Article
V Serendipity
This
post is modified with corrections from a similar post on Mario
Apuzzo's blog on June 26, 2015 at 10:34 PM.
>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/05/senator-cruz-senator-rubio-and-governor.html
<<>>
On
Sean Hannity's radio program today, June 26, 2015, Texas Federal Sen.
Ted Cruz said that Article V is a viable solution to an activist, aka
legislative, Supreme Court.
The RightScoop.com
@ 7m30s
>> http://therightscoop.com/ted-cruz-these-are-some-of-the-darkest-24-hours-in-nations-history/
Quote:
The RightScoop.com
@ 7m30s
>> http://therightscoop.com/ted-cruz-these-are-some-of-the-darkest-24-hours-in-nations-history/
Quote:
"I
think we need to look at fundamental
structural changes, such as periodic
retention elections, and if Congress won't act to adopt
a fundamental structural amendment like that, I think you're going to
see more and more movement for an Article V convention of the states
because the men and women of America are fed up with politicians in
Washington who won't listen and won't lift a finger to stop this
lawlessness."
Here
is the serendipity.
With an Article V convention of the states that both Mark Levin and Sen. Ted Cruz advocate, both of these "natural born Citizen" new meaning neo-birthers, aka Article II kissin' cousins to Obot-in-Chief Obama and his cohort who promote the 2008-2015 myth, the theory, the neo-birther idea that ONLY one U.S. citizen parent is sufficient to be an "nbC" and eligible to be President, with an Ariticle V convention to propose amendments, economic or term limits or eligibility, both Levin and Cruz and et al. will be forced to admit that "natural born Citizen" is ONLY a reference to ONLY singular U.S. citizenship ONLY by birth on U.S. soil ONLY by birth to two U.S. citizen married "heterosexual" parents. That means singular U.S. citizenship is possible ONLY by birth on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married "heterosexual" parents, not by birth to somebody somewhere on U.S. soil or foreign soil and then being adopted by a single male or female, or by being adopted by two married heterosexual parents or adopted by two "married" homosexual "parents."
So, what will WE the People think about this "serendipity" and about an Article V convention of states to propose a constitutional amendment?
With an Article V convention of the states that both Mark Levin and Sen. Ted Cruz advocate, both of these "natural born Citizen" new meaning neo-birthers, aka Article II kissin' cousins to Obot-in-Chief Obama and his cohort who promote the 2008-2015 myth, the theory, the neo-birther idea that ONLY one U.S. citizen parent is sufficient to be an "nbC" and eligible to be President, with an Ariticle V convention to propose amendments, economic or term limits or eligibility, both Levin and Cruz and et al. will be forced to admit that "natural born Citizen" is ONLY a reference to ONLY singular U.S. citizenship ONLY by birth on U.S. soil ONLY by birth to two U.S. citizen married "heterosexual" parents. That means singular U.S. citizenship is possible ONLY by birth on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen married "heterosexual" parents, not by birth to somebody somewhere on U.S. soil or foreign soil and then being adopted by a single male or female, or by being adopted by two married heterosexual parents or adopted by two "married" homosexual "parents."
So,
right thinking citizens want to encourage Mark Levin and Sen. Ted
Cruz to promote an Article V convention of the states to
propose an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that clarifies that
marriage, implicit in the word "born" in "natural born
Citizen," is ONLY between a male and a female, ONLY
heterosexual men and women, for the purpose of preserving the
exceptional
exclusivity of "No Person except
a natural born Citizen" of the exclusive
"We the People...Union..." for the We the People
"Posterity"
with ONLY singular U.S. citizenship from
generation to generation, election to election, POTUS to POTUS.
So, what will WE the People think about this "serendipity" and about an Article V convention of states to propose a constitutional amendment?
An
Article V convention will smoke out Levin and Cruz and Hannity
and Beck and Limbaugh and Ingraham and Breitbart.com and
NationalReview.com, etc. and et al. (there are soooooooooo
many et als who are uninformed about the
exclusivity
of "born" in "natural born Citizen" and POTUS
eligibility) into original birther John Jay's originalist
camp with the common sense understanding that the original genesis
meaning of "born" and the original intent of
"natural born Citizen" means, since July 25, 1787 when John
Jay authored the phrase to prohibit POTUS eligibility from devolving,
not only on naturalized persons, of course, but also implicitly on to
persons ALSO born with dual U.S./foreign citizenship,
either by birth on U.S. soil OR by birth of foreign soil, to
either one OR zero U.S. citizen parents, and instead for POTUS
eligibility to devolve ONLY on persons with ONLY
singular U.S. citizenship ONLY by birth on U.S.
soil ONLY to two U.S. citizen married "heterosexual"
parents.
Serendipity, what an appropriate word for a terrible SCOTUS decision about homosexual marriage having equal status with heterosexual marriage that alone can produce the "posterity" of the "WE the People...more perfect Union." That is not a negative expression about people, simply an observation that human kind would not exist if it was not for heterosexual activity producing "posterity" from generation to generation, so that from election to election an eligible President could be chosen by We the People, the Posterity.
Art
U.S. Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union
( http://originalbirtherdocument.blogspot.com/ )
No comments:
Post a Comment