b> people"</b>
who will submit {<i>"Islam" means submission, submit}</i>
to live <b>"</b><b>under one</b><b> god"</b><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">while </span><b>"saluting
one flag"</b> and living in the world ummah <i>(commune)</i>
under one universal, collective law, the immutable shariah of Allah.
There are various Muslim state flags, some with the star and
crescent, some with the shahadah, some with the ISIS black flag,
called the "Black Standard" or the "Black Banner"
of ISIS (google <i>islamic flag</i> for urls).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Donald
Trump speech #1</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">RSBN.tv
@ 58min. 57sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://rsbn.tv/watch-donald-trump-rally-live-stream-in-greenville-nc/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Tuesday,
September 6, 2016: Full replay of the Donald Trump for President
rally in Greenville, NC at the Greenville Convention Center. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">YouTube
@ 58min. 57sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXMAvppTSAY</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Let
me quote the same passage from the bible I read on Saturday from
first John chapter four. 'No one has ever seen God, but if we love
one another God lives in us, and his love is made in us,' "all
of us, 'made complete in us.'</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Imagine
what our country could accomplish if we started working toward <b>one
people, under one God, saluting one flag</b>. <i>[much applause] </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one
people</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">under
one God</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;"><i>saluting
one flag</i></span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"It's
time to break with the bitter failures of the past and to embrace the
new American future.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"In
this future...and in this future we have to respect the dignity of
all Americans, and that means great jobs, great schools, and great,
safe neighborhoods.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"We
will keep our children safe, which requires secure borders, a strong
military, and supporting law enforcement."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Donald
Trump speech #2</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">RSBN.tv
@ 39min. 55sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://rsbn.tv/watch-donald-trump-speaks-in-philadelphia-pa-live-stream/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Wednesday,
September 7, 2016: Philadelphia, Pa. — At the Union League of
Philadelphia, Republican Donald Trump unveiled a plan for a major
increase in defense spending as he works to convince skeptics in both
parties that he’s ready to lead the world’s most powerful
military.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">YouTube
@ 39min. 55sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pep7ujf_6lk</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"We
will work across all racial and income lines to create one American
nation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Together
we will have one great American future. Our potential is unlimited.
<b>We will be one people, under one God, saluting one American flag</b>.
<i>[much extended applause]] </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">We
will be one people</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">under
one God</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">saluting
one American flag</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"And,
by the way, we love our flag."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Donald
Trump speech #3</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">RSBN.tv
@ 42min. 22sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://rsbn.tv/watch-donald-trump-speaks-at-values-voter-summit-in-washington-dc-live-stream/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Friday,
September 9, 2016: Full replay of Donald Trump’s speech at the
Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">YouTube
@ 42min. 22sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4H04qWj2sWo</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"We're
all equal and we all come from the same creator. If we remember that
simple fact, then our future is truly limitless. There is nothing we,
as Americans, can't do. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"There's
a biblical verse that I've often read, and I want to repeat it again
'cause I think it is so important to what we're trying to achieve
right now for our country. It's from first John, chapter four. 'No
one has ever seen God, but if we love one another, God lives in us,
and his love is made complete in us.' So true. [much applause] So
true.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Imagine
what our country could accomplish if we started <b>working together
as one people, under one God, saluting one flag</b>. <i>[much
extended applause]</i> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">working
together as one people</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">under
one God</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">saluting
one flag</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"It's
time to stop quibbling over the smallest words and time to start
dreaming about the great adventures that lie ahead for our country.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"This
is my promise to all of you. Starting in 2017 we will be one American
nation. It's time to break our ties with the bitter failures of the
past and to embrace a new American future. We have to do it. Together
we will make America believe again. We will make America united
again. And, we will make America great again.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Thank
you very much and God bless you. Thank you."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Donald
Trump speech #4 </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">RSBN.tv
@ 1hr. 26min. 35sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://rsbn.tv/watch-donald-trump-rally-in-asheville-nc-live-stream/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Monday,
September 12, 2016: Full replay of the Donald J. Trump for President
rally in Asheville, NC at U.S. Cellular Center. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">YouTube
@ 1hr. 26min. 35sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7cjvhPDZH0&feature=youtu.be</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Imagine
what our country could accomplish if we started <b>working together
as one people, under one God, saluting one American flag. One
American flag.</b> <i>[much extended applause </i><i>and USA, USA,
USA, USA, USA</i><i>] </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">working
together as one people</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">under
one God</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">saluting
one American flag</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;"><span style="font-style: normal;">one
American flag</span></span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">"</span><span style="font-style: normal;">What's
going on today, folks. What's going on today.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="font-style: normal;">"It's
time to break with the bitter failures of the past and to embrace the
new American future. This is a future, we will respect the dignity of
all Americans. And that means great jobs, great schools and great
neighborhoods. It also means safety.. It means safety. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b>Donald
Trump speech #5</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">RSBN.tv
@ 1hr. 28min. 57sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://rsbn.tv/watch-donald-trump-rally-in-des-moines-ia-live-stream/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Friday,
September 9, 2016: Full replay of Donald Trump’s speech at the
Values Voter Summit in Washington, DC. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">YouTube
@ <span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">34</span>min. 55sec.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAdHsSXu5iM&feature=youtu.be</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"I
will fight for every part of the nation, and I will fight to bring us
all together as one American, which we're not. We're so badly
divided. Imagine what our country could accomplish if we started
<b>working together as one people, under one God, saluting one
American flag. One American flag.</b> <i>[much applause]</i> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">working
together as one people</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">under
one God</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">saluting
one American flag</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one
American flag</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"It's
time to break with the bitter failures of the past, and to embrace a
new, inclusive, and prosperous, and I mean truly prosperous, American
future. It can be better than we ever were, we can. We can be better,
we can be greater, than we ever were. I know the people, I've seen
thousands, I've seen millions of people, incredible people. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"We
can be greater than ever before."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-size: large;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/09/donald-trump-one-people-one-god-one-flag_11.html</span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-39820064058507744972016-08-27T20:02:00.000-07:002016-09-02T21:53:13.675-07:00Original Genesis: Who Started The "Birther" Movement?
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><b>Original
Genesis</b></span></span></div>
<span style="font-size: x-large;">
</span><div align="center" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black; font-size: x-large;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><b>Who
Started The "Birther" Movement?</b></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">This
was first posted on the Washington Times .com on August 27, 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Original
Genesis</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Who
started the "birther" movement?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">John
Jay did on July 25, 1787.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Hillary
Clintons 2007/08 "machine" picked up the 1787 "birther"
singular U.S. citizenship implication of John Jay, then dropped it
like a hot potato for some obscure reason, and Donald Trump picked up
the "birther" question around the same time that Arizona
Sheriff Joe Arpaio noticed that BHObama's birth certificate was as
phony as a 3 dollar bill and reported his findings at a news
conference on March 1, 2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">John
Jay started the "birther" movement when he sent a July 25,
1787 thank you note to his friend George Washington.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Jay
suggested that the presidency should not devolve on anyone except a
"natural born Citizen." </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
his July 25, 1787 note to Washington, Jay underlined the word "born,"
implying that "born" meant to Jay, in 1787 America, that
the citizenship that qualifies a person as an Article II Section 1
clause 5 "natural born Citizen" is possible only from birth
(35 years) and only "by birth alone."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">1
- The child must be born only on U.S. soil (including U.S.
jurisdiction on foreign soil--military, diplomat, etc.).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">2
- The child must be born only with singular U.S. citizenship, not
dual U.S./foreign citizenship as implied by the 1790 Naturalization
Act language of "natural born Citizen"--an implication that
was corrected when "natural born Citizen" was replaced with
"citizen," repealed with the 1795 Naturalization Act
language, language that continues today in 2016 in all immigration
and naturalization acts of Congress.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">3
- The child must be born only to two U.S. citizen parents married
only to each other.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Singular
U.S. citizenship "by birth alone" is only possible when
both parents, who are married only to each other, both have U.S.
citizenship. It is that singular U.S. citizenship of both parents
that is passed on to the child "by birth alone."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
1787 America, under the concept of "coverture," the U.S.
citizenship of the husband was acquired by the foreign born wife
automatically, without an oath of naturalization. It was acquired "by
marriage alone." Since both married parents would have U.S.
citizenship, the child, born after their marriage, would also have
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If
the child was born before their marriage, the child would be a U.S.
"citizen" because the father was a U.S. citizen, but not a
"natural born Citizen" with singular U.S. citizenship
because the mother was still a foreign citizen. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">That
is the situation with Donald Trump. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">All
5 of DJT's children are U.S. citizens but none is a U.S. "natural
born Citizen" because the mothers either naturalized after the
children were born (Ivana—Don, Eric, Ivanka, and Melania—Barron)
or the parents married after the child was born (Marla—Tiffany).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">It
was not until an ACT of Congress in the 20th century, the 1922 Cable
Act, that the wife was allowed to retain her foreign citizenship if
she wanted to. If she did not naturalize, the child, born either
before or after their marriage, would be a "citizen" with
singular U.S. citizenship but not an Article II Section 1 clause 5
"natural born Citizen" with singular U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Only
a "natural born Citizen" is "...eligible to the Office
of President... ."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
his short note to Washington, Jay certainly did not imply that
eligibility to be president was by birth to persons not married to
each other—whether the two persons were both U.S. citizens or if
the male was a U.S. citizen and the female was a foreign citizen
(whether she is a friend for love or a prostitute for money.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
1787 America, Jay certainly did NOT imply that eligibility to be
president applied to 2016 America children born to an unmarried man
with multiple sex partners who expect to receive welfare benefits
from the "man" Uncle Sam for the children born to unmarried
persons.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
1787 America, Jay certainly did not imply multiple wives as in Islam.
For a Muslim child, or a child born to an an independent Mormon with
multiple wives, to be eligible to be president, it would take an
amendment to the Constitution change the meaning of “natural born
Citizen.”</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">It
would also take an amendment to change the singular U.S. citizenship
meaning of "natural born Citizen" to include either birth
on foreign soil to only “one” U.S. citizen parent (Ted Cruz), or
birth on U.S. soil to “zero” U.S. citizen parents (Marco Rubio,
Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley), or birth to a U.S. citizen father with
multiple wives (some wives U.S. citizens and some not).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2863051432">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2863893955">3
days ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
United States doesn't observe made-up birther law. It sure doesn't
observe your wacky version of it.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28661175931"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2863893955">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2866117593">2
days ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"wacky"…</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Hey,
Dave B., your "wacky" word is not good enough.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Simply
present the history of the United States regarding the origin of
"natural born Citizen" in coherent sentences if you can.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If
you can't, well, you can't.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Since
you can't, don't bother thoughtful readers with your "wacky"
silliness.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28674949681"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2866117593">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2867494968">a
day ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Persons
who acquire US citizenship by birth in the United States are and have
always been natural born citizens, regardless of the nationalities of
their parents. That's longstanding, well-settled law. The status of
persons who acquire US citizenship by birth abroad to a US citizen
parent in regard to eligibility for the presidency has long been held
to be ambiguous and unresolved.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
In
2008, Leo Donofrio dreamed up that business about how a natural born
citizen had to be born in the United States to two US citizen
parents. Now YOU'VE added your own wacky spin that those two US
citizen parents must be married to each other. Whether or not a child
is born out of wedlock is of no relevance to that child's nationality
if that child is born in the United States-- except, I presume, in
the unusual case in which the father was a Blue List foreign
diplomat. But that's a matter of REAL law, and not imaginary, wacky
birther law, so it's probably over your head.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28683477051"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2867494968">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2868347705">19
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">John
Jay underlined "born" for a reason…</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B., you continue to digress.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
issue is John Jay's original intent for underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in his note to George Washington.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Jay
implied only singular U.S. citizenship, only possible by birth on
U.S. soil only to U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
"...nationalities of their parents" is not the issue. The
issue is the citizenship status of the parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
issue is simple.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Are
both of the parents U.S. citizens before the child is born? Not the
original foreign "nationality" of the parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
1795 Naturalization Act "citizen" language about, as you
wrote, "...persons who acquire US citizenship by birth abroad to
a US citizen parent," (parent = singular in your comment), the
1795 language resolved the issue about the eligibility to be
president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">A
"citizen" who is not a "natural born Citizen" is
not eligible to be president, and a "natural born Citizen"
only acquires singular U.S. citizenship "by birth alone" to
two U.S. citizenship married parents, not by birth to only one U.S.
citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/PogueMoran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2868347705">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869221639">6
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Okay
since we want to talk conspiracy. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">He
underlined born meaning one must be born a citizen. Plain and simple.
There is no requirement for one to be born of two US Citizen "married
parents"</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Are
you really claiming those born out of wedlock can't be president? How
about those those born of a father who died before birth? Do you
imply they can't be president either?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28696395042"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869221639">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869639504">2
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Are
you really claiming"…</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pogue
Moran, do you really think that when John Jay underlined the word
"born"in his note to his friend George Washington that he
was telling his friend that he, Jay, did not care about the marriage
"union" as much as he cared about the national "union?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Do
you really think that Jay believed, in 1787 America, that a married
U.S. citizen male who had a child with a U.S. citizen prostitute or a
neighboring U.S. citizen woman who was not a prostitute could look
his U.S. citizen wife in her eyes and say that his child with a woman
to whom he was not married would be eligible to be president of the
United States when the child attained the age of 35?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Really?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869639504">Art
Telles</a> • <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869928226">2
days ago </a></span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">That's
just silly.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28740285441"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869928226">Dave
B.</a> • <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874028544">36
minutes ago </a></span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"silly...:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B., that is just a silly inarticulate comment.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28696490092"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/PogueMoran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869639504">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869649009">2
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Really?
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Are
you really claiming there is more to that letter than there actually
is? His letter was a reference to the Commander in Chief of the Armed
forces and not the president. Back then the Commander in Chief and
the President were going to be two separate positions in the
government. Jay said nothing about the status of the parents in his
letter or marriage.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">I
notice you didn't answer my question. Do you believe that it requires
the father to be alive at the time the child is born?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">What's
funny though is the first candidate for the republican Party was
actually born of a french citizen father and was born out of wedlock.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">John
Jay could have clarified this at any time when he was chief justice.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28696960632"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869649009">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869696063">2
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Jay
said nothing about…"</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Since
Jay said nothing about the status of the parents or about marriage,
my common sense natural conclusion is that Jay implied two U.S.
citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">On
what do you base your one U.S. citizen parent, or zero U.S. citizen
parent, or unmarried "parents" since Jay did not mention
citizen status or marriage of the parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Common
sense is one thing but an agenda without common sense is not
persuasive and not convincing.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Common
sense affirms that a child is a "natural born Citizen" and
eligible to be president if born to two U.S. citizen married parents
before OR after the father dies.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">See,
Pogue Moran, since Jay did not mention the life status of the father
as you adduced, common sense fills in the implications.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Singular
U.S. citizenship is a citizenship higher hurdle than dual
U.S./foreign citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Singular
U.S. citizenship "by birth alone" according to Article II
Section 1 clause 5 to two U.S. citizen married parents is a
citizenship higher hurdle than U.S. citizenship "at birth"
according to the "citizen" language since 1795 of all
naturalization and immigration statutes to one U.S. citizen parent.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Singular
U.S. citizenship "by birth alone" according to A2S1c5 to
two U.S. citizen married parents is a citizenship higher hurdle than
the 1898 U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court's decision "declaring"
that Wong Kim Ark was a U.S. citizen even though he was born to two
zero U.S. citizen parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">See
how coherent, persuasive and convincing common sense is when
analyzing John Jay's original intent for underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen?"</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Jay
was right in 1787 about "natural born Citizen."<br />
</span></span></span><br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
Supreme Court was wrong in 1898 about "citizen" Wong Kim
Ark.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Two
U.S. citizen married parents is a citizenship higher hurdle and
produces more national stability than zero U.S. citizenship parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869696063">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869931477">2
days ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Since
Jay said nothing about the status of the parents or about marriage,
my common sense natural conclusion is that Jay implied two U.S.
citizen married parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
Apparently
we STILL haven't found the nexus of common sense and birtherism.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28740373122"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869931477">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874037312">36
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Apparently..."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B.. apparently you have no coherent substance to add to support your
2016 "natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirther theory,
your 2016 myth, that John jay did NOT mean to imply </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
_
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship <br />
_Only by birth on U,S. soil
<br />
_Only "by birth alone" to two U.S. citizen married
parents </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
when
he underlined the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George
Washington.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Do
you want to try it again, and add a refutation to my assertion about
John Jay's original genesis intent?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If
you do not, it's because you can't.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Neither
can ANY of the "nbC" new meaning neobirthers, and there are
many, that I have asked to rebut and refute my point about John Jay,
the author of "natural born Citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28740399362"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874037312">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874039936">33
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Look,
if you're that set on marginalizing yourself, don't expect me to try
to talk you out of it.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28740523882"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874039936">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874052388">16
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"...marginalizing..."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B., as you have revealed yourself in your comments to Mario Apuzzo in
this thread, you have returned to your way of saying nothing with
multisyllabic words.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Oh
well.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/PogueMoran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869931477">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2870845903">2
days ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">That's
because birtherism isn't common sense.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/PogueMoran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869696063">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869705173">2
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Common
sense" meaning you made up the conclusion and are trying to
think you know what a dead person said centuries ago. He was a chief
justice clearly it would have come up at sometime during his tenure
if he meant what you thought he meant.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">There
is no basis for there to be a rule for married parents. We're talking
about the real world here.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">I
notice you once again didn't answer my question. Under your theory
does the father have to be alive at the birth of the child? Using
your "common sense" strict nonsense if a child is born
after the father's death then he wouldn't have been born with two
citizen married parents at the time of his birth which is what you
claimed to require. Article 1 Section 5 says nothing about the
citizenship of the parents let alone mentioned parents or even
married parents. You just made this up.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You're
not using common sense art.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28697278362"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869705173">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869727836">an
hour ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Common
Sense"...</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">So,
then, you admit that you too "...made up the conclusion..."
that Jay implied U.S./foreign citizenship for the father and or
mother and that Jay also implied that marriage was NOT a factor since
Jay did not mention either in his July 25, 1787 note to George
Washington or at any time before or after he was Supreme Court Chief
Justice.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Is
that what you are implying, since Jay said noting about what he meant
by "natural born Citizen" and whether or not the father
died before the child was born?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Where
is the common sense in your unrealistic assumptions?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pogue
Moran, I answered your death question about the father. Did you read
quickly or slowly? Did you miss this:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">>>
<i>"Common sense affirms that a child is a "natural born
Citizen" and <br />
eligible to be president if born to two U.S.
citizen married parents </i><i><b><br />
before OR after</b></i><i>
the father dies."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">That's
my common sense. What's your common sense?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/PogueMoran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869727836">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869740448">an
hour ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">See
this is the problem you birthers have. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You
read something and then just make stuf up from it. Jay didn't really
imply anything. Jay implied that he didn't want someone born overseas
coming here and being commander in Chief. This has nothing to do with
those born here regardless of the status of the parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">But
that's not your original implication Art so now you've adjusted your
theory accordingly.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Okay
another question. So what happens when a child is born from a rape
and the attacker is unknown? Are you going to claim that child can't
be president? What about someone in Tom Vilsack's situation? Common
sense shows no one should listen to you.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If
the early Americans thought as you did they wouldn't have nominated
John C Fremont to be the first candidate for the Republican Party for
President.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28697730662"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869740448">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869773066">an
hour ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dittos
to "see...just make stuf up…"</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">If
Jay did not imply "anything" then Jay did not imply
"anything" when he underlined the word "born In
"natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his
friend George Washington, and Washington "knew" that that
was not implying "anything" important.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Common
sense reveals that a child born of rape is not a "natural born
Citizen" since the child was not born to two U.S. citizen
married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pogue
Moran, simple common sense is so revealing. Trying it yourself. I
know you can do it by simply putting yourself in Jays position and
telling yourself what YOU would mean by underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in 1787 America.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Fremont
is a digression away from John Jay.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28697824592"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://disqus.com/by/Pogue%20Moran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869773066">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869782459">an
hour ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Of
course he didn't imply anything by underlining the word born. Just
like there's no meaning to natural born citizen being capitalized in
the constitution. You're reading into something that wasn't there.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">How
does common sense say a child born of rape isn't a natural born
citizen? Again you're making the assumption that natural born citizen
requires two us citizen married parents when it doesn't. Do you have
any proof that the founders changed the meaning of the term natural
born citizen between what it was under the articles of confederation
to the constitution to magically mean born of two citizen married
parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You're
not using simple common sense but rather idiot birther logic which
has never held up in a court of law.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Fremont
is relevant. If the early americans felt as you claimed Jay did and
if they used your "common sense" then Fremont would have
never been able to be nominated and someone would have made a fuss
about it.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"> <span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
reality is you don't know what common sense is.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28698356532"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869782459">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869835653">13
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Of
course...you're making the assumption..."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pogue
Moran, you are doing the same thing you say that I am doing.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">I
say that Jay in 1787 implied <br />
only singular U.S. citizenship
that is <br />
only possible "by birth alone" on U.S. soil
<br />
only to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You
say that Jay did not imply "anything."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You
are promoting an eligibility theory, a myth that Jay did not imply
anything significant by underlining the word "born" in
"natural born Citizen" in 1787, so you, as do all other
"natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers, say that
Jay by NOT saying anything about one or two parents, citizens or not
citizens, can be construed today in 2016 America as implying that
anything goes concerning what Jay implied about being eligible to be
president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">_Two
U.S. citizen married parents or two U.S. citizens who are not married
only to each other.<br />
_Birth on U.S. soil or birth on foreign
soil.<br />
_Birth on foreign soil to one U.S. citizen parent or birth
two U.S. citizen married or not married parents.<br />
_Birth on U.S.
soil to one or zero U.S. citizen married parents or not married
persons.<br />
_Singular U.S. citizenship or dual U.S./foreign
citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
"nbC" new meaning neobirthers are not coherent, not
persuasive, not convincing, not exhibiting common sense about
original genesis and the original intent of John Jay, George
Washington and the delegates who adopted Article II Section 1 clause
5, and the states ratified who ratified the original intent of Jay
underlining the word "born" in "natural born Citizen"
in 1787.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">General
Fremont, the first person nominated by the nascent Republican Party
lost the general election. Four years later, Lincoln was the first
Republican elected president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Pogue
Moran, in his first inaugural address, Lincoln said that the Union is
older than the 1787 Constitution, older than the 1778 Articles of
Confederation, older than the 1776 Declaration of Independence, older
than the 1774 Articles of Association, and that his purpose as
President was to preserve the Union. He called it a perpetual Union.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Read
more here:<br />
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">>>
</span></b></span></span></span><a href="http://originalbirtherdocument14.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">http://originalbirtherdocument...</span></span></span></a></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">The
U.S. Constitution and the Union is defended by defending Jay's
original intent for underlining the word "born" in "natural
born Citizen" as meaning ONLY singular U.S. citizenship,
possible only "by birth alone" only to two U.S. citizen
married parents.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Defending
the original genesis original intent of John Jay and his reason for
underlining the word "born" in "natural born Citizen"
also defends Abraham Lincoln's original intent for defending the U.S.
Constitution of the entire Union.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">The
"union" of the singular U.S. citizenship family is united
to the "Union" of citizens who are eligible to be
president, the U.S. "natural born Citizen" is the ONLY U.S.
citizen eligible to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28698661141"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://disqus.com/by/Pogue%20Moran/">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869866114">an
hour ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">no
I'm actually not making assumptions here. You're the one claiming
that in changes one word between natural born subject and natural
born citizen that somehow jay made up this new type with new rules
that is contrary to the common law that the founders were raised in. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
Jay
wasn't a delegate to the convention and his letter wouldn't have
arrived in time.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You
claim Jay implied something that wasn't actually implied. You're
putting your own spin on something totally innocuous. I'm not
promoting a theory I'm just saying the way things actually are. The
way they've held up in court. Your two citizen parents married theory
hasn't held up in court on any of the birther related challenges.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">What's
being said is the founders used the common law in that one born on US
Soil regardless of parentage is a natural born citizen. This is
something even William Rawle knew and he was there at the founding.
He was also appointed first DA for Pennsylvania by President George
Washington so I'd think he would know a lot more about this than you:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Therefore
every person born within the United States, its territories or
districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural
born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all
the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity. " -
William Rawle - A View of the Constitution of the United States –
1829</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Yes
Fremont lost the election but thus he was nominated by one of the
major parties despite not meeting your made up requirements.
Obviously your made up requirements weren't something the founders or
early Americans believed.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Again
you claim to know Jay's original intent and yet that's not what he
said. So when you claim you're defending his original intent, you're
outright lying. Again Art not common sense. You make up a theory
which you still can't support.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28699359411"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869866114">Pogue
Moran</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869935941">13
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">John
Jay v. William Rawle? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">No.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Something
that would be nice for "nbC" new meaning neobirthers to do
is to clarify that Rawle only meant that, for eligibility to be
president, the parents could be either U.S. citizens or aliens when
their child is born "within" the United States and that is
what John Jay meant also, ONLY U.S. soil, not the citizenship status
of the parents, married to each other or not.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Are
you saying that Rawle, in 1829, although he did not say so, was
implying, for eligibility to be president, he was implying zero U.S.
citizenship for the married parents of a child, and Rawle was also
implying that the reproducers of a child could be unmarried, and that
John Jay would agree with Rawle?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Are
you saying that Rawle was implying one U.S. citizen parent or zero
U.S. citizen parents in 1829 America" as long as the child was
born "within" the United States and Jay would agree?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Since
Rawle did not clarify himself the way you and other "nbC"
new meaning neobirthers want him to be understood, we in 2016 America
can infer that Rawle was implying in 1829 America that <b>"...whether
the parents are citizens or aliens..."</b> meant what John Jay
meant and implied by underlining the word "born" in
"natural born Citizen" in 1787 America, that the married
parents of the child could be either born with U.S. citizenship or
could have been born on foreign soil with foreign citizenship who
became U.S. naturalized citizens BEFORE their child was born "within"
the United States and "... is a natural born citizen in the
sense of the Constitution."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Who
else after 1829 agreed with Rawle as you understand Rawle?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Did
the 1875 Minor v. Happersett Court adduce Rawle for their decision
because they agreed with what you say Rawle meant?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">No.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Did
the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark Court adduce Rawle to support
their decision because they agreed with what you say Rawle meant?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">No</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2868347705">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2868503711">16
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">You're
trying to make a constitutional case out of an underlined word in a
vague passage in a personal letter?<br />
</span></span></span><br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Here's
how much attention the Federal Convention paid to John Jay's letter--
he said,</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
"Permit
me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide
a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration
of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command
in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolved on,
any but a natural born Citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
Jay
is believed to have had the German officer, von Steuben, particularly
in mind when he wrote that letter. What did the delegates do? They
went out of their way, quite purposefully, to make men like von
Steuben eligible for the office of president, and the position of
"Command in chief of the american army." So much for your
underline.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"The
"...nationalities of their parents" is not the issue. The
issue is the citizenship status of the parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">In
the United States, citizenship completely overlaps nationality, just
as it does in every other country I know of; the reverse is not true.
All US citizens have US nationality. In US law, "nationality"
is linked to permanent allegiance.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"...the
1795 language resolved the issue about the eligibility to be
president."</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">According
to what genuine scholarly authority? That's birther law, vintage 2008
or younger. In 1938, here's what the executive departments reporting
to the president on US nationality law had to say about that:</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">""Naturalization,"
according to the usual acceptation of the term in the United States,
undoubtedly means the grant of a new nationality to a natural person
after birth. (Cooley, Principles of Constitutional Law, 88; Osborne
v. Bank, 9 Wheat. 827; 9 Op. Att'y Gen. 859). The term is not
ordinarily applied to the conferring of the nationality of a state,
jure sanguinis, at birth, upon a child born abroad. It has sometimes
been contended that the power conferred by section 8 of article I of
the Constitution "to establish an uniform Rule of
Naturalization" included the power to provide for acquisition of
nationality at birth by children born abroad to citizens of the
United States, and this contention finds some support in the fact
that the first naturalization act of the United States, which was
passed by the first Congress, that is, the act of March 26, 1790,
entitled "An act to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization"
(1 Stat. 108), contained a provision that the children of citizens of
the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits
of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens:
Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons
whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"It
is interesting to note, however, that the statute declares that such
children shall be "considered as natural born citizens."
Whether the term "natural born citizen," as used in section
1 of article II of the Constitution, with reference to eligibility to
the office of President of the United States, includes persons born
abroad to citizens of the United States is still a subject of debate.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"From
the discussion in the Convention of the Constitutional provision in
question it is apparent that the framers of the Constitution were
principally concerned with the desirability of making it clear that
the acquisition of citizenship of the United States should be
governed by a single Federal law and not left to diverse laws of the
various States of the Union, the provision in the Articles of
Confederation having proved most unsatisfactory. The members seem to
have had in mind, primarily at least, the matter of conferring
citizenship after birth, through the process of naturalization, upon
aliens who should have taken up their abode in the United States,
since mention was made of the fact that in some of the States under
the Confederation a long period of residence was required before
citizenship was granted, while in others it was granted immediately
or very shortly after arrival. A uniform rule seemed desirable. (The
Papers of James Madison (1840), vol. H, pp. 1274, 1300; The
Federalist, A New Edition (1818), No. XLII, pp. 267-268; Story on the
Constitution, ch. XVI; Warren, The Making of the Constitution, p.
480. See also Passenger Cases, 7 How. 282, 482). It may be possible
to hold, however, that the Convention, when using the expression "an
uniform rule of naturalization" contemplated a broader use of
the term "naturalization" than that which is now ordinarily
applied, and that it intended to cover cases in which citizenship
might be conferred by statute at birth upon children born to citizens
of the United States in foreign lands. The latter view was expressed
in the opinion of Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett, 1874,
88 U.S. 102, 168, and in the opinion of Justice Gray in US. v. Wong
Kim Ark, 1898, 100 U.S. 69,679 70-708.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"Even
if it is true that the term naturalization" in section 8 of
article I of the Constitution should be construed broadly, it does
not follow that in the proposed new act the narrower meaning
indicated by the definition under discussion cannot properly be used,
especially as this meaning is now universally attributed to the word.
Certainly in recent years, at least, persons who were born abroad of
citizens of the United States and who acquired citizenship of the
United States at birth, under the provision of section 1993 of the
Revised Statutes, have never been termed "naturalized
citizens.""</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Nationality
Laws of the United States- Message from the President of the United
States Transmitting a Report Proposing a Revision and Codification of
the Nationality Laws of the United States, Prepared at the Request of
the President of the United States, by the Secretary of State, the
Attorney General, and the Secretary of Labor, submitted to President
Roosevelt on June 1, 1938</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/files/1940nat-act-comm-print-pt-1a.pdf</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Does
that sound like the 1795 act "resolved" it?</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-28696222441"></a>
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2868503711">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869622244">2
hours ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Yes…</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
1795 Naturalization Act is a "naturalization" act.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B, everything you adduced is about "naturalization" and
citizenship, not a definition of "natural born Citizen" as
John Jay obviously understood it when he underlined the word "born"
in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George Washington.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">An
Article II Section 1 clause 5 "natural born Citizen" is a
U.S. "citizen" with singular U.S. citizenship "by
birth" alone to two U.S. citizen married parents, not a
naturalization act U.S. "citizen" with singular U.S.
citizenship "at birth" to one U.S. citizen (Sen. Cruz) or
"at birth" to zero U.S. citizens as the Fourteenth
Amendment has been redefined by the 1898 U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark
Supreme Court (Sen. Rubio, Gov. Jindal, Gov. Haley).</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
immigration and naturalization statutes since 1795 use only the "at
birth" language for naturalized citizens, and do not refer to
children born on foreign soil as naturalized U.S. citizens "by
birth" to one U.S. citizen parent or two U.S. citizen married
parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
1795 Naturalization Act "citizen" language resolved that
children born abroad to two U.S. citizen married parents were U.S.
"citizens" at birth but NOT U.S. "natural born
Citizens" by birth alone, "citizen" language that ALL
immigration and naturalization statutes have affirmed since 1795.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/disqus_oESiueRQsK/">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869622244">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869915516">25
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">I
believe I've already addressed those points-- they're not improved by
rearranging the words. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><br />
The
United States observes its own real law, made by its Congress and
courts-- not imaginary law cooked up by self-marginalizing cranks and
crackpots.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869915516">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869946728">a
few seconds ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">"real
law"…</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B. Article II Section 1 clause 5 is part of the Constitution, not
United States "real law, made by its Congress and courts"
and can only be changed by amendment.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Dave
B. the original intent of John Jay in underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen," an intent that was agreed with
by Washington, the ConCon delegates and the states who ratified the
language of Article II Section 1 clause 5, is not changed by
naturalization statutes by the Congress or declarations by the
Supreme Court, federal courts, state courts.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Century Schoolbook, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="http://disqus.com/by/Dave%20B./">Dave
B.</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869975218">26
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Okay,
you've got a point-- the original Constitution wasn't made by
Congress. But it's real law, and it sure wasn't made since 2008 by
those cranks I mentioned, either.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;"><a href="https://disqus.com/by/art_telles/">Art
Telles</a> <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2869975218">Dave
B.</a> • <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fact-checking-media-yes-clinton-machine-did-start-/#comment-2874045504">37
minutes ago</a> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Huh?...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Of
course the "original Constitution" is "real" law.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">The
U.S. Constitution is "positive law" written to support the
"natural law" that the delegates possessed BEFORE the
positive law was debated, written, adopted and ratified.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: large;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-58324262950905070962016-06-05T12:18:00.003-07:002016-06-16T19:03:58.528-07:00Allow Foreign Born Adopted Children To Be Considered Natural Born Citizens<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Massachusetts
Resolution</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Allow
Foreign Born Adopted Children</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>To
Be Considered Natural Born Citizens</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>And
Eligible To Be President</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Attorney
Mario Apuzzo posted the following resolution which has been proposed
in the Massachusetts legislature to change by Congressional statute
alone the meaning of "natural born Citizen" in Article II
Section 1 clause 5 to allow foreign born childred adopted by U.S.
citizen parents to be eligible to be president. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">See
the original post on Mario's Natural Born Citizen blog on June 2,
2016 at 2:50 PM, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html?commentPage=2">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html?commentPage=2</a>
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">WHEREAS</span></b>
the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 amends the Immigration and
Naturalization Act (INA) to permit foreign born adopted children to
acquire automatic United States citizenship upon certain
conditions.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">WHEREAS</span></b>,
foreign born adopted children became United States citizens
automatically when at least one parent is a United States citizen,
the child is adopted under 16 years of age, the child is residing in
the United States in the legal and physical custody of the parent
having United States citizenship, and the adoption of that child has
been finalized, and all legal requirements applicable to adopted
children comply with the provisions set forth in section 101(b)(1) of
the Immigration and Naturalization Act.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">WHEREAS</span></b>,
despite automatic United States citizenship under the Child
Citizenship Act of 2000, foreign born adopted children are not
considered natural born citizens of the United States under the
United States Constitution and as such, cannot be afforded certain
inalienable rights and privileges available to natural born citizens
under the United States Constitution including but not limited to
being eligible to pursue the Office of President of the United
States.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">WHEREAS</span></b>,
the purpose of the natural born citizen clause in the United States
Constitution is to protect the nation from foreign influence and
ensure absolute loyalty and attachment to the principles of the
Constitution.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">WHEREAS</span></b>,
there are more than 250,000 foreign born adopted children in the
United States whom are United States citizens that are being raised
as Americans, educated as Americans and bear true faith and
allegiance to the United States just like natural born citizens.
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">THEREFORE</span></b>,
be it resolved that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts speaking
through its legislature hereby petitions the United States Congress
to enact legislation allowing foreign born adopted children that
satisfy the requirements under the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 to
be considered natural born citizens so that they can be afforded the
same inalienable rights and privileges extended to all other citizens
of the United States pursuant to the United States Constitution.<br />
</span></span></span><br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is attorney Apuzzo's comment:<br />
<br />
"This proposed
Resolution 3317 is misguided. Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4,
Congress shall have "Power To . . . establish an uniform Rule of
Naturalization . . . throughout the United States.” Establishing a
rule of naturalization does not include the power to make any one a
natural born citizen, for the power starts with the concept that the
status of natural born citizen already exists prior to Congress
exercising that naturalization power and it would be a contradiction
in terms to hold that a naturalized citizen can be a natural born
citizen. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"It
is that preexisting definition of a natural born citizen which was
incorporated into the Constitution and which Congress cannot change
without a constitutional amendment. That definition is found in the
common law the nomenclature with which the Framers were familiar when
they drafted and adopted the Constitution. That common law
incorporated the definition of a natural born citizen that existed
under the law of nations. That definition is a child born in a
country to parents who were its citizens. See Emer de Vattel, The Law
of Nations, Section 212 (1758) (1797); Minor v. Happersett (1898).
<br />
<br />
"A child born in a foreign nation to alien parents,
who is adopted by U.S. citizen couple and thereby becomes after her
or his birth and adoption a naturalization "citizen" of the
United States, cannot possibly be an Article II natural born citizen.
Congress proclaiming that such a child is a natural born citizen
would be an unconstitutional exercise of power the Congress does not
have. It would also be an act of discrimination against other
non-adopted persons who have become citizens of the United States
after their birth."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Read
the story about the Massachussetts resolution on the
NewBostonPost.com page:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Rep.
pushes resolution to keep niece’s White House dreams alive</b><br />
By
State House News Service | June 2, 2016, 10:15 EDT</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
at
<a href="http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/">http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/</a></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is my comment on Apuzzo's blog:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">She
said,<br />
<br />
"...I don’t know every problem in the world
yet, because I’m only eleven. I’m sure that the country will make
the right decision.”<br />
<br />
Mario,<br />
<br />
I read the
article that you linked to yesterday that is titled <b>Rep. pushes
resolution to keep niece’s White House dreams alive.</b><br />
<br />
When
11 year old Alena Mulhern learns in a matter of seconds that in 1787
a "natural born Citizen" was understood to be a child born
with only singular U.S. citizenship, a "natural born Citizen"
requirement which is only possible by being born only on U.S. soil
only "by birth" to two U.S. citizen married parents, maybe
she will educate the adults that she will not be eligible to be
president of the United States when she is 35 years of age, because a
Congressional statute does not trump and never will trump the
original genesis original intent of the words "natural born
Citizens" in Article II Section 1 clause 5 of the
Constitution.<br />
<br />
The word "born" in "natural
born Citizen" means born, yes, but only born in the United
States, not Canada, England, France, Mexico, Kenya, Cuba, Russia,
Iraq, Iran, China or anywhere else in the world.<br />
<br />
The word
"Citizen" in "natural born Citizen" means
citizen, yes, but only a citizen "by birth," by natural law
-- birth, not "at birth" by positive law -- statute, to two
U.S. citizen married parents, the only U.S. citizens who can convey
their mutual singular U.S. citizenship to their child. <br />
<br />
An
adoptive parent can't convey what they do not have for the same
reason that a positive law, naturalization language, can not trump
natural law, birth.<br />
<br />
Where are the constitutionally
educated adults in the state government of Massachussetts and the
U.S. Congress?<br />
<br />
Are the lights on? <br />
Is anybody
home?<br />
<br />
Art<br />
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">June
3, 2016 at 9:53 PM </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>This
is my comment to a commentator on NewBostonPost.com:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Amendment
vs. Statute.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Chris
Whittle, in your first sentence you wrote "A Uniform Rule of
Naturalization means Congress has the right to determine <i><b>by
statute</b></i> who is a natural born citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
the U.S. Congress has the right (and under Article V so do the
"several states" have the constitutional right) to
determine who is a natural born citizen, but <i><b>not by statute</b></i>,
only <i><b>by amendment</b></i>, because the "natural born
Citizen" language is only in the Constitution ratified in 1787
with the original intent of being <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">perpetual</span></b>,
not in any of the positive law immigration or naturalization acts
passed by Congress since the 1790 Naturalization Act, up to and
including the 1952 Immigration and Naturalization Act and
clarifications since 1952.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">As
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote in paragraphs 6 and 8: (6) "The
Constitution did not give to Congress the power to define a natural
born citizen ...." (8) " For Congress to know what a
natural born citizen was before it could naturalize anyone to be one
would mean that the definition of a natural born citizen already
existed."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Also,
you wrote that "Congress could end birthright citizenship for
abroad births without a constitutional amendment." Yes, because
Congress already has Article 1 positive law naturalization authority
to clarify who is a "citizen" without an amendment.
However, as to who is a "natural born Citizen," the
U.S.Congress or the "several states" must amend the
language of Article II Section 1 clause 5 to clarify that only
singular U.S. citizenship is the implicit original intent of "nbC"
or that dual U.S./foreign citizenship is the implicit original intent
of "nbC" in A2S1c5.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>This
is my comment to Mario Apuzzo on his blog about a commentator on the
NewBostonPost.com:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Reply
to Chris Whittle...<br />
<br />
Mario,<br />
<br />
I just finished
reading your response to Chris Whittle at the New Boston Post.<br />
</span></span></span><br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<a href="http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/#comment-2711935440">http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/#comment-2711935440</a>
<br />
<br />
Here on your blog, in part 1 on June 4, 2016 at 6:38 PM,
you referenced John Jay and George Washington with logic and reason
that is so clear and coherent that it is irrefutable. <br />
<br />
If
the "natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers want to
rebut and refute your conclusion that John Jay and George Washington
were in agreement about the common sense meaning of "natural
born Citizen" in 1787 America, all the neobirthers need to do is
defend the proposition that John Jay did NOT mean what you said he
meant, and that Jay meant something else and Washington agreed with
Jay, and then the neobirthers simply need to spell it out coherently
if they can.<br />
<br />
You wrote:<br />
<br />
<b>Sentence 7:</b><br />
>>
If Congress were going to make anyone a natural born citizen through
a statute, then it would have to know what a natural born citizen was
before making one through one of its naturalization statutes.
