The
L.A. Times:
How
Easy To Think Like a New Meaning Neobirther
This
post is modified with corrections from a similar post on Mario
Apuzzo's Natural Born Citizen
blog on September
6, 2015 at 7:30 PM.
>>
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/07/july-4-1776-birth-day-of-nation-and.html
<<>>
LA
Times Op-Ed
Ignore Trump — the issue of birthright citizenship has been settled
By David Rivkin, John Yoo – September 6, 2015
>> http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0906-rivkin-yoo-birthright-citizenship-20150906-story.html
Did you know this? It must be true. It's in the LA Times.
Ignore Trump — the issue of birthright citizenship has been settled
By David Rivkin, John Yoo – September 6, 2015
>> http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0906-rivkin-yoo-birthright-citizenship-20150906-story.html
Did you know this? It must be true. It's in the LA Times.
>> "Reading allegiance into the 14th Amendment would largely defeat the intent of its drafters, who wanted to prevent politicians from denying citizenship to those they considered insufficiently American."
[...snip]
And did you know this?
"The 14th Amendment's drafting history supports our reading.
"The Civil Rights Act of 1866, which inspired the amendment, guaranteed birthright citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. except those "subject to any foreign power" and "Indians not taxed."
"If the 14th Amendment's drafters had wanted "jurisdiction" to exclude children of aliens, they easily could have repeated the "foreign power" line."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So,
since "...they easily could have repeated" the
reference to foreign powers, but they did not, then, ipso facto, dual
U.S./foreign citizenship with allegiance to a "foreign power"
is not trumped by, and is equal to, allegiance to ONLY the
U.S., whether the issue is birthright citizenship for a child or for
POTUS eligibility.
See how easy it is to think like a new meaning neo-birther?
An Article II Section 1 clause 5 "natural born Citizen" new meaning neo-birther believes the 2000s theory, the 2000s myth that birth on U.S. soil to only one U.S. citizen parent is sufficient to make a person a singular U.S. citizen (aka a "natural born Citizen") and "...eligible to the Office of President."
A Fourteenth Amendment "citizen" new meaning neo-birther believes the 2000s theory and myth that birth on U.S. soil to zero U.S. citizen parents was incorporated retroactively by the 1898 Supreme Court into the original genesis original intent meaning of the framers of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment, because, since the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark Court said that a child born on U.S. soil to zero U.S. citizen parents is, ipso facto, a U.S. citizen even though the child derived U.S. citizen by Supreme Court fiat and did not derive U.S. citizenship from the foreign citizenship parents, then THAT amendment of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment by the 1898 Supreme Court fiat is the perpetual law of the land.
Neat and simple, huh?
Now we know, because the LA Times said so, that the Supreme Court, ipso facto, trumps Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution and the Artilc 1 naturalization authority of the U.S. Congress.
Art
U.S. Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union
OriginalBirtherDocument24.blogspot.com )
See how easy it is to think like a new meaning neo-birther?
An Article II Section 1 clause 5 "natural born Citizen" new meaning neo-birther believes the 2000s theory, the 2000s myth that birth on U.S. soil to only one U.S. citizen parent is sufficient to make a person a singular U.S. citizen (aka a "natural born Citizen") and "...eligible to the Office of President."
A Fourteenth Amendment "citizen" new meaning neo-birther believes the 2000s theory and myth that birth on U.S. soil to zero U.S. citizen parents was incorporated retroactively by the 1898 Supreme Court into the original genesis original intent meaning of the framers of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment, because, since the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark Court said that a child born on U.S. soil to zero U.S. citizen parents is, ipso facto, a U.S. citizen even though the child derived U.S. citizen by Supreme Court fiat and did not derive U.S. citizenship from the foreign citizenship parents, then THAT amendment of the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment by the 1898 Supreme Court fiat is the perpetual law of the land.
Neat and simple, huh?
Now we know, because the LA Times said so, that the Supreme Court, ipso facto, trumps Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution and the Artilc 1 naturalization authority of the U.S. Congress.
Art
U.S. Constitution: The Original Birther Document of the Union
OriginalBirtherDocument24.blogspot.com )
No comments:
Post a Comment