<br />
<br />
<b>Sentence 8:</b><br />
>> For Congress to know
what a natural born citizen was before it could naturalize anyone to
be one would mean that the definition of a natural born citizen
already existed. <br />
<br />
<b>Sentence 9:</b><br />
>> If the
meaning of a natural born citizen already existed before Congress was
to naturalize anyone to be one, that meaning had to be the meaning of
a natural born citizen that the Framers had in mind when they drafted
and adopted the Constitution. <br />
<br />
<b>Sentence 10:</b><br />
>>
In fact, we know that the Framers had a meaning of a natural born
citizen in mind before Congress passed any naturalization Act, for
John Jay wrote a letter dated July 25, 1787 to then-General George
Washington recommending that only a natural born citizen be allowed
to serve as Commander in Chief and George Washington wrote back
thanking him for the suggestion without asking him what he meant by a
natural born citizen."<br />
<br />
Sentence #10 with the logical
inference about the tacit agreement between John Jay and George
Washington is what I have been saying since 2012 when Jay became my
"natural born Citizen" new best friend when I understood
that Jay's prescient suggestion was intended to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">perpetual</span>,
<i><b>generation to generation</b></i>, and that his <span style="background: #ffff00;">perpetual</span>
"original genesis original intent" was implied when he
underlined the word <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
in "natural <span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span>
Citizen" in his note to Washington who obviously agreed with
Jay's "original genesis original
intent."<br />
<br />
Art<br />
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">June
4, 2016 at 11:07 PM </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html?commentPage=2">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html?commentPage=2</a>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>This
is my comment to long time Apuzzo nemesis Bryan Olson posted on
NewBostonPost.com:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="color: black;">"Whether
or not..."<br />
<br />
Bryan Olson, there you go again. <br />
<br />
As
you have done for years, every time you post on Mario Apuzzo's
Natural Born Citizen blog ( </span><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/</span></a><span style="color: black;">
) you create confusion. In your last paragraph you conflate two
issues and create confusion in your writing. <br />
<br />
You wrote
"Whether or not Congress can define the Article II term "natural
born Citizen" </span><span style="color: black;"><i><b>by statute</b></i></span><span style="color: black;">,"
and then pivot to the language of the two courts which obfuscated
about the original intent meaning of "natural born Citizen"
without adducing original sources to defend their arbitrary
conclusion that Apuzzo's "...legal position...has no merit in
law."<br />
<br />
Bryan, do you know what the sources are that do
have "merit in law" that support your position, and the
proposition of the "nbC" new meaning neobirthers, that an
"nbC" has dual U.S./foreign citizenship?<br />
<br />
Also,
do you know the sources that have "merit in law" that only
</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">"one"</span></span><span style="color: black;">
U.S. citizen parent (Obama, Cruz) or </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">"zero"</span></span><span style="color: black;">
U.S. citizen parents (Rubio, Jindal, Haley) was implied by John Jay
in 1787 (and so it is still the only implication today in 2016) when
he underlined the word </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span></span><span style="color: black;">
in "natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to
George Washington?<br />
<br />
Bryan, do you know the sources that
have "merit in law" that only </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">"two"</span></span><span style="color: black;">
U.S. citizen married parents was implied by Jay in 1787?<br />
<br />
Bryan,
as you know already, </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">there
are no sources for either implication</span></span><span style="color: black;">,
only singular U.S. citizenship vs. dual U.S./foreign citizenship.<br />
<br />
So
you and other "nbC" new meaning neobirthers </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">choose</span></span><span style="color: black;">
dual U.S./foreign citizenship and original intent meaning birthers
</span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">choose</span></span><span style="color: black;">
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship.<br />
<br />
Also, it seems that you
tacitly agree with Apuzzo that the Congress can NOT define "nbC"
</span><span style="color: black;"><i><b>by statute</b></i></span><span style="color: black;">,
because you obviously do not disagree with the language of Article I
that the Congress only has authority to define who is a </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">"citizen"</span></span><span style="color: black;">
of the United States with positive law naturalization language </span><span style="color: black;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at
birth"</span></b></span><span style="color: black;"> and
naturalization language after birth </span><span style="color: black;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
oath"</span></b></span><span style="color: black;"> at a ceremony. as
the 1952 Immigration and Naturalization Act articulates.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Bryan,
it is you who is crushing the presidential dreams of Alena Mulhern,
the 11 year old Chinese girl adopted by the U.S. citizens, by not
educating her that she is not "...eligible to the Office of
President" because she does not have U.S. citizenship <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth alone"</span></b> on U.S. soil/jurisdiction to two U.S.
citizen married parents, aka <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY
singular</span></b></i> U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"As you have done for years, every time you
post on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog you create
confusion."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'm
sorry you found my comment confusing. I just re-read it, and I don't
see what is so hard to follow. I think you confused yourself. You
certainly do not understand my position correctly. I've nothing to do
with your, "'nbC' new meaning neobirther". I did not
tacitly agree with Apuzzo. I'm certainly not crushing Alena Mulhern's
dream. Young Ms. Mulhern is taking initiative. Her success is far
from a sure thing, but the failure of the crank nonsense that you and
Mr. Apuzzo push is a sure thing because it has already happened.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
presented two reasons to reject Mr. Apuzzo's legal theory: First, he
chose to test it in court, multiple times, and lost every single
time. Incidentally, others have tested it too, and all the courts
that considered it rejected it. Second, we have already had two
presidents that could not be president under your and Mr. Apuzzo's
theory, including the one who was President of the United States when
Ms. Mulhern visited Washington D.C. and was first inspired to someday
seek the office.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"...crushing
Alena Mulhern's dream..."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You
certainly are crushing Alena Mulhern's dream, the 11 year old Chinese
girl's dream of becoming president of the United States, by
encouraging her to pursue the presidency with the help of misguided
elected officials in Massachusetts who think that simply asking the
U.S. Congress to pass a positive law to trump natural law ipso facto
to "consider" a foreign born child to be a "natural
born Citizen" after being adopted by one U.S citizen or two
married U.S. citizens.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Everything
else you wrote in your response to me is irrelevant if you can not
negate the common sense that natural law, birth, an "act"
of nature that is perpetual generation to generation, trumps positive
law, statute. an "act" of law that changes generation to
generation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is part of Olson's comment to attorney Mario Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario
Apuzzo Esq. Wrote:<br />
"We can all notice that this silly
riddler, who goes trolling about the internet under the stage name,
Bryan Gene Olson, continues to defend Barack Obama"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That's
over. There's no defense: Under the Constitution, Barack Obama can
never again be elected President. See the Twenty-Second Amendment.
What President Obama provides is a counter-example to the stupid
theory Mr. Apuzzo presented as if it were law.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">There
may be a serious argument as to whether Congress can make a person a
natural-born citizen months or years after birth, but Mr. Apuzzo's
argument is simply crank nonsense. When he spins a theory on who can
be president that implies the actual president cannot be president,
scholars are not likely to waste much time on it. It merits, "Shhhh!
The grown-ups are talking."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...
]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">See
the rest of Bryan Olson's responses to Mario Apuzzo at
NewBostonPost.com.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
</span></span></span><a href="http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/"><span style="color: black;">http://newbostonpost.com/2016/06/02/rep-pushes-resolution-to-keep-nieces-white-house-dreams-alive/</span></a></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my comment to Olson about his <span style="background: #ffff00;">"crank
nonsense"</span> comment to attorney Mario Apuzzo.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
the third paragraph you wrote "There may be a serious argument
as to whether Congress can make a person a natural-born citizen
months or years after birth, but Mr. Apuzzo's argument is simply
crank nonsense."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Do
you have a credible source for your assertion that there "may"
be a serious argument about what Congress can do by statute to "make"
a "natural-born citizen" without amending Article II
Section 1 clause 5?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
you do not have a credible source, your assertion that the Congress
can "make" by statute what attorney Apuzzo clearly
articulates the adoptive parents can NOT "make" by
adoption, your assertion is "simply crank nonsense" that is
incoherent.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my comment on NewBostonPost.com to attorney Apuzzo about Olson's
comments to Mario.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
a waste...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Your
back and forth with Bryan is such a waste of time 'cause Bryan is so
nebulous and irrational.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
Bryan was rational he would have a coherent reply to me, a person who
is not a lawyer, and simply articulate a reason why he, an "nbC"
new meaning neobirther like others who have been posting their drivel
on your Natural Born Citizen blog, </span></span></span><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;">puzo1.blogspot.com</span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
e.g. Kevin/PhD mathematician, aka Slartibartfast, and Kevin/Masters
mathematician, aka Doctor Conspiracy, host of </span></span></span><a href="http://obamaconspiracy.org/"><span style="color: black;">ObamaConspiracy.org</span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
does NOT believe that natural law birth, an "act" of nature
that, according to John Jay, George Washington and the constitutional
convention delegates that adopted the "birth" language of
Article II Section 1 clause 5, was intended to be perpetual -
generation to generation concerning eligibility to be president,
trumps positive law, statute. an "act" of law that changes
generation to generation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That
should be very easy for an Obot of eight years to articulate, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to my "third paragraph" comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles asked me:<br />
"Do you have a credible source for your
assertion that there 'may' be a serious argument about what Congress
can do by statute to 'make' a 'natural-born citizen' without amending
Article II Section 1 clause 5?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes,
of course. See Professor John M. Yinger's analysis on this very
question from 1999-2000.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
then, a federal court allowed that Congress could make a person a
natural-born citizen retroactively. Markham Robinson petitioned the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
for a preliminary injunction to remove John McCain from the ballot
[Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 - 2008]. To rule on the
motion, the Court assessed the likelihood of Robinson winning on the
merits:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">----</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
At
the time of Senator McCain’s birth, the pertinent citizenship
provision prescribed that “[a]ny child hereafter born out of the
limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose father or mother
or both at the time of the birth of such child is a citizen of the
United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.”
Act of May 24, 1934, Pub. L. No. 73-250, 48 Stat. 797. The Supreme
Court has interpreted the phrase “out of the limits and
jurisdiction of the United States” in this statute to be the
converse of the phrase “in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof,” in the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore
to encompass all those not granted citizenship directly by the
Fourteenth Amendment. Under this view, Senator McCain was a citizen
at birth. In 1937, to remove any doubt as to persons in Senator
McCain’s circumstances in the Canal Zone, Congress enacted 8 U.S.C.
1403(a), which declared that persons in Senator McCain’s
circumstances are citizens by virtue of their birth, thereby
retroactively rendering Senator McCain a natural born citizen, if he
was not one already. This order finds it highly probable, for the
purposes of this motion for provisional relief, that Senator McCain
is a natural born citizen. Plaintiff has not demonstrated the
likelihood of success on the merits necessary to warrant the drastic
remedy he seeks.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
----</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So
yes, there is a serious argument. And there is the <span style="background: #ffff00;">whack-job
crank nonsense</span> that you and Mr. Apuzzo are spouting, under
which two actual U.S. presidents could not be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">John
Yinger said...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
Prof. Yinger is a "credible source" because he knows the
history of John Jay's reason for wanting only a "natural born
Citizen" to be eligible to be president, and that is why Yinger,
after proposing statute legislation, proposed that an amendment may
be necessary if a statute is not sufficient. See his very last
sentence before his first footnote; the url to his Maxwell School of
Citizenship website is found below.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">However,
Bryan, the issue here on NewBostonPost is between your position that
Congress "may be" able to "make" a foreign born
child "at birth" or later in life "by oath" (my
words) into a "natural born Citizen" by statute, positive
law, and my and Mario Apuzzo's position that it takes two U.S.
citizen married parents to "make" a natural born Citizen
with singular U.S. citizenship "by birth alone," natural
law.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For
a resolution to our discussion here Prof. Yinger is not a “credible
source” about whether or not a statute can “make” a natural
born citizen. Do you have any other credible source?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Natural
law trumps positive law because natural law is perpetual--generation
to generation--while positive law changes generation to generation.
That is what Prof. Yinger and the Massachusetts politicians are
either ignorant of or don't care about.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For
Congress to "make" a foreign born person into a natural
born citizen is not a coherent proposition, but for those who
maintain this incoherent point of view it would require an amendment.
An amendment is what Yinger wrote on his Maxwell School, Syracuse
University website in 2000, and I do not accept the credibility of a
Congressional amendment, which is in itself a positive law “making”
what a Congressional positive law without an amendment can not
“make,” because a “natural born Citizen” can ONLY be “made”
by the union of two U.S. citizen married parents who alone can “make”
“by birth alone” a “natural” born Citizen with ONLY singular
U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Instead
of<span style="background: #99ccff;">* </span>putting a few urls here
on NewBostonPost, simply click on my avatar or my name, and at the
top left side of the Disqus page click on my
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent url, then on the right side of the
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent page click on my
OriginalBirtherDocument link. Half way down the page you will find
the following info about Prof Yinger with his Maxwell School of
Citizenship acrtive url plus other urls.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">*
</span><span style="background: #99ccff;"> </span>The above paragraph
was written for the NewBostonPost.com page which did not publish my
previous post with only two urls, so here is the Yinger url and below
are the other urls:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">*
</span>(
http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jyinger/citizenship/history.htm )</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">On
February, 2015 I put this short info about Professor Yinger on my
OriginalBirtherDocument blog.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Grandfather
Foreign Born Adopted Children Into POTUS Eligibility</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">John
Yinger, Professor at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public
Affairs, Syracuse University, has an excellent summary of the history
of the inclusion of the "nbC" phrase into Article II. Read
his 2000 article<span style="background: #99ccff;">*</span> with 62
footnotes. However, after citing the history of the uncertainty of
John Jay's original intent meaning of "nbC," Yinger
promotes grandfathering foreign born adopted children into POTUS
eligibility with an amendment to the Constitution if a statute is not
sufficient.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">*
</span><b>The Origins and Interpretation of the Presidential
Eligibility Clause in the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Founding
Fathers Want the President To Be a “Natural Born Citizen” and
What Does this Clause Mean for Foreign-Born Adoptees?</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">*
</span>(
http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/jyinger/citizenship/history.htm )</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">More
of my comments are found here<span style="background: #99ccff;">**</span>
and here<span style="background: #99ccff;">***</span> on my
OriginalBirtherDocument blog which do NOT endorse grandfathering into
POTUS eligibility foreign born adopted children, and do endorse the
legislatures of the states using the original Article V authority to
propose an amendment to maintain the "original genesis original
intent" of "natural born Citizen" as proposed by John
Jay.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">**
</span>(
http://originalbirtherdocument.blogspot.com/2014/12/time-to-change-conversation.html
)</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">***
</span>( http://originalbirtherdocument2.blogspot.com/ )</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
do you have any other credible sources?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
you do not, your "nbC" new meaning neobirther <span style="background: #ffff00;">whack-job
crank nonsense</span> is incoherent.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/06/allow-foreign-born-adopted-children-to.html"><span style="color: black;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/06/allow-foreign-born-adopted-children-to.html</span></a></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Yinger also wrote in the last paragraph
above the first footnote that an amendment 'may' be required if
'path-breaking legislation' is not sufficient."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Here's
what you asked me, Telles:<br />
"Do you have a credible source
for your assertion that there 'may' be a serious argument about what
Congress can do by statute to 'make' a 'natural-born citizen' without
amending Article II Section 1 clause 5?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So
that's one source, as requested.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"John Jay's original genesis original intent
for underlining the word 'born' in 'natural born Citizen' which can
mean ONLY one thing, only singular U.S. citizenship possible only by
birth alone only to two U.S. citizen married parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well
I'm pretty sure I know your source for that: You made it up. Of
course if you cite Jay saying it, I will retract.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"So, Bryan, do you know what sources your
second credible source 'citation,' the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California, which sources does it adduce
to defend what you assert,"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Closing
your eyes does not make it go away:<br />
"Congress enacted 8
U.S.C. 1403(a), which declared that persons in Senator McCain’s
circumstances are citizens by virtue of their birth, thereby
retroactively rendering Senator McCain a natural born citizen, if he
was not one already." Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2D 1144
(2008)</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Federal Court allowed that Congress could make a person a
natural-born citizen, even retroactively months or years after birth.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, are you serious in asserting that
your second 'credible source' can defend the proposition that a
positive law, statute, can 'retroactively' do with a law what ONLY
natural law, nature, can do ONLY 'by birth alone?'"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'm
defending what I wrote: "There may be a serious argument as to
whether Congress can make a person a natural-born citizen months or
years after birth, but Mr. Apuzzo's argument is simply <span style="background: #ffff00;">crank
nonsense</span>." On the serious argument, I cited a federal
court allowing just that. On the <span style="background: #ffff00;">crank
nonsense</span>, I pointed out that under your theory and Mr.
Apuzzo's, two actual U.S. presidents could not be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Article
II vs. District Judge</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your first response is not responsive. Yinger is not a "credible
source," he is merely a "source" who expresses a wish
that the constitution be ultimately amended if a statute is not
sufficient to grandfather foreign born adopted children into POTUS
eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your second response about John Jay is also not responsive because
you do not refute that by underling the word “born” in “natural
born Citizen” Jay meant by implication ONLY singular U.S.
citizenship, a citizenship status which is ONLY possible by birth on
U.S. soil/jurisdiction ONLY <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">“by
birth alone”</span></b> ONLY to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">To
be responsive, you would need to assert that you know that Jay DID
mean dual U.S./foreign citizenship and Jay did NOT mean ONLY singular
U.S. citizenship, etc. Well, Olson, I'm pretty sure I know that you
can NOT produce a source: You would need to make up a dual
U.S./foreign citizenship statement by John Jay. Of course, if you
cite a Jay note saying that dual U.S./foreign citizenship was his
original genesis original intent for underlining the word “born”
I will retract.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your third response is not responsive because closing your eyes does
no make it so. Read what District Judge William Alsup wrote in
paragraphs two and three of his, order, simply an order, <b>Order
Denying Preliminary Injunction</b>:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
</span></span></span><a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13604511613654311533&q=Robinson+v.+Bowen,+567+F.+Supp.+2d+1144+%282008%29&hl=en&as_sdt=6,44&as_vis=1"><span style="color: black;">https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13604511613654311533&q=Robinson+v.+Bowen,+567+F.+Supp.+2d+1144+%282008%29&hl=en&as_sdt=6,44&as_vis=1</span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
District Judge's statement of the facts in paragraph two was not
intended to clarify the difference between a “citizen” “at
birth” and a “natural born Citizen” <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">“by
birth alone.”</span></b> His comments about Article II and the
Fourteenth Amendment are not meant to assert that the Congress
enacted 8 U.S.C. 1403(a) to retroactively “make” or “render”
a positive law (statute) “citizen” into a natural law (nature)
“natural born Citizen.” That would be incoherent and irrational.
Statute does not trump nature.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Sen.
McCain was born in 1936, two years after the Act of May 24, 1934,
Pub.L. No. 73-250, 48 Stat. 797, and the year before Congress enacted
8 U.S.C. § 1403(a) <i><b>“...to remove any doubt as to persons in
Senator McCain's circumstances in the Canal Zone. …,”</b></i> but
1403(a) was not enacted for Sen. McCain, of course. The District
Judge simply applied to McCain what was already on the books, he was
a citizen by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents (see paragraph
one) who happened to be on U.S. jurisdiction soil outside of the
United States.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">After
saying that McCain was a “citizen” by birth, the District Judge
simply stated his personal opinion that Congress, with the 8 U.S.C
Act enacted in 1937, simply <i><b>“...declared that persons in
Senator McCain's circumstances are citizens by virtue of their birth,
thereby retroactively rendering Senator McCain a natural born
citizen, if he was not one already.”</b></i> The District Judge did
not say that in 2008 the Congress was “retroactively rendering”
Sen. McCain a “natural born citizen” in 1937, of course, since
McCain was born in 1936, or that McCain was an “nbC” by statute.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">However,
the District Judge's conclusion that an Act of Congress, a statute,
can “retroactively” render a “citizen” into a “natural born
Citizen” <i><b>“...if he was not one already”</b></i> is not
coherent. In saying <i><b>“...if he was not one already”</b></i>
the District Judge is incoherent because a statute can not “make”
what can ONLY be “made” <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">“by
birth alone,”</span></b> a person born with ONLY singular U.S.
citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
District Judge's <b>"...if...not..."</b> conclusion in his
opinion in his Order is simply an opinion about what the Supreme
Court and the Congress have done and what he thinks the implication
is, <b>"...if...not...."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
opinion of the District Judge is no more credible than your opinion
that the District Judge is correct and no more credible than my
opinion that the District Judge is wrong.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
is credible is John Jay's original genesis original intent, which can
be ONLY singular U.S. citizenship, etc. If you think that Jay implied
dual U.S./foreign citizenship, do you have a reasonable and coherent
credible source?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Can
Congress by statute extend “citizenship” to those not covered as
“natural born?”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Can
Congress by statute extend “natural born citizenship” status to
those NOT covered <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by birth
alone"</span></b> to two U.S. citizen married parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your fourth response is, well, it is what it is. The word “may”
says it all.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Your
<span style="background: #ffff00;">"crank nonsense"</span>
about retroactively amending the implied original genesis original
intent of original birther John Jay is shallow and incoherent. When
Jay underlined the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen" Jay implied ONLY <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth alone"</span></b> and NOT by statute, retroactive or
proactive.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">PS.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
don't bother responding with snippets like you do here and have done
for years on attorney Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog. Since you
can't articulate why John Jay did <b>NOT</b> imply <b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship when he underlined the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen," your "nbC" new meaning
neobirtherism that also encourages foreign born persons to change the
original genesis original intent of meaning implied in the word
"born" will continue to be incoherent and inarticulate and
irrational.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">John
Jay would agree with me and attorney Apuzzo if he were here to read
your defense of the neobirtherism of Yinger and the District Judge
who said the Congress could render a "citizen" to be a
"natural born Citizen" <i><b>"... if he was not one
already."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, your first response is not
responsive. Yinger is not a 'credible source,'"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Yinger work is now frequently cited by scholars in the field. You
don't have to learn anything from it, but -- this is the point -- you
could.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Does
the idea ever dawn on you that attorneys who lose all their cases and
all their appeals might not be your best source for legal analysis?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, your second response about John Jay
is also not responsive because you do not refute that by underling
the word 'born' in 'natural born Citizen' Jay meant by implication
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship, a citizenship status which is ONLY
possible by birth on U.S. soil/jurisdiction ONLY 'by birth alone'
ONLY to two U.S. citizen married parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">My
response was to point out that you made it up, but offer to retract
if you could actually cite it to Jay. Obviously I've nothing to
retract.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"After saying that McCain was a “citizen”
by birth, the District Judge simply stated his personal opinion that
[...]"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Not
just a personal opinion, no. He wrote that in his capacity as an
Article III judge, exercising the judicial power of the United
States. You are correct that case of adopting a foreign child is
different, but what little guidance we have from Courts indicates
that Congress can make a person a natural-born citizen retroactively.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"The opinion of the District Judge is no more
credible than your opinion that the District Judge is correct and no
more credible than my opinion that the District Judge is wrong."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Can
you point out the part of the Constitution where you and I are vested
with the judicial power of the United States? I'm pretty sure that I
would remember being appointed by the President with advice and
consent of the Senate.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Again,
there may be a serious argument as to whether Congress can make a
person a natural-born citizen months or years after birth, but you
and Mr. Apuzzo are simply spouting crank nonsense. Under your theory
two actual U.S. presidents could not be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-2722737167"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
is my response to Olson:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Your
snippet responses are not productive, not challenging, not
persuasive, not convincing, not interesting.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
you can't refute with multiple sentences and paragraphs that
articulate one thought, your understanding that John Jay implied dual
U.S./foreign citizenship in a coherent way that refutes my contention
that John Jay implied ONLY singular U.S. citizenship ONLY <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth alone"</span></b> when he underlined the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen," your digressions are a waste of
your "nbC" new meaning neobirther intellect and my "nbC"
original genesis original intent original birther intellect.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Your snippet responses are not productive,
not challenging, not persuasive, not convincing, not interesting."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Not
to *you*.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Since you can't refute with multiple
sentences and paragraphs that articulate one thought, your
understanding that John Jay implied dual U.S./foreign citizenship in
a coherent way that refutes my contention that John Jay implied ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship ONLY 'by birth alone' when he underlined
the word 'born' in 'natural born Citizen,' your digressions are a
waste of your 'nbC' new meaning neobirther intellect and my 'nbC'
original genesis original intent original birther intellect."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What?
You dropped your "married parents" clause? That was my
favorite. You out-cranked Apuzzo with that one.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>There
you go again...</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your snippet <b>"not to you"</b> and <b>"What?"</b>
are not productive and not challenging. But, they definitely are
silly.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is spell out your 2000s "natural born Citizen"
new meaning neobirther theory and myth that when John Jay underlined
the word "born" in "natural born Citizen" he did
NOT imply and he did NOT mean ONLY singular U.S. citizenship ONLY <b>"by
birth alone"</b> to two U.S. citizen married parents. Simple,
right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is articulate your reasoning in a coherent sentence,
just 1 sentence should be enough, that Jay DID mean dual U.S./foreign
citizenship either by naturalization <b>"at birth"</b> or
by naturalization <b>"after birth"</b> later in life <b>"by
oath"</b> according to statute. Simple, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is clarify with reason in a coherent sentence why the
1875 Minor v Happersett Court in the quote by attorney Apuzzo did NOT
understand "born" in "nbC" to be a reference to
<b>"by birth alone"</b> to two U.S. citizen married
parents. Simple, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is tell us why the 1875 Minor Court did NOT understand
that in 1787 "born" in "natural born Citizen" did
NOT refer to ONLY married parents and that "born" ALSO
meant born to a female U.S. citizen prostitute and a male U.S.
citizen. Simple, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is articulate why your "nbC" new meaning
neobirtherism is superior to the original intent birthers who contend
that John Jay would agree that birth to persons who were NOT married
to each other was NOT the Minor v Happersett Courts prevenient
presupposition when they wrote <i><b>"...it was never doubted
that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens
became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is simple. <br />
Write complete sentences and avoid
the "silly riddler" snippets.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, your snippet 'not to you' and 'What?'
are not productive and not challenging. But, they definitely are
silly."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">There's
no challenging a fantasy world other than to point out that such it
is. Mr. Telles, you are pushing a theory on who can be president
under which the actual president cannot be president. Inside your own
head you get to decide the rules, but young Alena Mulhern was
inspired by visiting our nation's capital and I rather doubt that the
inside of your head can compete.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"... singular U.S. citizenship ONLY 'by birth
alone' to two U.S. citizen married parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Love
your "married parents" clause. Should I argue against it?.
Nope, just emphasize it. Like this:<br />
<span style="background: #ffff00;">Hey,
get a load of this guy</span> who thinks that <span style="background: #ffff00;">to
be president </span>your <span style="background: #ffff00;">parents</span>
had to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">married</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"All you need to do is simple."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
I need to do is done.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to "kookologist" Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hey...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Hey,
get a load of this guy</span> who can not articulate a coherent
sentence and deny that John Jay did NOT mean that to be president
parents were expected to be married, and Jay would have accepted
Bryan Olson's silly riddler, <b>"kookologist"</b>
conclusion that Jay himself would be a <b>"kook"</b>
because Jay would NOT have included as a "natural born Citizen"
a child born to a female U.S. citizen prostitute who was not married
to her male U.S. citizen pimp or her male U.S. citizen customer,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Is
Bryan a "natural born Citizen new meaning neobirther "kook"
himself? Yes, he is, and this John Jay inspired original genesis
original intent original birther has discovered a <b>"kookologist"</b>
who is a "kook" himself for believing such neobirther
nonsense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
who calls himself a <b>"kookologist"</b> without portfolio
(see one of his recent comments below), is implying that Jay was a
<b>"kook"</b> for implying by underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" that Jay meant born with ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship, which is possible ONLY <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth alone"</span></b> ONLY to two U.S. citizen married
parents, married ONLY to each other.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your <b>"kookologist"</b> neobirtherism <b>kookery</b> is
just to easy to refute.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
you need to do is clarify with a coherent sentence, that means with
thoughtful reason, why you think and believe in your <b>"kookologist"</b>
heart that Jay was a <b>"kook"</b> for implying singular
U.S. citizenship <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by birth
alone"</span></b> to two married U.S. citizen married parents or
why Jay was NOT a <b>"kook"</b> for implying by underlining
the word "born" in "natural born Citizen" to any
ole prostitute and any ole customer.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Articulate
that one Bryan, you ole <b>"kookologist"</b> you.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Was
Jay a <b>"kook"</b> for implying two U.S. citizen married
parents, married only to each other, or NOT a <b>"kook"</b>
for implying one female U.S. citizen prostitute parent, not married
to the male U.S. citizen "partner" participating in
reproducing the population?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
would be good, if you could do it, but you won't, 'cause you can't
articulate a coherent "nbC" new meaning neobirther
<b>"kookoloist"</b> sentence...so any ole snippet will
do...and I'll pick and choose which <b>"kookologist"</b>
snippet I'll respond to.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
if it wasn't for your <b>"kookologist"</b> without
portfolio snippets, we wouldn't know what a <b>"kook"</b>
you "nbC" new meaning neobirthers really are, spouting your
one U.S. citizen parent theory, your myth, instead of helping educate
an eleven year old child to understand that a "natural born
Citizen" is eligible to be president of the United States ONLY
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by birth alone"</span></b>
to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">See
how easy it is to articulate John Jay's original intent for underling
the word "born" in "natural born Citizen" in
1787?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You
can't see it?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well,
maybe that's because you are a <b>"kookologist"</b> who
believes the 2000s theory, the 2000s myth of only one U.S. citizen
parent and now the theory, the myth, of "grandfathering"
foreign born children in POTUS eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Sheesh,
what a kooky thought that is.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote of my:<br />
"conclusion that Jay himself would be a
'kook' because Jay would NOT have included as a 'natural born
Citizen' a child born to a female U.S. citizen prostitute who was not
married to her male U.S. citizen pimp or her male U.S. citizen
customer,"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Pretty
awful stuff there, Mr. Telles. You won't find it Jay's writing, nor
mine.<br />
All you.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"married
parents" vs. not married reproducers of children...</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Olson, did you forget what you wrote?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
you previously quoted me and then added your comment about <b>"married
parents"</b> being something that you did not need to argue
against, and then you quote me a second time and leave out the word
<b>"kookologist"</b> and you start your response with the
word "conclusion" in connection with John Jay.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
you claimed years ago to be a <b>"kookologist"</b> who has
always defended the "natural born Citizen" new meaning
neobirtherism theory of <b>ONLY one</b> U.S. citizen parent is
sufficient for POTUS eligibility, and whose reason for being a
<b>"kookologist"</b> is to debunk the John Jay original
intent birthers who promote the common sense that <b>ONLY two</b>
U.S. citizen married parents are necessary to pass singular U.S.
citizenship to the child for the child to be Article II eligible to
be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
you are not the only <b>"kookologist"</b> debunking
kookery. I am also a <b>kookologist</b> debunking kookery. I am
debunking your <span style="background: #ffff00;">neobirtherism
kookery</span> that <b>ONLY one</b> U.S. citizen parent is sufficient
for POTUS eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Sheesh,
what a kooky idea <b>ONLY one</b> is compared to <b>ONLY two</b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
in your <b>"kookologist"</b> debunking of two U.S. citizen
married parents you NEVER articulate with reason, how, why, <b>ONLY
one</b> U.S. citizen parent trumps <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen
married parents, while I and attorney Apuzzo and other original
genesis original intent birthers constantly adduce the language of
the courts and naturalization acts and support our conclusions with
reason.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You
NEVER use facts, evidence and reason because your <b>ONLY one</b>
U.S. citizen parent is unreasonable. That is why it is <span style="background: #ffff00;">neobirther
kookery</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
is your first quote of my first statement:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"... singular U.S. citizenship <b>ONLY 'by
birth alone'</b> to two U.S. citizen married parents."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Love
your "married parents" clause. Should I argue against it?
Nope, just emphasize it. Like this:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hey,
get a load of this guy who thinks that to be president your parents
had to be married.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...end
quote #1...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
is your second quote of my second statement:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote of my:<br />
"conclusion that Jay himself would be a
'kook' because Jay would NOT have included as a 'natural born
Citizen' a child born to a female U.S. citizen prostitute who was not
married to her male U.S. citizen pimp or her male U.S. citizen
customer,"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Pretty
awful stuff there, Mr. Telles. You won't find it Jay's writing, nor
mine.<br />
All you.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...end
quote #2]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
you are correct when you write about what will not be found in your
writing. By promoting the <span style="background: #ffff00;">neobirtherism
kook theory</span> that "born" in "natural born
Citizen" does NOT imply birth to <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen
married parents, you are definitely calling original birther John Jay
a <b>"kook"</b> for implying <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen
married parents by underlining the word "born" in "natural
born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to George Washington, a
suggestion that was accepted by the delegates without debate about
what "born" meant.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
1787 America it meant <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen "married"
parents, NOT shacking up "parents" and NOT a female U.S.
citizen prostitute who may have increased the population with a child
with her male U.S. citizen "pimp" whom she may have been
trying to bribe, or a child with a male U.S. citizen "customer"
whom she may have been trying to bribe.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
I agree that <b>Jay was NOT a kook</b>. So, if you can, defend your
proposition that Jay implied <b>ONLY one</b> U.S. citizen parent when
he underlined the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen" and George Washington agreed with him.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You
won't because you can't.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That's
why <b>ONLY one</b> U.S. citizen parent is <span style="background: #ffff00;">neobirther
kookery</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Why
are <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen <b>"married" parents</b>
original birther John Jay's implicit original genesis original intent
for underlining the word "born?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Simple.
<b>ONLY singular</b> U.S. citizenship can be passed on (aka
"devolve") to a child from <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen
<b>married parents</b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
from an <b>ONLY two</b> U.S. citizen married parents <b>original
birther "kookologist"</b> to an <b>ONLY one</b> U.S.
citizen parent <b>neobirther "kookologist,"</b> debunk <b>ONLY
two</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">"married"</span>
with <b>ONLY one</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">NOT "married"</span>
if you can.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><b><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
is Olson's response to me:</span></span></b></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, you claimed years ago to be a
'kookologist' who has always defended the 'natural born Citizen' new
meaning neobirtherism theory of ONLY one U.S. citizen parent is
sufficient for POTUS eligibility"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
a mess. I've told you over and over, I have no such theory. Remember
I gave you a hint: Marco Rubio is a natural-born citizens. Also, I've
been a kookologist since before Leo Donofrio came out with the
twofer-birther theory in October or November of 2008. I've studied
9-11-inside-jobbers, Einstein deniers, and designers of perpetual
motion machines.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, you are not the only 'kookologist'
debunking kookery. I am also a kookologist debunking kookery. I am
debunking your neobirtherism kookery that ONLY one U.S. citizen
parent is sufficient for POTUS eligibility."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">People
care about who can be president. We know Chester Arthur could and
Barack Obama can be president because Arthur was and Obama is. Your
theory is crank nonsense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><b><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
is my response to Olson:</span></span></b></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">dittos
to "What a mess"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
your response is so silly.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan
Olson wrote something irrational.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"What
a mess. I've told you over and over, I have no such theory. <br />
Remember
I gave you a hint: Marco Rubio is a natural-born citizens. Also, ...
."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes,
Bryan, what a mess you continue to make defending your "natural
born Citizen" new meaning neobirther kookery for Article II
POTUS eligibility, whether it's kookery about the <span style="background: #ffff00;">"one"</span>
U.S. citizen parent (Obama and Cruz, etc.) OR your kooky "hint"
about the <span style="background: #ffff00;">"zero"</span>
U.S. citizen parent (Rubio, Jindal, Haley).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
you're not stupid, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So,
if you can, simply spell out how and why <span style="background: #ffff00;">"one"</span>
U.S. citizen parent OR <span style="background: #ffff00;">"zero"</span>
U.S. citizen parents trump original birther John Jay's implication of
ONLY <span style="background: #ffff00;">"two"</span> U.S.
citizen married parents when he underlined the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his
friend George Washington.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You
can do that in one paragraph with only three sentences, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
you respond with a <b>"what a mess"</b> snippet, then you
are either stupid or ignorant or deliberately deceptive for your own
"nbC" neobirther "kookologist" <span style="background: #ffff00;">taqiyya</span>*
reason to conceal something. You're either concealing an agenda or
lack of ability to reason why <span style="background: #ffff00;">"one"</span>
or <span style="background: #ffff00;">"zero"</span> trump
<span style="background: #ffff00;">"two"</span> U.S. citizen
married parents for a child to be eligible to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>"This
practice [taqiyya] is emphasized in Shia Islam whereby adherents are
permitted to conceal their religion when under threat of persecution
or compulsion. However, it is also permitted in Sunni Islam under
certain circumstances."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">*
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya</a>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-2722709075"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is attorney Mario Apuzzo's first comment to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
silly riddler says that my argument, i.e., that a natural born
citizen is a child born in a country to parents who were its
citizens, which is what the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court said in
Minor v. Happersett (1875), is simply crank nonsense. Yet, he tell us
that Congress through its naturalization powers can take a person who
was born an alien, i.e., not a natural born citizen, and make him or
her a natural born citizen after his or her birth. Now we can see how
we have come to Presidents endorsing for President persons who are
being criminally investigated by that President's chief law
enforcement authority.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to attorney Mario Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"This silly riddler says that
my argument, i.e., that a natural born citizen is a child born in a
country to parents who were its citizens, which is what the unanimous
U.S. Supreme Court said in Minor v. Happersett (1875), is simply
crank nonsense."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Still
getting the order of implication wrong after seven years of arguing
it? Yes, that's crank nonsense. Minor has it the other way: Children
born in a country to parents who were its citizens are natural-born
citizens. Of course they are. I've never said otherwise.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Yet, he tell us that Congress
through its naturalization powers can take a person who was born an
alien, i.e., not a natural born citizen, and make him or her a
natural born citizen after his or her birth."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No,
as I tell it, that matter is likely a serious argument.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
said that the eligibility of foreign-born children who receive
citizenship by statute upon birth is a fairly recent consensus of the
America legal community. I started saying so after John S. McCain III
became the 2008 Republican nominee but before Ted Cruz ran for his
Senate seat. All along I allowed that a serious scholar might make a
case against it, and when Ted Cruz ran for President we saw a few do
so.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
was your Obama denial, Mr. Apuzzo, that said to be crank nonsense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Looking
at your actual results, Mr. Apuzzo, don't I get any credit for
turning out be right all the time?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario
Apuzzo wrote:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
"Now
we can see how we have come to Presidents endorsing for President
persons who are being criminally investigated by that President's
chief law enforcement authority."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">And
in the other major party the highest person in the order of
succession condemns a presidential candidate's racism while endorsing
him.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is attorney Apuzzo's long response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
silly riddler who goes by the stage name, Bryan Gene Olson, said:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Still
getting the order of implication wrong after seven years of arguing
it? Yes, that's crank nonsense. Minor has it the other way: Children
born in a country to parents who were its citizens are natural-born
citizens. Of course they are. I've never said otherwise.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
Mr. Olson is not only a silly riddler, but he also has poor reading
comprehension and logical skills and is intellectually dishonest to
boot. This is what Minor held with respect to who was a natural born
citizen and therefore ipso facto a citizen of the United States at
common law:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born
citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At
common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the
Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children
born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves,
upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born
citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some
authorities go further and include as citizens children born within
the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168]
parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the
first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve
these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider
that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are
themselves citizens.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Minor
v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Note
how Mr. Olson dishonestly leaves out the part of Minor that explained
that those natural born citizens, as it defined them, were
“distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” According to the U.S.
Supreme Court, at common law, all those who were not born in the
country to parents who were its citizens were “aliens or
foreigners,” who could become “citizens” of the United States
through naturalization and possibly under the Fourteenth Amendment.
(U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) later held that a person born in the
United States to alien parents who were domiciled and permanently
residing in the United States and neither foreign diplomats nor
military invaders was a “citizen of the United States” by virtue
of the Fourteenth Amendment; it did not hold that such person was a
“natural born citizen” by virtue of the common law that defined
an Article II natural born citizen.) With Minor’s explanation, it
exhausted all possible persons who could be natural born citizens.
There were no other persons who could be natural born citizens, for
all the rest of the people were “aliens or foreigners.” Indeed,
the Court explained that at common law if one was not born in the
country to parents who were its citizens, one was an alien or
foreigner. For sure, the Court provided an all-inclusive and
all-exclusive definition of a natural born citizen. Hence, only those
born in the United States to parents who were its citizens were
natural born citizens. Hence, there is no order problem with how I
said Minor defined a natural born citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It’s
utterly hilarious that this silly riddler lectures on logic when he
really is a dullard at it. He still has not figured out what the
fallacy of affirming the consequent is even though I have explained
it to him for about 7 years now. He thinks that all natural born
citizens are born citizens, and therefore all born citizens are
natural born citizens, as smart as saying that all poodles are dogs,
therefore all dogs are poodles.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
Mr. Olson were to take some basic logic courses, he should learn that
what Minor provided in its definition of a natural born citizen are
necessary and sufficient conditions to be satisfied in order for one
to be a natural born citizen. That means that at common law if one
did not satisfy one or the other of those conditions, one was not
only not a natural born citizen, but one was an alien or foreigner in
need of naturalization. That naturalization occurred through the
naturalization acts of the states and then exclusively through those
of Congress starting in 1790. After the passage of the Civil Rights
Act of 1866 and the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1866,
that also occurred under those laws.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
silly riddler said:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
said that the eligibility of foreign-born children who receive
citizenship by statute upon birth is a fairly recent consensus of the
America legal community. I started saying so after John S. McCain III
became the 2008 Republican nominee but before Ted Cruz ran for his
Senate seat. All along I allowed that a serious scholar might make a
case against it, and when Ted Cruz ran for President we saw a few do
so.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Firsts,
Mr. Olson falsely claims that the John McCain example helps him. John
McCain was physically born in Panama to two U.S. citizen parents who
were serving the armies of the United States at the time of his
birth. Given that his parents were in the U.S. military at that time,
McCain was born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. He
is thus reputed born in the United States. So, he was born in the
United States to U.S. citizen parents. He is therefore a natural born
citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Second,
there have been some persons with law degrees arguing that certain
persons running for the Office of President and born out of the
United States to one or two U.S. citizen parents neither in the U.S.
military nor in its diplomatic service are natural born citizens.
These persons are very small in number compared to the great number
of persons with law degrees. Some members of Congress have even
several times tried to introduce such legislation, but their efforts
have always failed. A demagogue like Mr. Olson throwing his two cents
into the sordid pot surely does not mean or change anything.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Olson believes that he has not squeezed enough blood out of the
meaning of a natural born citizen. Now he further expands the number
of persons who he claims are natural born citizens. Now he even
claims that a person who was born an alien can also be a natural born
citizen. Again, this silly riddler’s ridiculous position is
contrary to the teachings of the U.S. Supreme Court. In Elk the U.S.
Supreme Court, written by Justice Gray who also wrote Wong Kim Ark,
explained:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
section contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources
only: birth and naturalization. The persons declared [p102] to be
citizens are "all persons born or naturalized in the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." The evident
meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or
degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely
subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and
immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in
the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other.
Persons not thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at
the time of birth cannot become so afterwards except by being
naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings under the
naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by
which foreign territory is acquired.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Elk
v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101-02 (1884). The Court explained that if
one is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time
of birth, one can become a citizen thereof at that time under the
Fourteenth Amendment and needs no naturalization after birth. The
Court further explained that if one is not subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth, then in order
for one to be a citizen of the United States one must be naturalized,
under either a naturalization Act of Congress or a treaty. Surely, if
one is naturalized to be a “citizen” of the United States at
birth or after birth only under a statute or treaty, one is not nor
can one be a “citizen” of the United States “at birth” under
the Fourteenth Amendment, let alone an Article II “natural born
citizen” at common law. The inescapable conclusion from these
teachings is that a child born in a foreign nation to alien parents,
even though later adopted by U.S. citizen parents during the child’s
years of minority, is not born in the United States and subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States and therefore cannot be a
citizen of the United States “at birth” under the Fourteenth
Amendment (like Obama, Rubio, Jindal, and Haley, who are generally
not considered to be naturalized because they do not need a
naturalization statute to make them citizens of the United States,
but who are nevertheless naturalized according to the original
meaning of the term under the original Constitution). Nor can that
child be a naturalized “citizen” of the United States “at
birth” under a naturalization Act of Congress (like Cruz). Rather,
the best that such a child can do is become a naturalized “citizen”
of the United States after birth under a different naturalization
provision of an Act of Congress (like Arnold Schwarzenegger).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
silly riddler said:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Looking
at your actual results, Mr. Apuzzo, don't I get any credit for
turning out be right all the time?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Here
we can see how much more Mr. Olson is a dullard at logic. Now he
tells us that if a judge makes a statement, it is necessarily
correct, and since he adopts the judge’s statement, he too is
correct. Mr. Olson does not understand that with that thinking he is
committing the fallacy of appeal to authority. No, Mr. Olson does not
want to admit that my position is very good, for it stands on
relevant legal and historical sources and on valid and sound
reasoning. If it were not that good, Mr. Olson would have been able
to refute it after 8 years trying to do so. Rather, the furthest Mr.
Olson has ever gotten is to merely parrot some state judge’s
conclusion, never providing the sources and reasoning that support
that conclusion, a sure sign that the conclusion is not only not
binding on the nation, but plainly wrong.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
silly riddler said:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">And
in the other major party the highest person in the order of
succession condemns a candidate's racism while endorsing him.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Here
we see more of this silly riddler's poor logic. His fallacious moral
equivalency is a big failure. First, he concedes that we have come to
a President endorsing for President a person who is being criminally
investigated by that President's chief law enforcement authority.
Second, he has no evidence that Donald Trump is a racist. I have told
him numerous times that he is a despicable demagogue. That he seeks
to exploit race (in this article he also seeks to exploit pity for a
little girl) for purposes of political gain does not prove the
assertion and also shows how much of a loser he is.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Barack
Obama was born to an alien father (British and then Kenyan). Ted Cruz
was born in a foreign nation (Canada) to an alien father (Cuban).
Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, and Nikki Haley were all born to alien
parents (Rubio's were Cuban and the others Indians). That little girl
was born in a foreign nation (China) to alien parents (not
identified). Hence, they are all not natural born citizens, for not
being born in the United States to parents who were its citizens.
They are all “citizens” of the United States “at birth,”
either under the Fourteenth Amendment or naturalization Act of
Congress (the latter applies to Cruz and the little girl), but are
not nor can they be natural born citizens at common law. Remember,
all natural born citizens are born citizens, but not all born
citizens are natural born citizens. In the case of the adopted
foreign girl, she cannot even claim to be a born citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So,
let’s see if Mr. Olson has any more riddles for us to solve.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to attorney Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Suppose
an attorney loses all his cases and all his appeals, but tells you
it's because his courts keep getting everything wrong. He tells you
that you are flunking logic to heed the actual verdicts.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
When
you need legal advice, is that your guy?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
The
reason I ask...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Note how Mr. Olson
dishonestly leaves out the part of Minor that explained that those
natural born citizens, as it defined them, were 'distinguished from
aliens or foreigners.'"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Then
we look up and see that I was responding to Mr. Apuzzo writing, "a
natural born citizen is a child born in a country to parents who were
its citizens, which is what the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court said in
Minor v. Happersett (1875)". That was all he wrote about Minor
in the comment I was following. He left off the part he now claims
dishonest to omit.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"According to the U.S. Supreme
Court, at common law, all those who were not born in the country to
parents who were its citizens were 'aliens or foreigners,'"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No,
Mr. Apuzzo is not telling the truth. Mr. Apuzzo, I will retract if
you can quote the Minor court saying that at common law *all* those
who were not born in the country to parents who were its citizens
were aliens or foreigners. Let's see how you do.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Incidentally,
one has only to read the very next paragraph of Minor v. Happersett
to read the Court say that the Congress in 1790 was under its power
of naturalization to consider children born abroad of citizens to be
natural-born citizens.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"He thinks that all natural
born citizens are born citizens, and therefore all born citizens are
natural born citizens, as smart as saying that all poodles are dogs,
therefore all dogs are poodles."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bet
he cannot quote me ever making that argument. He frequently makes up
stupid stuff and claims it to be someone else's.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Firsts, Mr. Olson falsely
claims that the John McCain example helps him."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
focused significant expert attention on the question of foreign-born
citizens from birth, and yes, that helped me see the consensus of the
legal community. For why John S. McCain is a natural-born citizen, I
recommend reading the analysis of scholars, and the federal court
citation I provided Mr. Telles. Avoid attorneys who push crank
theories and lose in court every single time.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Second, there have been some
persons with law degrees arguing that certain persons running for the
Office of President and born out of the United States to one or two
U.S. citizen parents neither in the U.S. military nor in its
diplomatic service are natural born citizens. These persons are very
small in number compared to the great number of persons with law
degrees."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">But
large in number compared to the number of person's with law degrees
arguing otherwise. Moreover, the ratio of judges deciding such a
candidate can run for president to those deciding he cannot is a
division by zero error.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Mr. Olson believes that he
has not squeezed enough blood out of the meaning of a natural born
citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">When
Mr. Apuzzo decides what I believe it looks bloody meaningless.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Here we can see how much more
Mr. Olson is a dullard at logic. Now he tells us that if a judge
makes a statement, it is necessarily correct, and since he adopts the
judge’s statement, he too is correct."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">No,
I tell that court results matter; tantrums of losing attorneys, not
so much. We might ask Mr. Apuzzo:<br />
If the decisions of those
courts do not matter, why did you, and your clients with the benefit
of your legal advice, choose to take your cases there to be decided?
Esquire Apuzzo has litigated presidential eligibility many times. He
not only lost all his cases and appeals, he brought them all. No one
dragged him or his clients to court. He dragged other people, over
and over. The fights he lost, he picked.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my comment to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">You're
too silly...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan
Olson,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
was reading as your comment to attorney Mario Apuzzo was posted that
starts with "Suppose an attorney...."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan,
all your snippets are just too silly to respond to.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Is
somebody paying you to write such drivel or are you wasting your time
because you have nothing else to do and you have nowhere else to go?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles wrote:<br />
"Bryan, all your snippets are just too silly
to respond to."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Too
late. That's a response.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art
Telles asked:<br />
"Is somebody paying you to write such drivel
or are you wasting your time because you have nothing else to do and
you have nowhere else to go?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I've
explained many times. <span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm a
kookologist</span>. It's <span style="background: #ffff00;">a hobby</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="post-2724501321"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is attorney Apuzzo's response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As
we can see, the silly riddler is reading comprehension challenged.
The silly riddler thinks he can make up for what he does not know by
giving us more of his silly riddles. Mr. Olson, despite all his silly
riddles, has been a loser and will stay a loser.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Bryan Olson's response to attorney Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'll
show you a loser. There are from Mr. Apuzzo's legal actions just in
his home state of New Jersey.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"For
the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Defendants' motion to
dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."<br />
-- United
States District Court, D. New Jersey, Kerchner v. Obama, 669 F. Supp.
2d 477 (D.N.J. 2009).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Although
the District Court did not explicitly state that Appellants' claims
were frivolous, the finding of other district courts that plaintiffs
who filed complaints based on similar legal theories violated Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 11 should have served as meaningful notice
that the appeal here would be frivolous.<br />
...<br />
For the
reasons set forth, we will affirm the District Court's order of
dismissal.<br />
...<br />
We also note with concern that Appellants
failed to cite Berg in their opening brief. See, e.g., N.J. Rule of
Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(3)('A lawyer shall not knowingly fail to
disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling
jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the
position of the client'). Although Berg was filed only some two
months before Appellants' brief, it is unlikely it had not come to
their attention given the identity of the issues."<br />
--
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Kerchner v.
Obama, 612 F. 3D 204 (2010).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Kerchner,
Charles, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE U.S., ET AL.<br />
The
Petition for a writ of certiorari is denied."<br />
-- U.S.
Supreme Court, Orders of 29 Nov 2010.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well
intentioned, has no merit in law.”<br />
-- ALJ Jeff S. Masin for
the NJ Office of Administrative Law, 10 April 2012, ballot challenge
of Purpura and Moran v. Obama.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"After
full consideration of the the record and a review of the exceptions
filed, I hereby adopt the ALJ's Initial Decison in its entirety."<br />
--
NJ Secretary of State Kimberly M. Guadagno, 12 April 2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Because
right now we have a precedent saying that Mr. Obama is a natural-born
citizen."<br />
-- Mario Apuzzo Esquire, before the Superior
Court of New Jersey Appellate Division, Trenton NJ, 30 May 2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">We
have carefully considered appellants’ arguments and conclude that
these arguments are without merit. We affirm substantially for the
reasons set forth in ALJ Jeff S. Masin’s thorough and thoughtful
written opinion of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the Secretary on
April 12, 2012.”<br />
-- Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate
Division, Purpura v. Obama, May 31, 2012</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"I
CONCLUDE that Senator Cruz meets the Article II, Section I
qualifications and is eligible to be nominated for President. His
name may therefore appear on the New Jersey Republican primary
ballot. "<br />
-- ALJ Jeff S. Masin, NJ Office of Administrative
Law, ballot challenge of Williams et al v. Obama, 12 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Although
untimely, I have considered and rejected the exceptions; they merely
restate legal authority and arguments presented and addressed by ALJ
Masin in his initial decision.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
After
full consideration of the record and the exceptions from the parties,
I hereby adopt the ALJ's Initial Decision in its entirety."<br />
--
NJ Secretary of State Kimberly M. Guadagno, 13 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So
we did that, and he [New Jersey Appellate Division Judge John C.
Kennedy] still denied it again.<br />
It was the same thing when he
said that there’s no 'irreparable injury' shown and we haven’t
shown a 'likelihood of success.'"<br />
-- Mario Apuzzo Esquire,
as reported by The Post & Email, article dated 29 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is attorney Apuzzo's response to Olson:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">To
demonstrate that he is not a loser, Mr. Olson has given us his best
copy and paste job. Here it is. I have separated each one of Olson’s
comments to show that he likes to take one case and give the
impression that it is three. So here, we actually have three cases,
Kerchner, Purpura/Moran, and Williams/Powers:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">1.
a.++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"For
the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Defendants' motion to
dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
United States District Court, D. New Jersey, Kerchner v. Obama, 669
F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.N.J. 2009).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Court decided that the plaintiffs did not have Article III standing
because even if the plaintiffs were injured by having to live under a
President who is not an Article II natural born citizen, so is every
other American. The court also addressed "prudential standing,"
finding that Congress was the correct branch of government and not
the judiciary to decide the definition of a natural born citizen. In
any event, there is nothing in the decision on the merits of the
meaning of a natural born citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">1.b.
++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Although
the District Court did not explicitly state that Appellants' claims
were frivolous, the finding of other district courts that plaintiffs
who filed complaints based on similar legal theories violated Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 11 should have served as meaningful notice
that the appeal here would be frivolous.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For
the reasons set forth, we will affirm the District Court's order of
dismissal.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">...<br />
We
also note with concern that Appellants failed to cite Berg in their
opening brief. See, e.g., N.J. Rule of Professional Conduct
3.3(a)(3)('A lawyer shall not knowingly fail to disclose to the
tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the
lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client').
Although Berg was filed only some two months before Appellants'
brief, it is unlikely it had not come to their attention given the
identity of the issues."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Kerchner v.
Obama, 612 F. 3d 204 (2010).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Court decided that the plaintiff’s did not have standing. There is
nothing in the decision on the merits of a natural born citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As
far as citing Berg v. Obama, the Third Circuit chopped off a material
element of N.J. Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3(a)(3). Here is the
full quote of the rule which shows how the Court quoted it
erroneously:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">(“A
lawyer shall not knowingly ... fail to disclose to the tribunal legal
authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be
directly adverse to the position of the client....”). Notice how
the fake, phony, fraud Mr. Olson has omitted the ellipsis from what
the Court quoted. He does this to hide that fact that the Court did
not properly quote the rule.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Here
is how the rule really reads:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">RPC
3.3 Candor Toward the Tribunal</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">(a)
A lawyer shall not knowingly:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">***</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">(3)
fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling
jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the
position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As
we can see, the Third Circuit when quoting the rule removed the last
part of the rule which reads “and not disclosed by opposing
counsel” and replaced it with ellipsis. Ellipsis is the omission
from speech or writing of a word or words that are superfluous or
able to be understood from contextual clues. So, through its
ellipsis, the Court represented that the words, “and not disclosed
by opposing counsel,” were superfluous matter or even something to
be understood from the remaining context of its statement. But any
reasonable reading of the rule reveals that what the Court omitted
from the rule is a material element of the rule and that there is
nothing in the part of the rule that the Court quoted which would
alert the reader that as long as opposing counsel cited the legal
authority in the controlling jurisdiction, there was no violation of
the rule. For sure, if opposing counsel cites a legal authority in
the controlling jurisdiction, the court is put on notice of that
authority and therefore not the least mislead. I cannot imagine why
the Court would remove a material part of the rule. Doing so is like
a prosecutor removing a material part of a criminal statute and
moving forward with a criminal prosecution.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
my 95-page brief, I explained to the Court that it had unjustly and
inappropriately removed this critical material part of the rule when
quoting the rule. I explained that the omitted part is a material
element of the rule which the Court should not have removed. I
further explained that I had stated in my opening brief that there
were various cases that had found that plaintiffs did not have
standing in the Article II eligibility context, but that those cases
were distinguishable from the Kerchner case, that opposing counsel in
the Kerchner appeal had specifically cited and discussed the Berg
case in their opposition brief, and that I had cited and fully
discussed the case in my reply brief. All of that was done before the
Court was asked to rule on the matter. Olson even made this comment
at Dr. Conspiracy’s blog: “Mario, do you think the defense —
the guys who beat you in the District Court — will cite the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals’ precedential opinion on Berg v. Obama in
their brief? I do.”
</span></span></span><a href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/02/kerchners-dont-ask-dont-tell-ad/"><span style="color: black;">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/02/kerchners-dont-ask-dont-tell-ad/</span></a><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hence,
since the Third Circuit Court of Appeals itself wrote the Berg
decision, I mentioned in my moving brief that cases had been decided
that found that natural born citizen challengers did not have
standing and added that those cases were distinguishable from the
Kerchner case, opposing counsel specifically cited and discussed the
Berg case in their opposition brief, and I also cited and discussed
it in my reply brief, the Court before ruling in the Kerchner case
was fully aware of the Berg decision which incidentally was also
written by Circuit Judge Sloviter, who also wrote the Kerchner
decision. So, the Court received input by both parties on and had
full knowledge of the Berg case before it was asked to decide the
Kerchner case. In short, under the complete text of the ethical rule
and not that incorrectly provided by the Court and Mr. Olson, there
was not the slightest violation of Rule 3.3 and no basis whatsoever
to hint at any ethical violation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Finally,
Mr. Olson does not disclose that after receiving my response to its
Order to Show Cause, the Third Circuit Court discharged its order to
show cause and made no finding of any sanctions.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Olson attempts to smear by work on the meaning of a natural born
citizen by fraudulently suggesting that I did something unethical in
the Kerchner appeal, an appeal that never reached the merits of the
definition of the clause. Olson is well aware of all this, having
read my 95-page brief to the 3rd Circuit and having even commented on
how opposing counsel would cite the Berg case at Dr. Conspiracy’s
blog. But yet he still implies that I committed some ethical
violation when filing the appeal on standing to the Third Circuit.
Olson is a desperate human being, first saying that I committed
perjury on the Court and now saying that I committed an ethical
violation. Olson is a despicable human being, stuck in his warped,
deluded, and corrupt political world.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">1.c.
++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Kerchner,
Charles, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE U.S., ET AL.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Petition for a writ of certiorari is denied."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
U.S. Supreme Court, Orders of 29 Nov 2010.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court
on the issue of standing. As it does in the great majority of
petitions brought to it, it denied without comment the Petition. The
Court did not comment at all on the definition of a natural born
citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">2.
a. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well
intentioned, has no merit in law.”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
ALJ Jeff S. Masin for the NJ Office of Administrative Law, 10 April
2012, ballot challenge of Purpura and Moran v. Obama.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">New
Jersey ALJ Jeff S. Masin is the state administrative law judge who
found that there was no evidence in New Jersey proving who Obama was,
where he was born, and to whom he was born and who agreed with
Obama’s lawyer that such evidence was not relevant because even
“Mickey Mouse” could run for President.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">2.b.
+++++++++++++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"After
full consideration of the the record and a review of the exceptions
filed, I hereby adopt the ALJ's Initial Decison in its entirety."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
NJ Secretary of State Kimberly M. Guadagno, 12 April 2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Sure,
Guadango agreed with ALJ Masin that even Mickey Mouse could run for
President.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">2.c.
+++++++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Because
right now we have a precedent saying that Mr. Obama is a natural-born
citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
Mario Apuzzo Esquire, before the Superior Court of New Jersey
Appellate Division, Trenton NJ, 30 May 2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">We
have carefully considered appellants’ arguments and conclude that
these arguments are without merit. We affirm substantially for the
reasons set forth in ALJ Jeff S. Masin’s thorough and thoughtful
written opinion of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the Secretary on
April 12, 2012.”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division, Purpura v. Obama,
May 31, 2012</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Appellate Division added nothing of its own to the Purpura case. It
said that it was affirming Masin and Guadagno “substantially for
the reasons set forth in ALJ Jeff S. Masin’s thorough and
thoughtful written opinion of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the
Secretary on April 12, 2012.” Hence, read ALJ Masin’s decision
and nothing more, a decision in which he concedes on the record that
there was no evidence of the fact in the record, but then concludes
that Obama was a natural born citizen because he was born in the
United States.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">3.
a. ++++++++++++++++++++++=</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"I
CONCLUDE that Senator Cruz meets the Article II, Section I
qualifications and is eligible to be nominated for President. His
name may therefore appear on the New Jersey Republican primary
ballot. "</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
ALJ Jeff S. Masin, NJ Office of Administrative Law, ballot challenge
of Williams et al v. Obama, 12 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ALJ
Masin was recalled from retirement especially to address the natural
born citizen issue in 2016. Changing his mind, now he ruled that a
presidential candidate did have a burden to prove that he was
constitutionally qualified to be on the primary election ballot. He
also abandoned the English common law that he pulled out of U.S. v.
Wong Kim Ark (1898) as the rule to establish who was a natural born
citizen and said that it was really a different law that decided that
question. Now he said it was a mixture of the English common law and
the English Parliament naturalization Acts, fixed as of some
arbitrary moment in time which he picked, that defined a natural born
citizen. By adopting this new approach, what he did was take a
naturalized subject under English naturalization Acts and convert him
into an Article II natural born citizen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">3.b.
++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Although
untimely, I have considered and rejected the exceptions; they merely
restate legal authority and arguments presented and addressed by ALJ
Masin in his initial decision.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">After
full consideration of the record and the exceptions from the parties,
I hereby adopt the ALJ's Initial Decision in its entirety."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
NJ Secretary of State Kimberly M. Guadagno, 13 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Guadagno
added nothing to the analysis. Read ALJ Masin’s decision and you
have it all.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">3.c.
++++++++++++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So
we did that, and he [New Jersey Appellate Division Judge John C.
Kennedy] still denied it again.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
was the same thing when he said that there’s no 'irreparable
injury' shown and we haven’t shown a 'likelihood of success.'"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">--
Mario Apuzzo Esquire, as reported by The Post & Email, article
dated 29 April 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~~~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Justice
Kennedy denied the application for emergent relief, finding that
appellants had not asked New Jersey to stay the election and that
there was enough time before the New Jersey primary for the Appellate
Division to rule on the appeal in the normal course. I then asked
Secretary Gaudagno for a stay, and she said that it did not exist and
denied by request. I then provided the State’s denial of the stay
to the Appellate Division. Justice Kennedy still then denied treating
the appeal on an emergent basis, again finding that the Court would
have enough time to deal with it in the normal course, a finding
which is clearly incorrect given that the Appellate Division has yet
to issue a Scheduling Order and decide the appeal even though it is
marked “Accelerated” and given that the primary has already
passed. As far as Justice Kennedy’s statement regarding the
“likelihood of success,” he made the statement with only ALJ
Masin’s new-found English law decision before him, i.e., without
any briefs or arguments of the parties.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">++++++++++</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As
we can see, this is a record of justice in New Jersey which does not
bode well for the Garden State. And as far as Mr. Olson is concerned,
by presenting this record in defense of himself, it shows that Mr.
Olson is still a loser.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is Olson's response to attorney Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
"I
have separated each one of Olson’s comments to show that he likes
to take one case and give the impression that it is three."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Three
citations are from three different authorities to whom Mr. Apuzzo,
and his clients with the benefit of his legal advice, chose to take
his arguments. Mr. Apuzzo likes to pretend that he only lost in "some
lower courts". In fact he appealed several times and lost all
those too.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"The Court decided that the
plaintiff’s did not have standing. There is nothing in the decision
on the merits of a natural born citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
listed the case as a loss. When an attorney sues and gets dismissed
because his clients do not have standing to sue, that is a loss.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"So, through its ellipsis, the
Court represented that the words, 'and not disclosed by opposing
counsel,' were superfluous matter or even something to be understood
from the remaining context of its statement."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Apuzzo's argument is deceitful. The Court of Appeals noted with
concern his failure to cite Berg v. Obama in his opening brief. At
the time of Mr. Apuzzo's opening brief, opposing counsel had not
disclosed Berg. Their later citation of it does not reach backward in
time and improve Mr. Apuzzo's behavior in filing his opening brief.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Incidentally,
I told Mr. Apuzzo that the Circuit Court's "PRECEDENTIAL"
designation of Berg v. Obama trashed the Kerchner v. Obama appeal,
and I told him at the time. Had he been wise enough to listen, he
could have avoided having a frivolous appeal and professional conduct
concern on his record.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"I filed a Petition for a Writ
of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of standing."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Apuzzo presented four questions in his petition for cert in Kerchner,
only one of which was on standing. The second was: "2. Whether
putative President Obama can be an Article II 'natural born Citizen'
if he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother
and a non-United States citizen British father and under the British
Nationality Act 1948 he was born a British citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"New Jersey ALJ Jeff S. Masin
is the state administrative law judge who found that there was no
evidence ..."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Ever
hear another legal profesional try to counter a court citation with
what the losing attorney said?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Sure, Guadango agreed with
ALJ Masin that even Mickey Mouse could run for President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Apuzzo sought a decision on the merits. He got one. He does not like
it so he smears the authorities.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"The Appellate Division added
nothing of its own to the Purpura case."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Appellate Division found Mr. Apuzzo's arguments to be "without
merit", and the ALJ's written opinion to be "thorough and
thoughtful". Mr. Apuzzo does not have to learn anything from
that, but he could.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"ALJ was recalled from
retirement especially to address the natural born citizen issue in
2016."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">By
recalling Masin the New Jersey legal system rather whacked Mr. Apuzzo
with the clue-stick.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"Guadagno added nothing to the
analysis."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mr.
Apuzzo had been complaining about arguments that he said ALJ Masin
had not addressed. Secretary Guadagno read Mr. Apuzzo's exception and
rejected it because it, "merely restate(s) legal authority and
arguments presented and addressed by ALJ Masin in his initial
decision."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Losing
attorney Mario Apuzzo wrote:<br />
"As we can see, this is a
record of justice in New Jersey which does not bode well for the
Garden State."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">My
what bad luck then, that New Jersey is where Mr. Apuzzo practices
law. In fact Mr. Apuzzo also took his eligibility arguments out of
state. He lost everywhere else too. Every case; every appeal. 100%
fail.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is my comment to attorney Apuzzo:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
Bryan Olson has chosen to not respond to my question about whether or
not he is being paid to write his drivel or if he simply has no place
else to go and nothing else to do, it is reasonable to conclude that
he is NOT being paid, he simply has noting else to do but waste his
time reading your comments and writing his silly riddler shallow
thinker nonsense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>This
is attorney Apuzzo's response to me:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">This
despicable riddler's job is to protect Barack Obama. In that
connection, he even supports the notion that a naturalized "citizen"
of the United States such as Ted Cruz, so made only by a
naturalization Act of Congress, is a common law Article II "natural
born citizen." Now, as we can see from his presence at this
article on adoption, he supports the notion that a child born in a
foreign nation to alien parents and who is adopted by a U.S. citizen
couple during the child's years of minority and who becomes a
"citizen" of the United States only by virtue of a
naturalization Act of Congress is also a common law Article II
natural born citizen. His job is not to demonstrate how he is correct
and to refute our position on the meaning of a natural born citizen.
Rather, his job is to simply repeat over and over again, troll if you
will, some current-day law and administrative judges' conclusions
rendered in cases in which plaintiffs or petitioners argued that
Barack Obama and Ted Cruz are not natural born citizens, conclusions
which lack historical and legal sources and reasoning to support
them, and to smear my work on the meaning of a natural born citizen.
That, indeed, serves to protect the legacy that Barack Obama is
seeking to create.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/06/allow-foreign-born-adopted-children-to.html</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-23999026851623217642016-05-29T20:48:00.002-07:002016-05-29T20:54:11.780-07:00U.S. Immigration Act vs. Subversion vs. Rob Natelson<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b><span lang="en-US">U.S.
Immigration Act vs. Subversion vs. Rob Natelson</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>The
Walter-McCarran Immigration Act vs. Rob Natelson...</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Regarding
my Rob Natelson comment that I also posted on Mario Apuzzo's Natural
Born Citizen blog on May 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
https://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html?showComment=1464280680500#c8213117118635483886</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">U.S.
immigration policy would be undermined by Rob Natelson's suggestion
about an amendment to clarify that only one U.S. citizen parent would
be sufficient to make a child "...eligible to the Office of
President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">See
Natelson's Fort Worth Star-Telegram article which he posted on his
website:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
https://www.i2i.org/cruz-withdrawal-postpones-natural-born-issue/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Diana
West has a short article about the House Committee on Un-American
Activities in which she includes a comment by Archibald Roosevelt
about the Walter-McCarran Immigration Act and connecting it to the
legal immigration and U.S. naturalization of Russian communist agents
ever since the 1917 communist revolution in Russia.</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">She
wrote that "...the Committee held hearings into Communist
Political Subversion in the cities of Washington, D.C., Youngstown,
Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle," and published
their findings in which she found "...a statement by Archibald
B. Roosevelt (1894-1979), conservative businessman and much-decorated
veteran of both World Wars who was also a son of President Theodore
Roosevelt." </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Diana
writes that Roosevelt described "...the Kremlin's "two-pronged
course of action," in which "Roosevelt noted that the
Kremlin first needed "assurance that their foreign-born
operators ... will not be deported or denaturalized. This would
ensure the maintenance of those forces which the Red strategists have
filtered in through our weak immigration barriers throughout the
years."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
the penultimate paragraph Diana quotes Roosevelt:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<i><i>"The second requirement for the conquest of America
is to make certain that the security checks against immigrants are
weak and ineffective and that there must exist loopholes through
which swarms of Red agents can enter this country to swell the size
of the subversive forces. ... The </i><i><b>Walter-McCarran
Immigration Act provides America with the legal weapons</b></i><i> to stop the Red immigration plot in its tracks ...."</i></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Diana
concludes:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
"Holy smokes. Roosevelt was discussing what remains a
<i><b>matter of intense topicality, the subversion
of U.S. immigration policy</b></i>, focusing on
the 1950s Communist/Leftist opposition to the Walter-McCarran
Immigration Act."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">My
point is this.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Roosevelt's
words about communist subversion as Diana put it: <b>"...matter
of intense topicality, the subversion of U.S. immigration
policy,"</b> are relevant for the same internal
security reason that John Jay was relevant and prescient in 1787
(with the intention of being perpetual generation to generation) when
he underlined the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen" before the first immigration and naturalization act was
passed.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
U.S. Congress should strengthen U.S. immigration policy. Also, if the
U.S. Constitution is amended, it should be amended to strengthen U.S.
citizenship, not to diminish it like Natelson has suggested in his
article on the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Natelson is not thinking clearly, it seems to me, if he thinks that
only one U.S. citizen parent was John Jay's original genesis original
intent, and that, consequently, ONLY singular U.S. citizenship is of
no consequence.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-51312532642111210242016-05-13T14:13:00.002-07:002016-06-05T12:25:20.319-07:002011 Prophecy: Donald Trump President Elect In 2016<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>DONALD
TRUMP WILL BE ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 2016</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 16pt;"><b>MARK
TAYLOR'S APRIL 28, 2011 PROPHECY</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">A
few days ago, May 7, 2016, I listened to the Mark Taylor interview on
the TruNews YouTube channel about his April 28, 2011 prophecy about
New York business man Donald Trump and his successful bid for the
presidency of the United States. In 2011 Mark thought that Donald
Trump might announce pursuit of the U.S. presidency in 2012, but when
Mr. Trump did not announce, he put his written prophecy, which he
calls a "word" from the Lord, into his files. It was not
until 2015 that he realized that the prophecy was intended for 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the transcript of the entire 1 hour 9 minute discussion with Mark
Taylor on April 18, 2016 on TruNews.com.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the TruNews url for the 1h 9m audio:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">>>
<a href="http://www.trunews.com/trunews-041816-mark-taylor-gods-man">http://www.trunews.com/trunews-041816-mark-taylor-gods-man</a></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the TruNews url for the 3 minute video:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">>>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1rDHKTj-LI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1rDHKTj-LI</a></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the TruNews url for a 15 minute version of the discussion:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">>>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmWtysscTF4">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmWtysscTF4</a></span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the TruNews url for the text of the "Commander-In-Chief"
prophecy:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<a href="http://www.trunews.com/gods-man-firefighter-shares-2011-vision-of-president-trump">http://www.trunews.com/gods-man-firefighter-shares-2011-vision-of-president-trump</a>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is the url for a 1 hour 3 minute video on the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaRywCgbkgumBBIddVeRjZw">Komorusan714</a>
YouTube channel:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqwFWD_Htfo">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqwFWD_Htfo</a></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="border-bottom-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-bottom-width: 1pt; border-style: none none solid; margin-bottom: 0in; padding: 0in 0in 0.03in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>TruNews
Announcer:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>And
there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars,
and upon the earth distress of nations with perplexity. The sea and
the waves roaring. Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for
looking after those things which are coming on the earth for the
powers of heaven shall be shaken.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>One
man, one microphone, one mission, one message. TruNews, the only
newscast reporting the countdown to the second coming of Jesus
Christ. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Here
is end time newsman Rick Wiles.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Introduction</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Rick
Wiles:</b></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
is TruNews. Uncensored news, views, and commentary. Welcome to the
program. I'm Rick Wiles. Doc Burkhardt [sp.?] and Edward Szall are
here with me. Guys, glad to have you here.</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc
and Edward:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Great
to be here [in unison].</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Rick
Wiles:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Alright,
this is going to be a really interesting program.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Several
weeks ago I was with my wife Susan, you guys already know this story.
I was with Susan while she was visiting her physician who is Dr. Don
Colbert, and I had a conversation with Mrs. Colbert while Susan was
with the doctor. Mrs. Colbert mentioned to me that one of her
husband's patients gave him a copy of a prophetic message he said the
Lord gave him, and Mary Colbert went to her office and retrieved the
document for me to read. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It
was dated <span style="background: #ffff00;">April 28, 2011</span>.
The moment I read the first line of the prophecy I immediately
glanced back at the date to make sure I had read it correctly. I did
read it correctly. The date was <span style="background: #ffff00;">April
28, 2011</span>. I read the entire prophecy and then sat silent for a
moment as I tried to comprehend the message. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
looked over at Mrs. Colbert and I asked, are you telling me this is
for real. Are you telling me a patient of Dr. Colbert gave him this
prophecy in <span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span>? And she
nodded her head and said, yes, it's true. And then she picked up her
phone and she called the gentleman and introduced me to him, and then
he told me the story about the day the Lord gave him the prophecy. So
I asked him if he would come on TruNews and share it with the entire
TruNews audience. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Fascinating
story here. This is definitely fascinating, and the gentleman is on
the telephone right now. Mr. Mark Taylor is a retired Lieutenant in
the fire department, and he is on the phone right now from his home </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
welcome to TruNews.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Mark
Taylor:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Thank
you Rick. It's glad to be here.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>April
28, 2016</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
I want to start right at the beginning of this prophecy because I
looked at the date, I began reading the prophecy and then I, I didn't
even get past the first sentence and I looked back at the date and
I'm thinking, is this a typo. This must have been <span style="background: #ffff00;">April
28, 2016</span>, but, wait a<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
minute, it's not. We haven't even reached April 28, 2016. So I got
thinking, maybe it was March 28, 2016, you k</span>now. So, I went
ahead and read the entire prophecy, and the first thing I said to
Mary Colbert was, is this for real? Are you honestly telling me that
this was given to you five years ago? And she said, oh, yeah, this
man is a patient here. He gave this to Dr. Colbert.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
Mark, tell us about, was there anything special that happened to you
on the day that you received this? Were you in prayer? Just set the
stage for us, and then I want you to read the prophecy word for word.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Ok.
What happened was, in 2006, right as I retired, I had a visitation
from the Lord, and in that visitation the Lord assigned an angel to
me. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And,
fast forward to about four years ago, I had, prophet Kent Simpson
[sp?] gave me a prophetic word, we never met, never spoke, he told me
that I had an angel assigned to me. He was assigned to me for the
gift of faith. He was to minister not only to me but for me, but he
would also only hear the words that come from the throne of God, and
when he heard those words that came from the throne of God he would
immediately go and do those words to come up, to bring it to pass. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
in <span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span>, I was sitting in
front of the tv and <span style="background: #ffff00;">I saw Donald
Trump on tv</span>, and, al<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">l of
a sudden I went, oh my gosh—this hit me like a ton of bricks—I'm
hearing the voice of a president. So, I we</span>nt into my office
and I sat down and I started writing what God was saying because in
that visitation that I had that was what my strongest anointing would
be, in the written prophetic word.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Ok,
I just want to take this step by step here. So, <span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span>
you're in your living room. You're watching television and Donald J.
Trump is on television. Was it one of his reality shows or an
interview?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump And The 2015 Triple Crown Winner</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It
was in an interview, I think in the news, because at the time he was
thinking about running for president. And I want to make, I want the
listeners to understand, because I am real here and I don't want to
deceive anybody, I originally thought that this was going to be for
<span style="background: #ffff00;">2012</span> because on, three
months later I wrote a prophecy called <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">The
Great Horse</span></i>, that there was another Triple-Crown winner
coming, and I said in 2012 there would be another Triple Crown
winner, and it would be a sign to the Church that it was their time
to break out, because Secreariat was a sign of the end time Church. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
remember this prophecy. I remember this now. We talked about this,
yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
<i>[name garbled]</i> talked about Secretariat was a sign of the end
time Church, it would come from behind and be the winner. Well, we
don't know when that time was going to be, but this next Triple Crown
winner was going to show that it was time for the Church to break
out. So, anyhow, I thought all of this was supposed to go down in
2012.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
we had a Triple Crown winner, and it was Pharaoh <i>[American
Pharoah—Triple Crown winner in 2015 and winner of the 2015 Breeders
Cup Classic—the "grand slam" of horse racing]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
in 2012. This was all supposed to happen in 2012. Donald Trump and
the horse. And, so, I thought, when that didn't come to pass, 'cause
Trump never announced he was going to run. so I thought I had truly
missed these two <i>[prophetic]</i> words, so I set them aside. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
there's a, I'm trying not to get off topic here, but, God gave me
<span style="background: #ffff00;">General Eisenho</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">w</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">er</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">'</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">s
speech</span>. He says, I want you to go back and take that speech
and I want you to rewrite it and address it to my army. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Which
speech?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>D-Day
June 16, 1945</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
<span style="background: #ffff00;">D-Day speech</span>. So, I went
back and I took the D-Day speech, and I rewrote it addressing it to
God's army. Well, I didn't know what to do with it at the time so I
pushed it aside with the rest of the stuff. Well, fastforward to
2015. I thought I had missed all this stuff. All of a sudden, the
Triple Crown winner comes, <span style="background: #ffff00;">American
Pharoah, 2015</span>, and I'm on the phone with my sister and she
says, oh my gosh, what day is today? And I said <span style="background: #ffff00;">it's
D-Day</span>, and I heard the Lord say, release the speech. <span style="background: #ffff00;">Ten
days lat</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">er</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Donald Trump announces he's running for president, and I we</span>nt,
oh my goodness. So I pulled all this stuff out, these three things
that I had set aside for years, and, all of a sudden, everything came
together at one shot.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
in the prophecy, and I asked the Lord, I said, Lord did I miss this,
and he says no. He says, all of this was supposed to happen in two
thousand and twelve but, he says, my people were not ready. He said,
I held it off. He says, go back and look at the horse that ran in two
thousand and twelve, becuase the horse won the first two races but he
lost the last one. And, I always thought it had a kind of peculiar
name, and it was <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">I'll Have
Another</span></i>, which I thought meant "I'll have antother
drink" or something, and the Lord said, no, "I'll have
another one coming" is what he meant. It's because my people the
Church was not ready, they needed three or four more years of this
garbage with Obama going on. But it would get a righteous anger, rise
up and say, enough's enough. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
that's why all this stuff came together in a ten day period. <span style="background: #ffff00;">June
16</span><sup><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">th</span></sup><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
Donald Trump announces h</span>e's running. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
I'll read the prophecy first, and then I'll go back and give, maybe,
some details, if that's ok. Will that be alright?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sure,
go ahead.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Commander-In-Chief</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Alright.
So I titled the prophecy <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Commander-In-Chief</span></i>.
And it says,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Spirit of God says:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
have chosen this man, Donald Trump, for such a time as this. For as
Benjamin Netanyahu is to Israel, so shall this man be to the United
States of America! For <span style="background: #ffff00;">I will use
this man</span> to bring <span style="background: #ffff00;">honor</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">respect</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
and </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">restoration</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
to America. Am</span>erica will be respected once again as the most
powerful and prosperous nation on earth, other than Israel. <span style="background: #ffff00;">The
dollar</span> will be the strongest it has ever been in the history
of the United States, and will once again be the currency by which
all others are judged.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Spirit of God says:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
enemy will quake and shake and fear <span style="background: #ffff00;">this
man I have anointed</span>. They will even quake and shake when he
announces he is running for president. It will be like the shot heard
across the world. The enemy will say, what shall we do now? <span style="background: #ffff00;">This
man knows all our tricks and schemes</span>. We have been robbing
America for decades, what shall we do to stop this? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
Spirit says HA! No one shall stop this that l have started! For the
enemy has stolen from America for decades and it stops now! For I<span style="background: #ffff00;">
will use this man to reap the harvest</span> that the United States
has sown for and plunder from the enemy what he has stolen and return
it 7 fold back to the United States. The enemy will say Israel,
Israel, what about Israel? For Israel will be protected by America
once again. <span style="background: #ffff00;">The spirit says yes!
America will once again stand hand and hand with Israel</span>, and
the two shall be as one for the ties between Israel and America will
be stronger than ever, and Israel will flourish like never before.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Spirit of God says:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
will protect America and Israel, for <span style="background: #ffff00;">this
next president will be a man of his word</span>. When he speaks the
world will listen and know that there is something greater in him
than all the others before him. <span style="background: #ffff00;">This
man’s word is his bond</span> and the world and America will know
this and the enemy will fear this, for this man will be fearless. The
Spirit says, when the financial harvest begins so shall it parallel
in the spiritual for America.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Spirit of God says:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
this next election they will spend billions to keep this president
in; it will be like flushing their money down the toilet. Let them
waste their money, for it comes from and it is being used by evil
forces at work, but they will not succeed, for <span style="background: #ffff00;">this
next election will be a clean sweep for the man </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">that</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">
I have chosen</span>. They will say things about this man, the enemy,
but it will not affect him, and they shall say it rolls off of him
like the duck, for as the feathers of a duck protect it, so shall my
feathers protect this next president. Even <span style="background: #ffff00;">mainstream
news media</span> will be captivated by this man and the abilities
that I have gifted him with, and they <span style="background: #ffff00;">will
even begin to agree with him</span> says the Spirit of God.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Amazing.
This is truly amazing. Mark, <span style="background: #ffff00;">it
reads like you wrote it last week</span>. That's why it took me back
so strongly because I kept looking at the date. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
And, the one thing I wanted to point out is, because there is a whole
World War 2 component to this thing, and there's a bigger picture
that the Church is not seeing right now, and, that, <span style="background: #ffff00;">it's
all about the end time harvest</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Called—Not
Chosen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Before
we go there let's disect this word and then we'll move on and talk
about the prophetic meaning for <span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
body of Christ. Looking at this prophetic word, it says, </span><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
spirit of God says I have </span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
this man, </span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
Trump</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">, for such a
time as this</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">. What
does that mean to you?</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">That
means he's </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
been </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">called</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
he's been </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
There's a difference. </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Just</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
like Joseph was </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not called</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
he was </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
So, Donald Trump has been </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">H</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is
whole life building this empire </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">has
been to prepare him for the season that's coming up right now, that
we're in right now, in order to help turn America around. And, the
one thing I wanted to</span> point out is that, when he announces it
will be like the shot heard around the world. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>June
16, 1945</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>June
16, 2015</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here
in the second paragraph the Lord told me, I want you to go back and I
want you to research <span style="background: #ffff00;">June
sixteen</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">th</span>. So, I went
back and I couldn't find anything, and I said, Lord, I can't find
anything, and he said, go back to <span style="background: #ffff00;">World
War 2</span>. So, I went back to World War 2, and <span style="background: #ffff00;">June
16, 1945</span> was the day they made the decision to drop the atomic
bomb. Now, if that's not a shot heard around the world, I don't know
what is. So, I mean, do you think that's a coincidence that he
<span style="background: #ffff00;">announces</span> on that same day,
'cause it's going to be like a nuclear bomb going off when he
announces, because this man is known world wide. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
prophecy says they will even quake and shake when he announces he is
running. The enemy will say, what shall we do now? This man knows our
tricks and schemes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sure,
absolutely. I mean, how many times have you heard him sit up there
and say, hey, I know all this about such and such a group. This is
what <span style="background: #ffff00;">China</span>'s tryig to do.
This is what <span style="background: #ffff00;">Mexico</span>'s trying
to do. You know, these aren't friends of the United States, you know
what I mean, a lot of times. So, I mean, he's exposing everything
right now. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">He
knows how international business works.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Exactly.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
he knows the way the deals are made.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
that terrifies the people who are doing the deals. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Seeds Have Been Sown</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Reap
The Harvest</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
absolutely. And, I don't want to get off track, but, I mean, because
there's more to say about that, but he is going to be used, it says
right here, <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">he will use this man
to reap the harvest</span></i><i> the U</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">nited
States has sown for, and plunder from the enemy </span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">what
he has stolen and return it back </span></i><i>seven fold to the
United States</i>. Everybody always says that America is under
judgment, judgment, judgment. No, it's not. The systems are, but what
God's going to do is he's going to go back and reap this harvest.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
I didn't know much about Donald Trump when I wrote this. I knew he
was a very powerful, wealthy individual who created a huge business.
That's about all I knew of him at the time, and so, I mean, <span style="background: #ffff00;">he's
going to literally use this man to plunder from the enemy from what
we have sown</span>. Nobody talks about the good things America has
done. Look at all the seeds we have sown. I wrote that in my other
prophecy, <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">America, America</span></i>.
All the seeds that we have sown are coming back to America. Ninety
percent of the gospel that's gone out has come from America. Where
are all those seeds? Nobody talks about the seeds that are come to
harvest. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">God's
going to bring <span style="background: #ffff00;">those seeds </span>back
to harvest and <span style="background: #ffff00;">he's going to use
Donald Trump</span> as part of that because he knows all these
things, he's been there, he's done that, he's experienced it. He
knows how to go in there and get it like he talks about taking the
oil on some of these places, <span style="background: #ffff00;">getting
the money back</span> for protecting some of these countries. See,
all that money's gonna start coming back.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>America
Is Not Under Judgment</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>America
Is The Launching Platform For The Harvest</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
when you say America's not under judgment, you said, what is it, the
system is under judgment?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
think the systems, like the financial systems, the political systems,
the immigration system, all these systems of the worldly systems,
because, you're having this new world order starting to take effect,
and that's what God's going to put a stop on in America because
America has been chosen as the launching platform for the harvest.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
we have certainly been, many of us , crying out to the Lord for years
to free us of the tyranny of this regime, because it is a regime.
It's a wicked, evil regime that has taken control of the United
States of America and seeks to control the rest of the world, and
they're committing acts of evil and wickedness.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Signs—Signs—Signs—Signs</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.
What you're saying is the <span style="background: #ffff00;">kingdom
of darkness</span> is in the political realm right now. You're seeing
it, everything's being exposed right now. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">God
is using, and I can give <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span>,
I wrote down some <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span>,
'cause God's giving <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span>
everywhere right now in this electoral process. He's giving <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span>
for who he <span style="background: #ffff00;">has</span> anointed, who
he <span style="background: #ffff00;">has not</span> anointed in this
hour. And I wrote down some things for the people, for the listeners,
to show that <span style="background: #ffff00;">he is anointed by God</span>
for us. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
the <span style="background: #ffff00;">first one</span> is that
everytime this man is attacked, never in the history of politics have
you ever seen someone get attacked the way this man has, but,
everytime he's attacked his numbers go up, the others go down, even
to the point where they get kicked out of the race. Why do you think
that is? That is <span style="background: #ffff00;">because he is
anointed</span>. God is very serious right now when he says, do not
touch my anointed. Whether you agree with him or you don't agree with
him, he's still <span style="background: #ffff00;">anointed by God</span>.
Don't touch him. And that's why you're seeing these people get kicked
out of the race. Even news media outlets are taking a hit because the
ones who are doing the attacking are the ones who are getting hit,
because God is not playing games anymore when it comes to this.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Examples
Of Chosen Vessels</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Nebuchadnezzar</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cyrus</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Constantine</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Let
me ask, I'm going to bring Doc Burkhart [sp?] into this conversation.
Doc, does the bible give us examples of the Lord choosing and
anointing men to do an assignment in his name, who, those men would
not necessarily qualify as choirboys?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Certainly.
I mean, you've got <span style="background: #ffff00;">Cyrus</span>,
you've got <span style="background: #ffff00;">Nebuchadnezzar</span>. I
mean, you've got numerous examples in the Old Testament of God using
those that we would consider outside the fold, or even ungodly in
some aspects, and oftentimes God is saying, like with Nebuchadnezzar,
this is <span style="background: #ffff00;">my vessel</span>, this is
<span style="background: #ffff00;">my chosen</span> one. Well, it's
hard for a lot of modern day believers to wrap their minds around
that, but, that's in God's providence and he has a plan much further
out than we can imagine.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">He
<i>[</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Constantine</span></i><i>]</i>
had the vision, he saw the cross in the sky, and he heard the words
<i>"conquer by this sign."</i> And so he started whooping
everybody's butt defeating everything, every army. And what did he
do? He established a kingdom that ended persecution against the
Church, and for the first time in four hundred years Christians could
worship God without fear of persecution. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
I think, part of the trap that we kind of get wrapped up in here in
North American Christianity is that we have to give candidates what
we call the Christianity litmus test, you know, rather than is this
God's will for this time.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Precisely.
When people tell me, over the years a lot of people have written to
me to tell me, you know, that Constantine was a real bad guy, or evil
guy, you know, they've got nothing good to say about Constantine.
That just tells me two things, they know very little about world
history and they know very little about the ways of God. Because, my
reply to them is, let me tell you something, if you lived back in the
days of Constantine, I assure you, if you'd been there and you were a
Christian, you would have had <span style="background: #ffff00;">a
reelect Constantine bumper sticker on your donkey cart</span>, 'cause
he was the best thing that happened to the Church at that time.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">More
visions, more Constantine.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">They
were still burning Christians on light poles. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Edward:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Make
Rome Great Again <i>[words not clear]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
right. And, so, Constantine put an end to the persecution of the
Church and Christianity flourished because of Constantine.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Absolutely.
And, like I said, it's hard for a lot of North American Christians to
wrap their minds around God using the ungodly, what we call the
ungodly.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Who
church people call ungodly.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right,
that to accomplish his plan, his purpose and his will, because some
times there's not a godly person that fits the bill.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
I don't know of anybody tough enough to take a beating like Donald
Trump has taken a beating. I mean, they have pounded on that man.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right,
and his numbers continue to go up because of it.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
and it's like, I have this visual image of Donald Trump like a big
oak log and it's got handles on it and the hand of God has grabbed
those handles and is just slamming that log into the gates of hell,
just mocking this thing over and Donald Trump is tough enough to take
the beating. And I'm talking about the beating that God is doing to
him by using him as a battering ram against the forces of evil in
this country.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, in the Old Testament the story of Nebuchadnezzar and God using
him is a fascinating story. If you just look at Nebuchadnezzar alone,
and just see the process that God worked in his life to bring him to
a relationship with God. I mean, it was just amazing and in some
sense I see an analogy there with Mr. Trump in the sense we wouldn't
consider him, you know, the cookie cutter type Christian candidate,
but, at the same time we're seeing a transition in him where many of
the values that believers hold dear, he's, you know—</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">He's
the champion of those issues.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
he seems to be growing in those values, and that's, you know, that's
what surprised me. I just see so many parallels with the story of
Nebuchadnezzar in the Old Testament.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>2011
Prophecy</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
Third Term For Obama</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.98in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
Landslide For Donald Trump</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Mark,
this prophecy </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">said, the
spirit of the Lord says in the next election they will spend billions
to keep this president in. Is that referr</span>ing to <span style="background: #ffff00;">Obama</span>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
I believe that there is a plan for him to try and stay for a third
term. Now, everybody says he can't because of the Constitution.
Well, first off, he's broken the Constitution how many times, and
it's never stopped him? But, I believe, that there is a plan, but, I
believe, at this point, now, you've gotta remember <span style="background: #ffff00;">this
was back in 2011</span>, because I've written a lot of prophetic
words since then, and because, the Church has been cryng out, that is
the one thing they have been doing for God to heal the land, and God
has said that I'm going to heal the land in these other prophetic
words that I've written. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
back then, at the time he had a plan to run for a third term. I still
think he does, and part of that, which doesn't take a prophetic voice
to figure it out, is that he wants to declare martial law, in which
case every thing's off. And that's why you're seeing Soros bring in
these <span style="background: #ffff00;">agitators</span> and
literally try to start a civil war. Well, it's going to backfire so
I'm not too worried about it. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
the other one is that I believe Hillary Clinton, that the reason she
hasn't been indicted is because, they're going to see that no one can
beat Trump. He's going to have such <span style="background: #ffff00;">a
landslide</span>, nobody can beat Trump, they're gonna panic, they're
gonna <span style="background: #ffff00;">indict her at the last
minute</span>, one of the plans is, and then they're going to rally
around Obama to try to bring him in for that third term. That could
be possible, a second one. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But
there's other plans that, I think, that are going down. And the other
thing too is that when you see Hillary Clinton that's just four more
years of Obama. And we really don't know how much money they are
spending. Look at how much money they are spending just to keep Trump
out let alone try to put Hillary in. Do you know what I mean? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
I mean, all this money, if you're bound by the super pacs, lobbyists
and the special interest groups, you are bound to the world system,
period, and Trump is the only one that's not bound to that. So, that
is <span style="background: #ffff00;">another sign</span> that,
basically, God has chosen him. And so, I mean, I think there was a
plan for this president to run for a third term. I think right now,
at this point, I think that plan is going to get thwarted, because of
what God has been showing me and what I've written in previous
prophetic words. You have to remember this was, what, four years ago?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Five
years ago this month</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
Things change, so, I mean, they have changed since then as far as the
prophetic writing that you have that I've sent you. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
my lifetime I have never seen so many powerful people and entities
unite, from different political spectrums, to oppose one man, and to
openly say we will stop him. They don't even hide their intention.
They talk about how they're going to stop him, even to the point
where the Washington Post published an article talking about how to
stop Trump after he wins the November election. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Kingdom Of Darkness Is A Sign</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
And again, you're dealing with the <span style="background: #ffff00;">kingdom
of darkness</span>. And, <span style="background: #ffff00;">that's
another sign</span> which I didn't write down. I want to go over a
couple of these signs real quick because every time he is attacked
his poll numbers go up, the others go down. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
second one was <span style="background: #ffff00;">Megyn Kelly</span>.
Now, I hate to bring that up, but <span style="background: #ffff00;">that
was a sign</span>, and she tried to go after Trump on the first
debate which created a huge uproar, and she herself said that she was
picking the questions herself, investigating the questions. Well,
they weren't presidential questions, they were gotcha questions. And
I heard from her own mouth in an interview that that morning of the
debate she got violently ill. And what you didnt't see on tv during
the debate is that she had a blanket over her legs and a bucket next
to her seat in case she got sick. Well, again, God was firing a
warning shot—<span style="background: #ffff00;">don't attack my
anointed</span>, period. So, and now, she's talking about not even
upping her contract with Fox because Fox is in such disarray over
this whole thing with Trump. It's affected her career. So, you're
seeing this and you're seeing other <span style="background: #ffff00;">news
outlets taking a hit</span> because they have been <span style="background: #ffff00;">attacking
God's anointed</span>. So<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
that's another </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">sign</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Kingdom Of Darkness Is A Sign</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Demons
Manifesting Is A Sign</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
<span style="background: #ffff00;">other one is</span>, the <span style="background: #ffff00;">kingdom
of darkness</span> is attacking this man like never before like
you've just seen. God is using this man to literally, he's not
rattling the gates because when you rattle the gates you don't make
entry. This man has been literally splitting the kingdom of darkness
wide open, and God is using him as a light to do that with because in
every area that you can think of, immigration, I mean, the financial
systems, the political systems, the news media, all of it's corrupt,
all of it's being run and dominated by the kingdom of darkness. <span style="background: #ffff00;">God
is using this man to expose it</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
you go to <span style="background: #ffff00;">another sign</span>, the
last one. When you go to this man's rallies—you don't see these
<span style="background: #ffff00;">agitators</span> at these other
rallies. You might get one or two here for somebody, this that and
the other, but what you're seeing happening is the <span style="background: #ffff00;">kingdom
of darkness</span> is actually noticing the authority that God has
put on this man, and those are <span style="background: #ffff00;">demons
manifesting in this man's rallies</span>, inside and outside. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
they're <span style="background: #ffff00;">talking about killing him</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
These are <span style="background: #ffff00;">demons that are
manifesting</span>. The demons can recognize authority when they see
it. That's why they call them agitators. They get agitated. So, I
mean, they're literally manifesting in this man's rallies.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Hatred
For Hell Splitter Donald Trump</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Hatred
For Borders Protector Donald Trump</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Glenn
Beck talked about stabbing him. Of course, he later denied it. The
audio is clearly, says what he intended. He said the stabbing
wouldn't stop. Ted Cruz jokingly said, if Donald Trump was behind my
vehicle I don't know which peddle I would push. I mean, this kind of
talk is unheard of in a presidential race where people are openly
talking about killing a presidential candidate. What is provoking
this visceral hatred of Donald Trump?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because
God is using him to literally split hell wide open and stop this new
world order. Because, you know, again, they want open borders, they
want free flow of people and products coming across the borders, the
whole NAFTA thing, the new currency, this that and the other, and
what God is saying is, no, I have chosen America for my gospel to go
forth. <span style="background: #ffff00;">I am going to use America as
the hub by which the end time harvest is to be launched</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, I just thought of something. The bible says that God
establishes the borders of nations. It says satan is trying to erase
borders. Borders are ordained by God. I never thought about that Doc.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Church's Ground Game</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>America
Is The Hub For The End Time Harvest</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.
And what's happening is that the Church, the Church has had a good
game as far as praying and interceding for the country. We've gotten
that part right. What we have not gotten right is our ground game,
our ground warfare. And, what God is showing me is that this is all
about the end time harvest. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Like,
because in the other prophetic word that I wrote, America's been
chosen for the hub by which the end time harvest will be launched.
Like England was the hub for D-Day, so here we go with the D-Day
invasion thing where you had man power, equipment, money, weapons,
that's all coming to America now for the harvest to be released. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">America's
going to be the hub for the <span style="background: #ffff00;">end
time harvest</span> to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">released</span>,
and he's <span style="background: #ffff00;">using Donald Trump</span>
to do that, and the reason is, is because the Church is behind on the
ground game. So, God is having to use Donald Trump to literally splt
hell wide open right now and expose everything until the army of God
mobilizes and basically hits the beaches and begins to take ground
for the kingdom of God and hold it and get a stronghold here in the
last Christian nation on earth.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Jesus
Was God's Whip In The Temple</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump is God's Whip In America</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
that was the very next thing I was going to say to you. It seems as
though God is using Mr. Trump to do what the Church has failed and
neglected to do, which is to attack this evil regime. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.
The Church has not been doing its job, because there are some things
in the natural that are required. Now, I always love the quote when
people tell me, well, how can you be Christian and vote for Donald
Trump and, you know, he's so brash, he calls names, this that and the
other. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
have you read your bible lately? Jesus was the model that we all are
to live our lives by. He called people hypocrites. He called them,
you know, brood of vipers. I mean, he called his own disciples
cowards.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know what some Church people would have said to Jesus? Jesus, you're
not being Christ like.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
right. What would Jesus do. You know, picking up a whip and driving
people out of the temple isn't beyond the realm of possibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
was what my next comment was going to be. He went into the temple, he
turned the tables over, he drove them out with a whip. Well, what was
he saying? I mean, to turn the tables over on the corrupt you're
going to have to drive them out, and he didn't use the word of God,
he used a whip.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
this ministry, TruNews, we have been on the radio since 1999 and all
we've ever talked about is this evil regime, and the need for
repentance in the land, and for the body of Christ to rise up and
take back this country and make it a Christian nation again. That's
all we've ever talked about and our biggest frustration over all
these years has been the apathy, the indifference, and the
complacency in the churches.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Absolutely,
and <span style="background: #ffff00;">that's why God is having to use
Donald Trump</span> to do this, to hold off those forces. To hold off
the voice of <span style="background: #ffff00;">Islam</span> and
bolster the voice of <span style="background: #ffff00;">Christianity</span>
'cause he's already said he's going to do that. <span style="background: #ffff00;">The
wall</span> has to be built. We have to. Rick Joyner had a vision
over two years ago, it was called <i>The Border Wars</i>, you can
look it up, maybe you guys have already seen it, where if the <span style="background: #ffff00;">borders</span>
are <span style="background: #ffff00;">not sealed</span> we would have
a war in this country like we've never seen before, and some of it's
already started. So the <span style="background: #ffff00;">wall</span>
has to be built, we have to have <span style="background: #ffff00;">borders</span>,
and these people have to be removed out of here, period, because we
have to be able to get a foothold in the Christian world. They're
trying to induce Islam in here and quiet, silence the Christian
voice.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump Election Certainty</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Good
For America</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Good
For The Christian Church</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
are you absolutely <span style="background: #ffff00;">certain</span>
Donald J. Trump will be <span style="background: #ffff00;">elected</span>
in November?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
have to go by what God has told me and shown me.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Are
you <span style="background: #ffff00;">certain</span> the Lord spoke
to you and Donald Trump is going to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">elected</span>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Absolutely. <span style="background-color: yellow;">Yes.</span></span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
you believe that this is the beginning of a spiritual turnaround in
the condition of the United States of America.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Absolutely</span>.
America's best days are ahead of her. I'm not saying we're not going
to have some issues before then, because we are, there's going to be
some hot spots, but, just because we have tornadoes or hurricanes,
America's not under judgment. Again, where's the seeds that all the
good that America has done? There are countries that have done a
thousand times worse than America ever thought about being, and last
time I looked they're still on the map.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah,
but they didn't have the gospel. They didn't reject the gospel. We
have a significant portion of the population that has openly defied
God and said we don't want you, we don't want your son, we don't want
your holy book, we don't want you commanding us. That's a problem.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right,
but the thing is, and again, here we go back to the Church. The
reason the country is in this condition is because of the Church, and
we've lost our ground game, and it's time now to hit the ground. It's
time to actually get out from behind the four walls of your comfort
zone and hit the streets to evangelize for this end time harvest.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
you've got churches out there who have, what, ten, twenty, thirty
thousand people in them? Can you imagine for one second that if you
took thirty thousand people, that's literally an invasion force, and
hit the streets of a major city and went in there and evangelized,
loving all people, praying, healing the sick, casting out demons, and
locked that city down for the kingdom of God, you could turn a city
around over night. But, the problem is getting people out from behind
their comfort zone, number one, and number two, getting out from
behind the four walls of the Church. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">There's
lessons to be learned in this election. Donald Trump has started <span style="background: #ffff00;">an
incredible movement</span>. God's used him to start this movement.
He's not doing it sitting behind his desk and behind four walls. He's
going out and getting them, which is what we as the <span style="background-color: yellow;">body of Christ</span>,
or the <span style="background-color: yellow;">army of God</span>, because they're <span style="background: #ffff00;">two
different things</span>, the army of God has to do. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Five
Supreme Court Justices</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>One
Death—One Retirement—Three Scandals</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
in another prophetic word that you said the Holy Spirit gave you, the
Lord told you that <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald Trump</span>
will completely remake the United States <span style="background: #ffff00;">Supreme
Court</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.
<i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Do Not Fear, America</span></i>,
I wrote that on February twenty fourth, two thousand and sixteen. In
that prophetic word, and I don't have proof because I didn't write it
down at the time when God was dealing with me on this because in one
prophetic word God said there was going to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">three
judges</span> that the next president was going to <span style="background: #ffff00;">appoint</span>.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
God started dealing with me on this and I left it in there because I
wanted people to see that I'm real. I'm not trying to deceive
anybody. But, he started dealing with me on this and now <span style="background: #ffff00;">the
number is up to five</span>, and I said, ok Lord, the number's five.
What's gonna happen? And he says, one's gonna die and it's not going
to be who they expect. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
I didn't write that down, so I have no proof of it. I only told my
family about it. But, <span style="background: #ffff00;">one's gonna
die</span> and it's not gonna be who they expect, 'cause everybody
expected it to be Ginsburg; she's the oldest. <span style="background: #ffff00;">One's
gonna retire</span> and <span style="background: #ffff00;">three were
going to get caught up in some type of a scandal</span>. So, but, it
would be reserved for God's anointed, which would be Donald Trump.
That God was going to hold off this thing that Obama was trying to do
and nominate someone and that the next president would be the one who
nominated. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
five seats. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right,
and that would have reformed the court, basically.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You're
telling us you believe the Lord has told you <span style="background: #ffff00;">President
Donald Trump is going to appoint five Justices</span> to the Supreme
Court.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
what God has told me. Now, what I didn't realize was, now, I gotta be
honest, I didn't think this one that was going to die was going to be
Scalia. I thought it was going to be a liberal judge, not a
conservative one. So, that one even caught me off guard. You know,
God doesn't tell a prophetic voice everything, all of the details
sometimes, you know.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Personally,
I think he was murdered, and I believe this evil regime is trying to
speed up its evil transformation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Absolutely,
because a Supreme Court Justice in some cases can be more important
than the president. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>vs.
</b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Secret
Societies And Corruption</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">About
a month or so ago former House Speaker <span style="background-color: yellow;">Newt Gingrich</span> made a
surprising comment on a live interview on Fox News. It went over the
head of the Fox anchorman. He was asked what explains the hatred of
the establishment for Donald Trump, and Mr. Gingrich gave his
analy<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">sis, but the last thing he
said was, Mr. Trump did not go through the </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">initiation</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
He did </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not join</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">secret</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
society. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hmm.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Has
the Lord spoken to you anything about, you know, secret societies in
the country controlling the political process?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">No.
He's not shown me anything about that. What he has shown me is just
the corruption. In the one prophetic word that I wrote that you have,
<i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Time Is Up For Those Who Are
Corrupt</span></i>. And the one thing God is doing right now that he
is very serious about, it doesn't matter if you're in the political
arena, it doesn't matter if you're part of God's leadership in the
Church, if you are corrupt God is going to expose you himself and he
is going to remove you, because we should be on meat and not milk at
this point, because the end time battle has begun and the <span style="background: #ffff00;">end
time harvest</span> has begun. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And,
again, we should be on meat, not milk. But, if you are corrupt, he
will remove you. And even to the point, and there's going to be some
people probably who will disagree with me on this, when God told me
this he said, even if it means if they stand in the way of my agenda
in America I'll remove them from the face of the earth. Now, after he
told me that, within 48 hours two people died to confirm what I
heard. One was a young man from the Obama administration who got
killed in a weird bicycle accident in a bicycle race, he went head on
with a car, and another one was a young Saudi prince. And, well,
people ask, what does that have to do with America? Well, first off,
follow the money for the elections. They have a vested interest in
our elections. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
that was <span style="background: #ffff00;">two signs</span> to me
that what I was hearing was correct. Well, you're also, within the
next, I'm going to say about the end of the month, this whole thing
with the D.C. madam thing is coming out, you've got a guy whose
fixing to give 815 names. Between that and that island that the
billionaire had that still has not come to fruition yet, they haven't
released names down there quite yet either, that's not come to pass,
I think you're fixing to see one of the biggest political scandals in
American history take place. And I think it's going to change the
dynamics of this political race, number one, and this will be in
favor, I think, of who God has anointed, and there's also going to be
some things happen in the country as well. I'm really surprised that
we have not been hit yet. I think that it only by the grace and mercy
of God that we haven't been, on a terrorist hit. The Lord has showed
me a date. I'm working with some people right now that there's a
possible hit coming, so people just be praying that God exposes it
and thwarts it. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
you know, I think, between all these dynamics, I think that you're
going to see a huge change in this process, because, again, you know,
people like Marco Rubio, they went after Trump. I mean, he lied, he
betrayed, he stole. I mean, and the one thing I tell people about a
betrayer, you never have to worry about like Judas Iscariot. Sooner
or later they're going to hang themselves, and that's what happened
to him. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Ted
Cruz, you're seeing a lot come out with Ted Cruz right now. You know,
it's not my job to tell people who to vote for. You know, God gives
everyone their own free will. All I'm telling you is who God has
anointed for this hour. You have to discern, and that's what the
Church is lacking, is discernment. The Church is split on this
election right now. Use discernment and wisdom.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Read
the signs</span>. God is giving <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span>
all the time in this process but people are not reading them. Look at
the <span style="background: #ffff00;">signs</span> at what's going on
with Ted Cruz in this campaign right now. These character issues that
have been going on, stealing the votes from Ben Carson, all these
things. All these things are not lining up. Just because this man is
a preacher's son does not mean he's best qualified for the job. <span style="background: #ffff00;">Read
the signs</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>General
Eisenhower's D-Day Speech</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Army Of God</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
take a moment and read the remake of <span style="background-color: yellow;">Dwight Eisenhower's D-Day
speech</span>. You changed it to be an address to the body of Christ.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
addressed to the army of God, because what God is doing right now,
and in some of these other words you'll see that he is commanding his
army to get in the fight, to rise up. He's trying to mobilize his
army, the ground game that we've been talking about. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
basically what this says, it's from
<i>Supreme Headquarters,
Department of Spiritual Warfare</i>
is what I labeled it as. From <i>Supreme
Commander to the Army of God, Heaven's Invading Expeditionary Forces</i>.
It says:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Supreme
Headquarters</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Department
of Spiritual Warfare</b> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Supreme
Commander to the Army of God</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Heaven's
Invading Expeditionary Forces</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Apostles,
prophets, evangelists, preachers and teachers, men and women of the
Army of God. You are about to embark upon a great crusade toward
which we have striven since all of creation. The eyes of the world
and all of heaven are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty
loving people everywhere march with you. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
company with our brothers and sisters in arms in other fronts you
will bring about the destruction of the satanic war machine, the
elimination of a demonic tyrany over the oppressed peoples of the
earth, and security for ourselves and a free world. Your task will
not be an easy one. Your enemy is well trained, well equipped and
battle hardened, he will fight savagely, but now is the time. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Much
has happened since the demonic triumphs of years past. The body of
Christ has inflicted upon demonics great defeats in the spiritual and
natural realms. Our spiritual offensive has seriously reduced their
strength in the air and their capacity to wage war on the ground. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I've
given you an overwhelming superiority in weapons for your warfare and
placed at your disposal great reserves of trained fighting men and
women from the body of Christ. The tide has turned. The free men and
women of my army are marching together to victory. I have full
confidence in your courage, devotion to duty and skill in battle. We
will accept nothing less than full victory for this is a great and
noble undertaking, and the victory is yours. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.98in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Your
Supreme Commander,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.98in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">God</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
you don't know this but, going back to early 2012, I told our radio
audience that I was discerning in the spirit realm that satan had
launched a massive military style assault against the Church. I could
feel it. You could feel a shift in the spiritual realm. You know, I
saw it with the <span style="background: #ffff00;">occult</span>
rituals on live television, you know, at the half time of the Super
Bowl, the Grammy Awards and the Olympic Games and so forth. You have
just very dark, demonic ceremonies being held on live television. But
Mark, I've said a number of times I believe <span style="background: #ffff00;">God's
going to launch a D-Day invasion</span>. There's going to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">a
counter offensive</span>. That's why this excites me. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
Spiritual D-Day Invasion</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Body Of Christ At Home</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Army Of God At The Front</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Wow.
Yeah. Absolutely. And, that's what this is. This is a call to arms
right now. God is saying it's time to, and we go back to the D-Day
thing because, again, it's going to come in three waves, this
harvest. And that's what God was showing me. And that you've got the
<span style="background: #ffff00;">body of Christ</span> and the <span style="background: #ffff00;">army
of God</span>, and they're<span style="background: #ffff00;"> two
different things</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Think
of the body of Christ basically like boot camp. The first wave of
this harvest, if you will, will be the maturest of the mature because
what you have, if you've studied D-Day a little bit, you go back and
you see that they were on the ships for three days and these guys
were seasick. And, what's happening is, you have a lot of people from
the body of Christ who are on these ships, they're sea sick, they're
being tossed about, they don't know which direction to go in, and
they're focusing on the storm. So, it's kind of taken them out of the
war, so to speak. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Then
you've got some who have matured enough to get into the landing
craft. They're approaching the beach but they're seeing the obstacles
on the beach and they're focusing on the obstacles versus the
mission. What is the mission? The mission is to hit the beaches, gain
ground, move inland and conquer that ground for the kingdom of God
and hold it at all costs. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">And,
again, </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">God's using Donald
Trump to split hell wide open</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
which is supposed to be our job, but we've got to get our ground game
going. And, he's buying time for us to get</span> that ground game
going.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know Mark, I'll tell you, personally, what this has done for me, it's
caused me to recognize that not every Christian is in the army of
God. I've just always assumed, you know, the <span style="background: #ffff00;">body
of Christ</span> is synonymous with the army of God, but, what I'm
realizing right now is that, you know, ok, if you have a nation, if
you have the general population, the entire general population is not
serving in the military. There is a called out segment of the
population that's been assigned the responsibility of waging warfare
in defense of that nation. <span style="background: #ffff00;">That's
the army</span>. And so, the body of Christ is the general population
of the kingdom, but in the body of Christ there is a segment of the
body of Christ that's been called by the Commander of heaven's armies
to be on the battlefield.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Be
on the front line.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Be
on the front line and to wage spiritual warfare. Now, for those of us
who are in spiritual uniform, engaged, we don't, you know its, you
kind of look back at everybody else and say, what are you doing back
there, you know. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Why
aren't you in the army too?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
Why aren't you in the army? Get out here and fight.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
And it's because we're all at different spiritual maturity levels
right now. And I think a lot to do with this electoral process, God
is exposing things in the Church. I think he's also discerning, and
this is like a promotional time. Are you going to get promoted out of
the body of Christ and into the army of God?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
do you know something I just thought about? In world war 2, not
everybody was on the front lines fighting in world war 2. Back home,
Doc, do you know what they were doing? They were sacrificing, they
were going without, they were rationing, they were buying war bonds,
they were doing anything that they could do to contribute towards the
victory. See, they didn't get a pass, they didn't get to sit out
world war 2. Everybody was doing something to help the toops win the
war. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
And I think what God is doing in this hour is that he's trying to
call out the lukewrm Christian, if you will, or what I call the drive
thru Christian, where they just want to drive through and get their
Happy Meal message. You know what I mean? It's not going to cut it in
this end time right now, because you're not going to survive these
end times unless you are walking in a constant presence of God and in
the army of God, so to speak. God's trying to mobilize his army. He's
trying to get people promoted. He's trying to get you matured; get
you out of the body of Christ and in the army and take your place in
that army wherever it may be. I mean, you may be called to be, and
this is going into a different area. You may be called to be a
senator, congress person or woman. It's our job as the army of God.
If you're called to that, you need to take your place because now is
the time.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, in this prophetic message that you wrote in 2015 you're talking
about the spiritual principle of holding territory, occupy and
holding the territory. You quoted General Patton when he said, I
don't like paying for the same real estate twice. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
Exactly, and that's the other thing that I wanted to lead up to is
the leadership, because, you know, God's not going to put up with
this corrupt leadership anymore. You're going to see, and that's the
one thing that Christians don't understand about Donald Trump. When
you understand who and what <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
Trump</span> is, you understand the man. He is a General Patton. He's
a General McArthur, a General Montgomery. All these generals have
something in common, and what was the one thing that always got them
in trouble? It was their mouth. They weren't politicians. These guys
were created for one reason and one reason only and that was to win.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark,
this is Doc. You know, this is a pretty dramatic prophecy, all these
together. Have you received any kind of back lash from these
prophecies. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Do
Not Fear, America</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Gosh,
yes. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Can
you share with us a little bit about that?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
The other day when Obama was fixing to nominate Garland to the
Supreme Court, the Lord told me, he said, I want you to prophesy this
thing out in the open, the <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">Do
Not Fear, America</span></i> prophecy, about the Supreme Court.
Within an hour I literally got attacked so hard I unlocked my front
door because I thought I was going to have to go to the hospital.
Five minutes into that my wife called me and says, hey, my car's
broke down. She was on the way to lunch from work. I mean, it just,
we got hammered. Now, the attack didn't last long, but, I mean, but,
I've been sick for ten years. I've been literally sick for ten years.
That's why I was going to doctor Colbert. But, I have not been able
to leave my house, literally. God's had me isolated in my house
almost for ten years.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What
are you wrestling with? What's the sickness?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well.
For four or five years they couldn't find anything wrong with me. I
was bedridden for four or five days, I couldn't eat for four or five
days, and then finally I went to a doctor that found everything in
one shot. I had a very low thyroid. I had severe adrenal burn out
from the fire service, running day and night. And then I had the
hormones of a seventy year old at forty three. But, he left to go to
a lucrative, he got a lucrative offer <i>[word garbled]</i> the
hospital, so I had to go find doctor Colbert at that point, and he
took off where he left off. But, I'm still not a hundred percent. I'm
still dealing with a few issues. But, you know, praise God, I'm able
to do this right now. I'm able to come and do. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
the point being is God's had me isolated for ten years. And God is
releasing upon the earth prophetic voices like myself. I'm not the
only one. I don't take the glory for this. I give it all to God. But
he is releasing prophetic voices all over the earth. Probably tens of
thousands are hitting the earth, and all of heaven's coming with us
in this end time. And, he's releasing us out of these caves that
we've been hidden. He's had us hidden for a reason.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What's
been the reaction from the Christian community to the words the
Lord's put in your heart?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Five
Years</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
actually, <span style="background: #ffff00;">this is my first
interview</span>, public interview with all of this. This is the
first time I've done this. I, you know, God bless her, Mary Colbert
has sent this prophetic word out to a bunch of people. And I just
love the Colbert's to death, they're great people. And, she said
people are carrying the Trump prophecy on their phone. And, I'm just
getting feedback from her because <span style="background: #ffff00;">I
don't have a platform</span>. This is the first platform I've had,
literally, right now as we're speaking.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
interesting. The Lord is using TruNews to release this prophetic
word.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Five
years</span> old prophetic word. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">And
sat there for </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">five years</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
that </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald Trump</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
was </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by God to be the president of the United States, and people are
hearing i</span>t for the very first time today on TruNews.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
absolutely. And, but the feedback I'm getting back from Mary is that
everyone's excited about it that she's sharing it with. She's given
it to, I think, some big ministries, because, you know, they deal
with some big ministries, and the feedback has been positive. I mean,
not everybody's going to agree. I understand that, you know, and I'm
ready for that. That's fine. That's their own free will to pick and
choose what they want to believe.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But
you have to share what God's laid on your heart.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Exactly,
you know, and I just want people to pray about and seek God's face as
to who he's anointed, and pray for discernment and wisdom in these
end times, because, this electoral process, you know, things are
about to change in the next month or so, but, just discern. That's
what we need the most, discernment and wisdom in these end times
right now. To discern who are the sheeps and dressed, or, who are the
<span style="background: #ffff00;">wolves</span> dressed in <span style="background: #ffff00;">sheep</span>s
clothing so to speak.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
that's another thing that's happened in this campaign. Donald Trump's
candidacy has ripped the cover off of a lot of people and they have
exposed themselves for who and what they are.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
exactly. And, you know, Marco Rubio was one. And, you know, I think
it's beginning to happen with Ted Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Even
among, we're seeing among the political elite, we're seeing among the
news media, we're seeing that they have been colluding and working
together for years and the Trump candidacy has forced them to come
out in the open and declare that they are brethern, whether they're
Republican or Democrat, they are brethern. They believe in this new
world order.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
I asked the Lord one day, I said, Lord, we have control of the House
and Senate. What is going on? Why are they giving this president
carte blanche? And the Lord told me, he says, because they're in on
it. He said, they are giving him carte blanche because they are
looking at Obama as the finisher. But he says, I have a plan. H<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">e
says, it's </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not gonna happen</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
because, number one, I'm standing in the way and </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">I've
got a man called Donald Trump standing in the way</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
till my army mobilizes.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Do
you remember, several years ago, the <span style="background: #ffff00;">House
stenographer</span> who began prophesying on the floor of the House?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
interviewed her here on this program, and her husband. She was, of
course, they took her out of the House, but she was prophesying. She
said nothing like that had ever happened to her in her lifetime, but,
<span style="background: #ffff00;">she said, the spirit of God came
upon her</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> and </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">she
began prophesying</span>. And, she was talking, you know, I don't
remember the exact prophecy but she was talking about the Lord knew
of their schemes and he was going to stop them, a<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">nd
it referred to </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">Free Masons</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Wow.
Wow. Yeah, I don't doubt that one bit.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>America,
America</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, Mark, I've got to tell you what this has done for me. I've had
a long, lonely road here at this ministry. Now, the Lord called me
out of TBN in 1998 and told me to warn America to repent and to come
back to him, or this country would face, would suffer great woe and
heartbreak and trouble, and so, that's been our message. And, over
the years things have gotten darker and darker, and the Church has
been silent. And evil has grown stronger in the land, and the Church
has been silent. It's been very depressing to continue in this work
wondering where does this end? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, I know that there are saints who are hearing the message and
responding. W<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">e hear from them
every day. </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">A</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">nd,
so, when Mary </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Co</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">lbert</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
gave this prophecy to me that you gave in </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
beyond the revelation that Donald Trump would be the president of the
United States, what I</span> saw in it was the Lord saying to the
body of Christ, <span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm not done with
America yet</span>. I'm hearing the prayers, I'm hearing the pleas of
the saints who are grieving over the nation, and <span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm
going to give you a reprieve</span>. I'm going to give you an
opportunity to speak for me again. That was just an amazing fresh
breeze in my soul.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
And it's in the prophetic word that you have called <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">America,
America</span></i>. That exact phrase you just said. It's funny you
say that, because he's commanding his army in that prophecy to arise
and take their place. And, so I mean, all this stuff that we're
talking about is in that one prophecy pretty much.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
that prophecy says, this was given to you <span style="background: #ffff00;">October
7, 2015</span>:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>America,
I have chosen you as the launching platform for the world </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>by
an assult on the spiritually oppressed peoples of the earth. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>People
will say, how are we chosen? </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>It's
as if America is frozen. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Am
I not the God of the universe, of all creation? </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>I
have heard the cries of my people that have sought my face, and I
will heal their nation. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>People
will ask how I will do this.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">I
shall do this in two parts</span>. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What
are the two parts?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
it says, first.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
spirit of God said:</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
army of God, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>out
of the darkness I command you to arise and to take your place, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>for
I have given you extra time, mercy and grace. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Go,
go, go. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Do
not slow down. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Begin
to hold your ground for there is no more time to waste. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>America
will once again be the great light. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
enemy will say, oh, the light. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
light shines so bright. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>There
is nothing else left to do but to take flight. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>And
indeed they will.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">The
sign</span> will be a <span style="background: #ffff00;">mass exodus</span>
in the natural as the spirits will flee.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What
does that mean?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
think it means, people will, as soon as he takes the oath, I think
you're going to see a <span style="background: #ffff00;">mass exodus</span>
south of the border.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Oh,
hallelujah.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That'll
be <span style="background: #ffff00;">the sign</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Ok.
I hope it's the lefties, the communists, the socialists. I hope they
flee.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
It's all of them. That's what he's saying right here. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Listen,
I'll raise money to help them. We'll have a flee fund. We will pay
the relocation expenses of socialists and communists. Leave the
universities. Leave the news media. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
now. Cuba's back open again.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Cuba,
yeah. It won't cost that much. Send them over to Cuba. We could just
buy a boat here and run charter back and forth from Florida to Cuba.
Take all the American communists over to Cuba and drop them off in
that wonderful, Cuban, commusist utopia. And Obama could maybe become
the president of Cuba. And his portrait could be engraved next to Che
Guevara.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Gate Keeper</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Gate Keeper</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
Spiritual Gate Keeper</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
second part.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
spirit of God sa<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ys:</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">T</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">he</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">
gate keeper</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">, the </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">gate
keeper</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">, </span></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">president</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the United States is the </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">spiritual
gate keeper</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">. </span></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>I
have chosen this man Donald Trump </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">and
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">anointed</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
him as president for such a time as this. </span></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Can
you not see this?</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">F</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">or,
even in </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">his name</span>,</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Donald,
meaning world leader. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>The
spiritual connotation means faithful. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Trump,
meaning to get the better of, outrank or defeat someone, or something
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>often
in a highly public way. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>This
man I have chosen will be a <span style="background: #ffff00;">faithful</span>
world leader </i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>and together with my army will defeat all of America's
enemies </i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>in the spiritual and in the natural. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>You
will see it manifest before your eyes. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>I
wil use this man to <span style="background: #ffff00;">shut</span> the
gates, doors and portals this past president has <span style="background: #ffff00;">opened</span>.
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>He
will <span style="background: #ffff00;">open</span> gates, doors and
portals this past president has <span style="background: #ffff00;">shut</span>.
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>My
army shall not be silent. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>They
will begin to see he is the one I have <span style="background: #ffff00;">chosen</span>.
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>They
will begin to <span style="background: #ffff00;">rally</span> around
him and keep him covered in <span style="background: #ffff00;">spiritual
support</span>, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>and
as you gain ground they will say America is not frozen. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Then
it goes on and talks about <span style="background: #ffff00;">the
seeds</span> that we talked about earlier.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Gentlemen,
Doc, Edward. What are your thoughts as you listen to Mark?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Edward</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
his initial prophecy when he said that the dollar will be the
strongest. When we go back to when we talked about oil, the economics
of oil. Right now, as the oil price is depressed, or we look back in
January when it was severely depressed, the dollar was it's highest
it's ever been because of the petrodollar alliance. So, even though
this may have occured back in <span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span>,
it's occuring again right now, and based on what the IMF and what
central bankers are planning, there's a plan to make the dollar so
expensive that countries will have no choice but to decouple. So, I
think, that part of the prophecy, it's so huge, huge part of that
message you wrote down.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.
And, you know, God, the thing about the <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">America,
America</span></i> prophecy, God also gives <span style="background: #ffff00;">other
signs</span> of what's going to take place. He talked about <span style="background: #ffff00;">OPEC</span>
in here, actually. He talked about<span style="background: #ffff00;">
the seeds</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Talk
about OPEC. I saw that in one of the prophetic words. What was that
about?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah.
It says:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">OPEC,
OPEC, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">take
a hike, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">for
I'm tired of your evil energy spikes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">When
my president takes office</span> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">you
will shake and quake. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
will say America no longer needs us.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
that is true,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">for
she will be energy independent </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">for
my red, white and blue. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a sign will be given </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">when
prices go low </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">for
a gallon of gas will be one dollar and below.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
what astounds me on that one is that it was what, maybe a month or so
ago, that Donald Trump was calling for <span style="background: #ffff00;">one
dollar a gallon gas</span>. So that was <span style="background: #ffff00;">the
sign</span> that would be given.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mark.
Of course there's been a lot of talk in recent years that the dollar
is finished as the global reserve currency, and there are powerful
forces at work to bring it down. I believe that Barack Obama is
working from the inside to weaken the United States so that other
nations will rise up bigger and stronger. But, I've pointed out in
the past that the enemies, the real motive of the enemy in destroying
the dollar is to cut off the flow of money to world missions. That's,
I don't know if the Church of God, the body of Christ, comprehends
the magnitude of the spiritual impact that would be felt world wide
if the U.S. dollar collapsed. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right,
and that's why Donald Trump's spoken all the time on Chinese
<span style="background: #ffff00;">devaluing</span> the dollar,
because he's wanting to bring the money back to America because,
again, it takes money to move the gospel. It takes man power, it
takes equipment, it takes people, you name it, food. I mean, all
these things that it took like in England. They were storing this
stuff up for the D-Day invasion. It's going to be the same way here.
There's going to be so much money pouring into this country, and he
knows how they're trhing to devalue the dollar. He knows the way
around all this to stop it. And, you know, that's why your seeing
this <span style="background: #ffff00;">kingdom of darkness</span>
trying to fight him on this mess. It's not gonna work, you know,
'cause God's already spoken it. There it is, and when God speak
something, to me, that's it.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
this is a fascinating. Doc, you know, it's being released for the
first time. You know this is going to make news. This program's going
to make news.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
and we'll get the emails, we'll get the calls. Thank goodness Mark
has a tough skin from being a fireman for all those years <i>[garbled
cross talk]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
this is going to get picked up by the secular news media that a
prophecy was given to someone <span style="background: #ffff00;">five
years ago</span> that <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald Trump
would be elected president of the United States</span>. And, so,
Mark, you might want to get prepared.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah,
I have been prepared for a long time.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
may find yourself being interviewd quite often in the days ahead.
We're honored that the Lord arranged for TruNews to be the ministry
and the media venue that this prophetic word was going to be brought
forth. Of course, only time will decide, show us whether it is a
prophecy from the Lord. And, we won't have to wait that long. This is
April and November will be here very soon and we will know whether
this was a prophecy from the Lord, and it will stand or fall on its
own in just a few months.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Absolutely.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
when you read it, Doc, <span style="background: #ffff00;">it reads
like Mark wrote it last week</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Right.
It really does.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Not
five years ago</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">We
were reading through it earlier today, just shocked. This was five
years ago.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">I
don't know anybody</span> that was seriously talking about Donald
Trump running for president <span style="background: #ffff00;">five
years ago</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, he toyed with it for several election cycles, but nothing
serious.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
to go into detail about the attacks that will be on him and that the
attacks would run off his back like water off a duck's back. You
know, billions will be spent. I mean, this is so accurate. That's
what makes me <span style="background: #ffff00;">believe this is a
true word from the Lord</span>. And if it is, what really excites me
is that the Lord is saying to us, the body of Christ, I'm going to
give you a second wind. I'm going to give you, I'm going to get the
enemy off your back 'cause the enemy's been on the Churck of God
intently, intensly in recent years. Persecution has ramped up. The
hostility? You can feel the hostility in this country towards the
Church. And it would be refreshing to have a period of time once
again in this country where we did not have that hostile environment
on the body of Christ and on preaching the gospel. And to have a man
in the White House who was actually favorable to the churches in this
nation and would actually help us instead of fighting us and
threatening us and plotting against us.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">It's
been a long time since we've had that kind of president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Doc</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Amen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yeah,<span style="background: #ffff00;">
it's coming.</span> </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Amen.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>MT</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">It's
coming</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>RW</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">Alright.
My guest has been Mark Taylor. He's a retired firefighter. </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">You
heard it for the very first time here on TruNews.</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">
On behalf of Doc. Burkhardt </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><i>[sp?]</i></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">
and Edward </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">Szal</span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">l,
I'm Rick Wiles. </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">Thank you for
listening to the program today. Spread this program around on social
media. Do your part to be an evangelist and tell everybody you know
to listen to this program. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And,
also, please prayerfully consider supporting TruNews. We are
supported 100% on the generous love offerings of the people who
listen to this program on a daily basis. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">You
can support us at TruNews.com. If you want to use PayPal our address
is Support@TruNews.com. </span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;">And
if you want to send a check, a money order or precious metals, you
may address your letter to post office box 690069 in vero Beach,
Florida. Our zip code is 32969. God bless. I'll see you tomorrow.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-42873279236827911072016-05-08T11:10:00.002-07:002016-05-08T11:14:37.372-07:00Argumentum ad Ignorantiam<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Today
I posted this on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/03/ted-cruz-neither-natural-born-citizen.html</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>"argumentum
ad ignorantiam"</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario,</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Your
response to Bob and Bryan Gene Olson is poignant. Definition #3 in my
American Heritage Dictionary is 3a: Neat, skillful, and to the point.
3b: Astute and pertinent; relevant: "poignant suggestion".</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Maybe
you can have a poignant suggestion about <b>"argumentum ad
ignorantiam"</b> to Greg Conterio who wrote on March 5, 2015
"Ted Cruz and Natural Born Citizenship: A Belated Reply to Mario
Apuzzo" where your response to Bob and Bryan is posted.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
http://www.westernfreepress.com/2015/03/05/ted-cruz-and-natural-born-citizenship-a-belated-reply-to-mario-apuzzo/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
Mr. Apuzzo continues, explaining that NBC actually has a specific
meaning. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
He cites as proof of the assertion </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
“The fact that there was in the Constitutional Convention no debate
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
on the meaning of the clause gives us more evidence that </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
the clause must have had a settled meaning.” </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
Not being an attorney myself, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
I could not remember the name for this type of argument, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
and had to look-up the Latin phrase, which is <b>argumentum ad
ignorantiam</b>, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
or appeal to ignorance. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
It is a logical fallacy, which loosely translated means </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
“..he didn’t say his name isn’t Mike, so his name must be
Mike!” </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
The truth of the matter is, the term NBC does not, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
and did not at the time hold a specific legal meaning. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
It actually is an adaptation of the term natural-born subject, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
as under English common law, the people were subjects, rather than
citizens. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
And to his credit, Mr. Apuzzo does concede </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
that the term NBC derives from English common law. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
What he fails to note however is that according to Blackstone ... .</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Greg
Conterio cites a long quote from Blackstone that includes this: </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<b>"...so that all children, born out of the king’s ligeance,
whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born
subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any
exception;...."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario,
I'll let you clarify <b>"argumentum ad ignorantiam"</b> if
you want to, but I will simply clarify the history of the "birther"
nomenclature that Conterio mentions in his first paragraph.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hey
Greg and all "natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers
who continue to deliberately ignore the original genesis original
intent for including the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Hillary
Clinton or her campaign staff did not come up with the "birther"
designation implied in the word "born."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">John
Jay implied the "birther" position of </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ONLY
by birth </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ONLY
by birth on U.S. soil </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ONLY
by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">when
he underlined the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his good friend George
Washington who passed the suggestion on to the convention delegates who
incorporated the "natural born Citizen" phrase into Article
II Section 1 clause 5 without debate because they already knew that
"born" and "citizen" were perpetually linked by
the word "natural" forever, indefeasible.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship is indefeasible because U.S. citizenship
<b>"by birth alone"</b> on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married
parents can NOT be annulled or made void by a law passed by Congress.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>A
positive law (statute) can NOT annul a natural law (nature).</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/03/natural-precedes-positive-law.html</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-23214583614586890712016-03-23T13:41:00.000-07:002016-03-23T16:55:55.341-07:00Natural Law PrecedesAnd Informs Positive Law<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 22pt;"><b>Natural
Law Precedes And Informs Positive Law</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">On
March 16, 2016 at 11:49 PM on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen
blog I challenged one of Mario's "natural born Citizen" new
meaning neobirthers, a commenter with the name of Bryan/Unknown, with
something simple about natural law (nature) and positive law
(statute):</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Rebut
and refute a natural law with a positive law.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Rebut
and refute nature with a statute.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">On
March 19, 2016 at 2:27 AM Bryan/Unknown responded on Mario's blog
with a nonresponse again as he has done in the past to previous
challenges to clarify how <b>dual</b> U.S./foreign citizenship is
good 'nuf for government work, specifically eligibility to be chief
executive of the United States, and why <b>ONLY </b><b>singular</b><b>
</b>U.S. citizenship <b>ONLY </b>by birth on U.S. soil <b>ONLY </b>to
two U.S. citizen married parents is not the original intent for the
words <b>"born"</b> and <b>"Citizen"</b> in
"natural born Citizen". </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For
some reason Bryan/Unknown and all of the other "natural born
Citizen" new meaning neobirthers who espouse the 2000s myth
about <b>dual</b> U.S./foreign citizenship is good 'nuf never, ever
defend <b>dual</b> citizenship as equal to <b>singular</b> U.S.
citizenship and simply ridicule <b>ONLY </b>singular U.S. citizenship
as the first POTUS eligibility reqirement, the first reqirement that
<b>MUST</b> precede <b>by birth alone</b> the fourteen years
residence requirement in the United States up to and including the
requirement to be at least thirty-five years of age.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Bryan/Unknown
wrote:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>>>
</i><i>"Why is it *my* challenge to support things that you
believe while I argue they are silly?<br />
<br />
</i><i>>> </i><i>"As
I've pointed out several times, only in man-made law are there
citizens or nations that could have citizens. I don't hear anyone
disagreeing on that. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>>>
"</i><i>You think there's a law of natural </i><i>[sic]</i><i>
on who is and is not a natural-born citizen? </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>>>
"</i><i>If so, and you accept that nations are man-made, then
you necessarily believe in laws of nature that depend upon human
inventions.<br />
<br />
</i><i>>> </i><i>"It makes no sense
to me. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>>>
"</i><i>You cannot defend a ludicrous position by assigning me
the challenge of finding evidence for it."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
pertinent sentenc is this:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><i>>>
"</i><i>If so, and you accept that nations are man-made, </i></b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><i>>>
</i><i>then you necessarily believe in laws of nature </i></b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><i>>>
</i><i>that depend upon human inventions."</i></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Specifically
pertinent is <b>"...laws of nature that depend upon human
invention."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">All
Bryan/Unknown and "natural born Citizen" new meaning
neobirthers need to do to advance (but never to win) their 2000s
theory that dual U.S./foreign citizenship is the point of "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in Article II Section 1 clause 5
and POTUS eligibility is to adduce only one <b>"law of nature"</b>
that is said to <b>"depend"</b> on <b>"human
invention."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">As
usual, Bryan's/Unknown's comments are poorly written, and he does not
explain his points. He simply throws out his comments that are
intended to support dual U.S./foreign citizenship POTUS eligibility
while driving by, so to speak, like throwing a molotov cocktail while
driving by in a speeding vehicle.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
reality is that ALL positive law <i><b>(</b></i><i><b>statute</b></i><i><b>)</b></i>
is dependent on natural law <i><b>(</b></i><i><b>nature</b></i><i><b>)</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Absolutely
NO natural law is dependent on positive law, what Bryan/Unknown in
his comment calls <b>"human invention"</b>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
"natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers seem to
never want to admit regarding POTUS eligibility is that nature is not
dependent on statute, which means that <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S.
citizenship <b>ONLY</b> by birth alone <b>ONLY</b>
on U.S. soil <b>ONLY</b> to two U.S. citizen married parents
is <b>NOT</b> dependent on a old or new statute about dual
U.S./foreign citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
pertinent example that Bryan/Unknown probably thinks makes his
positive law case that <b>"...laws of nature...depend upon human
invention"</b> is the language of the U.S. Constitution itself. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I'm
sure that Bryan/Unknown and "natural born Citizen" new
meaning neobirthers who promote the 2000s theory, the 2000s myth that
dual U.S./foreign citizenship makes a person eligible to be president
would agree with the next paragraph that the U.S. Constitution is an
example of positive law, and yet <span style="background: #ffff00;">how</span>
it became positive law defeats their position that the original
intent of the positive law constitution determines the original
intent meaning of the natural law word "born" in "natural
born Citizen" concerning POTUS eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
natural law reality about positive law reality is that the language
of the constitution is "positive law" written by humans who
are the product of natural law <i><b>(aka, </b></i><i><b>the</b></i><i><b>
unified congress of two bodies and then birth)</b></i>. Also, the
language of the written constitution written by humans expresses the
"natural law" reality that <b>"birth"</b> is a
"natural law" activity of the unified congress of two
bodies that necessarily precedes a "positive law"
declaration by humans who are members of the unified Congress of two
bodies, <i><b>aka </b></i><i><b>the </b></i><i><b>House and Senate</b></i>.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
other words, it is "natural" law that "born"
precedes positive law "Citizen" and so natural law
determines positive law and POTUS eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
the humans, the result of natural law, did not exist first, the
positive law language of the constitution could not be written. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
this obvious sense, existence of humans precedes existence of human
law, this is what is meant with natural law precedes positive law and
positive law is dependent on natural law.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
Bryan/Unknown identifies as the <b>"...laws of nature that
depend upon human invention..."</b> has nature and law reality
bass akward. The nature and law reality is that the positive law of
the constitution is dependent on the natural law prior existence of
the humans who express their positive law thought by writing their
common sense positive law declarations, speifically, regarding POTUS
eligibility, that <b>ONLY</b> a "natural born <i><b>(</b></i><i><b>a
</b></i><i><b>natural law birth)</b></i> Citizen <i><b>(</b></i><i><b>a
</b></i><i><b>positive law </b></i><i><b>dec</b></i><i><b>l</b></i><i><b>aration</b></i><i><b>)</b></i><b>"</b>
could be "...eligible to the Office of President" because
<i><b>"</b></i><i><b>ONLY by </b></i><i><b>natural law alone"</b></i>,
also known as
<b>ONLY "by birth alone" </b>to
two U.S. citizen <i><b>(positive law)</b></i> married
<i><b>(positive law)</b></i> parents <i><b>(natural law)</b></i>,
could a person <i><b>(natural law)</b></i> be a "natural born
Citizen" with <b>ONLY </b>singular
<i><b>(positive law)</b></i>
U.S. citizenship <i><b>(positive
law)</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
other words, <b>birth alone</b>,
which is the natural law result of an natural law act of congress,
determines natural born citizenship. For that natural law reason a
law, a positive law, a statute passed by an Act of Congress, is not
necessary to determine who is "...eligible to the Office of
President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
positive law "Citizen" designation is dependent on the
natural law "born" activity that is necessary <b>before</b>
a "natural born Citizen" can even exist to become
"...eligible to the Office of President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
2012, whenever I've challenged "natural born Citizen" new
meaning neobirthers who promote the 2000s theory, the myth, with a
similar challenge to defend dual U.S./foreign citiznship as
sufficient for POTUS eligibility, they have NEVER, ever responded in
depth with substance, either on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen
blog, or Kevin Davidson's ObamaConspiracy.org blog or
BirtherReport.com, or AmericanThinker.com, or TheRightScoop.com.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Regarding
eligibility to be POTUS, <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship as the
<b>ONLY</b> <i><b>original genesis original intent</b></i><i> </i>for
the word <b>"born"</b> in "natural born Citizen"
can <b>NOT</b> be rebutted and can <b>NOT</b> be refuted with dual
U.S./foreign citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That
is natural law reality.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Singular
U.S. citizenship is the POTUS eligibility reality that Bryan/Unknown
and "natural born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers NEVER
rebut and NEVER refute by explaining in depth the 2000s myth and
theory of the sufficiency if not superiority of dual U.S./foreign
citizenship. Instead, "nbC" new meaning neobirthers respond
in a ways that are similar to Bryan/Unknown. They either say
something like, "well, we don't know what "natural born
Citizen" means" so that is why dual U.S./foreign
citizenship looks ok to them, or they say something similar to what
Bryan/Unknown wrote — they simply throw their ideological molotov
cocktails as they drive and say something like <b>"...laws of
nature...depend upon human invention"</b>
without explicating their
point with substance.<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">On
Mario's blog Bryan/Unknown wrote about my natural law and positive
law comment:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i><br />
</i><i>>>
</i><i>"It makes no sense to me. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>>>
"</i><i>You cannot defend a ludicrous position by assigning me
the challenge of finding evidence for it."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
Bryan/Unknown wrote about <b>"...laws of nature...depend upon
human invention"</b> makes no sense to me for the same reason
that it would not have made sense to original birther John Jay and
original birther George Washington and the original birther framers
and ratifiers of the constitution who understood that the laws of
nature and nature's God preceded the language and the intent of the
constitution.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Natural
born Citizen" new meaning neobirthers who promote the 2000s
theory, the 2000s myth that dual U.S./foreign citizenship is
sufficient for POTUS eligibility, and that <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S.
citizenship is <b>NOT</b> the <b>ONLY</b> meaning, <b>NOT</b> the
<b>ONLY</b> <i><b>original genesis original intent</b></i> for the
word <b>"born"</b> in "natural born Citizen",
cannot defend a ludicrous position by denying the natural law reality
that precedes positive law reality—nature and birth precede statute
and declaration about eligibility to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That
is natural law reality about positive law reality.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/2016/03/citizen-clarifies-born-in-natural-born.html</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-23851292313896017382016-03-02T16:42:00.000-07:002016-03-10T12:53:58.273-07:00"Citizen" Clarifies "Born" in Natural Born Citizen<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>“</b><b>Citizen”
Clarifies the Meaning of “Born” in Natural Born Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"if...then..."
and "...born..."</b><br />
<br />
Mario Apuzzo posted <i><b>The
Framers’ Definition of a Natural Born Citizen Is Not Based on Race,
Color, or Religion</b></i><span style="background: #66ffff;">*</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">1</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">
</span>at his Natural Born Citizen blog that is filled with a "whole
lotta" meaty morsels, but his "gravy" is good too. He
has mentioned the "gravy" before, but I mention it here to
tie it in with a comment on Apuzzo's blog by a commenter named Illion
on March 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM in which he says <i>"... if your US
citizenship can be </i><i><b>affected by an Act of Congress</b></i><i>,
then </i><i><b>you are not</b></i><i> a natural born US citizen,"</i>
and to tie Mario's "gravy" comment in with my own emphasis
on John Jay's emphasis on the connection between the words <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
and <span style="background: #ffff00;">"Citizen"</span> in
"natural born Citizen," a phrase that Jay authored in his
July 25, 1787 note to his good friend George Washington, a suggestion
which Washington, as president of the constitutional convention,
passed on to the framers of the language of the U.S. Constitution,
specifically Article II Section 1 clause 5, the presidential
eligibility clause<span style="background: #66ffff;">*2 </span>.<br />
<br />
<span style="background: #66ffff;">*</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">1</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">
</span>http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-framers-definition-of-natural-born.html<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #66ffff;">*2
</span><b>[</b><i><b>Part 1a]</b></i> No Person except a natural born
Citizen, <i><b>[Part 1b]</b></i> or a Citizen of the United States,
<i><b>[Part 1c]</b></i> at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, <i><b>[Part 1d]</b></i> shall be eligible to the Office
of President; <i><b>[Part 2a]</b></i> neither shall any person be
eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of
thirty five Years, and <i><b>[Part 2b]</b></i> been fourteen Years a
Resident <i><b>[Part 2c]</b></i> within the United States.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
The
"gravy" in Attorney Appuzo's post is the clear conclusion
in the penultimate paragraph which I have opened up here to emphasize
the bold points: <br />
<br />
>> Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and
Haley are all not natural born citizens of the United States.<br />
<br />
>>
None of them are citizens <b>only</b> by virtue of being <b>born in</b>
the United States to U.S. citizen parents.<br />
<br />
>> Obama,
Rubio, Jindal, and Haley <b>all need</b> the Fourteenth Amendment to
be citizens. <br />
<br />
>> <b>Without</b> the Fourteenth
Amendment, <br />
>> they could be <b>citizens of the state</b>
in which they were born, <br />
>> but<b> not a citizen</b> of
the United States, <br />
>> <i><b>let alone</b></i> a natural
born citizen of the United States.<br />
<br />
>> "Cruz
<b>needs</b> a naturalization Act of Congress <br />
>> to be a
citizen of the United States. <br />
<br />
>> Being born in a
foreign country, <br />
>> <b>without the Act</b>, <br />
>>
Cruz would <b>not even</b> be a citizen of any state, <br />
>>
<i><b>let alone</b></i> a natural born citizen. <br />
<br />
>>
<b>He would be an alien</b>."<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
Here
are some questions for all "natural born Citizen" new
meaning neobirthers in 2016 America tied in with Illion's coherent
and cogent <b>"if...then"</b> comment:<br />
<br />
>>
"... <span style="background: #ffff00;">if</span> your US
citizenship can be affected <br />
>> by an Act of Congress, <br />
>>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">then</span> you are not <br />
>>
a natural born US citizen"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">For
"nbC" new meaning neo-birthers who say that the framers and
ratifiers of 1700s America did not define the original intent of
<b>"born"</b> in the eligibility clause 5 in Article II
Section 1 to mean <b>ONLY</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">singular</span>
U.S. citizenship, so that is why they are willing to give Sen. Cruz
and Sen. Rubio the benefit of the doubt because they both have <span style="background: #ffff00;">dual</span>
U.S./foreign citizenship, here are some helpful clarifying questions.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">In
1787 America did the framers intend for <b>"born"</b> and
<b>"Citizen"</b> in the Article II Section 1 clause 5
eligibility clause to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">perpetual</span>
or <span style="background: #ffff00;">temporary</span>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
temporary, where is it recorded in the archives that the framers and
ratifiers debated that the connection between <b>"born"</b>
and <b>"Citizen"</b> was to be temporary?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
there is no record in the national archives of the framers and
ratifiers debating perpetual or temporary, the <span style="background: #ffff00;">obvious</span>
conclusion is that the connection between <b>"born"</b> and
<b>"Citizen"</b> in "natural born Citizen" was
intended to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">perpetual</span>,
not temporary. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Common
sense. Right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">What
is the connection between <b>"born"</b> and <b>"Citizen"</b>
in "natural born Citizen?" </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
connection is very simple to articulate.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b><br />
When
John Jay underlined the word <b>"born"</b> in "natural
born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George
Washington, did Jay mean and did Washington agree that "born"
meant "born" <u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b></u>
in the United States <b>OR</b> "born" in <u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ANY</span></b></u>
nation on earth?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">When
Jay connected the word </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"born"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
with </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in "natural born Citizen" in his note to Washington, which
Washington passed on to the framers, what </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">did
the word </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
mean to the 1787 framers </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">and
1787-1790 ratifiers</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Did
John Jay mean to imply that </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"born"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in "natural born Citizen" meant "born" </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in the United States </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>OR</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
"born" </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">anywhere</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
on earth?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Did
John Jay mean to imply that </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in "natural born Citizen" meant a "citizen" of
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
the United States </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>OR</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
a "citizen" </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">anywhere</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
on earth?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
Did
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">the
1787 framers imply that </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">the
original intent of</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">in
"natural born Citizen" </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">was
to perpetually </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">mean</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">a
"citizen" of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b>ONLY</b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
the United States </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>OR</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
a "citizen" of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b>ANY</b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
nation on earth?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Well,
obviously, the </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
original intent </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">meaning
possible </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">in
1787 America, only four years after the war of independence was ended
at the 1783 Treaty of Paris of which John Jay was a signatory, could
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">be</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
a </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"citizen"</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
of the United States </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
a "citizen" of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ANY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
other nation on earth </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">dis</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">s</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">onant
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">association
of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
the U.S. </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone"</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ANY</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
nation on earth </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"alone"</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
is c</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">ommon
sense, right?<br />
Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Both
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
the U.S. </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"alone"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ANY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
nation on earth </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"alone"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
can </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
be the original intent of the framers, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Question:</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Does
the connection of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"born"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in "natural born Citizen" mean </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">either</span></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">or</span></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
dual U.S./foreign citizenship? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">common
sense </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">perpetual
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">original
intent connection </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">could
obviously</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
be </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>BOTH</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">singular
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>OR</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
dual</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So,
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"born"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"Citizen"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
in "natural born Citizen" can mean </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b>ONLY</b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>by
birth </b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
either/or, not either a "citizen" of another nation </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
or a "citizen" of </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">both</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">the
U.S. and a "citizen" of another nation, aka dual
U.S./foreign citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Right?<br />
Yes.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"if...then..."
and "...born..."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
constitutional "scholars" and politicos need to remember
that the framer's language was eventually accepted without debate or
disagreement by the ratifiers of the several states. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Since
September 17, 1787 when the Constitution's language was adopted by
the framers and sent to the states to be ratified, if a person is
born </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
on U.S. soil and born </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
to two U.S. citizen married parents, then that person is a U.S.
natural born citizen</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">b</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">y
</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>birth"
</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
and has </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
singular U.S. citizenship which can </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
be </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>affected</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
by an Act of Congress. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship is indefeasible because U.S. citizenship
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">by
birth </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></b></u></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>"</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married parents can </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
be annulled or made void by a law passed by Congress. A positive law
</span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>(statute)</i></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
can </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>NOT</b></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
annul a natural law </span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><i>(nature)</i></span></span><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art<br />
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-51462653464136569192016-02-22T20:16:00.000-07:002016-02-28T18:05:40.905-07:00Mr. Trump's 5 Children Are Not Natural Born Citizens<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Donald
Trump</b><b>'</b><b>s </b><b>5 </b><b>Children Are </b><b>U.S.
Citizens </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>But
</b><b>Not </b><b>U.S. </b><b>Natural Born Citizens</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mario
Apuzzo, Esq. posted <i><b>"Donald Trump Is Right to Retweet that
Marco Rubio Is Not a Natural Born Citizen"</b></i><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">1</span>
on
Monday, February 22, 2016. </span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span></span><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">1</span></span><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">
</span></span><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"> Article:
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/donald-trump-is-right-to-retweet-that.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/donald-trump-is-right-to-retweet-that.html</a>
</span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
the third paragraph he accurately writes <i>"...birth </i><i><u><b>alone</b></u></i><i>.
... birth does not exist in a vacuum"</i> which he supports in
the rest of the article today and in the two previous articles<span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">2</span>
and <span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">3</span>.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
"A natural born citizen is a citizen by virtue of birth and
birth <u>alone</u>. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
"But birth does not exist in a vacuum. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
"There are circumstances that exist at the time of birth. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
"Those circumstances are, among many, the parents to whom one is
born </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
"and the place where one is born. ..."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">2</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>
</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>rticle
#1:</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-illinois-board-of-elections-got-it.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-illinois-board-of-elections-got-it.html</a>
</span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="8576350019560106661"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Friday,
February 5, 2016: <i><b>The Illinois Board of Elections Got It Wrong:
Ted Cruz Is Not a Natural Born Citizen </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">3</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">
</span></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>rticle
#2:</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/ted-cruz-misrepresents-law-and-his.html">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/ted-cruz-misrepresents-law-and-his.html</a>
</span></span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="5513459538801078291"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Thursday,
February 18, 2016: <i><b>Ted Cruz Misrepresents the Law and His Being
a Natural Born Citizen at Town Hall Meeting </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
two circumstances that Mr. Apuzzo mentions in his third article, and
in the previous two articles, that reinforces singular U.S.
citizenship, is the U.S. citizenship of both parents in addition to
where their child is born.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>A
Suggestion For Mr. Trump</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
have a suggestion for Mr. Trump about how to promote <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
singular U.S. citizenship in a way to clarify why the word <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
reveals who a "natural born Citizen" is that will get the
grudging respect of the "natural born Citizen" new mean
neobirthers who support Sen. Cruz, Sen. Rubio, Gov. Jindal and Gov.
Nikki Haley, and etc., etc., etc.,: bring all 5 of his children into
the conversation about eligibility to be president. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(1)</span></b>
First is the date of naturalization of his first wife, Ivana, and the
birth dates of his three children with her, Don Jr., Ivanka, Eric,
births which happened <span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span>
her naturalization.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(2)</span></b>
Second is the date of the birth of his second daughter, Tiffany,
which <span style="background: #ffff00;">preceded</span> the marriage
to his second wife, Marla.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(3)</span></b>
Third is the date of naturalization of his third wife, Melania,
which, while the date of her naturalization is still unclear, her
naturalization is thought to have been <span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span>
the birth of son Barron.<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Naturalization
</b><b>After </b><b>Birth Of </b><b>Three Children</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">See
Ivana's naturalization notice in the <i><b>May 26, 1988
Lewiston-Auburn, Maine Journal</b></i><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">4</span>.
Since she was naturalized in 1988, the former Mrs. Trump
became a U.S. citizen 11 years <span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span>
Don was born, 7 years <span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span>
Ivanka was born, and 4 years <span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span>
Eric Trump was born.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ccffff;">*</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">4</span><span style="background: #ccffff;">
</span>
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1899&dat=19880527&id=LiEgAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YmYFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5053,3823442&hl=en</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"With
her at <i><b>Wednesday's ceremony</b></i> was her husband,
billionaire developer Donald Trump...."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">[...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"Mrs.
Trump, a 38 year-old, Austrian-born, former Czechoslovakian national,
came to this country 10 years ago after working as a model in
Montreal."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>See
the bios for the three oldest children on Wikipedia:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"Donald
John "Don" Trump, Jr. (<i>born December 31, 1977</i>)...."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump,_Jr.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"Ivanka
Marie Trump (<i>born October 30, 1981</i>)...."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"Eric
Frederic Trump (<i>born January 6, 1984</i>)...."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Trump</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Two
U.S. Citizen Parents </b><b>Not Married Yet </b><b>To Each Other</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br />
It
is my understanding that in 1787 America, when <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
in "natural born Citizen" could <b>ONLY</b> mean <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
to two (2) U.S. citizen married parents for the child to be eligible
to be president, <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
could <b>NOT</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">also</span> mean,
for eligibility to be president purposes, birth to two (2) U.S.
citizens who were <b>NOT</b> married to each other, whether they were
both single at the time a child is born to them <b>OR</b> both were
married to other spouses at the time a child is born to them.
<br />
<br />
Without a legal <span style="background: #ffff00;">"marriage</span>"
<b>BEFORE</b> a child is born, what is the <span style="background: #ffff00;">"legal"</span>
<u><b>foundation</b></u> of being a singular U.S. citizen? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If
<b>ONLY</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">singular</span> U.S.
citizenship is <span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span> the <b>ONLY</b>
original intent default "legal" meaning of <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
in "natural born Citizen," then <b>ONLY</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">dual</span>
U.S./foreign citizenship is the <b>ONLY</b> original intent default
"legal" meaning of <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
in "natural born Citizen" when the two persons are <span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span>
married to each other <span style="background: #ffff00;">before</span>
their child is born.<br />
<br />
With the common sense understanding
about the original intent of <span style="background: #ffff00;">"born"</span>
in "natural born Citizen" meaning <b>ONLY</b> birth to two
(2) U.S. citizen married parents in 1787 America and continuing today
into 2016 America, it looks like ALL 5 of Donald Trump's children are
not natural born citizens.<br />
<br />
In addition to the info about
Mr. Trumps' three oldest children with his first wife Ivana, is this
birth info about second daughter Tiffany with his second wife
Marla.<br />
<br />
<b>Tiffany Trump</b>, daughter with Marla Maples,
was born a U.S. citizen on October 13, 1993 and U.S. citizen Trump
and U.S. citizen Maples were married on December 20, 1993, two months
<span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span> Tiffany's
birth.<br />
<br />
<b>Marla Maples </b><b>info </b><b>on Wikipedia:</b><br />
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marla_Maples<br />
<br />
"Maples
and Donald Trump have one child together, Tiffany Ariana Trump, who
was born on October 13, 1993.[5] In December, 1993 the couple
married,...."<br />
<br />
<b>Here is a </b><b>Chi</b><b>cago
Tribune announcement of </b><b>the </b><b>Trump and Maples wedding on
Dec. 1</b><b>9</b><b>, 1993, the day before the marriage:</b><br />
>>
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1993-12-19/news/9312190244_1_marla-maples-donald-trump-david-dinkins<br />
<br />
"NEW
YORK — The middle-aged master builder finally decides to marry the
actress-model <b>mother of his infant child</b>, a week after she
unveils her new line of maternity clothes,...."<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Naturalization
</b><b>After </b><b>Birth Of </b><b>One Child</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br />
In
addition to the birth info about Mr. Trumps' three oldest U.S.
citizen children with his first wife Ivana and the birth info about
his second U.S. citizen daughter Tiffany with his second wife Marla
is the birth info about the youngest U.S. citizen son Barron.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Bio
on Wikipedia:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melania_Trump</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"Melania
Trump ... became a <span style="background: #ffff00;">naturalized</span>
U.S. citizen in 2006."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"In
2006, Melania gave <span style="background: #ffff00;">birth</span> to
a son named Barron William Trump."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
While
it is clear that Mr. Trump's </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">four</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
olde</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">r</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
children are "citizens" but </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
"natural born citizens" it is </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">not
clear if </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Barron is </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">or
is not</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> an "</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">natural
born Citizen" with </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">After many years, it is
still not clear when Melania Trump naturalized; </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">before</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
or </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Ba</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">rr</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">on's
birth. If </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">born</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">before</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
Barron, </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">by"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
birth on U.S. soil to two (2) U.S. citizen married parents, </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">has
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship and</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is a U.S. </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"natural
born Citizen"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">who</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is eligible to be president; if </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">born</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
Barron, </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">at"</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">birth</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is a U.S. </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"citizen"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">but </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">not
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">a U.S. "natural
born Citizen" and so</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">not</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
eligible to be president.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Free
Republic had a post on April 14, </span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
with quotes from the HillaryNMe blog:</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
>>
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2704935/posts<br />
<br />
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">From
the last paragraph of HillaryNMe.com - April 14, </span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">2011</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">:</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
>>
http://www.hillarynme.com/2011/04/14/shocker-donald-trumps-children-ineligible-to-be-president-just-like-obama/<br />
<br />
"The
Donald’s fifth child with Melania is ineligible because his mother
is a native of Slovenia. Barron Trump was born in April of 2006 and
Melania’s naturalization as a U.S. citizen is unclear at this
time."<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">So,
w</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">hat is known is that
Donald Trump married Melania on January 22, 2005 and Barron Trump was
born March 20,2006. </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">What
is not </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">knows yet</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is if Melania naturalized </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">before</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">or </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">after</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Barron was born.</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
<br />
The
next quote below from the 2011 HillaryNMe post mentions the
three-legged stool accurately as related to natural born citizenship:
<br />
<br />
>> "...there are three elements that complete
the natural born citizen requirement. <br />
>> Just like a
three-legged stool requires three legs to stand upright, <br />
>>
all three elements are needed for the legal requirement for natural
born citizenship to be perfected."<br />
<br />
[...snip...]<br />
<br />
"Natural
born citizenship requires ... that BOTH parents are U.S. citizens at
the time of the birth. ..."<br />
</span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
</span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Another</span></b></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Suggestion for Mr. Trump</span></b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">With
these facts about the birth
of all 5 of Mr. Trump's
children being true, I have
another
suggestion for Mr. Trump.<br />
<br />
If Mr. Trump were to
acknowledge that <b>ALL</b> of his own children, while born on the
"land" as he likes to say, are not <span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth </span><u><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></u><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span>
natural born citizens because they do <b>NOT</b> have <b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship, a constitutional requirement that is <b>ONLY</b>
possible <span style="background: #ffff00;">by birth</span> on U.S.
soil <b>ONLY</b> <span style="background: #ffff00;">by birth</span> to
two U.S. citizen married parents, so, for that common sense reason,
he, as a presidential candidate can invoke the U.S. Constitution as
the <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"law"</span></b>
that demands that Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio be disqualified from
pursuing the presidency of the United States. <br />
<br />
It would
not be Mr. Trump the candidate demanding that the two <span style="background: #ffff00;">dual</span>
U.S./foreign citizenship candidates be disqualified, but the
Constitution itself that would be making the <b>original genesis
</b><i><b>(birth)</b></i><b> original intent </b><i><b>(citizenship)</b></i>
demand: <b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship that is </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
po</span>sible <span style="background: #ffff00;">"by birth
</span><u><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></u><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span>
<b>ONLY</b> on U.S. soil <span style="background: #ffff00;">"by
birth </span><u><span style="background: #ffff00;">alone</span></u><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span>
<b>ONLY</b> to two (2) U.S. citizen married parents.<br />
<br />
In
addition, Mr. Trump can challenge Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio to use the
word<span style="background: #ffff00;"> "born"</span> in
"natural born Citizen" to defend <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">dual</span></b><b>
U.S./foreign citizenship</b> and birth to <b>ONLY</b>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">ONE</span>
U.S. citizen parent (Sen. Cruz) <b>OR</b> birth to
<span style="background: #ffff00;">ZERO</span>
U.S. citizen parents (Sen. Rubio).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">On
Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog, CDR Kerchner suggested that
I post the info about Mr. Trump's children not being natural born
citizens </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">on Ann
Coulter's Facebook page</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">></span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/donald-trump-is-right-to-retweet-that.html?showComment=1456200326773#c7006625091530720315</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">This
was my response </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">with a
couple of emendations</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.</span></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Thanks
CDR Kerchner for the suggestion about Facebook and communicating with
Ann Coulter myself, but I have never wanted to be on Facebook or
Twitter, so I don't have an account on either.<br />
<br />
If you or
other readers post on either forum, put what I wrote here on Mario's
blog onto Facebook as you suggested and put a link to Mario's blog
for a long term reference source. What he has written is certainly
more important than my short comment.<br />
<br />
"Ann Coulter,
please write an article about how </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">all 5 </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of
Mr. Trump's children are not eligible to be president of the U.S.
for the same reason that Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio are not eligible:
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">all </span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">7 </span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">U.S.
"citizens"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
- </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">5</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of Mr. Trump's children and the 2 U.S. Senators, do not fulfill the
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">original genesis
</span></b><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">(birth)</span></b></i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
original intent </span></b><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">(citizenship)</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of "natural born Citizen" </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">with
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship.</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><br />
<br />
It
is very simple to articulate what "born" means in "natural
born Citizen" in a way that some constitutional "scholars"
and WE the People can understand:<br />
<br />
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship<br />
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by birth on U.S. soil<br />
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by birth to two (2) U.S. citizen married
parents."<br />
<br />
</span><br />
Art<br />
Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-54548120247293227762016-01-31T12:04:00.001-07:002016-02-01T19:09:13.427-07:00Sen. Ted Cruz vs. Donald Trump: 6th GOP Debate<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Sen.
Rafael Edward 'Ted' Cruz</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Donald
J. Trump</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Obfuscation</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Original
Genesis Original Intent Common Sense</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">At
the 6<sup>th</sup> GOP debate on January 14, 2016, Senator Ted Cruz
cited an <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
birther theory and concludes that Donald Trump is also not a "natural
born Citizen" and also not eligible to be POTUS if Sen. Cruz,
Sen. Rubio and Gov. Jindal are not eligible.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Let's
start with the American Heritage Dictionary definition of
"<i><b>obfuscat</b></i><i><b>ion</b></i>."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">obfuscation
<i>n.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">obfuscate
<i>v.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">obfuscatory
<i>adj.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1.
To make so confused or opaque as to be difficult to perceive or
understand.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2.
To render indistinct or dim; darken.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Transcript
from the Sixth Republican Debate</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>January
14, 2016</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Here
is </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">my</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">7 min. 30 sec.</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
transcript of the Cruz and Trump exchange from the January 14, 2016
Republican debate. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">The
transcript </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">s</span>tarts
a little after 28m:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeqe_XKWs3o</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
transcript starts at about 23 minutes:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPpWwcmpvH4</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
8 min video with transcript is from RealClearPositics.com:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/14/cruz_vs_trump_over_natural_birth_under_your_theory_you_would_be_disqualified_from_running_for_president.html</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Neal
Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I'll
start with you Senator Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
you are, of course, a strict constitutionalist, no one would doubt
that. And, as you know, the U.S. Constitution says only natural born
citizens are eligible for the office of president of the United
States.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Stop
me if you've heard this before.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now.
You were born <i>[mild and friendly laughter]</i>, you were born in
Canada to an American mother, so you were and are considered an
American citizen. But, that fellow next to you, Donald Trump, and
others, have said that being born in Canada means you are not natural
born, and that has raised questions about your eligibility. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Do
you want to try to close this topic once and for all tonight?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Senator
Ted Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hah.
Well, Neil, I'm glad we are focusing on the important topics of the
evening <i>[friendly laughter and applause]</i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
know, back in September, my friend Donald said he'd had his lawyers
look at this from every which way and there was no issue there. There
was nothing to this birther issue <i>[friendly laughter and
applause]</i>. Now, since September the Constitution hasn't changed
<i>[friendly laughter and applause and guffaws]</i> but the poll
numbers have <i>[friendly and loud voices and applause]</i>. And, I
recognize, I recognize that Donald is dismayed that his poll numbers
are falling in Iowa. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But,
the facts and the law here are really quite clear. Under longstanding
U.S. law, the child of a U.S. citizen born abroad <i>[</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">ed.
</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">the child is the one
born abroad</span></i><i>]</i> is a natural born citizen. If a
soldier has a child abroad, that child is a natural born citizen.
That's why John McCain, even though he was born in Panama, was
eligible to run for president. If an American missionary has a child
abroad, that child is a natural born citizen. That's why George
Romney, Mitt's dad, was eligible to run for president even though he
was born in Mexico.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">At
the end of the day, the legal issue is quite straightforward.
But,
I would note the <span style="background: #ffff00;">birther
theories</span>
that Donald has been relying on.
<span style="background: #66ffff;">S</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">ome</span>
of the more
<span style="background: #66ffff;">extreme</span> ones <span style="background: #66ffff;">insist</span>
you must not only be born on <span style="background: #66ffff;">U.S.
soil</span>, but have <span style="background: #66ffff;">two parents
born on U.S. soil</span>. Under that theory, <span style="background: #ffff00;">not
only would I be disqualified</span>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Marco
Rubio would be disqualified</span>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Bobby
Jindal would be disqualified</span>, but interestingly enough, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
J. Trump would be disqualified</span> <i>[friendly loud and long
laughter and applause]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Not
me.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because,
because <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald's mother was born in
Scotland</span>, she was naturalized.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
Donald.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But
I was born here.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
the issue of citizenship, Donald.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">A
big difference.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
the issue of citizenship, Donald, <span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm
not going to use your mother's birth against you</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Good,
because it wouldn't work.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You're
an American as is everybody else on this stage, and I would suggest
we focus on whose best prepared to be Commander-in-Chief, because
that's the most important question facing the country <i>[friendly
loud applause]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mr.
Trump. Did you address that? Did you raise that because of his rising
poll numbers?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Let
me just tell you something, and you know because you just saw the
numbers yourself. NBC, Wall Street Journal just came out with a poll
<i>[unfriendly audience boo</i><i>s</i><i>]</i> headlined Trump way
up, Cruz going down. I mean <i>[unfriendly audience noise]</i>, so
you can't <i>[noise continues]</i>, they don't like the Wall Street
Journal, they don't like NBC, but I like the poll <i>[unfriendly
audience noise continues]</i>, and frankly, it just came out, and, in
Iowa now, as you know Ted, in the last three polls, I'm beating you.
So you know, you shouldn't misrepresent how well you're doing with
the polls. You don't have to say that. In fact, I was all for you
until you started doing that, because that's a misrepresentation,
number one.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Number
two. This isn't me saying it. I don't care. I think I'm going to win
fair and square. I don't have to win this way <i>[friendly mild
audience applause]</i>. Thank you. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">Laurence
Tribe</span>, from Harvard, of Harvard, said that there is a serious
question as to whether or not Ted can do this. Ok? There are other
attorneys that feel, and very, very fine constitutional attorneys,
that feel that because he was <span style="background: #ffff00;">not
born on the land</span>, he <span style="background: #ffff00;">cannot
run for office</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here's
the problem. We're running, we're running, he does great, I win, I
choose him as my vice presidential candidate and the Democrats sue
because we can't take him along for the ride. I don't like that. Ok? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
fact is, and if for some reason he beats the rest of the field
<i>[unfriendly audience boos]</i>, he beats the rest of the field
<i>[unfriendly noise continues]</i>, see, they don't like that. They
don't like that. No, they don't like that he beats the rest of the
field because they want me <i>[friendly and loud voices and
applause]</i>. But, if for some reason he beats the rest of the
field, I already know the Democrats are going to be bringing a suit.
You have a big lawsuit over your head while you're running, and you
become the nominee, who the hell knows if you can even serve in
office? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
you should go out, get a declaratory judgment, let the courts decide.
And, you shouldn't have mentioned the polls because I wouldn't have
been much different.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Why
now? Why are you raising this issue now?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because
now he's doing a little bit better <i>[loud audience voices and
applause]</i>. I didn't care before <i>[noise continues]</i>. No,
it's true. Hey, look. He never had a chance. Now he's doing better.
He's got probably a four or five percent chance <i>[Cruz smiles,
audience laughter]</i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Thank
you, Mr. Trump.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
fact is, there is a big overhang. There's a big question mark on your
head, and you can't do that to the Party. You really can't do that to
the party. You have to have certainty. Even if it was a one percent;
and it's far greater than one percent 'cause he wasn't born. I mean,
you have great constitutional lawyers who say you can't run. I'm not
bringing a suit, I promise, but the Democrats are going to bring a
lawsuit, and you can't. You have to have certainty. You can't have a
question. I can agree with you, or not, but you can't have a question
over your head <i>[unfriendly audience voices]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Senator,
do you want to respond?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Well,
listen, I've spent my entire life defending the Constitution before
the U.S. Supreme Court, and I'll tell you, I'm not going to be taking
legal advice from Donald Trump <i>[friendly loud audience voice and
applause]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You
don't have to. Take it from Laurence Tribe. Take it from your
professor. Take it from your own professor.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
chances of any litigation proceedig and succeeding on this are zero.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That's
wrong.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
Mr. Trump is very focused on <span style="background: #ffff00;">Larry
Tribe</span>. Let me tell you who Larry Tribe is. He's a left wing
judicial activist Harvard Law professor who was Al Gore's lawyer in
Bush vs. Gore. He's a major Hillary Clinton supporter, and there's a
reason why Hillary's supporters are echoing Donald's attacks on me.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">He's
not the only one.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because
Hillary wants to face Donald Trump in the general election.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">He's
not the only one. There are many lawyers.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And,
I'll tell you what Donald. You very kindly, just a moment ago,
offered me the VP slot <i>[Trump smiles, friendly audience voices and
applause]</i>. I'll tell you what. If this all works out, I'm happy
to consider naming you as VP, and so, if you happen to be right, you
could get the top job at the end of the day <i>[friendly audience
voices and applause]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">No
<i>[audience noise continues]</i>. I like it. I'd consider it, but I
think I'll go back to building building if it doesn't work out.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Actually,
I'd like to get you to build the wall.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
have the feeling it's going to work out, actually.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Alright.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<End
of Transcript>></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
his response to Neil Cavuto Sen. Cruz obfuscated about "natural
born" and tacitly avoided the "Citizen" issue when he
said:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"...
I would note the <b>birther theories</b> that Donald has been relying
on. <b>S</b><b>ome</b> of the more <b>extreme</b> ones insist you
must <b>not only</b> be <b>born on U.S. soil</b>, but have <b>two
parents born on U.S. soil</b>."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"Under
that theory, <b>not only would I be disqualified</b>, ... but ...
<b>Donald J. Trump would be disqualified</b>."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
Sen. Cruz, <b>WHAT</b> are you saying and what are you <b>NOT</b>
saying?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, you are accurate about what is <b>"extreme"</b>: "<i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
</span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">birther
theories</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> ...
</span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">extreme</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
... be </span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">born on
U.S. soil</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">but </span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">have
</span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">two parents
born on U.S. soil</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,"</span></i>
so why do you not spell out what you think is <b>NOT</b> "extreme?"
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, what <b>"birther"</b> theory are <i><b>you</b></i>
relying on? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, are you relying on a "natural born Citizen" <i><b>original
genesis original intent</b></i> theory, a.k.a. an <i><b>"original
birther"</b></i> theory of <i><b>ONLY</b></i><i> singular U.S.
citizenship</i>, or are you relying on a "natural born Citizen"
<i><b>new meaning neobirther</b></i> theory of <i><b>ALSO / </b></i><i><b>ONLY</b></i><i>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship</i>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, are you aware <i>(yes, of course you are aware, </i><i>you
memorized the U.S. Constitution at age thirteen</i><i>—this is a
rhetorical question to get to a larger point)</i> that <i><b>"natural
born Citizen"</b></i> with the <i><b>ONLY</b></i> implication of
<i><b>ONLY singular U.S. citizenship</b></i> was a phrase that was
inspired by <i><b>"</b></i><i><b>o</b></i><i><b>riginal birther"</b></i>
John Jay on July 25, 1787 when he underlined the word <i><b>"born"</b></i>
in <i><b>"natural born Citizen"</b></i> in his note to his
very good friend and also <i><b>"</b></i><i><b>o</b></i><i><b>riginal
birther"</b></i> George Washington, a suggestion that was
accepted without debate by the 1787 <i><b>"original birther"</b></i>
framers and then eventually by all of the <i><b>"original
birther"</b></i> ratifiers of the several states, including it's
author <i><b>"original birther"</b></i> John Jay, a New
York state ratifier? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Or,
Sen. Cruz, are you relying on a 2000s mythology, a 2000s theory of
dual U.S./foreign citizenship inspired by "natural born Citizen"
<i><b>new meaning neobirthers</b></i> who assert that <i><b>ONLY</b></i>
one U.S. citizen parent is sufficient, to use your word, to <b>"qualify"</b>
to be president, and who also assert that <b>it does not matter wher</b><b>e</b>
a "natural born Citizen" is born, on U.S. soil or foreign
soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, if you do not agree that the <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
implication of John Jay's underlined word <b>"born"</b> was
<i><b>ONLY </b></i><i>singular U.S. citizenship</i> to qualify to be
"...eligible to the Office of President," you and other
"natural born Citizen" <i><b>new meaning neobirthers</b></i>
need to adduce your sources who advocated for either <i><b>ALSO</b></i><i>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship</i>, or <i><b>ONLY</b></i><i> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship</i>. Here's a hint: <i><b>ALSO</b></i><i>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship</i> implies that <i><b>ONLY</b></i><i>
singular U.S. citizenship</i> was also discussed.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating with the suggestion that there are many "birther
theories" are you tacitly suggesting that there are <i><b>"birther
theories"</b></i> that are <b>NOT</b> extreme? Are you saying
that there are <i><b>original genesis original intent</b></i>
"birther theories" that you do accept?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" are you tacitly suggesting that what is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" is that the child <b>MUST</b> be born on U.S.
soil and that <b>BOTH</b> parents do <b>NOT</b> need to be born on
U.S. soil, but, if both parents naturalize, they <b>MUST</b>
naturalize as U.S. citizens <b>BEFOE</b> their child is born on U.S.
soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
definitely is <i><b>NOT</b></i> extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
<i><b>IS</b></i> "...eligible to the Office of President"
<i><b>common sense</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" are you tacitly suggesting that what is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" is that the child <b>MUST</b> be born on U.S.
soil and that <b>BOTH</b> parents do <b>NOT</b> need to be born on
U.S. soil, but, if one parent <b>IS</b> born on U.S. soil as a U.S.
citizen and the other parent naturalizes, that the naturalized parent
MUST naturalize as a U.S. citizens <b>BEFOE</b> their child is born
on U.S. soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
definitely is <i><b>NOT</b></i> extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
<i><b>IS</b></i> "...eligible to the Office of President"
<i><b>common sense</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" are you tacitly suggesting that what is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" is that the child does <b>NOT</b> need to be born
on U.S. soil but that <b>BOTH</b> parents <b>MUST</b> be born on U.S.
soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
definitely <i><b>IS</b></i> extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is <i><b>NOT</b></i> "...eligible to the Office of President"
<i><b>common sense</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
child <b>DOES</b> need to be born on U.S. soil, and the parents do
<b>NOT</b> need to be born on U.S. soil.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" are you tacitly suggesting that what is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" is that the child does <b>NOT</b> need to be born
on U.S. soil and that <b>BOTH</b> parents do <b>NOT</b> need to be
born on U.S. soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
definitely <i><b>IS</b></i> extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is <i><b>NOT</b></i> "...eligible to the Office of President"
<i><b>common sense</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
child <b>DOES</b> need to be born on U.S. soil, and the parents do
<b>NOT</b> need to be born on U.S. soil</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" are you tacitly suggesting that what is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" is that the child does <b>NOT</b> need to be born
on U.S. soil and that <b>ONLY </b><i><u><b>one</b></u></i> parent
<b>DOES</b> need to be born on U.S. soil?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
idefinitely <i><b>IS</b></i> extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is <i><b>NOT</b></i> "...eligible to the Office of President"
<i><b>common sense</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
child <b>DOES</b> need to be born on U.S. soil and two parents do <b>NOT</b>
need to be born on U.S. soil.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by obfuscating about "birther theories" that are
"extreme" with your "extreme" example that
definitely is extreme, what would you say is <b>NOT "</b>extreme"
about citizenship, the heart of the issue about being a "natural
born Citizen" that you avoided by adducing only the issue of
soil of birth of the child and the soil of birth of one parent?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here
is a way to clarify what is <b>NOT</b> extreme about citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Is
<i><b>singular U.S. citizenship</b></i> "extreme" relative
to being "...eligible to the Office of President" or is
<i><b>singular U.S. citizenship</b></i> NOT extreme?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Is
<i><b>dual U.S./foreign citizenship</b></i> "extreme"
relative to being "...eligible to the Office of President"
or is <i><b>dual U.S./forei</b></i><i><b>gn</b></i><i><b> citizenship</b></i>
NOT extreme?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1
- Is <b>ONLY </b><i><b>singular U.S. citizenship</b></i> "extreme?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2
- Is <b>ALSO</b> <i><b>dual U.S./foreign citizenship</b></i>
"extreme?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3
- Is <b>ONLY</b> <i><b>dual U.S./foreign citizenship</b></i>
"extreme?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, is <b>ONLY</b> singular citizenship common sense?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, is <b>ALSO</b> dual citizenship common sense?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, is <b>ONLY</b> dual citizenship common sense?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, it is simple to state and simple to understand the common sense
about being <i><b>"from" birth</b></i> and <i><b>"by"
birth</b></i> a U.S. "citizen" who is a U.S. "natural
born Citizen" who is "...eligible to the Office of
President: </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY,
</b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> singular U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY
</b><i><b>by birth</b></i> on U.S. soil/jurisdiction.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY
</b><i><b>by birth</b></i> to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mario
Apuzzo had a short comment about the Cruz / Trump exchange on his
Natural Born Citizen blog on January 15, 2016, the day after the
debate.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/11/a-citizen-is-one-thing-but-natural-born.html?showComment=1452863855001#c6985378128834215493</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. said... </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
Leo, <br />
<br />
>> Did you notice how Cruz attempted to
dismiss the "birthers" as at least one state judge has done
by arguing the <b>"extreme"</b> example, wherein he said
that some birthers contend that <span style="background: #ffff00;">the
child's parents have to be born in the United States</span> in
order<b> for their child born to them in the United States</b> to be
<b>a natural born citizen</b>. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
He then followed that since Trump's mother was not born in the United
States, Trump would not be a natural born citizen. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
Cruz is a liar again like before, like he did not know that he was a
citizen of Canada. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
We know that parents do not have to be born in the United States.
They only have to be U.S. citizens, <u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">either</span></b></u><span style="background: #ffff00;">
natural born citizens of the United States </span><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">or</span></b></u><span style="background: #ffff00;">
citizens of the United States</span>. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
When Trump was born in the United States, both of his parents were
U.S. citizens (his mother naturalized before Trump was born). His
father was a natural born citizen and his mother was a citizen of the
United States. That makes Trump a natural born citizen. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
Trump should have set Cruz straight on his lies and distortions.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>>>
January 15, 2016 at 8:17 AM </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><<>></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Notice
<i>"... <b>the child's </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">parents</span></b><b>
have to be </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born in</span></b><b>
the United States."</b></i> </span></span></span>
</div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, if both parents must be born in the U.S. is an "extreme"
example of what is <b>NOT</b> the original intent of Article II
Section 1 clause 5, specifically the word <i><b>"born"</b></i>
in "natural born Citizen," what do you say is <b>NOT</b>
the "extreme" proposition? What do you say <b>IS</b> the
1787 <i><b>original genesis original intent</b></i> common sense? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, what are you proposing with the obfuscation, the "extreme"
theory, about both <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"...parents
have to be born in the United States"</span></i> ? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1.
Are you asserting that <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b></i>
married parents do <b>NOT</b> need to be born in the United States? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2.
Are you asserting that <b>ONLY</b> <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span></b></i>
parent, married or not, must be born in the United States? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3.
Are you asserting that <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b></i>
parents, married or not, must be born in the United States? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">4.
Are you asserting that the child must have <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">5.
Are you asserting that the child must have <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parent, married to the partner or not? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">6.
Are you asserting that the child can have <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parents, married or not?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Notice
<i>"...<u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">either</span></b></u><b>
natural born citizens of the United States </b><u><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">or</span></b></u><b>
citizens of the United States</b>."</i></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1.
</b>Some "citizens" are U.S. "natural born Citizens"
<b>ONLY </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at"</span></b>
birth and <b>ONLY </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
birth</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>2.
</b>Some "citizens" are U.S. "citizens" <b>ONLY
</b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at"</span></b>
birth and <b>ONLY </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
statute</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>3.
</b>Some "citizens" are U.S. "citizens" <b>ONLY
</b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at"</span></b>
naturalization and <b>ONLY </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
oath</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
"Natural Born Citizen" is Determined ONLY by Natural Law
and Positive Law</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Since
<b>"natural law"</b>
<i>(nature)</i> can
not be changed by <b>"positive
law"</b> <i>(statute)</i>,
the U.S.
Congress, the <b>"positive
law"</b> law
making body of the United
States, determines the
application of positive law <i>(statute)</i>
as positive law
is informed by natural law <i>(nature)</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
U.S. Congress of "WE the
People" determines both
the <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">positive</span></b><b>
law</b></i> of
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"when"</span></b>
and the <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">natural</span></b><b>
l</b><b>aw</b></i> of <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"how"</span></b>
U.S. "natural
born Citizen" status
is acquired <b>ONLY</b>
by children: (1) <b>ONLY</b>
by children <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">at"</span></b>
birth by positive law <i>(statute)</i>,
<i><b>AND</b></i> (2)
<b>ONLY</b>
by children <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
birth by natural law <i>(no statute can change "nature"
and natural law birth)</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
"Citizen" is Determined ONLY by Positive Law and Positive
Law</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
U.S. Congress of "WE the
People" determines both
the <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">positive</span></b><b>
law</b></i> of
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"when"</span></b>
and the <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">positive</span></b><b>
l</b><b>aw</b></i> of <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"how"</span></b>
U.S. "citizen"
status
is acquired by <b>BOTH</b>
children and adults: (1)
<b>ONLY</b>
by children <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at"</span></b>
birth by positive law <i>(statute)</i>,
<i><b>OR</b></i> (2)
<b>ONLY</b>
by adults <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
oath by positive law <i>(statute)</i>.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>1.
</b>Some "citizens" are U.S. "natural born Citizens"
<b>ONLY "at"</b> birth and <b>ONLY "by"</b>
birth.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1a.
Singular U.S. citizenship
ONLY "at" birth =
positive law.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1b.
Singular U.S. citizenship
ONLY "by" birth =
natural law.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1a
- <span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">A</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">t"</span>
birth = positive law:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
U.S. Congress,
the "positive law" law
making body, determines the
positive law of <b>"when"</b>
U.S. natural
born citizen status
is acquired by the child — <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">at"
birth</span></b>. It
must be from and <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"at"</span></b>
birth for <i>"...eligible to the Office of President"</i>
at age 35 <i>(to "attain" 35 years of age)</i>,
and 14 years residency up to and including age 35 within the United
States, to make sense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1b
- <span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">B</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">y"</span>
birth = natural law:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
U.S. Congress,
the "positive law" law making body, by the positive law of
<b>"when"</b>
U.S. natural
born citizenship is acquired by the child, determined
in 1787, in Article II Section 1 clause 5, that
the congress of the parents, the "natural law" child maker
bodies,
is <b>"when"</b>
and <b>"how"</b>
singular U.S. citizenship
is acquired by the child — <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">by"
birth</span></b>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">So,
how is
Article II Section 1 clause 5
U.S. "natural
born Citizen" status
acquired by the child for the
child to be qualified to be
"... eligible to the Office of President?"</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY,
</b><b>"by"</b>
birth, singular
U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY,
"</b><b>by"</b>
birth, at the
instant of birth, on U.S.
soil</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>ONLY,
</b><b>"by"</b>
birth, two U.S. citizen
married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b><<>></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>From
1787</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Original
Genesis Original Intent Common
Sense About "Natural Born Citizen"</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>To
2016</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>New
Meaning Neobirther "Extreme"
Absurdity About "Natural
Born Citizen"</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Original
Genesis Original Intent Common Sense</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
two</span></b> U.S. citizen
parents, both of whom
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> as
U.S. citizens, either <b>"at"</b>
birth by positive
law <i>(statute)</i> or <b>"by"</b>
birth by
natural law <i>(nature)</i>,
or both of whom can be naturalized U.S. citizens.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Since
Sen. Cruz did not adduce other "birther theories" that are
just as "extreme" as the absurd theory he adduced that the
child must be born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizn parents who also
must be born on U.S. soil for the child to qualify to be "...eligible
to the Office of President," here are a few "extreme"
and absurd "natural born Citizen" <i><b>new meaning
neobirther</b></i> theories that are contrary to the "natural
born Citizen" <i><b>original genesis original intent meaning</b></i>.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">See
which theory fits Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley,
Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Mike Huckabee, Carley
Fiorina, Rand Paul, Chris Cristie, Rick Santorum, or your favorite
federal or state elected officials.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #1</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>(the
<b>"must"</b> word for both parents is so obvious and
absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b></i>
be<i><b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b></i> to<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
two</span></b></i> U.S. citizen
parents, both of whom
<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b></i>
be <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b></i>
on <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S. soil</span></b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #2</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("one"
parent and the <b>"must"</b> word for the parent is so
obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #3</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("one"
parent is absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #4</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">("one"
<i>parent and the <b>"must"</b> word for the parent
is so obvious and absurd</i>)</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must
</span></b>be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #5</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("one"
parent and the <b>"</b><b>can</b><b>"</b> word for the
parent is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #6</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("foreign
soil" and "one" parent and the <b>"</b><b>must</b><b>"</b>
word for the parent is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>
to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #7</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("foreign
soil" and "one" parent is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">on
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span>to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #8</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("foreign
soil" and "one" parent and the <b>"</b><b>must</b><b>"</b>
word for the parent is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">on
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span>to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must
</span></b>be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #9</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("foreign
soil" and "one" parent is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">on
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>
to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
o</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ne</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent who <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #10 </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("zero"
parents and the <b>"must"</b> word is so obvious and
absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents, both of
whom <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b>
be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #11</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("zero"
parents is so obvious and absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents, both of
whom <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #12</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>("zero"
parents and the <b>"must"</b> word is so obvious and
absurd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents, both of
whom <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Extreme
Absurdity #13</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>(included
because the <b>"can"</b> word is so obvious and
absurd—except for the open borders crowd)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a "natural born Citizen" the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be<b> born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
soil</span></b> to<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents, both of
whom <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">can</span></b>
be
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born</span></b>
on <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">soil</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Singular
U.S. Citizenship</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Original
Genesis Original Intent</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #1</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
born on U.S. soil/jurisdiction and <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
born to two U.S. citizen parents married only to each other, the
child has <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
singular U.S. citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">For
a child to be a U.S. "natural
born Citizen" with <b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY
</span></b><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">singular</span></b></i>
U.S. citizenship the child
must <b>ONLY</b>
be born on <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b></i> and
<b>ONLY</b>
born to <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parents married
only to each other who
were U.S. citizens BEFORE their child is born. It
does <b>NOT</b>
matter if both
parents
were born on U.S. soil as
U.S. citizens <b>"</b><b>at"</b>
birth <i>(positive law)</i>
OR <b>"by"</b>
birth <i>(natural law)</i>.
It also does <b>NOT</b>
matter if one <b>OR</b>
both parents were naturalized
<i>(positive law)</i> as
U.S. citizens <b>BEFORE</b>
<i>(positive law)</i> their
child is born on U.S. soil.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #2</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <b>born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
soil</span></b> to <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents married
only
to each other,
the child has by
positive law <i>(statute)</i>
and by natural law common
sense <i>(nature)</i>, <i><b>ONLY
singular U.S.</b><b> citizenship</b></i>,
the child is a U.S. "natural
born Citizen" because the child <i><b>was </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born
on U.S. soil to two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #3</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <i><b>born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b><b> to </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span></b><b>
U.S. citizen parent</b></i>, married
or not married to the partner, the
child by positive law
<i>(statute)</i> acquires
the U.S. citizenship of
one parent and the foreign citizenship of the other parent. The child
has dual citizenship, not
singular U.S. citizenship.
The child is not a U.S.
"natural born Citizen"
because the child was <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not
born on U.S. soil to two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #4</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <i><b>born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span></b></i> to <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parents, the child has, by positive law <i>(statute)</i>,
singular U.S.
citizenship, but
the child is not a U.S. "natural born Citizen" because the
child was <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not born on
U.S. soil to two</span></b></i> U.S.
citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #5</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <i><b>born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
soil</span></b></i> to <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parents, married
or not married to each other, the
child has by positive law
<i>(statute)</i> singular
U.S. citizenship, but
the child is not a U.S.
"natural born Citizen"
because the child was <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not
born on U.S. soil to two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #6</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <i><b>born on </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
soil</span></b></i> to <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parent, married
or not married to the partner, the
child has by positive law
<i>(statute)</i> singular
U.S. citizenship, but
the child is not a U.S.
"natural born Citizen"
because the child was <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not
born on U.S. soil to two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Common
Sense #7</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
a child is <b>born on </b><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
soil</span></b></i> to <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen parents, married
or not married to each other,
the child has by
positive law <i>(statute)</i>
and by natural law common
sense <i>(nature)</i>,
foreign citizenship, and the child is not a U.S.
"natural born Citizen"
because the child was <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not
born on U.S. soil to two</span></b></i>
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
the sixth debate Sen. Cruz adduced the concept of birth on U.S. soil
for both the child and the parents for the child to be qualified to
be president, but in the debate or on the stump Sen. Cruz does not
adduce the concepts of being a "citizen" or being a
"natural born Citizen" according to the 1787 <i><b>original
genesis original intent</b></i> meaning of Article II Section 1
clause 5. </span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
his response to Neil Cavuto's question about the question of Sen.
Cruz's eligibility and whether or not he was a "natural born
Citizen" according to the Constitution, Sen. Cruz responded with
obvious obfuscation by referring to a mythical <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
example that no informed or uninformed or misinformed constitutional
scholar has ever espoused, and by citing the <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
example he did not need to refer to the <i><b>original genesis
original intent</b></i> meaning of citizenship implied in "natural
born Ctizen" in A2S1c5. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Consider
some of the well rehearsed words by Sen. Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Neal
Cavuto:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>I'll
start with you Senator Cruz.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Now,
you are, of course, a strict constitutionalist, no one would doubt
that. And, as you know, the U.S. Constitution says <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">only
natural born citizens are eligible for the office of president</span></b>
of the United States.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Senator
Ted Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"Hah.
Well, Neil, I'm glad we are </i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">focusing
on the important topics</span></b></i><i> of the evening [friendly
laughter and applause]. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"You
know, <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">back in September</span></b>,
my friend Donald said he'd had his lawyers look at this from every
which way and there was no issue there. There was nothing to this
<b>birther</b> issue [friendly laughter and applause]. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"Now,
since September </i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">the
Constitution hasn't changed</span></b></i><i> [friendly laughter and
applause and guffaws] but the poll numbers have [friendly and loud
voices and applause]. And, I recognize, I recognize that Donald is
dismayed that his poll numbers are falling in Iowa. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
</b><b>C</b><b>omment</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, as you know, the U.S. Constitution is the foundation of the
eligibility issue, specifically the issue of <b>ONLY</b> singular
U.S. citizenship versus <b>ALSO</b> or <b>ONLY</b> dual U.S./foreign
citizenship, so, yes, Sen. Cruz, dittos to "<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">focusing
on the </span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">important
topics</span></b></i>."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, in your response to Neil Cavuto that was directed at Donald
Trump and not directed to any of the other candidates who are
definitely natural born citizen, and also not directed at Sen. Rubio
who also is not a natural born citizen, why is it that Article II
Section 1 clause 5 <i>(A2S1c5</i><i> — "...natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen...at the time..."</i><i>)</i> of the U.S.
Constitution definitely was <b>NOT</b> your point of focus in your
response at the sixth GOP debate or in your stump speeches?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If
A2S1c5 implied <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ALSO</span></b>
or <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship, you would probably refer to dual citizenshp
as the essence, the <b>original genesis original intent</b> essence
of clause 5, specifically the word <b>"born"</b> in
"natural born Citizen" and the word<b>"eligible."</b>
Right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Yes,
Sen. Cruz, "<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">the
Constitution hasn't changed</span></b></i>" since September 2015
when Donald Trump said there was noting to the <i><b>"birther
issue"</b></i> except
that he changed his mind. It also has not changed since
September 17, 1787 when the <i><b>original birthers</b></i>, the
framers adopted and the ratifiers ratified, the language of A2S1c5
that <i><b>original birther</b></i> George Washington recommended to
the convention delegates, also <i><b>original birthers</b></i>, after
receiving a note from <i><b>original birther</b></i> John Jay written
on July 25, 1787 about protecting the integrity of the executive
office from usurpation. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
his note <i><b>original birther</b></i> John Jay underlined the word
<b>"born"</b> in "natural born Citizen" with the
obvious implication, in fact the <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
implication, that the <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><b>
"citizen"</b> eligible to be commander of the U.S. military
and to occupy the executive offce would have <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><b>,
</b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> singular
U.S. citizenship — <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><b>,
</b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> on U.S. soil/jurisdiction
— <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><b>,
</b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY,</b><i><b> by birth,</b></i>
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> on U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, if you do not agree that <i><b>original birther</b></i> John
Jay did <b>NOT</b> imply <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship then
you <b>MUST </b>believe that Jay implied <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">either</span></b>
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">or</span></b>
Jay implied <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ALSO</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span>dual U.S./foreign citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, if you assert that Jay meant <b>ALSO</b> U.S./foreign
citizenship your are admitting that Jay <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">could</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
have implied</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b> singular
U.S. citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, since you and "natural born Citizen" <i><b>new
meaning neobirthers</b></i> can not admit that John Jay implied
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY"</span></b>
singular U.S. citizenship when he underlined the word <b>"born"</b>
in "natural born Citizen," and since you also can not admit
that John Jay implied <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ALSO"</span></b>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship when he underlined the word <b>"born,"</b>
the burden of proof is on you to adduce the historical record
debating the meaning of <b>"born"</b> in "natural born
Citizen" in clause 5 as having the <i><b>original genesis
original intent</b></i> meaning of "<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY"</span></b>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship, U.S. soil birth <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">OR</span></b></i>
foreign soil birth with <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b></i>
one U.S. citizen parent.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the burden of proof is on persons born on foreign soil to only
one U.S. citizen parent married to a foreign citizen parent to adduce
the debates in the historical records in which John Jay's <b>"born"</b>
implication in his "natural born Citizen" suggestion was
discussed and accepted without disagreement as implying <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ONLY"</span></b>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship (<i>U.S. soil</i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
birth </span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">OR</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
fore</span></i><i>ign soil birth </i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">with
</span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
one U.S. citizen parent</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">)
as superior to </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ALSO"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
dual U.S./foreign citizenship by birth to </span><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ONLY</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
one U.S. citizen parent married to one foreign citizen oarent, and as
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ALSO</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
superior to </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ONLY"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by birth singular U.S. citizenship, </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ONLY"</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">by birth on U.S.
soil, </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"ONLY"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, where is the record that the framers and the ratifiers debated
the acceptance of <b>ALSO</b> dual <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">or</span></b>
<b>ONLY</b> dual U.S./foreign citizenship for POTUS eligibility vs.
<b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship for POTUS eligibility?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the burden of proof is on the <b>ALSO</b> or <b>ONLY</b> dual
U.S./foreign citizenship proponents. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, you need to adduce discussion by the framers and ratifiers
about the common sense or lack of common sense of accepting dual
U.S./foreign citizenship for eligibility to be president. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, it is not possible to adduce discussion about dual U.S./foreign
citizenship because the framers and ratifiers did <b>NOT</b> discuss
dual citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the framers and ratifiers also did <b>NOT</b> discuss singular
U.S. citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the framers and ratifiers did <b>NOT</b> discuss <b>EITHER</b>
singualr U.S. citizenship <b>OR</b> dual U.S./foreign citizneship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the framers and ratifiers did <b>NOT</b> discuss the good sense
of <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship versus the nonsense of <b>ONLY</b>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the framers and ratifiers did <b>NOT</b> discuss the good sense
of <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship versus the nonsense of <b>ALSO</b>
dual U.S./foreign citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the framers and ratifiers did <b>NOT</b> discuss anything other
than the good sense of <b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship that was
implicit in the word <b>"born"</b> that John Jay underlined
in <b>"natural born Citizen"</b> in his July 25, 1787 note
to George Washington. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, John Jay's implicit <b>original genesis original intent</b> for
underlining the word <b>"born"</b> in "natural born
Citizen" is simple to state and simple to understand:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY,</b><i><b> by birth,</b></i>
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the<span style="background: #ffff00;"> implicit</span> <b>original
genesis original intent</b> inherent in the <span style="background: #ffff00;">explicit</span>
text of Article II Section 1 clause 5 is also simple to state and
simple to understand:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>No
Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United
States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be
eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be
eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of
thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the
United States.</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">No
Person except a natural born Citizen, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">or
a Citizen of the United States, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">at
the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">shall
be eligible to the Office of President; </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">neither
shall any person be eligible to that Office </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">who
shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">and
been fourteen Years a Resident </span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">within
the United States.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<ol>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">No
Person except a natural born Citizen</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">or
a Citizen of the United States</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">at
the time of the Adoption of this Constitution</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">shall
be eligible to the Office of President</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">neither
shall any person be eligible to that Office </span></span></span>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">who
shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">and
been fourteen Years a Resident </span></span></span>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">within
the United States</span></span></span></div>
</li>
</ol>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>1.
</b><b>No Person except a natural born Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
"natural born Citizen" is just like a "citizen"
except for being unique among citizens, aka exceptional. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">All
children are by "nature" natural when born, but only a
child born to two U.S. citizen married parents is a "natural
born Citizen" who has derived singular U.S. citizenship from two
married parents who are both U.S. citizens. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Singular
U.S. citizenship "by" birth is what makes a "natural
born Citizen" exceptional, aka more than just a "citizen"
"at" birth "by" statute or later in life "by"
oath according to statute, aka "by" statute.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">A
singular U.S. citizenship "natural born Citizen" "by"
birth is exceptional compared to a dual U.S./foreign citizenship
"citizen" "at" birth by statute and later in life
"by" oath according to statute, "by" statute.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>2.
or a Citizen of the United States</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
"or a Citizen" of #2 is diffrent and distinct from the
"natural born Citizen" of #1.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>3.
at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
words "at the time" are no longer applicable to POTUS
eligibility since the last 1787 "or a Citizen" died
sometime in the 1800s.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>4.
shall be eligible to the Office of President</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
words "be eligible" apply from generation to generation,
election to election, ONLY to ALL federal U.S. Presidents, never to
federal U.S. Representatives or federal U.S. Senators who are covered
with Article I Section 2 and Article 1 Section 3.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>5.
neither shall any person be eligible to that Office </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
"neither" reference is obviously a continuation of the
"original genesis original intent" of the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" as it refers to eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>6.
who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
"thirty five Years" is <i>"from" </i>birth <i>"by"</i>
birth, not <i>"from"</i> birth <i>"at"</i> birth
that is only possible <i>"by"</i> statute <i>"by"</i>
oath.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>7.
and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
residency requirement <i>"been fourteen Years"</i>
obbviously can NOT refer to ONLY the first 14 years of residency or
to ALSO sporadic years of residency inside AND outside the U.S. up to
and including age 35. The word <i>"been"</i> can refer to
ONLY the LAST 14 years of residency up to a<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">nd
including age 35. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>8.
within the United States</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Also,
the tacit implication is that</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
after </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the minimum </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">age
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">35
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is attained</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">residency </span><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"within"</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the U.S. must include ONLY the last 14 years </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">up
to and including </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">whateve
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">age</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is </span><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">(36
or more)</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the person w</span>ho is
being inaugurated president.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>But,
the facts and the law here are really quite clear. Under longstanding
U.S. law, the child of a U.S. citizen born abroad [<span style="background: #ffff00;">ed.
</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">the child is the one born
abroad</span>] is a natural born citizen. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>If
a soldier has a child abroad, that child is a natural born citizen.
That's why John McCain, even though he was born in Panama, was
eligible to run for president. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>If
an American missionary has a child abroad, that child is a natural
born citizen. That's why George Romney, Mitt's dad, was eligible to
run for president even though he was born in Mexico.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>At
the end of the day, the legal issue is quite straightforward. But,
I would note the <span style="background: #ffff00;">birther
theories</span> that Donald
has been relying on. <span style="background: #66ffff;">S</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">ome</span>
of the more <span style="background: #66ffff;">extreme</span>
ones <span style="background: #66ffff;">insist</span> you must not
only be born on <span style="background: #66ffff;">U.S. soil</span>,
but have <span style="background: #66ffff;">two parents born on U.S.
soil</span>. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Under
that theory, <span style="background: #ffff00;">not only would I be
disqualified</span>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Marco Rubio
would be disqualified</span>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Bobby
Jindal would be disqualified</span>, but interestingly enough, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
J. Trump would be disqualified</span> [friendly loud and long
laughter and applause].</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
</b><b>Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, you know that the <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"longstanding
U.S. law"</span></i> that you are referring to is <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
the 1790 Naturalization Act "natural born Citizen" language
which was repealed and replaced with the 1795 Naturalization Act
"citizen" language. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
specific language of the 1790 NA said:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"And
t</i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">he children of such
persons so naturalized, dwelling </span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">within</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the
time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of
the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States,
that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United
States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: ...."</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>The
specific language of the 1795 NA said:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="font-variant: small-caps;">Section</span>
3</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"><i>And
be it further enacted, That the children of persons duly naturalized,
dwelling </i><i>within </i><i>the United States, and being under the
age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization; and the
children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and
jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of
the United States:</i></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Amplification of the 1790 NA:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"And
the <span style="background: #ffff00;">children of such persons so
naturalized</span>, dwelling <span style="background: #ffff00;">within</span>
[<b>wi</b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">th</span></b><u><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">in</span></b></u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">]
</span>the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years <span style="background: #ffff00;">at
the time</span> of such <span style="background: #ffff00;">naturalization</span>
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>[<span style="background: #ffff00;">naturalization</span>
o<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">f the father </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">and,
under the 1790s </span></i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">doctrine
of "coverture"</span></b><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
which covered the wife</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">until changed by
statutes of Congress in the 1800s and 1900s</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">under the doctrine of</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
"coverture," </span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
mother </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of
the child</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">by
marriage, </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">acquired</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the U.S. citizneship of her </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">naturalized
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">husband,
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">and
by extension, the child </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">acquired</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the U.S. citizenship of </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">both</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the naturalized father and mother</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">],</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"shall
also be <span style="background: #ffff00;">considered as citizens</span>
of the United States.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">And</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">[</span></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
1790 NA children are "</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">condidered</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"
as different, </span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">statute
</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"citizen"
</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">OR</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">statute
</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"natural
born Citizen"</span></b></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">]</span></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"the
</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">children of citizens</span></i><i>
of the United States, that may be</i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">
born beyond sea</span></i><i>, or </i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">out</span></i><i>
</i><i>[</i><i><u><b>out</b></u></i><i>]</i><i> of the </i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">limits
</span></i><i>of the United States,</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"shall
be </span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">considered</span></i><i>
as </i><i><span style="background: #66ffff;">natural born citizens</span></i><i>:
...."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Amplification </b><b>of the 1795 NA</b><b>:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"And
be it further enacted, That the children of persons duly <span style="background: #ffff00;">naturalized</span>,
dwelling within [<b>wi</b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">th</span></b><u><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">in</span></b></u><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">]</span>
the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at
the time of such naturalization;</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"<span style="background: #ffff00;">and</span>
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>[<b>the
1795 NA children are </b><b>BOTH</b><b> "</b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">considered</span></b><b>"
the same, </b><b>statute </b><b>"citizens"</b>]</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"the
<span style="background: #ffff00;">children of citizens</span> of the
United States, <span style="background: #ffff00;">born out</span>
[<u><b>out</b></u>] of the limits and jurisdiction of the United
States, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"shall
be <span style="background: #ffff00;">considered</span> as <span style="background: #66ffff;">citizens</span>
of the United States: ...."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>A
Brief Analysis of the 1790 and 1795 Naturalization Acts:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Notice
that in both the 1790 NA and the 1795 NA, <b>"considered"</b>
is positive law <i>(</i><i>statute</i><i>)</i>
language of Congress, positive law language, not <u><b>birth</b></u>
language, not natural law language. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
the 1790 NA, the child born between 1790 and 1795 with<u><span style="background: #ffff00;">in</span></u>
the United States <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">BEFORE</span></b>
the father, and by the <b>doctrine of "coverture"</b> the
mother, naturalized, the child, <b>AFTER</b> the father naturalized
as a U.S. citizen, the child was by the 1790 and the 1795 positive
law <i>(statute)</i> <b>"considered"</b> to be a U.S.
"citizen" under the <b>doctrine of coverture</b> until
reaching age 21, <b>AND</b> the child <i><b>"born beyond sea, or
out of the limits of the United States"</b></i> between 1790 and
1795, <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">AFTER</span></b> the U.S.
citizen parents were already residing on foreign soil were, the child
was <b>"considered"</b> to be a "natural born
Citizen." </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
1795 third Congress repealed the 1790 first Congress by removing the
<b>"natural born Citizen"</b> language and replacing it
with the <b>"citizen"</b> language. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the 1795 NA <b>"citizen"</b> designation has been the
consistent language of ALL statutes of Congress from 1795 to 2016.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>If
a soldier has a child abroad, that child is a natural born citizen.
That's why John McCain, even though he was born in Panama, was
eligible to run for president. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, as you know, when married diplomats and married military
personnel, for example, a military spouse and the civilian spouse,
are sent on assignment by the U.S. government to reside on foreign
soil and jurisdiction, the child who may be born outside of the U.S.
is, by <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">by"</span></b>
natural law birth <i>(</i><i>nature</i><i>)</i>, <b>NOT</b> by
positive law <i>(</i><i>statute</i><i>)</i>, the child is <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NOT</span></b>
"considered" to be a natural born citizen, the child <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">IS</span></b>
<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by" birth</span></b></i>
a natural born citizen, because the parents, plural, are both U.S.
citizens on official U.S. government assignment under U.S.
jurisdiction, just as if they were assigned to any city within the
United States. That was the official status of Sen. John McCain. The
resolution by the U.S. Senate <b>"declaring"</b> that Sen.
McCain was a natural born citizen was not necessary and it was
meaningless to his "natural born Citizen" status <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"from"</span></b>
and <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by" birth</span></b></i>
to two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>If
an American missionary has a child abroad, that child is a natural
born citizen. That's why George Romney, Mitt's dad, was eligible to
run for president even though he was born in Mexico.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, as you know, according to American statutes since the 1795
Naturalization Act up to and including the 1952 Immigration and
Nationalict Act, when any U.S. citizens, two U.S. citizen married
parents or one U.S. citizen parent, residing abroad has a child, the
child is, since 1795 up to and including 2016, a "citizen"
of the U.S., not a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>At
the end of the day, the legal issue is quite straightforward. </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, as you know, <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"[a]</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">t
the end of the day, the legal issue is quite straightforward"</span></i>:
a U.S. citizen with <b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship does <b>not</b>
need to renounce foreign citizenship as you did when you renounced
your Canadian citizenship in 2014.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>But,
I would note the <span style="background: #ffff00;">birther
theories</span> that Donald
has been relying on. <span style="background: #ffff00;">S</span><span style="background: #ffff00;">ome
</span>of the more <span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme</span>
ones <span style="background: #66ffff;">insist
you </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">
not only be born on U.S. soil, </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">but</span><span style="background: #66ffff;">
have two parents born on U.S. soil</span>.
</i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, why did you mention
only the "extreme" theory? Why not mention the A2S1c5
common sense original intent? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, as you know, the
"<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme"</span></b>
birther theory that you adduced has never, ever been espoused
by any informed or
uninformed constitutional scholar.
In fact, by
adducing the <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">have
</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">two
parents born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
example your
are covering up something important. You are telling
us what the meaning of
"natural born Citizen"
is <b>NOT</b> but your
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
example is <b>NOT</b>
telling us what the meaning
of "natural born
Citizen" <b>IS</b>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is obfuscation. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by citing the
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
example you can
avoid referring to the
<b>original genesis original intent</b>
meaning of "natural born Ctizen" in Article II Section 1
clause 5. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is obfuscation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, by saying
that <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"you
</span></i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">must</span></b></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">
not only be born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
but the child "must"
be born to <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"two
parents born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
with the tacit
implication that birth
on U.S. soil is <b>NOT</b>
the <b>original genesis original intent</b>
meaning of the word "born" in "natural born Ctizen"
is itself <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
mythology.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b></i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme"</span></b></i>
mythology is <i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b></i>
obfuscation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, the <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">have
</span></i><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">two
parents born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
language is itself extreme.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
is <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></i>
obfuscation.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Under
that theory, <span style="background: #ffff00;">not
only would I be disqualified</span>,
<span style="background: #66ffff;">Marco
Rubio would be disqualified</span>,
<span style="background: #66ffff;">Bobby
Jindal would be disqualified</span>,
but interestingly enough, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
J. Trump would be disqualified</span>
<i>[friendly loud and long
laughter and applause]</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, under your <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme"</span></b>
and mythological theory that
a child <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"must
not only be born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
but must
<b>ALSO</b> be born to
<i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"two
parents born on U.S. soil"</span></i>
for the child to be
qualified to be
"... eligible to the
Office of President,"
it makes it convenient for you to not need
to mention citizenship
at all
because the inclusion of citizenship into your <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
example would change the direction of discussion.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">According
to A2S1c5 common sense, when both
parents are naturalized U.S. citizens <b>BEFORE</b>
their child is born on U.S. soil then that child, born
on U.S. soil to
two U.S. citizen married parents, either
born or naturalized as U.S. citizens before
the child is born on U.S. soil,
is an A2S1c5 "natural born Citizen" who is qualified
and "...eligible to the
Office of President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It
is <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
obfuscation to <b>NOT</b>
mention that birth to two naturalized U.S. citizen parents who
were not born on U.S. soil,
or birth to one U.S. citizen
parent born on U.S. soil married to a naturalized U.S. citizen parent
who was not born on U.S.
soil, makes
a child a "natural born Citizen"
for a
common sense reason. Absolutely
no informed or uninformed
constitutional scholoar, absolutely
<b>nobody</b> would assert
that <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span></b>
U.S. citizen married parents, <b>EITHER</b>
both born as U.S. citizens <b>OR</b>
both naturalized as U.S. citizens, are <b>NOT</b>
sufficient for a child to be a "natural born Citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Under
A2S1c5 common sense, Donald
Trump would quality, but you Sen. Cruz, and Sen. Rubio and Gov.
Jindal would <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">be
disqualified."</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If
it is truly <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
that two married parents need to be born on U.S. soil <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">before</span></b>
their child is born on U.S. soil for the child to be qualified
and "... eligible to
the Office of President," what
wuoud you say is
the correct position that is <b>NOT</b>
"extreme" for
eligibility? If two U.S. citizen parents must be born on U.S. soil is
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
to you, what is <b>NOT</b>
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"extreme"</span></b>
to you? Is only one U.S.
citizen parent must be born on U.S. soil <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme"</span></b>
to you? Is
zero parents need to be born
on U.S. soil <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">extreme"</span></b>
to you? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">How
about this common sense position.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz, John Jay's implicit
<b>original genesis original intent</b>
meaning in underlining the word <b>"born"</b>
in "natural born
Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George
Washington is simple to
state and simple to understand:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY,</b><i><b> by birth,</b></i>
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Under
that theory, <span style="background: #ffff00;">not
only would I be disqualified</span>,
Marco Rubio would be disqualified, Bobby Jindal would be
disqualified, but interestingly enough, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald
J. Trump would be disqualified</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Donald
Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Not
me.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Because,
because <span style="background: #ffff00;">Donald's mother was born in
Scotland</span>, she was <span style="background: #ffff00;">naturalized</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Now,
Donald.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">But
<span style="background: #ffff00;">I was born here</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
the issue of citizenship, Donald.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">A
big difference.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
the issue of citizenship, Donald, <span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm
not going to use your mother's birth against you</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Trump:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Good,
because it wouldn't work.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Donald
Trump should have responded byt saying that "it wouldn't work"
because he
was born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married parents, one parent
who was born on U.S. soil as a U.S. citizen and one parent who
naturalized on U.S. soil as a U.S. citizen before
he was born, and that
Sen. Cruz was born on
foreign soil to one U.S. citizen parent and one foreign citizen
parent who didn't naturalize
before his son was born of
foreign soil.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">THAT
is why using Trump's "mother's birth against" him "wouldn't
work" against Trump but that Trump using Sen. Cruz's father's
birth against Sen. Cruz would work against
Sen. Cruz. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz qualifies as a "citizen" because dual U.S./foreign
citizenship <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">at"</span></b>
birth <i>(by
statute)</i> on U.S. soil or
<b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">at"</span></b>
birth <i>(by statute)</i>
on foreign soil to only one
U.S. citizen parent makes a child a U.S. "citizen" <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
positive law
<i>(</i><i>statute</i><i>)</i>,
not <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
natural law birth <i>(nature</i><i>)</i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Donald
Trump qualifies as a "natural born Citizen" because <b>ONLY</b>
singular U.S. citizenship <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">by"</span></b>
birth, <b>ONLY </b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
birth on U.S. soil, <b>ONLY
</b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"by"</span></b>
birth to two U.S. citizen married parents makes Article II Section 1
clause 5 common sense.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY,</b><i><b> by birth,</b></i>
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">You're
an American as is everybody else on this stage, and I would suggest
we <span style="background: #ffff00;">focus</span> on whose best
prepared to be Commander-in-Chief, because that's <span style="background: #ffff00;">the
most important question facing the country</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>My
Comment:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Donald
Trump should have responded
by saying that he <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">IS</span></b>
focusing on <i><span style="background: #ffff00;">"the
most important question facing the country"</span></i>:
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Who
is a better defender
of the U.S. Constitution, specifically Article II Section 1 clause 5,
the "natural
born Citizen" clause,
that is constitutionally
qualified to be Commander-in-Chief? A person born with <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
dual</span> U.S./foreign
citizenship and who needs to
renounce the foreign citizenship,
or a person born with <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
singular</span> U.S.
citizenship who does not
need to renounce anything?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>O</b></i><i><b>riginal
birther</b></i> John Jay and
<i><b>original birther</b></i>
George Washington and the <i><b>original birther</b></i>
framers and the <i><b>original birther</b></i>
ratifiers wrould probably concur with the simple words describing the
<i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">original genesis
original intent</span></b></i> of
the September 17, 1787
Article II Section 1 clause 5 common sense:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY,</b><i><b> by birth,</b></i>
singular U.S. citizenship </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">_
<b>ONLY, </b><i><b>by birth,</b></i> two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "liberation" serif , serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Original-Genesis-Original-Intent.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-38755896117040025962016-01-25T12:39:00.001-07:002016-01-26T08:52:42.455-07:00Laurence Tribe vs. Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>The
Living Constitution of Laurence Tribe</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>The
Original Intent Constitution of Ted Cruz</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>The
Living Constitution of Ted Cruz</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mario
Apuzzo posted a Winston Churchill vs. Ted Cruz comparison<span style="background: #99ccff;">*</span>
that is very appropriate and relevant to Harvard Law professor
Laurence Tribe's recent comments about the <b>"original meaning"</b>
that Sen. Cruz has been defending, uh, well, sort of. According to
Prof. Tribe, Sen. Cruz is not defending <b>"original meaning"</b>
as he did when he was a Harvard Law student of Prof. Tribe's and is
actually using Prof. Tribe's <b>"elastic </b><b>living
</b><b>constitution"</b> method to promote his, Cruz's, POTUS
eligibility.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #99ccff;">*
<a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/01/if-winston-churchill-was-not-even.html"><b>http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/01/if-winston-churchill-was-not-even.html</b></a></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">After
the quotes below from Tribe about his <b>"</b><b>elastic </b><b>living
constitution"</b> views vs. Sen. Ted <span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Cruz's
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"constitutional
originalist"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
views, </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">his
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"original
meaning"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
views</span>, I am posting an emended version of my May 13,
2014 comment that I first posted on Mario's Natural Born Citizen blog
and tying it in with his post about Winston Churchill and Churchill's
honest comment about the <b>"original intent"</b> of the
eligibility clause of the Constitution.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">By
adducing my 2014 comment that I posted previously and putting it
together with Tribe's clarification that Sen Cruz is not being
consistent with his <b>"original meaning"</b> views that he
espoused during his student days at Harvard, I am asking Sen. Cruz to
return to the <b>"original intent"</b> of his Harvard Law
student days when he defended his <b>"original meaning"</b>
view, a view which I think was <b>original birther</b> John Jay's
<b>original genesis original intent</b> reason for underlining the
word <b>"born"</b> in "natural born Citizen" in
his July 25, 1787 note to his good friend George Washington, a
suggestion which was passed on to and was accepted by the framers
without debate or disagreement, and was also accepted without
disagreement by the states that ratified the September 17, 1787
Constitution, specifically Article II Section 1 clause 5: <b>"No
Person except a natural born Citizen...shall be eligible to the
Office of President."</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
<b>"</b><b>original meaning"</b>
of Harvard student Cruz was the <b>original genesis original
intent</b> of John Jay, and
it is simple to state and
understand:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY
</b>singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
birth on U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
birth to two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Maybe
honest man <b>Winston Churchill</b> can get the attention of honest man
<b>Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz</b>
and inspire Cruz to admit that he has not been protecting the
original intent of the Constitution as he defended it in Prof.
Laurence Tribe's classroom at Harvard, a defense of original intent
that Tribe said earned student Cruz an A in a class of 150, even
though Cruz did not persuade and convince professor Tribe to agree
with Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>WBUR
- Boston's NPR news station – January 15, 2016:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<span style="background: #99ccff;">http://www.wbur.org/2016/01/15/donald-trump-ted-cruz-laurence-tribe-citizenship</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Questions
About Citizenship Become A Major Irritant For Ted Cruz</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Cruz
says this is all settled law, but Harvard’s Laurence Tribe
disagrees.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
clearly is not settled law,” Tribe said in recent an interview.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Tribe
brings an interesting perspective to this story. He obviously knows a
lot about the law, but he also knows a lot about Cruz — because
back in the mid-1980s, Tribe taught constitutional law to Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">He
was very colorful,” Tribe recalled. “He took me on all the time,
always had his hand up, he always wanted to disagree. And <b>he got
an A</b>, and there weren’t that many As in <b>a class of 150 or
so</b>.”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
source of their disagreement was their <span style="background: #ffff00;">differing
views of the Constitution.</span> Tribe is a liberal who regards the
Constitution as a living document that should be interpreted
according to changing times. <span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">“If
I were a justice on the Supreme Court </span><span style="background: #ffff00;">applying
my approach, I would actually vote for Ted Cruz’s citizenship,”
Tribe said.</span> “[But] <b>Ted Cruz has always made fun of that
way of looking at the Constitution</b>.”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"That’s
because Tribe says <span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Cruz is a
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">constitutional
“originalist,”</span></b> who believes the document should be
followed to the letter.<span style="background: #ffff00;"> Tribe says
jurists who share such a view might well conclude that Cruz is </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">not
eligible</span></b><span style="background: #ffff00;"> to be president
— because he was</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">not
born in America</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">."</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
was [Cruz’s] view that the Constitution was frozen in time,”
Tribe said. “Well now he’s
become a <span style="background: #ffff00;">fair-weather
originalist</span>. [The
Constitution] <span style="background: #ffff00;">means
what it always meant unless it hurts his ambitions</span>
— and that, I think, is the most important point in all
this. It shows that he’s a <b>constitutional hypocrite</b>, that
he’s <b>self-serving</b>, that he’s <b>cynical</b>, that he’s
really <b>unreliable</b>. And <b>it’s dangerous</b>!”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Prof.
Tribe's article that he wrote for the BostonGlobe.com on January 11
fills in the blanks to the above quotes from the January 15 WBUR
interview.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>The
BostonGlobe.com – January 11, 2016:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<span style="background: #99ccff;">https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/01/11/through-ted-cruz-constitutional-looking-glass/zvKE6qpF31q2RsvPO9nGoK/story.html</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Under
Ted Cruz’s own logic, he’s ineligible for the White House</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Opinion
| By Laurence H. Tribe</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"People
are entitled to their own opinions about what the definition ought to
be. But the kind of judge Cruz says he admires and would appoint to
the Supreme Court is an <span style="background: #ffff00;">“originalist,”</span>
one who claims to be bound by the narrowly historical meaning of the
Constitution’s terms at the time of their adoption. <span style="background: #66ffff;">To
his kind of judge</span>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">Cruz</span>
ironically <span style="background: #ffff00;">wouldn’t be eligible</span>,
because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and ’90s
required that someone actually be <span style="background: #66ffff;">born
on US soil to be a “natural born” citizen</span>. Even having <span style="background: #ffff00;">two
US parents wouldn’t suffice</span>. And having <span style="background: #ffff00;">just
an American mother</span>, as Cruz did, would have been <span style="background: #ffff00;">insufficient</span>
<b>at a time</b> that made <b>patrilineal</b> descent decisive."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"On
the other hand, <b>the kind of judge I admire and Cruz abhors</b> is
a <b>“living constitutionalist,”</b> one who believes that the
Constitution’s <span style="background: #ffff00;">meaning evolves
with the perceived needs of the time</span> and longstanding
practice. <span style="background: #ffff00;">To that kind of judge,
Cruz </span><span style="background: #66ffff;">would be eligible</span>
to serve because<span style="background: #66ffff;"> it no longer makes
sense to be bound by the narrow historical definition that would
disqualify him</span>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"When
Cruz was my constitutional law student at Harvard, he aced the course
after making a big point of opposing my views in class — arguing
stridently for sticking with the <b>“original meaning”</b>
<span style="background: #ffff00;">against</span> the idea of a more
<b>elastic “living Constitution”</b> whenever such ideas came up.
I enjoyed jousting with him, but Ted never convinced me — nor did I
convince him. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"At
least he was <span style="background: #ffff00;">consistent in those
days</span>. Now, he seems to be <span style="background: #ffff00;">a
fair weather originalist</span>,<span style="background: #66ffff;">
abandoning that method’s narrow constraints</span> <span style="background: #ffff00;">when
it suits his ambition</span>."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Next
is the comment that I wrote on Mario Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen
blog on May 13, 2014 at 10:56 AM, with some emendations here for
clarity and topicality.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Dittos
Leo and Robert...<br />
<br />
As you wrote Robert -<br />
<br />
>>If
Rubio, Cruz and any other non eligible contenders had any true
patriotism, <br />
>> they would simply explain that, <br />
>>
while they are honored to be considered for the office of POTUS, <br />
>>
they can't because they are not eligible."<br />
<br />
~ ~ ~<br />
<br />
As
you wrote Leo -<br />
<br />
>> Rubio and cruz should come out
and say they are not eligible, <br />
>> explain why they are
not <br />
>> and then say if a2 is amended <br />
>> and
allows a citizen of the us to be President <br />
>> then they
will run <br />
>> but we know that will never happen."<br />
<br />
~
~ ~<br />
<br />
This is what I wrote last year (2013) on my blog on
the page titled <b>"BIG Talkers and BIG Bloggers"</b><br />
>>
<a href="http://originalbirtherdocument7.blogspot.com/"><b><span style="background: #99ccff;">http://originalbirtherdocument7.blogspot.com/</span></b></a><br />
<br />
>>
“I decline the Office of POTUS<br />
>> “to DEFEND the
Office of POTUS”<br />
<br />
>> “I am giving up pursuit of
the Office of the President because I am a ‘Citizen’<br />
>>
“I have chosen to SAVE the Office of the President for a ‘natural
born Citizen’”<br />
<br />
[...]<br />
<br />
>> “We the
People” of America would definitely continue to listen to and act
on the words of a “truth speaker” like Sen. Ted Cruz if he were
to publicly acknowledge that the original genesis original intent of
the original birthers, John Jay and George Washington and the
original birther framers who wrote the words “natural born Citizen”
in Article II Section 1 clause 5, are STILL relevant and important
for OUR posterity also.<br />
<br />
>> “We the People” of
America would continue to listen to a “truth speaker” who would
give up an office with such great honor and respect like the Office
of the President for the purpose of protecting the Office of the
President.<br />
<br />
>> The whole WORLD would listen to a
truth speaker whenever she or he would speak about anything because
he or she would be known to speak ‘bold colors — not pale
pastels’ — truth to ‘We the People’ in a way similar to
President George Washington, President Abraham Lincoln, President
Ronald Reagan, and the proof would be in the historical fact that
they had given up something of great honor and respect in order to
adhere to the original intent of the original birthers who knew who
AND why ONLY a “natural born Citizen” is “... eligible to the
Office of the President.”<br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
Who knows, Robert and Leo, maybe some GREAT day Sen. Cruz or Sen.
Rubio or maybe even BOTH, will STAND Up and SPEAK Up and make an
original intent speech and say something like this –</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
<b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ORIGIANL
GENESIS ORIGINAL INTENT COMMON SENSE</span></b><br />
<br />
>>
Yes, after studying the Original Words of the U.S. Constitution, <br />
>>
the Original Document of American President Soil and Birth
eligibility;<br />
>> after analyzing<br />
>> the original
intent<br />
>> of the original words<br />
>> of the
original birthers<br />
>> aka the original framers of<br />
>>
Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5;<br />
>> after considering
original intent <br />
>> relevance to the framers of the
words<br />
>> natural born Citizen and "…or a
Citizen"<br />
>> I now understand that original intent
means<br />
>> I am definitely not a Clause 5 "…or a
Citizen."<br />
>> I am not a Clause 5 natural born Citizen
by birth.<br />
>> I am not Clause 5 "eligible to the
Office of President.<br />
>> I am not U.S. Soil Born to two
U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
I do not have only singular U.S. citizenship.<br />
</span></span></span><br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<b>ONLY</b> by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<b>ONLY</b> by birth with singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
<b>ONLY</b> by birth on U.S. soil/jurisdiction<br />
</span></span></span><br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
<b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">ORIGIANL
GENESIS ORIGINAL INTENT COMMON SENSE</span></b><br />
<br />
Yes, after
studying the Original Words of the U.S. Constitution, <br />
the
Original Document of American President Soil and Birth
eligibility;<br />
after analyzing<br />
the original intent<br />
of
the original words<br />
of the original birthers<br />
aka the
original framers of<br />
Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5;<br />
after
considering original intent <br />
relevance to the framers of the
words<br />
natural born Citizen and "…or a Citizen"<br />
I
now understand that original intent means<br />
I am definitely not a
Clause 5 "…or a Citizen."<br />
I am not a Clause 5
natural born Citizen by birth.<br />
I am not Clause 5 "eligible
to the Office of President.<br />
I am not U.S. Soil Born to two U.S.
citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
do not have only singular U.S. citizenship.<br />
<br />
<b>ONLY</b> by
birth to two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
by birth with singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
by birth on U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><br />
When
will possible POTUS aspirants Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio and et alii
stand for truth and the original genesis original intent of Article
II Section 1 Clause 5? When will Sen. Cruz and Sen. Rubio stand with
John Jay and his explicitly stated “natural born Citizen”
original intent of protecting America by protecting executive office
control of the US military... against ALL enemies, foreign AND
domestic?</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">It
makes one wonder how the prophecy <i>(see the </i><i><b>"BIG
Talkers and BIG Bloggers"</b></i><i>
url above</i><i>)</i> of the father Rafael Cruz will be
fulfilled if his son Sen. Ted Cruz accepts and adheres to the
original genesis original intent of Article II Section 1 Clause 5 and
“natural born Citizen” as being a reference to ONLY singular U.S.
citizenship, ONLY by being born on U.S. soil, ONLY to two U.S.
citizen married parents?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Sometimes,
it’s good to wonder.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Maybe
honest man <b>Winston Churchill</b> can get the attention of honest man
<b>Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz</b>
and inspire Cruz to admit that he has not been protecting the
original intent of the Constitution as he defended it in Prof.
Laurence Tribe's classroom at Harvard, a defense of original intent
that Tribe said earned student Cruz an A in a class of 150, even
though Cruz did not persuade and convince professor Tribe to agree
with Cruz.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY
</b>singular U.S. citizenship</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
birth on U.S. soil/jurisdiction</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>ONLY</b>
birth to two U.S. citizen married parents</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/"><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: "calibri" , sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #99ccff;">http://original-genesis-original-intent.blogspot.com/</span></b></span></span></span></a></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-11970730944936593162016-01-10T10:54:00.000-07:002016-01-11T11:51:59.839-07:00"Trump Talk" About "Cruz Talk" About Natural Born Citizen<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>"Trump
Talk" About "Cruz Talk" About Natural Born Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Here's
a</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;"> </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">short
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">7</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
minute </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">transcript
</span><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">(</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">23min.
50sec. to 30min. 50sec</span></i><i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">)</span></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of Donal</span>d
Trump's speech <i>(an excellent example of energetic </i><i><b>"Trump
Talk"</b></i><i>)</i> at his campaign rally in Clear Lake, Iowa
on January 9, 2016, in which Trump challenges Sen. Cruz to get a
declaratory judgment in court to clarify his eligibility to be POTUS
because he was not born <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">"in
the land"</span></b> as he, Trump, had always understood natural
born citizen to mean and to require for eligibility to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8Qkvck7u90 </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>@23min
50sec to 28min – 4m 10s</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Here's
one <i>[a poll]</i> in South Carolina, CBS, Trump 38, Cruz is second
at 23. You know what that is. I mean that's a massive difference. So,
we're doing good and we're going to do good here too. We're going to
win and we're going to come in first place.</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"But,
let me tell you, Ted. So Ted's a nice guy, and I like him, and he
likes me. A lot of other people don't like him, by the way, I must
tell you that. But I like him. Why do I like him? Because he's been
very nice to me. Alright?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"But,
here's a problem. He's talking about natural born citizen. Right?
Now, if he ever got the nomination, you know the Democrats are going
to bring a major suit. He was born in Canada. Whether we like it,
don't like it. He lived there. He was there. He was born in Canada. I
guess his parents voted in Canada. A lot of things. I mean a lot of
things happen here. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
you're born in Canada. It's immediately a little bit of a problem.
Now, gave up, gave up his citizenship, like, what, sixteen, eighteen
months ago. Joint citizenship. Did, he had a joint citizenship,
right? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"But,
here's the problem. Lawrence Tribe is from Harvard University Law
School; very great lawyer and a constitutional expert. So, he's on
television last night and he said about natural born citizen that
this matter is not a settled matter. It is wrong to say, this is an
exact quote, '[It is wrong to say] it is a settled matter because it
is not.' </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Now,
just so you understand, that means there's a question. It's not a
settled matter. He was born in Canada. And, I say to Ted. And as a
Republican I say it 'cause I think it's very important. You gotta get
it straightened out. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Now,
you can go for what's called a declaratory judgment, where you go to
the courts and you say there is a problem where there is a problem of
interpretation. And, you put a lot of papers in and you get a ruling
from a judge because you can not put somebody there, folks, that's
going to go in and he's going to be immediately sued by the
Democrats because they're saying he was born in Canada, he's not
allowed to run for president. And if there's that doubt, don't
forget, these law suits. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Who
knows more about law suits than I do? [applause] I'm the king. I'm
the king. These law suits take two, three, four years. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
you can't have somebody running; you cannot have somebody running and
have a law suit. And people have already said they're going to bring
the law suit. They say, 'if he get's the nomination we're bringing a
law suit' as to natural born citizenship. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"And,
honestly, I don't know, because some people say you have to be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born
in the land</span></b>. Ok? You have to be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born
in the land</span></b>. That's what I always thought before. You have
to be <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born on the land</span></b>.
So, he was <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">born in Canada</span></b>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>[Here
are some of Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Tribe's comments from
Breitbart.com]</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">>>
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/09/trump-trolls-cruz-again-cites-harvards-laurence-tribe-natural-born-citizen-matter-not-yet-settled/</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Trump
was citing comments that </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">Laurence
Tribe</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">—a
high-profile liberal constitutional law professor at Harvard who
taught both Cruz and President Barack Obama among other high profile
figures—recently told ABC News that </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">he
does not believe the natural born citizen question is “settled
law.”</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;">“ </span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">I
don’t agree that it’s ‘settled law,’ </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/constitutional-scholars-explain-ted-cruz-eligible-president/story?id=36127821" target="_blank">Tribe
said</a>. </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">The
Supreme Court has never addressed the issue one way or the other, as
I believe Ted ought to know.</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'
</span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Tribe
added that </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">he
personally believes Cruz is eligible</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
but that doesn’t mean it’s “settled law.”</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;">“ <span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">My
own view as a constitutional scholar is that the </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">better
view</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
— the one most </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">consistent
with the entire Constitution </span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">—
is the </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">broader
definition</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
according </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">to
which Cruz</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">
would be </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">eligible</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,”
Tribe said, noting that he believes that a natural born citizen
<b style="background-color: lime;">should include</b>, as ABC News wrote, </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">“anyone
who is a U.S. citizen at birth and doesn’t need to be naturalized.</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">'
</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">”</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If
Prof. Tribe really thinks that the <b>"better view"</b> is
the <b>"broader definition"</b> because it is <b>"consistent"</b>
with the <b>"entire"</b> Constitution and so that helps
Cruz's eligibility, I have some question for the law professor and
others.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, does the <b>"broader </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b>
of the <b>"entire"</b> Constitution include ONLY Article II
Section 1 clause 5?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, does the <b>"broader </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b>
of the <b>"entire"</b> Constitution include A2S1c5 and ALSO
the Fourteenth Amendment?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, does the <b>"broader </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b>
of the <b>"entire"</b> Constitution include A2S1c5 <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(Trump)</span></b>,
the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(Rubio)</span></b>
and ALSO statutes of Congress <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">(Cruz)</span></b>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, if the <b>"broader </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b> of
the <b>"entire"</b> Constitution helps Sen. Cruz's
eligibility, what is the "narrow view" of the "entire"
Constitution that hurts Sen. Cruz's eligibility and whom does the
"narrow view" help?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, does the <b>"</b><b>broader </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b>
of the "entire" Constitution, which includes both <b>A2S1c5</b>
and the <b>14</b><sup><b>th</b></sup><b> Amendment</b>, help <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">not
ONLY</span></b> the person with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">two</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents like <b>Donald Trump</b> but <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ALSO</span></b>
the person with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">one</span></b>
U.S. citizen parent like <b>Sen. Ted Cruz</b> and <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ALSO</span></b>
the person with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents like <b>Sen. </b><b>Marco </b><b>Rubio</b>?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Professor
Tribe, does the <b>"narrow </b><b>definition</b><b>"</b> of
the "entire" Constitution, which includes <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b>
A2S1c5 and the 14<sup>th</sup> Amendment, <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">include
and </span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">help</span></b>
the person with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">only two</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">
</span></b>U.S. citizen parents like Donald Trump and <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">exclude
and hurt</span></b> the persons with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">only
one</span></b><span style="background: #66ff66;"> </span>U.S. citizen
parent like Sen. Cruz and also <b><span style="background: #ffff00;">exclude
and hurt</span></b> persons with <b><span style="background: #66ff66;">zero</span></b>
U.S. citizen parents like Sen. Rubio?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Finally,
why do the Professor and others NOT say that the <b>"broader
</b><b>definition</b><b>"</b> of the <b>"entire"</b>
Constitution helps Donald Trump?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Could
it be that the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">definition</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"entire"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Constitution is sufficient because the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">definition</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
includes </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Article II Section 1 clause 5 </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">because</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Donald Trump</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">'s</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
father was born on U.S. soil and his mother, born on foreign soil,
naturalized </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">BEFORE</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Trump was born on U.S. soil? </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">These
should be very easy questions for Professor Lawrence Tribe and
Professor Robert Natelson and Professor William Jacobson and Jack
Maskell and Andrew McCarthy and Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck and Rush
Limbaugh and Mark Levin to answer. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">The
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">definition</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
means that </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Donald
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Trump
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">needs
</span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Article II Section 1 clause 5 for POTUS eligibility and he </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">does
</span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NOT</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
need the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">definition</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"entire"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Constitution, </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">A2S1c5
AND the 14</span><sup><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">th</span></sup><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Amendment, and he ALSO does </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">NOT</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
need statutes of Congress </span><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">(1952
Immigration and Nationality Act)</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">because
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
A2S1c5 </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">definition</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
by birth on U.S. soil </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
to two U.S. citizen married parents </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is
sufficient. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Does
Prof. Tribe understand that </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
singular U.S. citizenship </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is
what John Jay meant when he underlined the word </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"born"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
in </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"natural
born Citizen"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
in his note to George Washington, and which Washington passed on to
the framers in 1787? Born means </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"born"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
with </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">ONLY</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">singular
U.S. citizenship. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">THAT
is </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">why
a "natural born Citizen" does </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">NOT</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
need to renounce foreign citizenship before running for president. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Not
needing to renounce foreign citizenship</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is why Donald Trump </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">and
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">most
of</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the other Republican candidates </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">are
eligible to the office of President and why Sen. Cruz is not. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">PS.
</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Dr.
Carson's father was married to another woman when he married his
mother before Dr. Carson's birth, so Dr. Carson may not be eligi</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">b</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">le.
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">As
a Christian woman, a Seventh-day Adventist, she could not stay
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"married"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
to his father</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">.
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Both
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Sen.
Cruz's eligibility and Dr. Carson's eligibility are </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"not
settled"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
as Prof. Tribe might say. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Unless,
of course, Dr. Carson takes the biblical </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broad
way"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
that leads to destruction by accepting Prof. Tribes </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">unsettled
"theory"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
that the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"better
view"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"entire"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Constitution, a </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"better
view"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
which incorporates the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment and, since the 1790 Naturalization
Act was repealed five years later with the 1795 Naturalization Act, a
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"better
view"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
which incorporates the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the </span><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">1952
Immigration and Naturalization Act</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">,
a statute of Congress, into the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"narrow
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the 1787 Article II Section 1 clause 5 language. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">One
wonders what </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">John
Jay</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
and </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">George
Washington</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
and the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">1787
framers</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
of the language of A2S1c5 would think and say about Prof. Tribes
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"better
view"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
and the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
that is </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"consistent"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
with the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"entire"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Constitution concerning being </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"...eligible
to the Office of President?"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">B</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">y
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">implication,
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"better
view" </span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">of
a </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">is
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">so
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broad"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
that </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Prof.
Tribe's </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"unsettled"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
theory of his</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">allows
for including</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
statutes of Congress from 1790 to 2016 </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">to
help Sen. Cruz's eligibility: </span><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">“Tribe
said, noting that he believes that a natural born citizen </span></b><b><span style="background: #66ff66;">should
include</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;"> 'anyone who
is a U.S. citizen at birth </span></b><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">[14</span></i><sup><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">th</span></i></sup><i><span style="background: #ffff00;">
Amendment and statutes] </span></i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">and
doesn’t need to be naturalized.</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">'
</span></b><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">”</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">And
by extended implication, Prof. Tribe's </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background: #66ff66;">"should
include"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
Sen. Marco Rubio, Gov. Bobby Jindal, Gov. Nikki Haley and other
Fourteenth Amendment anchor babies since the </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">1898
United States </span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">v.
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Wong Kim Ark
erroneous decision</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">has
come to be construed to imply </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">that
even a child born on U.S. soil to foreign legal residents is not only
a U.S. </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"citizen"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
but </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">should
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">also
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">be
called</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">a
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"natural
born Citizen"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
and</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"...eligible
to the Office of President."</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">A</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">nd
to extend the implication even further, if Prof. Tribes </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"unsettled"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
theory of a </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"broader
definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
is not rebutted and refuted with an </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Article
V</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
convention of states to propose an amendment to clarify </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">that
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">the
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">1868 original
intent of the Fourteenth Amendment</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">did
NOT</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
include for POTUS eligibility the children born to </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">one
(Cruz)</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
or </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">zero
(Rubio)</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
U.S. citizen parents. </span></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">If
the Fourteenth Amendment is not clarified,</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
the Fourteenth Amendment </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"citizen"
</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">will
eventually be construed to apply to even </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">Muslim
jihadi </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">anchor
babies of </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">legal
</span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">aliens </span></b><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">AND
illegal aliens</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
so that </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">it
will be said that </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"natural
born Citizen </span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background: #66ff66;">"should
include"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">even
anchor babies with </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">zero
U.S. citizen parents</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">and
it will be proposed, based on Prof. Tribe's </span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"unsettled"
"borader definition"</span></b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
theory that </span><i><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">even
anchor babies of illegal aliens</span></b></i><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">wil
be said to be</span><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
</span><b><span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">"...eligible
to the Office of President."</span></b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">That's
nuts, right?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>[Trump
Talk continues here]</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Now,
John McCain, he had the same problem. The difference is his two
parents were both in the military. They were both in the military,
and he was born in a military base. Ok. I understand that. I mean,
it's a military base. What are you going to do, say, you know, mom
and dad, you should have taken me back home to be born. I can't run
for president. He was born in a military base, and I understand that.
And, by the way, La</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">u</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">rence
Tribe represented John McCain on that, and he said he [Tribe] was
troubled by it. They won, but he was always troubled by it. It
bothered him, but he also understood it. But, with Cruz, he said,
it's a problem.</span></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Now,
if it's a problem, they gotta work it out because you can't give
somebody a nomination—I think we're going to win, just so you
understand. I don't want to be like a negative person, and I don't
want to win this way. I don't want to win this way. I want to win
fair and square. And, based on all the polls, it looks like I'm doing
awfully well. </span></span></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"But,
you can't have a person running for office—even though</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>
</b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">Ted
is very glib and he goes out and he says</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">,
well, </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">I'm
a natural born citizen</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.
The prob..., </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">the
point is, you're not</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.
You gotta get a declaratory judgment. You have to have the courts
come up with a ruling or you have </span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">a
candidate who just cannot run</span></b></span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">.
Because, the other side will immediately bring suit and you've got
that cloud on your head. And, you can't have that cloud on your head.
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><</span></span><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>[At
this point the energetic "Trump Talk" about Sen. Cruz's
eligibility transitions to energetic "Trump Talk" about
winning where and how the other candidates don't have a chance, like
New York because of upstate New York, and with 20% of Democrats in
addition to the remnant Reagan Democrats.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>I
included the "winning" political talk below to show how
Trump makes news and headlines. He spent only four minutes on
"natural born Citizen" and the internet is going crazy, for
and against Trump. Mark Levin just can't get any rest from what he
calls "chasing shiny objects" and the "birther"
talk.]</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"You
know, the Republicans have a structural disadvantage to start off
with. </span></span></span>
</div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Speaking
of that, I think I'm going to do great in New York, a state that they
don't ever even talk about. Did you ever notice where they say, you
have to win Florida. I think I will. You have to win Ohio. Now, Ohio
is interesting because I do great in Ohio. I'm killing Kasich in
Ohio. Everyone said, maybe you should make him your running mate and
you'll win Ohio. I said, yeah, there's only one problem, I'm killing
him in the polls. Right? You know, it's the same thing like in
Florida where you're beating them and they say, why don't you pick
one of them. So, it's interesting. Pennsylvania, we're going to do
great. What they've done to the industries in Pennsylvania like the
coal industry, I guarantee you, I'm going to do great in
Pennsylvania. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"But
I think I'm going to do great in states that are not considered in
play. I think New York, you know, they came out with a poll the other
day, you probably saw it, upstate New York loves Trump. And, I think
I'll do well in Manhattan too. I live there. But, it's a little on
the liberal side, that's ok. You know what the truth is, whether it's
liberal or not liberal, whether it's Democrat or whatever, people
want safety. They want our country to be great again <i>[applause]</i>.
They want lower taxes <i>[applause]</i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
I think that I'm going to win states that these people up there, back
there with all of the cameras, they don't even talk about. I think
we're going to win states that aren't even talked about. Because, the
other people are not going to win any of those states. I mean,
there's not a chance. You know, Ted and Marco and all these people
are not going to win New York, and they're not going to have a chance
of winning New York. I have a good chance of winning. They like me. I
mean, sometimes they think I'm a little wild, but that's ok. But,
they like me in New York. ... So, a place like New York, which isn't
even thought of, hasen't been won in decades, all of a sudden they're
starting to say, you know, Trump would have a chance because upstate
New York ... because it is in such trouble, they think I have a good
chance of winning New York. By the way, nobody else does. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
other thing is, it just came out in one of the magazines and
newspapers, that if Trump gets the nomination, they think he's going
to take twenty percent of the Democrat vote. And, I think so too
<i>[applause]</i>. Do you remember the old little group of people,
they're so great, I love those people, some of them are still around,
and it was called Democrats for, who, Reagan. Remember how many
people voted for Ronald Reagan? We're going to have the same thing.
And, they're not polling that stuff. We're going to have the same
thing.</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Then,
I'm going to do great with the Hispanics."</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">[...snip...]</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">StopIslamizationOfAmerica.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-80429975552983770392016-01-07T20:13:00.000-07:002016-01-08T19:11:21.551-07:00Two Transcripts about Donald Trump: Sen. Ted Cruz and Mark Levin, Esq.<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Two
Transcripts of Sen. Ted Cruz and Mark Levin, Esq. </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Talking
About Donald Trump and Sen. Cruz's Presidential Eligibility</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Sen.
Cruz Answers Questions from Reporters </b></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>About
his Eligibility to be President</b></span><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>:</b></span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><span style="background: #ffff00;">>>
http://therightscoop.com/ted-cruz-responds-to-trumps-birther-claims-video/</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Partial
transcript from video #1:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
legal issue is straightforward. The son of a U.S. citizen born abroad
<i><b>[i.e. the child born abroad]</b></i> is a natural born citizen.
... The constitution and laws of the United States are
straightforward. The very first Congress <i><b>[in the 1790
Naturalization Act]</b></i> defined the child of a U.S. citizen born
abroad is <i><b>[the implication by lawyer and constitutional scholar Cruz </b></i><i><b>of "</b></i><i><b>is"
</b></i><i><b>is the continuous present tense</b></i><i><b> <span style="background-color: yellow;">"still
is"</span>]</b></i> a natural born citizen."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Partial
transcript from video #2:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"As
a legal matter, the question is quite straightforward and settled law
that the child of U.S. citizens born abroad <i><b>[i.e. the child born
abroad]</b></i> is a natural born citizen. ... </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"John
McCain was born in Panama but he was a natural born citizen because
his parents were U.S. citizens <i><b>[plural-both were citizens]</b></i>.
George Romney, Mitt's dad, was born in Mexico when his parents were
Mormon missionaries, but he's a U.S. citizen because his parents were
citizens <i><b>[plural]</b></i>. And actually, Barry Goldwater was
born in Arizona before Arizona was a state, and yet he was a natural
born citizen because his parents <i><b>[plural]</b></i> were
citizens.."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Mark
Levin Chastises Donald Trump on his Natonal Radio Program</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Listen
to <i><b>Mark Levin: Stop Cha</b></i><i><b>s</b></i><i><b>ing Dumbass
Issues</b></i> in the video on TheRightScoop.com:<br />
<span style="background: #ffff00;">>>
http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-stop-chasing-dumbass-issues/</span></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Partial
transcript from video #1:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Normally
I wouldn't start with this, the new birther issue, but I do want to
address it since my background is related to constitutional law. ...
I'll put my...thirty some years background into this. This is why I
was never a birther, quote unquote, when it came to Obama. Not only
is it stupid; not only don't we have standing to actually challenge
it; not only won't any court address it, it's just not true. ....</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
let me do my best to explain this in plain English so liberals can
understand it and goofballs can understand it. <i><b>[Levin's version
of "Natural Born Citizen for Dummies" </b></i><i><b>who are
not as informed as he his, of course</b></i><i><b>]</b></i>.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"And,
by the way, Trump has taken two positions on the same issue. Ann
Coulter has taken two positions on the same issue. I don't really
care what their view is on this. And I don't say this to attack Trump
or anything else. I'm just addressing this issue. He brought it up.
No, a reporter brought it up. Yeah, ok.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"If
you're born to a United States citizen, whether in America or outside
America, whether in an unincorporated American territory like Panama
in the case of John McCain, whether on a military base, whether in
Mexico like George Romney who ran for president at one point, it
doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Here's
what section one, article two of the Constitution says, clause five:
<i><b>'No person except a natural born citizen'</b></i>, <span style="background: #ffff00;">which
is not defined</span>, <i><b>'or a citizen of the United States at
the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to
the office of the president'</b></i>. That's it. That's it. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
let's say you're traveling overseas; let's say you're pregnant; say
you have a baby. Does that mean your baby is not eligible to be
president of the United States? Of course not. That baby's still an
American citizen under American statutory law. It's a natural born
American citizen. Well, what else would that child be? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"You
and I have argued, and I think effectively and definitively, that
just because somebody comes into the United States and has a child
doesn't mean that child is an American citizen. That's what the chain
migration types argue. That's what the birthright citizenship types
argue. You and I don't argue that.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
somebody's traveling here and they have a baby, that baby's not an
American citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment. Now, of course, the
amnesty crowd, the establishment Republicans, dummies on tv, they
argue that's the case, but it's not the case. So, we're perfectly
consistent. But even if we weren't consistent, we're talking about
two different parts of the constitution. One is the Fourteenth
Amendment and this is section one, article two, clause five. 'No
person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United
States'. That is, somebody born of another citizen, wherever, or
somebody born of another citizen in the United States is eligible for
the office of president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
here we are, we're going to spend the next five days on this because
the media love it. Do you love it? Do you think this is helpful in
determining who you might want to vote for? You going to chase
circles? You going to run backwards? You going to do backflips over
this? There's kooks all over the place, of course. Some of them have
law licenses. Some of them pretend to be professors. Some of them
have websites. I get it. I got it. I really do. But we're not
liberals. We're not liberals, we try to discern the truth. We try to
discern the facts. We try to discern the law. We try to figure out
what the framers meant in the Constitution.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
framers didn't reject people who were born of American citizens from
being American citizens. Did they? Of course not. And besides, the
Supreme Court would never hear this case. First of all, you have to
have standing and almost nobody does. It's a technical issue but it's
a crucial issue. That's number one. Number two, they would treat this
as part of the political question doctrine. They're not going to get
involved in it. They're just not going to do it. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Well,
some people will say, well now, there has to be a child of two
American citizen parents. But,<span style="background-color: yellow;"> that's not in the Constitution either.
Where does it say that? It doesn't say anything</span><span style="background: #99ccff;">*</span>.
So, rather than being activists and liberals rewriting the
Constitution and trying to change it to accommodate a candidate or
something, that's not what constitutional conservatives do. That's
not who we are. That's not who we are. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="left" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">__________</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b><span style="background: #99ccff;">*</span>Some
common sense question for Mark Levin. </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>So,
Mark, if two U.S. citizen parents is not in the Constitution, do you
know how many U.S. citizen parents are in the Constitution? One?
Zero? </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Mark,
do you know how many are implied in the Constitution? Two? One? Zero? </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Mark,
are you implying that since a definite number of U.S. citizen parents
is NOT mentioned, that means that EVERYBODY is eligible if born on
U.S. soil to two OR one OR zero U.S. citizen parents, and ALSO
eligible if born on foreign soil to one OR two U.S. citizen parents?</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Mark,
do you really think that John Jay implied multiple choice parents and
locations of birth when he underlined the word "born" in
"natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his
good friend George Washington, a national security suggestion that
was accepted by the framers when they adopted the new constitution on
September 17, 1787?</b></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Mark,
do you know how many U.S. citizen parents determine singular U.S.
citizenship and how many U.S. citizen parents determine dual
U.S./foreign citizenship? Two? One? Zero?</b></span></span></span></div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">Mark,
of course you know. So what's with the incoherent proposition quoted
above about two U.S. citizen parents, <i><b>"...</b></i><i><b>But,
</b></i><i><b><span style="background: #ffff00;">that's not in the
Constitution either</span></b></i><i><b>. Where does it say that? It
doesn't say anythin</b></i><i><b>g."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<<>></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"There
is even some question about Barry Goldwater because he was born in
Phoenix. Arizona was a territory. Well, does a territory count? In
the Panama Canal, the debate was, well, was it incorporated at the
time of John McCain's birth, whether it was a military base or not.
This is for the kooks. This is for the kooks. So, let the kooks argue
it. </span></span></span>
</div>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
truth is, the truth is this thing is resolved. Now, it may not be
resolved if you are an opponent of Cruz's. It may not be resolved if
you are one of the kooks out there. So what? But the media love it.
You want to know why the media love it? Because yesterday the
president of the United States, in dictatorial fashion was attacking
the Bill of Rights. Yesterday the president of the United States was
attacking the Second Amendment. Yesterday the president of the United
States was in essence making us all guilty until proven innocent when
it comes to the right to purchase weapons. Yesterday the president of
the United States went further than ever in eviscerating the
Constitution. And today, today we're chasing a birther argument.
Played right into the liberal's hands. Right into their hands. Even
Josh not Earnest mocking, mocking.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"I
don't know about you ladies and gentlemen, but the Republic is going
down the tubes. The Republic is going down the tubes. That's all I
care about. Restoring this Republic. I don't care about any
individual candidate. I don't believe in cults of personality. Some
websites do. Some commentators do. Fine. I'm not one of them. I do
not believe in cults of personality. I believe we need to do the best
we can to save this Republic; what's left of it, and restore liberty.
And chasing another dumbass issue ain't gonna do it. It's not gonna
do it. Go ahead, chase it, run around. Not backwards, run forward.
But this is not gonna do it. And it's not gonna change a single vote.
But now the lib media, they now have a reason not to focus on the
Second Amendment; not to focus on Obama and gun control. Now all talk
radio, everybody on tv, were chasing our own tails, we're acting
stupid on a subject that is moronic and boring. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Listen
to me. Yes, Cruz is eligible. Yes, his mother is an American citizen.
Yes, he was born in Canada. Canada's laws have nothing to do with
America's laws, America's constitution, America's statutes. Whether
Canada views him as a citizen, or did or didn't, and whether he
rejected, is of zero consequence. The issues is, what's the
consequence to the United States of America?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Stop
chasing liberal arguments. Don't accept cults of personality. Be
freedom loving constitutional conservatives. Have self respect, stand
on principle, and let us beat the liberals.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"I'll
be right back."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Partial
transcript from video #2:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"I'm
prepared to debate any so-called legal scholar, professor, serious
commentator or candidate on this particular issue on the air. More
than happy to do it. More than happy to. See, it's not a matter of
just an opinion. You have to understand the Constitution. You have to
understand the nature of construction. You have to understand a
little bit of American history. So, that makes things complicated for
liberals and knee jerkers. But, I'm more than happy to debate this
issue with anybody who says that an American citizen born of an
American citizen mother, wherever that citizen is born, is <span style="background: #ffff00;">not
eligible as a naturalized citizen to run for president</span> of the
United States. <span style="background: #ffff00;">There's absolutely
no authority for that</span>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"If
people want to gum up the works, gum up the works, but I'm putting
out a challenge, right now, on this program. But don't give me Ann
Coulter. She's taken different positions on this, and she backed
McConnell and Christy, and I don't need that, though<span style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-size: initial;">
I would be happy to do it, frankly. But even Donald Trump, whom I
like, a lot. And, no media, I'm not attacking Donald Trump. I'm
defending the Constitution. I'm defending the rule of law and I will
defend it against all comers. All comers. All comers, period. It
doesn't matter to me. Republican, Democrat, Independent, poor, rich,
white, black. Doesn't ma</span>tter to me. I'm not a liberal. And I
don't kneejerk like a liberal. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Over
at RightScoop, here's Trump, just in September, not five years ago,
not two years ago, in September. ABC News, cut eight, go: </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Reporter:</b>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'Do
you think he is ineligible to be president because he was born in
Canada?'</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Trump:</b>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'No.
From what I understand, everything is fine. I hear that it was
checked out by every attorney, every which way, and I understand Ted
is in fine shape.'</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Ok.
That was then. Now, yesterday, three months from there. Cut nine, go:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>Trump:</b>
</span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">'Well,
I mean, honestly, I hope that's not the case. I hope that's not going
to be a problem for him, but I've been hearing a lot about it, and
you've been hearing (garbled).</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Ok,
stop. It's not a problem for him. I hear a lot about everything. I
hear ... I hear, I hear, I hear. What does that have to do with
anything. ... It either is or it isn't. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"And
there are birthers out there, whenever I used to speak somewhere,
which wasn't often, they would always run up to me, 'You should be a
constitutional conservative. You should be with us on Obama on this
birther issue.' You know what I used to say to them? Get lost nutjob.
There is no birther issue. There's a liberty issue. There's a
national security issue. There's a law and order issue. There's a
capitalism and property rights issue. There's a Bill of Right issue.
Especially the Second Amendment now. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So
today, look at what we're discussing. The inbred puke over there in
North Korea is running wild. Islamonazis are still on the move. The
border's still wide open. And on and on and on. The problems this
country faces with the despotic conduct of this president, and here
we are chasing shiny objects.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"And
it's not the responsibility of a candidate to get a declaratory
judgment from a court that wouldn't even give him a declaratory
judgment on an issue like this. It's so absurd. Number one, the
political doctrine notion. The court's not going to get involved. And
number two, that's not how things work. Well, let me go into court
and clear my name. Clear your name from what? Let me go into court
and make sure what I'm doing is legal. Legal from what? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"If
somebody believes Ted Cruz does not have the legitimate
constitutional, uh, natural citizenship to run for president, let
that candidate go to court.Why don't they? There's my challenge. Go
to court. You get the declaratory judgment if you think you can get
it. You get some kind of injunction if you can. Go ahead. But it
won't happen 'cause it ain't gonna happen. 'Cause it won't work. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"Let
me be very clear about this 'cause I strongly supported Trump when he
said, hey, look, anchor babies, that's not provided for under the
Fourteenth Amendment. He was correct. One hundred percent correct and
he came under attack. I defended him, not because he's Donald Trump.
And I like Donald Trump. I defended him because he was right, and on
this issue he's wrong. He's wrong. That's ok, right? He was right,
actually, in September. He's wrong now. So, he was right in
September, he's wrong now. Every attorney, he understands, every
attorney and every which way, he understood, he's in fine shape. That
was correct. Now it's, well, people are raising the question. Ok,
fine, who cares? </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"So,
I have put this to sleep. If people want to keep chasing it's because
they want radio ratings or tv ratings or whatever it is. But, from a
constitutional point of view there's no problem. Ted Cruz is an
American citizen. Ted Cruz has been voting as an American citizen.
He's allowed to vote 'cause he is an American citizen. His mother is
an American citizen. He was born from his mother, an American
citizen. It doesn't matter where she was. Same with George Romney.
Same with John McCain. Same with, I'm sure, many many others. It
doesn't matter. .</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">"The
issue that the framers were concerned about was loyalty to the
country. <span style="background: #ffff00;">If somebody is born who is
not an American citizen, or is born outside the country whose not an
American citizen, they were concerned about allegiance to the
country. So, it's a fundamental matter.</span> I don't think that's
much about to be concerned. Do you ladies and gentlemen? No, I don't.
And were not going to take any calls on this 'cause it's boring and
boring and boring."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Allegiance
By Birth Place and Birth to Two U.S. Citizen Parents</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>(Singular
U.S. Citizenship)</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>vs.</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>Allegiance
By Birth Alone to One U.S. Citizen Parent</b></span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14pt;"><b>(Dual
U.S./Foreign Citizenship)</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">So,
it seems that Mark Levin's conclusion is that <i><b>allegiance </b></i>to
the country is of fundamental importance, but clarifying <i><b>how
many U.S. citizen parents, two or one or zero a child </b></i><i><b>is
</b></i><i><b>born with</b></i> <span style="background: #ffff00;">in</span>
the country (<span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S. soil</span> –
<span style="background: #ffff00;">two</span> – Trump, Paul,
Fiorina, etc.) (<span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S. soil </span>–
<span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span> – Obama) (<span style="background: #ffff00;">U.S.
soil</span> – <span style="background: #ffff00;">zero</span> –
Rubio, Jindal, Haley, etc.) or<span style="background: #ffff00;">
outside</span> the country (<span style="background: #ffff00;">foreign
soil </span>– <span style="background: #ffff00;">one</span> –
Cruz), is not of fundamental importance in understanding the
perpetual relevance and significance of "born" in "natural
born Citizen" in Article II Section 1 clause 5 and <i><b>singular
U.S. citizenship</b></i> and <i><b>allegiance</b></i> to the country.</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-8941761703933400842015-11-22T15:35:00.001-07:002015-11-22T15:35:44.999-07:00To the Architect Original Intent is Important<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>To
the Architect O</b><b>riginal </b><b>I</b><b>ntent is </b><b>I</b><b>mportant</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
post is modified with corrections from a similar post on Mario
Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog on November 22, 2015</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html</span></span></span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<br />
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
December 17, 2007 Becky Garrison published an interview titled, <b>The
Wittenburg Door Interview: N.T. “Tom” Wright</b>. He taught New
Testament studies for twenty years at Cambridge, McGill, and Oxford
universities. He is now Research Professor of New Testament and Early
Christianity at St Mary’s College in the University of St Andrews
in Scotland. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
the interview, Wright uses these examples to explain how Jesus and
Paul relate to each other still today, 2000 years later:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Composer:
writes the music</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Conductor:
uses the original music</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Musician:
plays the original music</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Musicians
must be united and must know the implicit structure</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Medical
researcher: finds </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Doctor:
applies to the patient what is found</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Architect:
designs</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Builder:
builds what has been designed</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hermeneutic
used (to interpret, to explain, the theory and method of
interpretation )</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">My
point for quoting N.T. Wright and his original intent comments as
related to Jesus, the Architect, and Paul, the Builder, is to apply
the original intent of the 1787 architects of the U.S. Constitution
to the 1787-2015 builders of the American union.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
the context of John Jay underlining the word "born" in
"natural born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to George
Washington, the "original genesis" meaning of a "natural
born Citizen" was and still is ONLY singular U.S. citizenship
ONLY by birth on U.S. soil ONLY to two U.S. citizen married parents.
ONLY singular U.S. citizenship was the "original intent" of
John Jay, the founder "architect" of "born," so
to speak, and of George Washington who passed the architectual
suggestion to the framers, the original "architects" of the
Constitution, and ultimately the ratifiers (including New York
ratifier John Jay), the original "builders" of the "union"
of America.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here
are the 7th, 8th and 9th questions and answers in which Wright
articulates, in the context of Jesus and Paul, why origins and
original intent are important for contemporary cultures. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Question
7</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>DOOR:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
means that there are the inherent dangers in viewing, say, the
Letters of Paul through the lens of contemporary culture.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Answer
7</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>WRIGHT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">There
are massive anachronisms when one makes assumptions about the things
going on in this world that weren’t in his world. This requires
that we read Paul faithfully and go between these two worlds. As I
hinted earlier, the fifth act, in which the Church is called to live
and work, is characterized by two things. First, it has firm and
fixed foundations, including a definite closing scene which is
already sketched in Romans 8, 1 Corinthians 15, Colossians 1 and
Revelation 21 and 22.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Second,
it has the command, under the spirit, to improvise through the
unscripted period between the opening scenes and the closing one. No
musician would ever suppose that improvising means playing out of
tune or time. On the contrary, it means knowing extremely well
whether one is in the implicit structure, and listening intently to
the other players so that what we all do together, however,
spontaneously, makes sense as a whole. That is the kind of
hermeneutic I envisage as I read, and preach from, Paul’s letters
today.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Question
8</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>DOOR:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Is
that why you once described relationship between Jesus and Paul as
that of composer and conductor, medical researcher and doctor, and
architect and builder?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Answer
8</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>WRIGHT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
composer writers the music. If the conductor decides to write some on
his own account, that would be a way of saying he didn’t want to
play that composer’s music, but some of his own instead. His job is
to play the music the original composer has written. The doctor takes
the results of the research and applies them to the patient. Her job
is not to do more research on the topic, or, if she thinks it is, it
isn’t because she’s is being loyal to the original researcher but
because she is being disloyal. The builder takes the plans drawn up
by the architect and builds to that design. It isn’t his task to
draw a new building; or, if he does, it’s not because he is filled
with the admiration for the original design but because he isn’t.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Question
9</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>DOOR:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Got
it. On the other extreme, how can stuff like The Gospel of Judas and
The Da Vinci Code inform the Christian faith?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Answer
9</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>WRIGHT:</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">What
we can see in this current passion for Gnosticism is a hunger for
spirituality and purpose. We have to ask why our culture is so hungry
for different kinds of spirituality.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Also,
the appeal of second century Gnosticism is that people in our culture
are eager to find anything to rebuke or replace traditional
Christianity. This myth—what I call “the new myth of Christian
origins,” according to which Jesus was just an ordinary person who
taught a new type of spirituality, that He didn’t die for our sins
or rise again—is what’s lurking behind the Jesus Seminar. Many
people in our culture don’t like traditional Christianity and are
eager to find anything else at all to go with instead. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
gnostic “new myth of Christian origins” relates to the gnostic
"new myth" of "natural born Citizen" as
understood by "nbC" new meaning "gnostic"
neobirthers.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mario,
similar to the way that Wright exposes the fallacy of the "builders"
changing the original plans of the "architect," to cite
only one of Wright's examples of original intent, it looks like the
original intent of architect John Jay has been usurped by "natural
born Citizen" new meaning gnostic neobirthers, aka the gnostic
"myth builders" of 2000s America, who promote the
incoherent theory that birth on either U.S. --OR-- foreign soil was
Jay's 1787 "original genesis original intent" for underling
the word "born", and that birth to either two OR one OR
zero U.S. citizen parents was Jay's and Washington's and the framers'
1787 original intent prior to the absurdity of the 1898 United States
v. Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court "ctizen" by fiat holding,
and, anyway, the ratifiers were the real architects of the "building"
known as the United States of America, so that implies that future
generations could also redefine "nbC" however they wanted.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>>>
"The builder takes the plans drawn up by the architect and
builds to that design. </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>>>
"It isn’t his task to draw a new building; </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>>>
"or, if he does, </b></i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i><b>>>
"it’s not because he is filled with the admiration for the
original design but because he isn’t."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">It
seems that the current "builders" of the "union"
of America <i>(Republican, Democrat, Independent, Libertarian and
Anarchist)</i> have changed the <b>"original genesis original
intent"</b> of the 1787 founders, framers and ratifiers, the
original architects and builders of the "union" of America
as President Abraham Lincoln articulated it in his 1861 first
inaugural address. See Bartleby.com - paragraph #14 (
<i>http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres31.html</i><i>
)</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Wright
says in answer #9, <i><b>"...</b></i><i><b>the appeal of second
century </b></i><i><b>Gnosticism...people in our culture are eager to
find anything to rebuke or replace traditional Christianity. This
myth—what I call “the new myth of Christian origins,”...."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
"new myth of Christian origins" that ignores tradition and
the "new myth" of "natural born Citizen" that
ignores commonsense original intent are gnostic myths pushed
by those who "know" what the framers did not know.
The new myth of the "nbC" gnostic
neobirthers is
inspired by the desire to
replace John Jay's traditional 1787 <b>"original genesis
original intent"</b> of
singular U.S. citizenship with dual U.S./foreign citizenship. This
is a 2000s myth that
appeals to 21st century
"gnostics" who "know" what John Jay, George
Washington and the framers and ratifiers did NOT
know, dual U.S./foreign
citizenship with, for example, ONLY one U.S. citizen parent, was John
Jay's "traditional" meaning.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">If
the "nbC" new meaning "gnostic"
neobirthers say that they do
NOT <b>"know"</b>
that ONLY singular U.S. citizenship ONLY by birth on U.S. soil ONLY
to two U.S. citizen married parents was Jay's "traditional"
meaning that was inspired by
Emer de Vattel in Vattel's
Law of Nations and was
applied by the 1875 Minor v. Happersett Court,
well, how do they <b>"know"</b>
that dual U.S./foreign citizenship by birth to ONLY one U.S. citizen
parent, married OR not, was Jay's "traditional" meaning
that the 1875 Minor v. Happersett Court was defending? They
don't <b>"know"</b>
and they don't care. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
applies to my Texas Federal senator Ted Cruz who, as a constitutional
scholar (and,
as a young man, memorized the entire U.S. Constitution),
does <b>"know"</b>
the original intent of
"natural born Citizen." That is why he parses his words by
saying that he has never breathed a breath when he was not a U.S.
citizen. Sen. Cruz does
<b>"know"</b> that
the <b>1952 Immigration and Naturalization Act</b>,
a statute passed
by Congress, the positive
law that he was born under, does NOT grant because it can NOT "grant"
"natural born Citizen" status to a "citizen" born
on foreign soil to ONLY one U.S. citizen parent. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz knows that a "citizen" can NOT be declared to be a
"natural born Citizen" by an Act of Congress, and
he knows that Article II Section 1 clause 5 identifies a "natural
born Citizen" as "...eligible to the Office of President"
ONLY by birth as a result of
an act of congress by two U.S. citizen married parents.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">StopIslamizationOfAmerica.blogspot.com</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-27233098078557186632015-10-29T19:48:00.000-07:002015-10-29T21:28:48.347-07:00Anecdote vs. Anecdote: Sen. Ted Cruz Said He is "Breath of Air" Citizen<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Anecdote
vs. Anecdote: </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>Sen.
Ted Cruz Said He Is A "Breath of Air" Citizen</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
post is modified with corrections from a similar post on Mario
Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen blog on October 6, 2015 at 12:42 PM.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Anecdote
vs. Anecdote...</b><br />
</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">New
Hampshire Public Radio published Sen. Cruz's response to a question
about his eligibility to be president.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
http://nhpr.org/post/cruz-opposing-planned-parenthood-where-were-other-presidential-candidates</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>Cruz
On Opposing Planned Parenthood: 'Where Were The Other Presidential
Candidates?' </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">By
Brady Carlson • Oct 4, 2015 </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>[...snip...]</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"Cruz,
like several other Republican hopefuls in this election cycle, heard
from an audience member who appeared to question the origins of
President Barack Obama, who was born in Hawaii to an American mother
and a Kenyan father. "Is there anything in the Constitution,"
the questioner asked to some laughter, "that the new president
can deport the last president?"</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"You
know, there's not," Cruz said, after a pause. "But I can
tell you this. On January 20th, 2017, when I rescind every single one
of Barack Obama's illegal and unconstitutional executive actions, he
might just well self-deport."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Cruz's
own origins came under question from a member of the audience, who
asked about the constitutional requirement that presidents be natural
born citizens. Cruz explained that while he was born in Calgary,
Alberta, he was a US citizen because he was born to an American
mother. "<b>I have never breathed a breath of air,"</b> he
said, <b>"when I wasn't an American citizen."</b></i></span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Sen.
Cruz's </span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><b>"breath
of air"</b></span></span></span><span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
comment is an interesting anecdotal reference and defense that
deserves dictionary analysis. Instead of simply responding with my
own anecdotal comment about original birther John Jay and his
original genesis original intent for underlining the word "born"
in "natural born Citizen" in his note to George Washington,
for fun and for those who do not have a dictionary handy, first I
will refer to two American Heritage Dictionary definitions of
"anecdote" and "anecdotal."</span></span></span></div>
</div>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<br />
<b>anecdote
n.</b><br />
1. A short account of an <b>interesting or humorous
event</b>.<br />
2. Secret or hitherto undivulged <b>particulars</b>
of history or biography.<br />
<br />
<b>anecdotal adj.</b><br />
1. Of,
characterized by, or full of anecdotes.<br />
2. Based on casual
<b>observations</b> or indications rather than <b>rigorous or
scientific analysis</b>.<br />
<br />
Mario wrote on his blog on
October 4, 2015 at 4:58 PM about Cruz and Minor v. Happersett: </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;">“<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Cruz
does not define a natural born citizen and state that he is one.
Rather, he relies upon breathing fresh air. …,” </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.5in;">
<span style="color: black;">“…
<span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Rather,
the standard may be found in [the] unanimous U.S. Supreme Court
decision of Minor v. Happersett (1875), where the Court defined a
natural born citizen as follows: <br />
<br />
<i>The Constitution does
not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. </i><i><b>Resort</b></i><i>
must be had </i><i><b>elsewhere</b></i><i> to ascertain that. At
</i><i><b>common-law</b></i><i>, with the </i><i><b>nomenclature</b></i><i>
of which the </i><i><b>framers</b></i><i> of the Constitution were
</i><i><b>familiar</b></i><i>, it was </i><i><b>never doubted</b></i><i>
that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens
became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were
natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or
foreigners.</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mario's
use of the Cruz and Minor anecdotal evidence reflects his consistent
and accurate use of “<b>rigorous or scientific analysis”</b> when
he adduces, to use only two examples, the actual holding of the 1898
United States v. Wong Kim Ark Court and the actual holding of the
1875 Minor v. Happersett Court as supported by the quote above. Both
Sen. Cruz and the Minor Court use anecdotal references to make their
contradictory “natural born Citizen” points. Sen. Cruz uses
“<b>breathed...air”</b> and the Minor Court uses
“<b>resort...elsewhere...common-law...nomenclature...framers...familiar...never
doubted….”</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br />
Here
is my point. <br />
<br />
Original birther John Jay is also anecdotal,
and is just as valid for anecdotal support to define an “nbC,” as
is Sen. Cruz's “<b>breathed...air”</b> and the Minor Court's
“<b>resort ... elsewhere ... nomenclature ... framers ... familiar
... never doubted ….”</b> <br />
<br />
In my opinion, the Minor v.
Happersett Court affirms John Jay's original genesis original intent
for underlining the word <b>“born”</b> in “natural born
Citizen” that was eventually incorporated into Article II Section 1
clause 5 by the framers, but Sen. Cruz's anecdotal “<b>breathed...air”</b>
reference does not follow Jay's “<b>original genesis original
intent”</b> presuppositional foundation for being "<b>born"</b>
a “citizen” with the “<b>perquisite”</b> of being uniquely
<b>"by birth"</b> alone “...eligible to the Office of
President.” The “<b>perk”</b> of being “<b>by birth”</b> an
Article II “natural born Citizen” is presidential eligibility, a
“<b>perk”</b> that is <b>NOT</b> available to an Article I
Representative “citizen” or an Article I Senator “citizen.”<br />
<br />
I'm
all for the primary and foundational use of the “<b>rigorous or
scientific analysis”</b> by adducing the actual holdings of the
different Courts, and secondarily, as the Minor Court did in adducing
an anecdotal “<b>event,”</b> of which the “<b>framers...were
familiar,”</b> I'm also for adducing analysis of historical events
that support the “<b>rigorous or scientific analysis”</b>
holdings of the Court, as the Minor v. Happersett Court did in this
citizenship and voting case.<br />
<br />
I never get a coherent “<b>dual
U.S./foreign citizenship”</b> rebuttal and refutation when I bring
original birther John Jay into the conversation, especially when I
write that, according to the “<b>nomenclature”</b> with which Jay
was familiar, Jay's “<b>original genesis original intent”</b> for
underlining the word <b>“born”</b> in “natural born Citizen”
for POTUS eligibility was <b>ONLY</b><i><b> singular</b></i> U.S.
citizenship <b>ONLY</b> by birth on U.S. soil <b>ONLY</b> by birth to
two U.S. citizen married parents <b>ONLY</b> married to each other
<b>BEFORE</b> the birth of their child.<br />
<br />
For some reason
the “nbC” new meaning neo-birthers, Democratic, Republican,
Independent, Libertarian, Progressive, Conservative, Anarchist <i>(still
in the nascent stage of “cell” division)</i>, NEVER have a
coherent rebuttal to the anecdotal assertion that John Jay's original
genesis original intent was <b>ONLY</b><i><b> singular </b></i>U.S.
citizenship by birth on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married parents
to be “...eligible to the Office of President.”<br />
<br />
Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="av-160-12200858207095622181"></a><a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="c9499111973217747"></a>
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here
is Mario's comment on October 6, 2015 at 7:06 PM.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Mario
Apuzzo, Esq. said... </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art,
<br />
<br />
Ted Cruz's argument that he is a natural born citizen
because he never breathed air when he was not an American is pretty
lame. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Depending
on when he was born during the history of our nation, there are
plenty of times during which being born under the same birth
circumstances as he claims for himself, he would not have been
breathing any air as an American. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Depending
on when he was born, rather than breathing air as an American, he
would have been breathing air as a British or Canadian subject <i>(from
his birth in the territory which today is called Canada)</i>, and
Spanish or Cuban citizen <i>(from being born to his Spanish or Cuban
father)</i>. </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">That
surely does not sound like a natural born citizen to me. </span></span></span>
</div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9108577395056736711.post-38295676189253561972015-10-29T19:18:00.000-07:002015-10-29T19:18:32.315-07:00It IS About Islam: The Twenty-year Plan To Establish the Muslim Caliphate<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>It
IS About Islam: </b></span></span></span>
</div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 18pt;"><b>The
Twenty-year Plan To Establish the Muslim Caliphate</b></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This
post is modified with corrections from a similar post on The
RightScoop.com on September 4, 2015.</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">>>
http://therightscoop.com/jeffrey-lord-defends-trump-says-hugh-hewitt-questions-were-gotcha-stuff/</span></span></span></div>
<div align="center" lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><<>></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">All
Trump needs to say is that he has been busy building a business, uh,
I mean, a GREAT business,, and meeting a payroll and keeping his
people employed, and etc.,, and, although he has a general
understanding of the idiocy happening in the Middle East, just as
most of We the People do in America, and since the jihad continues to
roll on, as president he will definitely become more informed about
the idiocy of religious/political jihad than Obama was when he was
elected.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Here's
a reading suggestion for Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Ted
Cruz, Rand Paul, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Mike Huckabee, Bobby
Jindal: read Chapter 4, <b>Establishing the Caliphate</b>, in Glenn
Beck's new book <b>It IS About Islam</b>, in the section titled <b>The
Twenty-year Plan (2000-2020)</b>, pages 68-81.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
page 71 Glenn closes the section with this:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>"Does
this all sound absurd? </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>Well,
consider that, as of 2015, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>a
decade after the plan was published by Hussein, </i></span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><i>the
first five phases have been right on schedule."</i></span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hussein
is Fouad Hussein.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">On
page 69 Glenn introduces the seven phases with this paragraph:</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hussein
wrote in a </span></span></span>
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">"...2005
book, <i><b>Al-Zarqawi: The Second Generation of Al Qaeda</b></i>,
which was published in Arabic, Hussein revealed the terrorist group's
twenty-year plan, which, in their own words, has seven different
phases.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; margin-left: 0.49in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Phase
1: The Muslim Awakening (2000-2003)<br />
Phase 2: Opening Eyes
(2003-2006)<br />
Phase 3: Arising and Standing Up (2007-2010)<br />
Phase
4: Collapse (2010-2013)<br />
Phase 5: Caliphate (2013-2016)<br />
Phase
6: Total Confrontation (2016-2019)<br />
Phase 7: Definitive Victory
(2020)</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-align: center;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">sp4x2
</span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">to
</span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art
Telles</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Isn't
it insane that in the current America, belief in the US Constitution
means you are a right wing zealot that deserves to be under
surveillance?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art
Telles </span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">to
</span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">sp4x2</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Dittos...</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">And
this "surveillance" is happening while the commune
organizer is the defender of HIS version of the U.S. Constitution
which allows for dual U.S./foreign citizenship and which allows ONLY
one U.S. citizen parent to be acceped as "...eligible to the
Office of President."</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">I
wonder what would happen during this primary season if Carly Fiorina,
or Rand Paul, or Scott Walker, or Mike Huckabee, or Donald Trump said
something about defending John Jay's original genesis original intent
for underlining the word <b>"born"</b> in "natural
born Citizen" in his July 25, 1787 note to his friend George
Washington?</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">In
my opinion, the underlined word <b>"born"</b> requires a
POTUS to be a "natural born Citizen" by being born with
<b>ONLY</b> singular U.S. citizenship <b>ONLY</b> by birth on U.S.
soil <b>ONLY</b> by birth to two U.S. citizen married parents who are
married <b>ONLY</b> to each other <b>BEFORE</b> the child is born.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">When
political push comes to political shove, I wonder which of the
Republican candidates will say that Obama was NOT constitutionally
qualified to be president because he was <b>NOT</b> an Article II
Section 1 clause 5 "natural born Citizen" because he was
born with only one U.S. citizen parent, so, for that reason, neither
is Ted Cruz "...eligible to the Office of President"
because he was born with dual U.S./foreign citizenship by being born
on foreign soil to only one U.S. citizen parent. Marco Rubio and
Bobby Jindal, who were both born with dual U.S./foreign citizenship
by being born on U.S. soil to two legal immigrant parents who were
not U.S. citizens when their children were born, so their children
were not born with singular U.S. citizenship and not "...eligible
to the Office of President.".</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The
commune organizer is not a "natural born Citizen" and the
Republicans should stop defending Obama's "citizen" status
as sufficient and equivalent to "natural born Citizen"
status in Article II, because <b>"born"</b> implies <b>ONLY</b><i><b>
singular</b></i> U.S. citizenship, <b>Not dual</b> U.S/foreign
citizenship.</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Art<br />
U.S.
Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union</span></span></span></div>
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<span style="color: black;"><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">(
</span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">http://OriginalBirtherDocument24.blogspot.com/</span></span><span style="font-family: Liberation Serif, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
)</span></span></span></div>
<br />
<div lang="zxx" style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
ajtelleshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08126712347019345867noreply@blogger.com0